In a sample of 12 states across all regions of the United States, I find that one of every three counties supports a different party for president than for its local legislature. I use a unique data set containing partisan affiliations of county councillors to analyze contexts that might lead voters to choose different parties at different levels of government. I find support for three explanations of representational splits: incomplete realignment, local electoral factors, and differentials in party strength. This article takes a step toward understanding how parties and partisan identities operate in a federal system.
AistrupJ. (1996). Republican contestation of U.S. State Senate elections in the South. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 15, 227-245.
2.
AldrichJ. H.GriffinJ. D. (2000, March). Ambition in the South: The development of Republican electoral support, 1948-1998. Prepared for the Citadel Symposium on Southern Politics, Charleston, SC.
3.
AlesinaA.RosenthalH. (1995). Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
ArceneauxK. (2006). The federal face of voting: Are elected officials held accountable for the functions relevant to their office?Political Psychology, 27, 731-754.
6.
ArringtonT.GrofmanB. (1999). Party registration choices as a function of the geographic distribution of partisanship: A model of “hidden partisanship” and an illustrative test. Political Geography, 18, 173-185.
7.
BishopB. (2008). The big sort: Why the clustering of like-minded america is tearing Us apart. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Company.
8.
BlackE.BlackM. (1987). Politics and society in the South. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
BlackE.BlackM. (2002). The rise of Southern republicans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
BrunellT.GrofmanB. (2009). Testing sincere versus strategic split-ticket voting at the aggregate level: Evidence from split house-presidential outcomes, 1900-2004. Electoral Studies, 28, 62-69.
11.
BullockC. S.IIIHoffmanD.GaddieR. K. (2005). The consolidation of the White Southern congressional vote. Political Research Quarterly, 58, 231-243.
12.
BullockC. S.IIIHoffmanD.GaddieR. K. (2006). Regional variations in the realignment of American politics, 1944-2004. Social Science Quarterly, 87, 494-518.
13.
BurdenB.HelmkeG. (2009). The comparative study of split-ticket voting. Electoral Studies, 28, 1-7.
14.
BurdenB.KimballD. C. (1998). A new approach to the study of ticket splitting. The American Political Science Review, 92, 533-544.
15.
BurdenB.KimballD. C. (2002). Why Americans split their tickets: Campaigns, competition, and divided government. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
16.
BurnhamW. D. (1965). The changing shape of the American political universe. American Political Science Review, 59, 7-28.
17.
CraigS.MartinezM.KaneJ. (1999). The structure of political competition: Dimensions of candidate and group evaluation revisited. Political Behavior, 21, 283-304.
18.
FiorinaM. (1992). An era of divided government. Political Science Quarterly, 107, 387-410.
19.
FiorinaM. (1996). Divided government (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Simon & Shuster.
20.
FischelW. (2001). The homevoter hypothesis: How home values influence local government taxation, school finance, and land-use policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
GlaserJ. M. (1996). Race, campaign politics and the realignment in the South. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22.
GreenD.PalmquistB.SchicklerE. (2002). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23.
HadleyC. (1985). Dual partisan representation in the South. Journal of Politics, 47, 254-568.
24.
HajnalZ. (2010). America’s uneven democracy: Race, turnout, and representation in city politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
25.
HetheringtonM.WeilerJ. (2009). Authoritarianism and polarization in American politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
26.
HoodM. V.KiddQ.MorrisI. (2004). The reintroduction of the Elephas maximus to the Southern United States: The rise of Republican state parties, 1960-2000. American Politics Research, 32, 68-101.
27.
HoodM. V.McKeeS. (2010). What made Carolina blue? In-migration and the 2008 North Carolina presidential vote. American Politics Research, 38, 266-302.
28.
JenningsM. K.NiemiR. (1966). Party identification at multiple levels of government. American Journal of Sociology, 72, 86-101.
29.
KarpJ.GarlandM. (2007). Ideological ambiguity and split ticket voting. Political Research Quarterly, 60, 722-732.
30.
KeyV. O.Jr. (1953). Partisanship and county office: The case of Ohio partisanship and county office: The case of Ohio. The American Political Science Review, 47, 525-532.
31.
KeyV. O.Jr. (1984). Southern politics in state and nation. Knoxville: The University of Tennessee Press. (Original work published 1949)
32.
KimballD. (2005). A decline in ticket-splitting and the increasing salience of party labels, 161-179. In WeisbergH.WilcoxC. (Eds.), Models of voting in presidential elections: The 2000 election. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
33.
LakoffG. (1996). Moral politics: What conservatives know that liberals don’t. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34.
LublinD. (2004). The Republican South. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
MebaneW. (2000). Coordination, moderation, and institutional balancing in American presidential and House elections. American Political Science Review, 94, 37-57.
36.
NicholsonS. (2005). Voting the agenda: Candidates, elections, and ballot propositions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
NieN.VerbaS.PetrocikJ. (1976). The changing American voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
NiemiR.WrightS.PowellL. (1987). Multiple party identifiers and the measurement of party identification. Journal of Politics, 49, 1093-1103.
39.
OliverJ. E.HaS. E. (2007). Vote choice in suburban elections. American Political Science Review, 101, 393-408.
RaeN. C. (1989). The decline and fall of the liberal Republicans: From 1952 to the present. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
42.
SaundersK.AbramowitzAWilliamsonJ. (2005). A new kind of balancing act: Electoral certainty and ticket-splitting in the 1996 and 2000 elections. Political Research Quarterly, 58, 69-78.
43.
SeguraG. M.NicholsonS. P. (1995). Sequential choices and partisan transitions in U.S. Senate delegations. Journal of Politics, 57, 86-100.
44.
SteedR.MorelandL. (2007). South Carolina: Change and continuity in the Palmetto state. In BullockC.RozellM. J. (Eds.), The new politics of the old South: An introduction to Southern politics (pp. 29-48). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
