Recently, Americans have become increasingly likely to hold anti-intellectual attitudes (i.e., negative affect toward scientists and other experts). However, few have investigated the political implications of anti-intellectualism, and much empirical uncertainty surrounds whether or not these attitudes can be mitigated. Drawing on cross-sectional General Social Survey (GSS) data and a national election panel in 2016, I find that anti-intellectualism is associated with not only the rejection of policy-relevant matters of scientific consensus but support for political movements (e.g., “Brexit”) and politicians (e.g., George Wallace, Donald Trump) who are skeptical of experts. Critically, though, I show that these effects can be mitigated. Verbal intelligence plays a strong role in mitigating anti-intellectual sympathies, compared with previously studied potential mitigators. I conclude by discussing how scholars might build on this research to study the political consequences of anti-intellectualism in the future.
AllumN.SturgisP.TabouraziD.Brunton-SmithI. (2008). Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: A meta-analysis. Public Understanding of Science, 17, 35-54.
2.
BerinskyA. J. (2017). Rumors and health care reform: Experiments in political misinformation. British Journal of Political Science, 47, 241-262.
3.
BlankJ. M.ShawD. (2015). Does partisanship shape attitudes toward science and public policy? The case for ideology and religion. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658, 18-35.
4.
BolsenT.CookF. L. (2008). The polls—Trends: Public opinion on energy policy: 1974-2006. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 364-388.
5.
BolsenT.DruckmanJ. N. (2015). Counteracting the politicization of science. Journal of Communication, 65, 745-769.
6.
BolsenT.DruckmanJ. N.CookF. L. (2015). Citizens, scientists, and policy advisors beliefs about global warming. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658, 271-295.
7.
BonikowskiB.GidronN. (2016). The populist style in American politics: Presidential campaign discourse, 1952-1996. Social Forces, 94, 1593-1621.
8.
BouchardT. J.Jr. (1998). Genetic and environmental influences on adult intelligence and special mental abilities. Human Biology, 70, 257-279.
9.
CampbellF. A.RameyC. T.PungelloE.SparlingJ.Miller-JohnsonS. (2002). Early childhood education: Young adult outcomes from the abecedarian project. Applied Developmental Science, 6, 42-57.
10.
CondonM. (2015). Voice lessons: Rethinking the relationship between education and political participation. Political Behavior, 37, 819-843.
11.
CookJ.NuccitelliD.GreenS. A.RichardsonM.WinklerB.PaintingR.. . . SkuceA. (2013). Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters, 8(2), 1-7.
12.
CzoppA. M.KayA. C.CheryanS. (2015). Positive stereotypes are pervasive and powerful. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 451-463.
13.
DawsonM. (2013). Verbal Intelligence. In VolkmarF. R. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of autism spectrum disorders (pp. 3243-3250). New York, NY: Springer.
14.
DearyI. J.BattyG. D.GaleC. R. (2008). Bright children become enlightened adults. Psychological Science, 19, 1-6.
15.
DeliaJ. G.KlineS. L.BurlesonB. R. (1979). The development of persuasive communication strategies in kindergarteners through twelfth-graders. Communication Monographs, 46, 241-256.
16.
DeYoungC. G.GraziopleneR. G.PetersonJ. B. (2012). From madness to genius: The openness/intellect trait domain as a paradoxical simplex. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(1), 63-78.
17.
DhontK.HodsonG. (2014). Does lower cognitive ability predict greater prejudice?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 454-459.
18.
DoriusS. F.AlwinD. F.PachecoJ. (2016). Twentieth century intercohort trends in verbal ability in the United States. Sociological Science, 3, 383-412.
Environmental Protection Agency. (2016). Radiation risks and realities. Washington, DC: National Service Center for Environmental Publications, Environmental Protection Agency.
21.
FowlerE. F.GollustS. E. (2015). The content and effect of politicized health controversies. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658, 155-171.
22.
GauchatG. W. (2008). A test of three theories of anti-science attitudes. Sociological Focus, 41, 337-357.
23.
GauchatG. W. (2012). Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review, 77, 167-187.
24.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
GoochA. (2015). Measurements of cognitive skill by survey mode: Marginal differences and scaling similarities. Research & Politics, 2(3), 1-11.
27.
HofstadterR. (1963). Anti-intellectualism in American life. (3. print.) (Vol. 713). New York, NY: Vintage.
28.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
29.
KahanD. M. (2012). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection: An experimental study. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 407-424.
30.
KahanD. M.LandrumA.CarpenterK.HelftL.JamiesonK. H. (2017). Science curiosity and political information processing. Advances in Political Psychology, 38, 179-199.
31.
KahanD. M.PetersE.DawsonE. C.SlovicP. (2013, September). Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government (Public Law Working Paper No. 307). New Haven, CT: Yale Law School.
32.
KahanD. M.PetersE.WittlinM.SlovicP.OuelletteL. L.BramanD.MandelG. (2012). The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change, 2, 732-735.
33.
KinderD. R.SandersL. M. (1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34.
KraftP. W.LodgeM.TaberC. S. (2015). Why people “don’t trust the evidence”: Motivated reasoning and scientific beliefs. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658, 121-133.
35.
KundaZ. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.
36.
LewandowskyS.OberauerK. (2016). Motivated rejection of science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25, 217-222.
37.
LodgeM.TaberC. S. (2013). The rationalizing voter. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38.
MacWilliamsM. C. (2016). Who decides when the party doesn’t? Authoritarian voters and the rise of Donald Trump. PS: Political Science & Politics, 49, 716-721.
39.
MalhotraN.KrosnickJ. A.HaertelE. (2007). The psychometric properties of the GSS Wordsum Vocabulary Test (GSS Methodological Report No. 11). Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center.
MinerJ. B. (1957). Intelligence in the United States. New York, NY: Springer.
42.
MooneyC. (2012). The republican brain: The science of why they deny science—and reality. New York, NY: John Wiley.
43.
NieN. H.JunnJ.Stehlik-BarryK. (1996). Education and democratic citizenship in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
44.
NisbetE. C.CooperK. E.GarrettR. K. (2015). The partisan brain how dissonant science messages lead conservatives and liberals to (dis)trust science. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658, 36-66.
OliverJ. E.RahnW. M. (2016). Rise of the Trumpenvolk: Populism in the 2016 election. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 667, 189-206.
47.
PriceE.OttatiV.WilsonC.KimS. (2015). Open-minded cognition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1488-1504.
48.
RiffkinR. (2016). For first time, majority in U.S. oppose nuclear energy. Gallup Politics. Washington, DC: Gallup.
49.
RigneyD. (1991). Three kinds of anti-intellectualism: Rethinking Hofstadter. Sociological Inquiry, 61, 434-451.
50.
SaadL.JonesJ. M. (2016). U.S. concern about global warming at eight-year high. Gallup Politics. Washington, DC: Gallup
51.
SchaffnerB. F.MacWilliamsM.NtetaT. (2016). Explaining white polarization in the 2016 vote for president: The sobering role of racism and sexism. Unpublished manuscript. Paper prepared for presentation at the Conference on the U.S. Elections of 2016: Domestic and International Aspects. January, 2017. IDC Herzliya Campus.
52.
StanovichK. E.WestR. F. (1997). Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 342-357.
53.
SturgisP.AllumN. (2004). Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science, 13, 55-74.
ThorndikeR. L. (1942). Two screening tests of verbal intelligence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 26, 128-135.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
