Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Democratic and Republican partisans dislike the opposing party and its leaders far more than in the past. However, recent studies have argued that the rise of affective polarization in the electorate does not reflect growing policy or ideological differences between supporters of the two parties. According to this view, though Democratic and Republican elites are sharply divided along ideological lines, differences between the policy preferences of rank-and-file partisans remain modest. In this article, we show that there is a close connection between ideological and affective polarization. We present evidence from American National Election Studies surveys that opinions on social welfare issues have become increasingly consistent and divided along party lines and that social welfare ideology is now strongly related to feelings about the opposing party and its leaders. In addition, we present results from a survey experiment showing that ideological distance strongly influences feelings toward opposing party candidates and the party as a whole.

Keywords

polarization ideology affective polarization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramowitz

A. I.

(2010). The disappearing center: Engaged citizens, polarization, and American democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Abramowitz

A. I.

(2013). The polarized public: Why American government is so dysfunctional. New York, NY: Pearson Longman.

Abramowitz

A. I.

(2015). The rise of affective polarization in the American electorate. In Green

Coffey

Cohen

(Eds.), The state of the parties: The changing role of contemporary American parties (7th ed., pp. 21-36). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.

Abramowitz

A. I.

Saunders

K. L.

(1998). Ideological realignment in the U.S. electorate. Journal of Politics, 60, 634-652.

Abramowitz

A. I.

Saunders

K. L.

(2005). Why can’t we all just get along? The reality of a polarized America. The Forum, 3(2), 1-22.

Abramowitz

A. I.

Saunders

K. L.

(2008). Is polarization a myth? Journal of Politics, 70, 542-555.

Abramowitz

A. I.

Webster

S. W.

(2016). The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century. Electoral Studies, 41, 12-22.

Ansolabehere

Snyder

Stewart

(2001). Candidate positioning in U.S. house elections. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 136-159.

Bafumi

Herron

M. C.

(2010). Leapfrog representation and extremism: A study of American voters and their members in congress. American Political Science Review, 104, 519-542.

10.

Bafumi

Shapiro

R. Y.

(2009). A new partisan voter. Journal of Politics, 71, 1-24.

11.

Berinsky

A. J.

Huber

G. A.

Lenz

G. S.

(2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20, 351-368.

12.

Campbell

Converse

P. E.

Miller

W. E.

Stokes

D. E.

(1960). The American voter. New York, NY: John Wiley.

13.

Conover

P. J.

Feldman

(1981). The origins and meaning of liberal/conservative self-identifications. American Journal of Political Science, 25, 617-645.

14.

Converse

P. E.

(1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Apter

D. E.

(Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206-261). New York, NY: The Free Press of Glencoe.

15.

Fiorina

M. P.

Abrams

S. J.

Pope

J. C.

(2005). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America. New York, NY: Pearson Longman.

16.

Fiorina

M. P.

Abrams

S. J.

Pope

J. C.

(2008). Polarization in the American public: Misconceptions and misreadings. Journal of Politics, 70, 556-560.

17.

Fiorina

M. P.

Levendusky

M. S.

(2006). Disconnected: The political class versus the people. In Pietro

N. S.

Brady

D. W.

(Eds.), Red and blue nation? Characteristics and causes of America’s polarized politics (pp. 49-71). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

18.

Frey

W. H.

(2014). Diversity explosion: How new racial demographics are remaking America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

19.

Frizell

(2015, September). One in five Americans still think Obama is foreign-born, according to poll. Time. Retrieved from http://time.com/4033161/obama-foreign-born

20.

Green

D. P.

Palmquist

Shickler

(2002). Partisan hearts and minds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

21.

Greenberg

S. B.

(2004). The two Americas: Our current political deadlock and how to break It. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.

22.

Huddy

Mason

Aaroe

(2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109, 1-17.

23.

Iyengar

Hahn

(2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59, 19-39.

24.

Iyengar

Sood

Lelkes

(2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 405-431.

25.

Jacobson

G. C.

(2007). A divided, not a uniter: George W. Bush and the American people. New York, NY: Pearson Longman.

26.

Jacobson

G. C.

(2012). The electoral origins of polarized politics: Evidence from the 2010 cooperative congressional election study. American Behavioral Scientist, 56, 1612-1630.

27.

Jacobson

G. C.

(2015). It’s nothing personal: The decline of the incumbency advantage in U.S. house elections. Journal of Politics, 77, 861-873.

28.

Klein

(2015, February). Obama derangement syndrome. Vox. Retrieved from http://www.vox.com/2015/2/23/8089639/obama-derangement-syndrome

29.

Kraushaar

(2014, February). The most divided congress ever, at least until next year. National Journal. Retrieved from http://www.nationaljournal.com/2013-vote-ratings/the-most-divided-congress-ever-at-least-until-next-year-20140206

30.

Levendusky

M. S.

(2009). The partisan sort: How liberals became democrats and conservatives became republicans. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

31.

Levendusky

M. S.

(2013). Why do partisan media polarize voters? American Journal of Political Science, 57, 611-623.

32.

Malka

Lelkes

(2010). More than ideology: Conservative-liberal identity and receptivity to political cues. Social Justice Research, 23, 156-188.

33.

Mann

T. E.

Ornstein

N. J.

(2013). It’s even worse than it looks: How the American constitutional system collided with the new politics of extremism. New York, NY: Basic Books.

34.

Mason

(2013). The rise of uncivil agreement: Issue versus behavioral polarization in the American electorate. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 140-159.

35.

Mason

(2015). “I disrespectfully agree”: The differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59, 128-145.

36.

Mutz

(2006). How the mass media divide us. In Brady

D. W.

Nivola

P. S.

(Eds.), Red and blue nation? (1st ed., pp. 223-248). Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.

37.

Mutz

(2007). Effects of “in-your-face” television discourse on perceptions of a legitimate opposition. American Political Science Review, 101, 621-635.

38.

Prior

(2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

39.

Rogowski

J. C.

Sutherland

J. L.

(2015). How ideology fuels affective polarization. Political Behavior, 38, 485-508.

40.

Theriault

S. M.

(2008). Party polarization in congress. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.15 MB

The Ideological Foundations of Affective Polarization in the U.S. Electorate

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material