To the extent voters respond at all to presidential policy positions, they may do so by changing their views on the policy or by changing their views of the president. Presidents need to account for both changes as they care both about citizen approval and citizen policy views. We explore this dynamic in response to the Iraq War using multiple statistical methods. We find consistent evidence that citizen views of President Bush influenced their support for the war even as citizen views of the war affected their approval of Bush. Net changes in aggregate public opinion were smaller than gross changes because of simultaneous movement in both directions on both the war and the president. Recognizing this two-way movement of opinion helps us to better understand the challenges facing presidents in leading public opinion.
AldrichJ.GelpiC.FeaverP.ReiflerJ.Thompson SharpK. (2006). Foreign policy and the electoral connection. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 477-502.
2.
AldrichJ.GriffinJ.RickershauserJ. (2005). The presidency and the campaign: Campaigns and voter priorities in the 2004 election. In NelsonM. (Ed.), The presidency and the political system (8th ed., pp. 219-234). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
3.
AlterJ. (2010). The promise: President Obama, year one. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
4.
American National Election Studies. (2005). The American National Election Study 2000-2004 Merged File [dataset]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer and distributor]. Available from www.electionstudies.org
5.
BaileyM. (2015). Real stats: Econometrics for political science, public policy, and economics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
6.
BaileyM.SigelmanL.WilcoxC. (2003). Presidential persuasion on social issues: A two-way street?Political Research Quarterly, 56, 49-59.
7.
BerinskyA. (2007). Assume the costs of war: Events, elites, and American public support for military conflict. Journal of Politics, 69, 975-997.
8.
BlinderS. (2007). Going public, going to Baghdad: Presidential agenda-setting and the electoral connection in Congress. In EdwardsG.KingD. (Eds.), The polarized presidency of George W. Bush (pp. 325-350). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
9.
CarminesE.StimsonJ. (1980). The two faces of issue voting. American Political Science Review, 74, 78-91.
10.
CarseyT.LaymanG. (2006). Changing sides or changing minds? Party identification and policy preferences in the American electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 464-477.
11.
CavariA. (2013). The short-term effect of going public. Political Research Quarterly, 66, 336-351.
12.
CohenJ. (2014). Presidential rhetoric and the public agenda: the nonlinear mediating effect of approval [manuscript]. Fordham University.
13.
CrawfordV.SobelJ. (1982). Strategic information transmission. Econometrica, 50, 1431-51.
EdwardsG. (2003). On deaf ears. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16.
EdwardsG. (2009). Leading the public. In HowellW.EdwardsG. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the American presidency (pp. 182-207). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17.
EdwardsG. (2012). Overreach: Leadership in the Obama presidency. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
FoyleD. (1999). Counting the public in: Presidents, public opinion and foreign policy. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
19.
HoD.ImaiK.KingG.StuartE. (2011, May). MatchIt: Nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. Journal of Statistical Software, 42, 8. Retrieved from IS http://www.jstatsoft.org/v42/i08
20.
HolstiO. (1992). Public opinion and foreign policy: Challenges to the Almond-Lippmann consensus. International Studies Quarterly, 36, 439-466.
21.
HurwitzJ.PeffleyM. (1987). The means and ends of foreign policy as determinants of presidential support. American Journal of Political Science, 31, 236-258.
22.
JacobsonG. (2006). A divider, not a uniter: George W. Bush and the American people. New York: Longman.
23.
KernellS. (1986). Going public: New strategies of presidential leadership. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
24.
KeshkO. (2003). CDSIMEQ: A program to implement two-stage probit least squares. The Stata Journal, 3, 1-11.
25.
LaddJ. (2007). Predisposition and public support for the president during the war on terrorism. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71, 511-538.
26.
LenzG. (2012). Follow the leader? How voters respond to politicians’ performance and policies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
27.
LodgeM.TaberC. (2000). Three steps toward a theory of motivated political reasoning. In LupiaA.McCubbinsM.PopkinS. (Eds.), Elements of reason: Cognition, choice and bounds of rationality (pp. 182-213). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
MondakJ.LewisC.SidesJ.KangJ.LongJ. (2004). Presidential source cues and policy appraisals, 1981-2000. American Politics Research, 32, 219-35.
29.
MorganS.WinshipC. (2007). Counterfactuals and causal inference: Methods and principals for social research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30.
OstromC.JobB. (1986). The president and the political use of force. American Political Science Review, 80, 541-566.
31.
PageB.ShapiroR. (1985). Presidential leadership through public opinion. In EdwardsG.ShullS.ThomasN. (Eds.), The presidency and public policy making (pp. 22-36). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
32.
PageB.ShapiroR.DempseyG. (1987). What moves public opinion?American Political Science Review, 81, 23-44.
33.
SigelmanL. (1980). Gauging the public response to presidential leadership. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 10, 427-433.
34.
ThomasD.SigelmanL. (1985). Presidential identification and policy leadership: Experimental evidence on the Reagan case. In EdwardsG.IIIShullS.ThomasN. (Eds.), The presidency and public policy making (pp. 37-49). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
35.
WilcoxC.AllsopD. (1991). Economic and foreign policy as sources of Reagan support. Western Political Quarterly, 44, 941-958.
36.
ZallerJ. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
ZallerJ. (1996). The myth of massive media impact revived. In MutzD.SnidermanP.BrodyR. (Eds.), Political persuasion and attitude change (pp. 17-79). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
