Recent studies in political psychology report a significant association between personality traits and ordinary citizens’ attitudes and behaviors in the political arena. A growing body of literature examines the influence of personality on individuals’ attachment to a political party and vote choice in electoral settings. In line with these studies, we analyze the relationship between personality traits and “correct voting”, i.e., the extent to which citizens vote in accordance with their own preferences and values. Using a large-scale national survey fielded in the context of the 2008 presidential election, we find that, after controlling for well-known predictors of correct voting, some of personality traits not only exert a direct influence on correct voting, but also moderate the effect of strength of party identification, a well-established determinant of correct voting. These findings provide new evidence for the idea that individual differences such as dispositional personality traits are deeply intertwined with both vote choice and democratic representation.
BarbaranelliC.CapraraG. V.VecchioneM.FraleyC. R. (2007). Voters’ personality traits in presidential elections. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1199-1208.
2.
BorghansL.DuckworthA. L.HeckmanJ. J.ter WeelB. (2008). The economics and psychology of personality traits. Journal of Human Resources, 43, 972-1059.
3.
BostonJ.HomolaJ.SinclairB.TorresM.TuckerP. (2014). Personality stability and politics: TIPI variability. Unpublished manuscript.
4.
BraderT. (2006). Campaigning for hearts and minds. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5.
BraderT. (2011). The political relevance of emotions: “Reassessing” revisited. Political Psychology, 32, 337-346.
6.
BullockJ. G.GreenD. P.HaS. E. (2010). Yes, but what’s the mechanism? (Do not expect an easy answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 550-558.
7.
CapraraG. V.BarbaranelliC.ZimbardoP. G. (1999). Personality profiles and political parties. Political Psychology, 20, 175-197.
8.
CapraraG. V.SchwartzS.CapannaC.VecchioneM.BarbaranelliC. (2006). Personality and politics: Values, traits, and political choice. Political Psychology, 27, 1-28.
9.
CarneyD. R.JostJ. T.GoslingS. D.PotterJ. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29, 807-840.
10.
CooperC. A.GoldenL.SochaA. (2013). The big five personality factors and mass politics. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 68-82.
11.
CredéM.HarmsP.NiehorsterS.Gaye-ValentineA. (2012). An evaluation of the consequences of using short measures of the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 874-888.
12.
DeYoungC. G. (2010). Toward a theory of the big five. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 26-33.
13.
DeYoungC. G.QuiltyL. C.PetersonJ. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880-896.
14.
FlynnK. E.SmithM. A. (2007). Personality and health care decision-making style. Journals of Gerontology, Series B, 62, P261-P267.
15.
FunderD. C.FastL. A. (2010). Personality in social psychology. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindseyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 668-697). New York, NY: Wiley.
16.
GerberA. S.HuberG. A.DohertyD.DowlingC. M. (2011). Personality traits and the consumption of political information. American Politics Research, 39, 32-84.
17.
GerberA. S.HuberG. A.DohertyD.DowlingC. M. (2012a). Personality and the strength and direction of partisan identification. Political Behavior, 34, 653-688.
18.
GerberA. S.HuberG. A.DohertyD.DowlingC. M. (2012b). Personality traits, disagreement, and the avoidance of political discussion: Putting political discussion networks in context. American Journal of Political Science, 56, 849-874.
19.
GerberA. S.HuberG. A.DohertyD.DowlingC. M.HaS. E. (2010). Personality and political attitudes: Relationships across issue domains and political contexts. American Political Science Review, 104, 111-133.
20.
GerberA. S.HuberG. A.DohertyD.DowlingC. M.RasoC.HaS. E. (2011). Personality traits and participation in political processes. Journal of Politics, 73, 692-706.
21.
GoldbergL. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
22.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B.Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528.
23.
HibbingM. V.RitchieM.AndersonM. R. (2011). Personality and political discussion. Political Behavior, 33, 202-223.
24.
JohnO. P.NaumannL. P.SotoC. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 114-158). New York, NY: Guilford.
25.
KnowlesE. S.NathanK. T. (1997). Acquiescent responding in self-reports: Cognitive style or social concern?Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 293-301.
26.
KraaykampG.van EijckK. (2005). Personality, media preferences, and cultural participation. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1675-1688.
27.
LaddJ. M.LenzG. S. (2008). Reassessing the role of anxiety in vote choice. Political Psychology, 29, 275-296.
28.
LaddJ. M.LenzG. S. (2011). Does anxiety improve voters’ decision making?Political Psychology, 32, 347-361.
29.
LauR. R. (2013). Correct voting in the 2008 U.S. presidential nominating elections. Political Behavior, 35, 331-355.
30.
LauR. R.AndersenD. J.RedlawskD. P. (2008). An exploration of correct voting in recent U.S. presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science, 52, 395-411.
31.
LauR. R.PatelP.FahmyD. F.KaufmanR. R. (2014). Correct voting across thirty-three democracies: A preliminary analysis. British Journal of Political Science, 44, 239-259.
32.
LauR. R.RedlawskD. P. (1997). Voting correctly. American Political Science Review, 91, 585-599.
33.
LauR. R.RedlawskD. P. (2001). Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 951-971.
34.
LauR. R.RedlawskD. P. (2006). How voters decide: Information processing in electoral campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35.
LauriolaM.LevinI. P. (2001). Personality traits and risky decision-making in a controlled experimental task: An exploratory study. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 215-226.
36.
LongJ. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
MalhotraN.KrosnickJ. A. (2007). The effect of survey mode and sampling on inferences about political attitudes and behavior: Comparing the 2000 and 2004 ANES to Internet surveys with nonprobability sample. Political Analysis, 15, 286-323.
38.
MarcusG. E.NeumanW. R.MacKuenM. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
39.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81-90.
40.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (1990). Personality in adulthood. New York, NY: Guilford.
41.
MondakJ. J. (2010). Personality and the foundations of political behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
42.
MondakJ. J.HalperinK. D. (2008). A framework for the study of personality and political behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 38, 335-362.
43.
MondakJ. J.HibbingM. V.CanacheD.SeligsonM. A.AndersonM. R. (2010). Personality and civic engagement: An integrative framework for the study of trait effects on political behavior. American Political Science Review, 104, 85-110.
44.
OsborneD.SibleyC. G. (2012). Does personality matter? Openness correlates with vote choice, but particularly for politically sophisticated voters. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 743-751.
45.
RabinowitzG.MacDonaldS. E. (1989). A directional theory of issue voting. American Political Science Review, 83, 93-121.
46.
RicheyS. (2008). The social basis of voting correctly. Political Communication, 25, 366-376.
47.
RyanJ. B. (2011). Social networks as a shortcut to correct voting. American Journal of Political Science, 55, 753-766.
48.
SchaffnerB. F.StrebM. J. (2002). The partisan heuristic in low-information elections. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 559-581.
49.
SchoenH.SchumannS. (2007). Personality traits, partisan attitudes, and voting behavior: Evidence from Germany. Political Psychology, 28, 471-498.
50.
SokheyA. E.McClurgS. D. (2012). Social networks and correct voting. Journal of Politics, 74, 751-764.
51.
VavreckL.RiversD. (2008). The 2006 cooperative congressional election study. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 18, 355-366.
52.
VecchioneM.SchoenH.CastroJ. L. G.CieciuchJ.PavlopoulosV.CapraraG. V. (2011). Personality correlates of party preference: The Big Five in five big European countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 737-742.
53.
WeinschenkA. C. (2014). Personality traits and the sense of civic duty. American Political Research, 42, 90-113.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
