We relate legislators’ financial assets to their roll call voting on, and cosponsorship of, legislation to permanently repeal or significantly reduce the Estate Tax in the 109th Congress. Even after accounting for legislators’ party affiliations, their global opinions about taxation, and their constituents’ opinions about the Estate Tax, together with other confounding factors, we find that wealthier legislators were more likely to vote for and cosponsor bills to reduce and repeal the Estate Tax.
AnsolabehereS.SnyderJ. M.Jr.StewartC.III. (2001). The effects of party and preferences on congressional roll-call voting. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 26, 533-572. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/440269
4.
ArielyD. (2008). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
5.
ArnoldR. D. (1990). The logic of congressional action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
6.
BartelsL. M. (2008). Unequal democracy: The political economy of the new gilded age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
BiancoW. T.SpenceD. B.WilkersonJ. D. (1996). The electoral connection in the early Congress: The case of the compensation act of 1816. American Journal of Political Science, 40(1), 145-171. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2111698
8.
BrattonK. A.HaynieK. L. (1999). Agenda setting and legislative success in state legislatures: the effects of gender and race. Journal of Politics, 61, 658-679. doi:10.2307/2647822
9.
BullockC. S.III.BradyD. W. (1983). Party, constituency, and roll call voting in the U.S. Senate. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 8(1), 29-43. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/439469
10.
BurdenB. C. (2007). Personal roots of representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
CanonD. T. (1999). Race, redistricting, and representation: The unintended consequences of black majority district. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
CarnesN. (2012). Does the numerical underrepreesntation of the working class in Congress matter?Legislative Studies Quarterly, 37(1), 5-34. doi:10.1111/j.1939-9162.2011.00033.x
13.
ChadwickL.SolonG. (2002). Intergenerational income mobility among daughters. American Economic Review, 92, 335-344. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3083337
14.
ChappellH. W.Jr.(1981). Conflict of interest and congressional voting: A note. Public Choice, 37, 331-336. doi:10.1007/BF00138252
15.
ClarkA. E.OswaldA. J. (1996). Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public Economics, 61, 359-381. doi:10.1016/0047-2727(95)01564-7
16.
CoxG. W.McCubbinsM. D. (1993). Legislative leviathan: Party government in the House. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
17.
FiorinaM. P. (1974). Representatives, roll calls, and constituencies. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
18.
GelmanA.HillJ. (2006). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
19.
GelpiC.FeaverP. D. (2002). Speak softly and carry a big stick? Veterans in the political elite and the American use of force. American Political Science Review, 96, 779-793. doi:10.1017/S000305540200045x
20.
GriffinJ. D.NewmanB. (2008). Minority report: Evaluating political equality in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21.
GrosecloseT.KrehbielK. (1994). Golden parachutes, rubber checks, and strategic retirements from the 102nd House. American Journal of Political Science, 23(1), 75-99. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2111336
22.
HibbingJ. R. (1983). Washington on 75 dollars a day: Members of Congress voting on their own tax break. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 8(2), 219-230. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/439430
23.
KesslerD.KrehbielK. (1996). Dynamics of cosponsorship. American Political Science Review, 90, 555-566. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2082608
24.
KingG.KeohaneR. O.VerbaS. (1994). Designing social inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
KingdonJ. W. (1981). Congressmen’s voting decisions (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
26.
KrehbielK. (1995). Cosponsors and wafflers from A to Z. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 906-923. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2111662
27.
LevittS. D. (1996). How do senators vote? Disentangling the role of voter preferences, party affiliation and senator ideology. American Economic Review, 86, 425-441. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2118205
28.
LichtblauE. (2011, August15). A businessman in congress helps his district and himself. New York Times, p. A1.
29.
LiptonE. (2011, July4). Congress’s man of the vines, including his own. New York Times, p. A1.
30.
LiptonE. (2011, September6). A congresswoman’s cause is often her husband’s gain. New York Times, p. A1.
31.
LiptonE. (2012, November9). Ethics in play, voters oust incumbents under scrutiny. New York Times, p. A20.
32.
MantelN.HaenszelW. (1959). Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 22, 719-748.
33.
MatthewsD. R. (1954). The social background of political decision makers. New York, NY: Random House.
34.
MayhewD. R. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
35.
MillerW. E.StokesD. E. (1963). Constituency influence in Congress. American Political Science Review, 57(1), 45-57. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1952717
36.
ReeherG. (1996). Narratives of justice: Legislators’ beliefs about distributive fairness. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
37.
RoccaM. S.SanchezG. R. (2008). The effect of race and ethnicity on bill sponsorship and cosponsorship in Congress. American Politics Research, 36(1), 130-152. doi:10.1177/1532673X07306357
38.
RohdeD. W. (1991). Parties and leaders in the post-reform House. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
39.
RomerD.KenskiK.WinnegK.AdasiewiczC.Hall JamiesonK. (2006). Capturing campaign dynamics, 2000 and 2004, The National Annenberg Election Survey. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
40.
SwersM. L. (2002). The difference women make: The policy impact of women in Congress. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
41.
TateK. (2003). Black faces in the mirror, African Americans and their representatives in the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
ThomasS. (1991). The impact of women on state legislative policies. Journal of Politics, 53, 958-976. doi:10.2307/2131862
43.
WashingtonE. (2008). Female socialization: How daughters affect their legislator fathers’ voting on women’s issues. American Economic Review, 98, 311-332. doi:10.1257/aer.98.1.311
44.
WawroG. (2000). Legislative entrepreneurship in the U.S. House of Representatives. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
45.
WelchS.PetersJ. G. (1983). Private interests and public interest: An analysis of the impact of personal finance on congressional voting on agriculture issues. Journal of Politics, 45, 378-396. doi:10.2307/2130131
46.
WhitbyK. J. (1997). The color of representation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
