Using digital text analysis methods, we analyze over 3800 newspaper articles covering U.S. Supreme Court judicial appointments between 1981 and 2009 to measure the level of (in)congruence between the Court’s agenda and the issues emphasized by the media. We find that newspapers highlight “culture war” issues at the expense of other important issues addressed much more frequently by the Court. Moreover, abortion in particular receives attention in more articles and in much greater depth than any other issue. With a few minor deviations, these patterns are consistent across nominations. These findings raise normative concerns regarding the didactic function of the print media in American democracy and shed empirical light on positive theories of media behavior.
AbramowitzA. I. (1995). It’s abortion, stupid: Policy voting in the 1992 presidential election. Journal of Politics, 57, 176-186.
2.
AlexaM. (1997). Computer-assisted text analysis methodology in the social sciences. Mannheim, Germany: Zuma.
3.
BartelsL. M. (1996, September). Politicians and the press: Who leads, who follows?Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA.
BennettW. L. (2003). The burglar alarm that just keeps ringing: A response to Zaller. Political Communication, 20, 131-138.
6.
BennettW. L. (2005). News: The politics of illusion (6th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson-Longman.
7.
BennettW. L.LawrenceR. G.LivingstonS. (2006). None dare call it torture: Indexing and the limits of press independence in the Abu Ghraib scandal. Journal of Communication, 56, 467-485.
8.
BrennanR. L.PredigerD. J. (1981). Coefficient kappa: Some uses, misuses, and alternatives. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 687-699.
9.
CaldeiraG. A.WrightJ. R. (1998). Lobbying for justice: Organized interests Supreme Court nominations, and United States Senate. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 499-523.
10.
CarminesE. G.StimsonJ. A. (1989). Issue evolution: Race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
CizmarA.LaymanG. C. (2009, April). What makes an issue easy? Impact of party, group, and policy cues on attitudes toward abortion and the environment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
12.
ClawsonR. A.StrineH. C.WaltenburgE. N. (2003). Framing Supreme Court decisions: The mainstream versus the Black Press. Journal of Black Studies, 33, 784-800.
13.
ClawsonR. A.WaltenburgE. N. (2003). Support for a Supreme Court affirmative action decision : A story in Black and White. American Politics Research, 31, 251-279.
14.
CohenJ. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37-46.
15.
DavisR. (1994). Decisions and images: The Supreme Court and the press. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16.
DavisR.StricklerV. J. (2000). The invisible dance: The Supreme Court and the press. Perspectives on Political Science, 29, 85-92.
17.
DavisR. (2005). Electing justice: Fixing the Supreme Court nomination process. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
DennisE. E. (1975). Another look at press coverage of the Supreme Court. Villanova Law Review, 20, 765-799.
20.
DownieL.Jr.KaiserR. G. (2002). The news about the news: American journalism in peril. New York, NY: Knopf.
21.
EricsonD. (1977).Newspaper coverage of the Supreme Court: A case study. Journalism Quarterly, 54, 605-607.
22.
EvansM.McIntoshW.LinJ.GatesC. (2007). Recounting the courts? Applying automated content analysis to enhance empirical legal research. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4, 1007-1039.
23.
EvansW. (1996). Computer-supported content analysis: Trends, tools, and techniques. Social Science Computer Review, 14, 269-279.
24.
FarnsworthS. J.LichterS. R. (2007). The nightly news nightmare: Television’s coverage of U.S. presidential elections, 1988-2004. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
25.
FarnsworthS. J.LichterS. R. (2006). The 2004 New Hampshire Democratic primary and network news. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 11(1), 53-63.
26.
FiorinaM. P. (2005). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America. London, UK: Longman.
27.
GansH. (1978). Deciding what’s news. New York, NY: Random House.
28.
GansH. (2003). Democracy and the news. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
29.
GimpelJ. G.WolpertR. M. (1996). Opinion-holding and public attitudes toward controversial supreme court nominees. Political Research Quarterly, 49, 163-176.
30.
GraberD. A. (2006). Mass media and American Politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
31.
GreyD. L. (1968). The Supreme Court and the news media. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
32.
HamiltonJ. (2003). All the news that’s fit to sell: How the market transforms information into news. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
HaysD.GuardinoM. (2010). How views made the news? Media coverage and the march to war In Iraq. Political Communication, 27(1), 59-87.
34.
IyengarS.ReevesR. (1997). Do the media govern?: Politicians, voters, and reporters in America. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
35.
JohnsonT. (2007). Review of WordStat 5.1, SIMSTAT 2.5, and QDA Miner 2.0. Political Methodologist, 15(1), 11-14.
36.
JoslynM. R.Haider-MarkelD. P. (2002). Framing effects on personal opinion and perception of public opinion: The cases of physician-assisted suicide and social security. Social Science Quarterly, 83, 690-706.
37.
KastellecJ. P.LaxJ. R.PhillipsJ. H. (2010). Public opinion and senate confirmations of Supreme Court nominees. Journal of Politics, 72, 767-784.
LeegeD.WaldK. D.KruegerB.MuellerP. D. (2002). The politics of cultural differences:Social change and voter mobilization strategies in the Post-New Deal Period. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
LewisN. A. (1993, July19). A new era in abortion. The New York Times, p. A13.
41.
MalteseJ. A. (1995). The selling of Supreme Court nominees. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
42.
McCombsM.ShawD. (1972). The agenda-setting function of the mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176-187.
43.
NewlandC. A. (1964). Press coverage of the United States Supreme Court. Western Political Quarterly, 17(1), 15-36.
44.
O’BrienD. M. (2009). Storm center: The Supreme Court in American politics. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
45.
O’CallaghanJ.DukesJ. O. (1992). Media coverage of the Supreme Court’s Caseload. Journalism Quaterly, 69, 195-203.
46.
OverbyL. M.BrownR. D. (1997). Reelection constituencies and the politics of Supreme Court nomination votes. American Politics Research, 25, 168-178.
47.
OverbyL. M.HenschenB. M.StraussJ.WalshM. H. (1994). African-American constituents and Supreme Court nominees: An examination of the Senate confirmation of Thurgood Marshall. Political Research Quarterly, 47, 839-855.
PollockP. H.LilieS.VittesM. E. (1993). Hard issues, core values and vertical constraint: The case of nuclear power. British Journal of Political Science, 23(1), 29-50.
PressC.VerBurgK. (1998). American politics and journalists. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
52.
Questioning Judge Sotomayor [Editorial]. (2009, July14). The New York Times, p. A24.
53.
RinghandL. A.CollinsP. M.Jr. (2010). Mayit please the Senate: An empirical analysis of the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings of Supreme Court nominees, 1939-2009. American University Law Review, 60, 589-641.
54.
SchudsonM. (1999). What public journalism knows about journalism but doesn’t know about “public.” In GlasserT. L. (Ed.) The idea of public journalism (pp. 118-133). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
55.
SebastianiF. (2002). Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Computing Surveys, 34(1), 1-47.
56.
SilversteinM. (1994). Judicious choices: The politics of Supreme Court nominations. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
57.
SilversteinM. (1999). Bill Clinton’s excellent adventure: Political development and the modern confirmation process. In GilliamH.ClaytonC. (Eds.) The Supreme Court in American politics. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
58.
SlotnickE. E.SegalJ. A. (1998). Television news and The Supreme Court: All the news that’s fit to air?Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59.
SlotnickE. E. (1993). Television news and the Supreme Court: A case study. Judicature, 77(1), 21-33.
60.
SolimineM. E. (1980). Newsmagazine coverage of the Supreme Court. Journalism Quarterly, 57, 661-663.
61.
SpaethH.EspsteinL.RugerT.WhittingtonK.SegalJ. (2010). The U.S. Supreme Court database. Retrieved from http://supremecourtdatabase.org
62.
WalkerJ. M. (2007). Politics and the confirmation process. In BybeeK. J. (Ed.), Bench press (pp. 123-130). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
63.
WeberR. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
64.
ZallerJ. (2003). A new standard of news quality: Burglar alarms for the monitorial citizen. Political Communication, 20, 109-102.
65.
ZwickR. (1988). Another look at interrater agreement. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 374-378.
