Many recent studies of the judiciary and public opinion adopt a model that views court decisions as aggravating division within the public. The authors question the image of Court as polarizer, arguing that the persuading influence of the U.S. Supreme Court is broader than contemporary authors acknowledge. Using a potential outcomes framework, the authors analyze public attitudes in response to the decision in Roe v. Wade, the original test case in Franklin and Kosaki’s seminal article. The authors’ evidence suggests that members of diverse groups who were aware of the Roe decision were more supportive of abortion than their decision-unaware counterparts.
AbadieAlbertoImbensGuido W.2006. “Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects.” Econometrica74:235-67.
2.
AbrahamHenry J.1977. Freedom and the Court. 3rd ed.New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
AdamanyDavid. 1973. “Legitimacy, Realigning Elections, and the Supreme Court.” Wisconsin Law Review1973:790-846.
4.
ArneyWilliam RayTrescherWilliam H.1976. “Trends in Attitudes toward Abortion, 1972–1975.” Family Planning Perspectives8:117-24.
5.
BaasLarry R.ThomasDan. 1984. “The Supreme Court and Policy Legitimation: Experimental Tests.” American Politics Research12:335-60.
6.
BairdVanessa A.JavelineDebra. 2007. “The Persuasive Power of Russian Courts.” Political Research Quarterly60:429-42.
7.
BarnumDavid G.1985. “The Supreme Court and Public Opinion: Judicial Decision Making in the Post–New Deal Period.” Journal of Politics47:652-66.
8.
BlakeJudith. 1977. “The Supreme Court’s Abortion Decisions and Public Opinion in the United States.” Population and Development Review3:45-62.
9.
CaldeiraGregory A.1986. “Neither the Purse nor the Sword: Dynamics of Public Confidence in the Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review80:1209-26.
10.
CaldeiraGregory A.GibsonJames L.1992. “The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science36:635-64.
11.
CasperJonathan D.1976. “The Supreme Court and National Policy Making.” American Political Science Review70:50-63.
12.
ChaikenShelly. 1980. “Heuristic versus Systematic Information Processing and the Use of Source versus Message Cues in Persuasion.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology39:752-66.
13.
ClawsonRosalee A.KeglerElizabeth R.WaltenburgEric N.2001. “The Legitimacy Conferring Authority of the U.S. Supreme Court: An Experimental Design.” American Politics Research29:566-91.
14.
CombsCombs W.WelchSusan. 1982. “Blacks, Whites, and Attitudes toward Abortion.” Public Opinion Quarterly46:510-20.
15.
CookElizabeth AdellJelenTed G.WilcoxClyde. 1992. Between Two Absolutes: Public Opinion and the Politics of Abortion. Boulder, CO: Westview.
16.
CookElizabeth AdellJelenTed G.WilcoxClyde. 1993. “Catholicism and Abortion Attitudes in the American States: A Contextual Analysis.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion32:223-30.
17.
CraigBarbara HinksonO’BrienDavid M.1993. Abortion and American Politics. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
18.
DahlRobert A.1957. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker.” Journal of Public Law6:279-95.
19.
DiamondAlexisSekhonJasjeet S.2005. “Genetic Matching for Estimating Causal Effects: A General Multivariate Matching Method for Achieving Balance in Observational Studies.” Working paper, Travers Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley.
20.
EbaughHelen Rose FuchsHaneyC. Allen. 1980. “Shifts in Abortion Attitudes: 1972–1978.” Journal of Marriage and Family42:491-99.
21.
EpsteinLeeKobylkaJoseph F.1992. The Supreme Court and Legal Change: Abortion and the Death Penalty. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
22.
FranklinCharles H.KosakiLiane C.1989. “Republican Schoolmaster: The U.S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion.” American Political Science Review83:751-71.
23.
FunstonRichard. 1975. “The Supreme Court and Critical Elections.” American Political Science Review69:795-811.
24.
GibsonJames L.1989. “Understandings of Justice: Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Political Tolerance.” Law & Society Review23:469-96.
25.
GibsonJames L.CaldeiraGregory A.2003. “Defenders of Democracy? Legitimacy, Popular Acceptance, and the South African Constitutional Court.” Journal of Politics65:1-30.
26.
GibsonJames L.CaldeiraGregory A.SpenceLester Kenyatta. 2003. “Measuring Attitudes toward the United States Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science47:354-67.
27.
GlennNorval D.1977. Cohort Analysis. Vol. 1. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
28.
GordonSanford C.HuberGregory A.2007. “The Effect of Electoral Competitiveness on Incumbent Behavior.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science2:107-38.
29.
GranbergDonaldGranbergBeth Wellman. 1980. “Abortion Attitudes, 1965–1980: Trends and Determinants.” Family Planning Perspectives12:250-61.
30.
GreenhouseLindaSiegelReva. 2010. Before Roe v. Wade: Voices That Shaped the Abortion Debate before the Supreme Court’s Ruling. New York: Kaplan.
31.
GrieveRichardSekhonJasjeet S.HuTeh-weiBloomJoan. 2008. “Evaluating Health Care Programs by Combining Cost with Quality of Life Measures: A Case Study Comparing Capitation and Fee for Service.” Health Services Research43:1204-22.
32.
GrosskopfAnkeMondakJeffery J.1998. “Do Attitudes toward Specific Supreme Court Decisions Matter? The Impact of Webster and Texas v. Johnson on Public Confidence in the Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly51:633-54.
33.
HallElaine J.FerreeMyra Marx. 1986. “Race Differences in Abortion Attitudes.” Public Opinion Quarterly50:193-207.
34.
HerronMichael C.WandJonathan. 2007. “Assessing Partisan Bias in Voting Technology: The Case of the New Hampshire Recount.” Electoral Studies26:247-61.
35.
HoDaniel E.ImaiKosukeKingGaryStuartElizabeth A.2007. “Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference.” Political Analysis15:199-236.
36.
HoekstraValerie J.1995. “The Supreme Court and Opinion Change: An Experimental Study of the Court’s Ability to Change Opinion.” American Politics Research23:109-29.
37.
HoekstraValerie J.2000. “The Supreme Court and Local Public Opinion.” American Political Science Review94:89-100.
38.
HoekstraValerie J.2003. Public Reaction to Supreme Court Decisions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
HoekstraValerie J.SegalJeffrey A.1996. “The Shepherding of Local Public Opinion: The Supreme Court and Lamb’s Chapel.” Journal of Politics58:1079-1102.
40.
JohnsonTimothy R.MartinAndrew D.1998. “The Public’s Conditional Response to Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review92:299-309.
41.
LeggeJerome S.Jr.1983. “The Determinants of Attitudes toward Abortion in the American Electorate.” Political Research Quarterly36:479-90.
42.
LernerRalph. 1967. “The Supreme Court as Republican Schoolmaster.” Supreme Court Review1967:127-80.
43.
LuksSamanthaSalamoneMichael. 2008. Abortion. In Public Opinion and Constitutional Controversy, edited by PersilyNathanielCitrinJackEganPatrick J., 80-107. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
44.
MarshallThomas. 1987. “The Supreme Court as an Opinion Leader.” American Politics Quarterly15:147-68.
45.
MateManojWrightMatthew. 2008. The 2000 Presidential Election Controversy. In Public Opinion and Constitutional Controversy, edited by PersilyNathanielCitrinJackEganPatrick J., 333-52. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
MondakJeffery J.1990. “Perceived Legitimacy of Supreme Court Decisions: Three Functions of Source Credibility.” Political Behavior12:363-84.
48.
MondakJeffery J.1991. “Substantive and Procedural Aspects of Supreme Court Decisions as Determinants of Institutional Approval.” American Politics Research19:174-88.
49.
MondakJeffery J.1992. “Institutional Legitimacy, Policy Legitimacy, and the Supreme Court.” American Politics Research20:457-77.
50.
MondakJeffery J.1994. “Policy Legitimacy and the Supreme Court: The Sources and Contexts of Legitimation.” Political Research Quarterly47:675-92.
51.
PettyRichard E.CacioppoJohn T.GoldmanRachel. 1981. “Personal Involvement as a Determinant of Argument-Based Persuasion.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology41:847-55.
52.
RosenbergGerald N.1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change?Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53.
RubinDonald B.1990. “Formal Modes of Statistical Inference for Causal Effects.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference25:279-92.
54.
ScottJacquelineSchumanHoward. 1988. “Attitude Strength and Social Action in the Abortion Dispute.” American Sociological Review53:785-93.
55.
SekhonJasjeet S.Forthcoming. “Multivariate and Propensity Score Matching with Automated Balance Search.” Journal of Statistical Software.
56.
SekhonJasjeet S.MebaneWalter R.Jr.1998. “Genetic Optimization Using Derivatives: Theory and Application to Nonlinear Models.” Political Analysis7:189-203.
57.
SinghB. KrishnaLeahyPeter J.1978. “Contexual and Ideological Dimensions of Attitudes toward Discretionary Abortion.” Demography15:381-88.
58.
StanleyHarold W.NiemiRichard G.1992. Vital Statistics on American Politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
59.
StoutenboroughJames W.Haider-MarkelDonald P.AllenMahalley D.2006. “Re-assessing the Impact of Supreme Court Decisions on Public Opinion: Gay Civil Rights Cases.” Political Research Quarterly59:419-33.
60.
StricklerJenniferDanigelisNicholas L.2002. “Changing Frameworks in Attitudes toward Abortion.” Sociological Forum17:187-201.
61.
TylerTom R.RasinskiKenneth. 1991. “Procedural Justice, Institutional Legitimacy, and the Acceptance of Unpopular U.S. Supreme Court Decisions: A Reply to Gibson.” Law & Society Review25:621-30.
62.
UslanerEric M.WeberRonald E.1979. “Public Support for Pro-choice Abortion Policies in the Nation and the States: Changes and Stability after the Roe and Doe Decisions.” Michigan Law Review77:1772-88.
63.
WilcoxClyde. 1990. “Race Differences in Abortion Attitudes: Some Additional Evidence.” Public Opinion Quarterly54:248-55.
