While the literature on party switching identifies the reasons that politicians switch parties and the negative electoral consequences of doing so, it does not adequately explore why these consequences exist. To accomplish this task the authors look at citizen responses to party switching. The authors explore perceptions of Arlen Specter and his change in party affiliation during the 2010 midterm election by using original survey data gathered from residents of Pennsylvania’s 3rd Congressional District. The authors posit that the information environment created by the parties, candidates, interest groups, and the media during the election frames the switch as both principled and opportunistic. The authors find that partisanship plays a large role in the frame that is accepted by citizens and that those frames subsequently influence their views of the candidate’s favorability.
AldrichJ. H.BiancoW. T. (1992). A game-theoretic model of party affiliation of candidates and office holders. Mathematical Computer Modelling, 16, 103-116.
CanonD. T.SousaD. J. (1992). Party system change and political career structures in the U.S. Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 17, 347-363.
6.
CastleD.FettP. J. (2000). Member goals and party switching in the U.S. Congress. In BiancoW. T. (Ed.), Congress on display, Congress at work (pp. 231-241). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
7.
CiglerA.GetterR. (1977). Conflict reduction in the post-election period: A test of the depolarization thesis. Western Political Quarterly, 30, 363-376.
8.
CoxG. W.McCubbinsM. D. (1993). Legislative leviathan: Party government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9.
CoxG. W.McCubbinsM. D. (2005). Setting the agenda: Responsible party government in the U.S. House of Representatives. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
10.
DownsA. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
GroseC. R.YoshinakaA. (2003). The electoral consequences of party switching by incumbent members of congress, incumbent legislators who switched parties, 1947-2000. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 27, 55-75.
17.
HetheringtonM. J. (2001). Resurgent mass partisanship: The role of elite polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 95, 619-631.
18.
HoltJ. M. (1967). Congressional insurgents and the party system, 1916-1919. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
LodgeM.TaberC. (2000). Three steps toward a theory of motivated political reasoning. In ArthurL.McCubbinsM. D.PopkinS. L. (Eds.), Elements of reason: Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality (pp. 183-213). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
28.
LupiaA. (1994). Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. American Political Science Review, 88, 63-76.
29.
MayhewD. R. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
30.
McGrawK. M. (1998). Manipulating public opinion with moral justification. The Annals of the American Academy, 560, 129-142.
31.
McGrawK. M.LodgeM.JonesJ. M. (2002). The pandering politicians of suspicious minds. The Journal of Politics, 64, 362-383.
32.
NicholsonS. P. (2005). The Jeffords switch and public support for divided government. British Journal of Political Science, 35, 343-356.
33.
PattersonT. (1993). Out of order. New York, NY: Vintage.
PopkinS. L. (1991). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
36.
RothenbergS. (1985). Party switches: Interviews about realignment and the political parties. Washington, DC: Institute for Government and Politics of the Free Congress Research and Education Foundation.
37.
ShahD. V.DomkeD.WackmanD. B. (1996). “To thine own self be true”: Values, framing, and voter decision-making strategies. Communication Research, 23, 509-560.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
