Party identification is notoriously “sticky,” yet over the last three decades the California electorate has changed tremendously. A once red state has become one of the most reliable Democratic strongholds in the nation. What explains this change? One common explanation rests with population shifts and macropartisan trends. Another claims the combination of a rapidly expanding Latino electorate and a series of high-profile anti-immigrant ballot initiatives supported by the state’s Republicans drove partisan change in California. Building off of previous research, we seek to reconcile the differential impacts of these factors on the state’s Latinos and non-Hispanic Whites. Our analyses partially confirm and clarify previous findings regarding Latino partisan change, while directly challenging findings regarding partisan change among non-Hispanic Whites.
AbramowitzA. I.SaundersK. L. (2006). Exploring the bases of partisanship in the American electorate: Social identity vs. ideology. Political Research Quarterly, 59, 175-187.
2.
AlvarezR. M.ButterfieldT. (2000). The resurgence of nativism in California? The case of Proposition 187 and illegal immigration. Social Science Quarterly, 81, 167-179.
3.
BarretoM. A.RamírezR.WoodsN. D. (2005). Are naturalize voters driving the California Latino electorate? Measure the effect of IRCA citizens on Latino voting. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 792-811.
4.
BowlerS.NicholsonS. P.SeguraG. M. (2006). Earthquakes and aftershocks: Race, direct democracy, and partisan change. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 146-159.
5.
BrantonR. P.DillinghamG.DunawayJ.MillerB. (2007). Anglo voting on nativist ballot initiatives: The partisan impact of spatial proximity to the U.S.–Mexico border. Social Science Quarterly, 88, 882-897.
6.
CainB. E.KiewietD. R.UhlanerC. J. (1991). The acquisition of partisanship by Latinos and Asian Americans. American Journal of Political Science, 35, 390-422.
7.
CampbellA.ConverseP.MillerW.StokesD. (1960). The American voter. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
8.
CarminesE. G.StimsonJ. A. (1989). Issue evolution: Race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
DonovanT.TolbertC. J.SmithD. A. (2008). Priming presidential votes by direct democracy. Journal of Politics, 70, 1217-1231.
10.
EriksonR.S.WrightG.C.McIverJ.P.1993. Statehouse Democracy: public opinion and policy in the American states. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
EriksonR. S.MacKuenM. B.StimsonJ. A. (2002). The macro polity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
12.
The Field Institute. (2000). California’s expanding Latino electorate. California Opinion Index, 1, 1-6.
13.
FiorinaM. P. (1981). Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14.
GelmanA. (2008). Red state, blue state, rich state, poor state: Why Americans vote the way they do. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
GreenD.PalmquistB.SchicklerE. (2002). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16.
HajnalZ.GerberE.LouchH. (2002). Minorities and direct legislation: Evidence from California’s ballot proposition elections. Journal of Politics, 64, 154-177.
17.
JohnstonR. (2006). Party identification: Unmoved mover or sum of preferences. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 329-351.
18.
KeithB. E.MaglebyD. B.NelsonC. J.OrrE.WestlyeM. C.WolfingerR. E. (1996). The myth of the independent voter. Berkeley: University of California Press.
19.
KoreyJ. L.LascherE. L.Jr. (2006). Macropartisanship in California. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 48-65.
20.
McAllisterI.MakkaiT. (1991). The formation and development of party loyalties: Patterns among Australian immigrants. Journal of Sociology, 27, 195-217.
21.
MendelbergT. (2001). The race card: Campaign strategy, implicit messages, and the norm of equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
NicholsonS. P. (2005). Voting the agenda: Candidates, elections, and ballot propositions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
PolsbyN. W.WildavskyA. B. (1971). Presidential elections (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s.
25.
SchragP. (1998). Paradise lost: California’s experience, America’s future. New York, NY: New Press.
26.
SmithD. A.DeSantisM.KasselJ. (2006). Same-sex marriage ballot measures and the 2004 Presidential election. State and Local Government Review, 38, 78-91.
27.
TolbertC. J.HeroR. E. (1996). Race/ethnicity and direct democracy: An analysis of California’s illegal immigration initiative. Journal of Politics, 58, 806-818.
28.
UhlanerC. J.GarciaF. C. (2005). Learning which party fits: Experience, ethnic identity, and the demographic foundations of Latino party identification. In SeguraG. M.BowlerS. (Eds.), Diversity and democracy: Minority representation in the United States. (pp 72-101). Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
