Spouses who talk about politics with each other have long been considered aberrant cases of political discussion because of the frequency of their interaction and the high levels of agreement between them. Using the 1996 Indianapolis-St. Louis Election Study, we challenge these assumptions. We find that compared with other types of discussion dyads, married dyads are no more likely to agree about a host of policy issues, even though they do talk about them more frequently. In addition, we find even when spouses do agree about their presidential vote choice more often, they do not perceive this agreement to exist. These findings indicate that within the microfoundations of married political behavior, spouses may experience less political variety because of the frequency of their interaction, but this does not necessarily mean they experience lower levels of disagreement.
Beck, P.A. ( 2002). Encouraging political defection: The role of personal discussion networks in partisan desertions to the opposition party and Perot votes in 1992. Political Behavior, 24, 309-337.
2.
Beck, P.A. ( 1991). Voter’s intermediation environments in the 1988 presidential contest. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 371-394.
3.
Berelson, B., Lazarsfeld, P., & McPhee, W. (1954). Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Huckfeldt, R. ( 2001). The social communication of political expertise. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 425-438.
5.
Huckfeldt, R., Johnson, P., & Sprague, J. ( 2004). Political disagreement: The survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J.M., & Osborn, T. ( 2004). Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: The political consequences of heterogeneous networks. Political Psychology , 25, 65-95.
7.
Huckfeldt, R., Sprague, J., & Levine, J. ( 2000). The dynamics of collective deliberation in the 1996 election: Campaign effects on accessibility, certainty, and accuracy. American Political Science Review, 94, 641-651.
8.
Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. ( 1995). Citizens, politics, and social communication. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Huckfeldt, R., Beck, P.A., Dalton, R., Levine, J., & Morgan, W. ( 1998). Ambiguity, distorted messages, and nested environmental effects on political communication. Journal of Politics, 60, 996-1030.
10.
Kenny, C. ( 1998). The behavioral consequences of political discussion: Another look at discussant effects on vote choice. Journal of Politics, 60, 231-244.
11.
Kenny, C. ( 1994). Political participation and effects from the social environment . American Journal of Political Science, 36, 259-267.
12.
Klofstad, C., McClurg, S., & Rolfe, M. ( 2009). Measurement of political discussion networks: A comparison of two name-generator procedures. Public Opinion Quarterly , 73, 462-483.
13.
Klofstad, C. ( 2007). Talk leads to recruitment: How discussions about politics and current events lead to participation. Political Research Quarterly, 60, 180-191.
14.
McClurg, S. ( 2008). Social expertise and the foundations of political involvement . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA.
15.
McClurg, S. ( 2006). The electoral relevance of political talk: Examining the effects of disagreement and expertise in social networks on political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 737-754.
16.
McClurg, S. ( 2003). Social networks and political participation: The role of social interaction in explaining political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 449-464.
17.
Mendez, J.M., & Osborn, T. ( 2010). Gender and the perception of knowledge in political discussion . Political Research Quarterly, 63, 269-279.
18.
Mondak, J. ( 1995). Media exposure and political discussion in U.S. elections . Journal of Politics, 57, 62-85.
19.
Mutz, D. ( 2002a). Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice. American Political Science Review, 96, 111-126.
20.
Mutz, D. ( 2002b). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 838-855.
21.
Plutzer, E., & McBurnett, M. ( 1991). Family life and American politics: The marriage gap reconsidered . Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 113-127.
22.
Popkin, S. ( 1991). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23.
Stoker, L., & Jennings, M.K. (1995). Life-cycle transitions and political participation: The case of marriage. American Political Science Review, 89, 421-433.
24.
Straights, B. ( 1991). Bringing strong ties back in interpersonal gateways to political information and influence. Public Opinion Quarterly , 55, 432-448.
