This study adopts a systemic approach, focusing on real-world online discussions in legislative-, media-, and activist-based forums, to explore a set of factors that affects reasoned disagreement in digital environments. While conventional analysis investigates the effects of disagreement on civic and political participation, this study unpacks forms of disagreement that retain a principled link with reason-giving. Our findings demonstrate that context matters for shaping online communication, but that other variables have even stronger correlations. Specifically, moderating disagreement—conceptualized as a way of disagreeing that nevertheless signals a background of agreement in the conversation—strongly increases the likelihood of justificatory behavior, and it does so in more categories than bold disagreement. In conclusion, we argue that forms of disagreement and their respective consequences deserve more empirical and normative attention, not only to advance debates on deliberation but also to critically understand the communicative complexities in a new media landscape.
AdamsBE (2015) Working through Disagreement in Deliberative Forums. The Social Science Journal52: 229–238.
2.
AllenVLLevineJM (1968) Social Support, Dissent and Conformity. Sociometry31: 138–149.
3.
AschSE (1956) Studies of Independence and Conformity: I. A Minority of One against a Unanimous Majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied70 (9): 1–70.
4.
BächtigerAGerberM (2014) “Gentlemanly Conversation” or Vigorous Contestation? An Exploratory Analysis of Communication Modes in a Transnational Deliberative Poll (Europolis). In: GrönlundKBächtigerASetäläM (eds) Deliberative Mini-Publics: Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp.115–134.
5.
BakshyEMessingSAdamicLA (2015) Exposure to Ideologically Diverse News and Opinion on Facebook. Science348 (6239): 1130–1132.
6.
BarberáPJostJTNaglerJ, et al. (2015) Tweeting From Left to Right: Is Online Political Communication More Than an Echo Chamber?Psychological Science26 (10): 1531–1542.
7.
BennettWLIyengarS (2008) A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication. Journal of Communication58 (4): 707–731.
8.
BlackLWWiederholdA (2014) Discursive Strategies of Civil Disagreement in Public Dialogue Groups. Journal of Applied Communication Research42 (3): 285–306.
9.
ChambersS (2009) Rhetoric and the Public Sphere: Has Deliberative Democracy Abandoned Mass Democracy?Political Theory37 (3): 323–350.
10.
ChambersS (2012) Deliberation and Mass Democracy. In: ParkinsonJMansbridgeJ (eds) Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.52–72.
11.
ChambersS (2017) Balancing Epistemic Quality and Equal Participation in a System Approach to Deliberative Democracy. Social Epistemology31 (3): 266–276.
12.
CuratoNHammondMMinJB (2019) Power in Deliberative Democracy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
DryzekJ (2016) Symposium Commentary: Reflections on the Theory of Deliberative Systems. Critical Policy Studies10 (2): 209–215.
14.
DryzekJHendriksC (2012) Fostering Deliberation in the Forum and Beyond. In: FischerFGottweisH (eds) The Argumentative Turn Revisited: Public Policy as Communicative Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp.31–57.
15.
ElsterJ (1998) Deliberation and Constitution Making. In: ElsterJ (ed.) Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.97–122.
16.
ErcanSAHendriksCMBoswellJ (2017) Studying Public Deliberation after the Systemic Turn: The Crucial Role for Interpretive Research. Policy & Politics45 (2): 195–212.
17.
EsauKFriessDEildersC (2017) Design Matters! An Empirical Analysis of Online Deliberation on Different News Platforms. Policy & Internet9 (3): 321–342.
18.
EsterlingKMFungALeeT (2015) How Much Disagreement Is Good for Democratic Deliberation?Political Communication32 (4): 529–551.
19.
FoxJHoltLF (2018) Fear of Isolation and Perceived Affordances: The Spiral of Silence on Social Networking Sites Regarding Police Discrimination. Mass Communication and Society21 (5): 533–554.
20.
GarrettRK (2009) Echo Chambers Online? Politically Motivated Selective Exposure among Internet News Users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication14 (2): 265–285.
21.
GarrettRKCarnahanDLynchEK (2013) A Turn toward Avoidance? Selective Exposure to Online Political Information, 2004–2008. Political Behavior35 (1): 113–134.
22.
GastilJ (2018) The Lessons and Limitations of Experiments in Democratic Deliberation. Annual Review of Law and Social Science14 (1): 271–291.
23.
GastilJBlackLMoscovitzK (2008) Ideology, Attitude Change, and Deliberation in Small Face-to-Face Groups. Political Communication25 (1): 23–46.
24.
GearhartSZhangW (2014) Gay Bullying and Online Opinion Expression: Testing Spiral of Silence in the Social Media Environment. Social Science Computer Review32 (1): 18–36.
25.
GrahamTWrightS (2014) Discursive Equality and Everyday Talk Online: The Impact of “Superparticipants.”Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication19: 625–642.
26.
GutmannAThompsonD (1996) Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
HabermasJ (1987) The Theory of Communicative Action: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
28.
HabermasJ (1996) Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge: MIT Press.
29.
HabermasJ (2009) Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research. In: HabermasH (ed.) Europe: The Faltering Project. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp.138–183.
30.
HalpernDGibbsJ (2013) Social Media as a Catalyst for Online Deliberation? Exploring the Affordances of Facebook and YouTube for Political Expression. Computers in Human Behavior29 (3): 1159–1168.
31.
HongYRojasH (2016) Agreeing Not to Disagree: Iterative versus Episodic Forms of Political Participatory Behaviors. International Journal of Communication10: 1743–1763.
32.
HuckfeldtRJohnsonPSpragueJ (2004) Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33.
KimY (2011) The Contribution of Social Network Sites to Exposure to Political Difference: The Relationships among SNSs, Online Political Messaging, and Exposure to Cross-Cutting Perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior27 (2): 971–977.
34.
KlapperJT (1960) The Effects of Mass Communication. Oxford: Free Press of Glencoe.
35.
KlofstadCASokheyAEMcClurgSD (2012) Disagreeing about Disagreement: How Conflict in Social Networks Affects Political Behavior. American Journal of Political Science57 (1): 120–134.
36.
Knobloch-WesterwickSKleinmanSB (2012) Preelection Selective Exposure: Confirmation Bias versus Informational Utility. Communication Research39 (2): 170–193.
37.
KockC (2012) A Tool for Rhetorical Citizenship: Generalizing the Status System In: Kock C and Villadsen L (eds)Rhetorical Citizenship and Public Deliberation. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, pp.279–295.
38.
KrippendorffK (2004) Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
LadenAS (2012) Reasoning: A Social Picture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
LandemoreHPageSE (2015) Deliberation and Disagreement: Problem Solving, Prediction, and Positive Dissensus. Politics, Philosophy & Economics14 (3): 229–254.
41.
LeeHKwakNCampbellSW (2015) Hearing the Other Side Revisited: The Joint Workings of Cross-Cutting Discussion and Strong Tie Homogeneity in Facilitating Deliberative and Participatory Democracy. Communication Research42: 569–596.
42.
LimonMABosterFJ (2001) The Impact of Varying Argument Quality and Minority Size on Influencing the Majority and Perceptions of the Minority. Communication Quarterly49 (4): 350–365.
43.
MaiaRCM (2012) From Public Sphere to Deliberative System: Locating the Place of the Media. In: MaiaRCM (ed.) Deliberation, the Media and Political Talk. New York: Hampton Press, pp.59–76.
44.
MaiaRCM (2014) Recognition and the Media. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
45.
MaiaRCM (2017a) Deliberative Media. In: BächtigerADryzekJSMansbridgeJ, et al. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.348–364.
46.
MaiaRCM (2017b) Politicisation, New Media and Everyday Deliberation. In: HayCFlindersMFawcettP, et al. (eds) Anti-Politics, Depoliticization, and Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.68–90.
47.
MaiaRCMRezendeTAS (2016) Respect and Disrespect in Deliberation across the Networked Media Environment: Examining Multiple Paths of Political Talk. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication21 (2): 121–139.
48.
MaiaRCMHauberGRossiniPCG, et al. (2015) Can the Deliberative System Break Up Pre-deliberative Consensus? Examining Discussions within Forums and across Wider Publics. Paper Presented at the III International Colloquium: The Deliberative System and Interconnected Media, The Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 4–6November.
49.
MansbridgeJBohmanJChambersS, et al. (2012) A Systemic Approach to Deliberative Democracy. In: ParkinsonJMansbridgeJ (eds) Deliberative Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.1–26.
50.
MansbridgeJFishkinJ (2017) Introduction: The Prospects and Limits of Deliberative Democracy. Daedalus146 (3): 6–13.
51.
Masullo ChenGLuS (2017) Online Political Discourse: Exploring Differences in Effects of Civil and Uncivil Disagreement in News Website Comments. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media61 (1): 108–125.
52.
MendonçaRFAmaralEF (2016) Racionalidade Online: provimento de razões em discussões virtuais. Opinião Pública22 (2): 418–445.
53.
MoscoviciSLageE (1976) Studies in Social Influence III: Majority versus Minority Influence in a Group. European Journal of Social Psychology6: 149–174.
54.
MutzD (2002) The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation. American Journal of Political Science46: 838–855.
55.
MutzD (2006) Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56.
NebloM (2015) Deliberative Democracy between Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57.
NelsonJLWebsterJG (2017) The Myth of Partisan Selective Exposure: A Portrait of the Online Political News Audience. Social Media + Society33 (3): 1–13.
58.
NikolovDOliveiraDFMFlamminiA, et al. (2015) Measuring Online Social Bubbles. PeerJ Computer Science1: e38.
59.
PariserE (2011) The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. London: Penguin Press.
60.
ParkinsonJ (2018) Deliberative Systems. In: BächtigerADryzekJSMansbridgeJ, et al. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.432–446.
61.
PavittC (2014) An Interactive Input-Process-Output Model of Social Influence in Decision-Making Groups. Small Group Research45 (6): 704–730.
62.
PavittCAloiaL (2009) Factors Affecting the Relative Proportion of Reason and Preference Statements during Problem-Solving Group Discussion. Communication Research Reports26 (4): 259–270.
63.
RisseT (2000) “Let’s Argue!” Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization54 (1): 1–39.
64.
RoweI (2015) Deliberation 2.0: Comparing the Deliberative Quality of Online News User Comments across Platforms. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media59 (4): 539–555.
65.
Schulz-HardtSBrodbeckFCMojzischA, et al. (2006) Group Decision Making in Hidden Profile Situations: Dissent as a Facilitator for Decision Quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology91 (6): 1080–1093.
66.
Schulz-HardtSFreyDLüthgensC, et al. (2000) Biased Information Search in Group Decision Making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology78 (4): 655–669.
67.
SmithAF (2011) The Deliberative Impulse: Motivating Discourse in Divided Societies, Kindle edn. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
68.
SteinerJ (2012) The Foundations of Deliberative Democracy: Empirical Research and Normative Implications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69.
SteinerJBächtingerASpörndliM, et al. (2004) Deliberative Politics in Action: Analyzing Parliamentary Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70.
SteinerJJaramilloMCMaiaRCM, et al. (2017) Deliberation across Deep Divisions: Transformative Moments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71.
StrandbergKBergJ (2015) Stretching the Boundaries of On-line Deliberation: An Experimental Study Evaluating the Impact of Temporality and Identifiability on Discussion Quality in On-line Deliberations. Javnost—The Public22 (2): 164–180.
72.
StrandbergKGrönlundK (2014) Online Deliberation: Theory and Practice in Virtual Mini-Publics. In: GrönlundKBächtigerASetäläM (eds) Deliberative Mini-Publics: Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp.93–14.
73.
StrandbergKGrönlundK (2018) Online Deliberation. In: BächtigerADryzekJSMansbridgeJ, et al. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.365–377.
74.
StricklerR (2018) Deliberate with the Enemy? Polarization, Social Identity, and Attitudes toward Disagreement. Political Research Quarterly71 (1): 3–18.
75.
Stromer-GalleyJ (2007) Measuring Deliberation’s Content: A Coding Scheme. Journal of Public Deliberation3 (1): 12.
76.
Stromer-GalleyJMuhlbergerP (2009) Agreement and Disagreement in Group Deliberation: Effects on Deliberation Satisfaction, Future Engagement, and Decision Legitimacy. Political Communication26 (2): 173–192.
77.
Stromer-GalleyJBryantLBimberB (2015) Context and Medium Matter: Expressing Disagreements Online and Face-to-Face in Political Deliberations. Journal of Public Deliberation11 (1): 1.
78.
SunsteinCR (2007) Republic.com 2.0. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press.
79.
SunsteinCR (2017) #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
80.
TanejaHWebsterJG (2016) How Do Global Audiences Take Shape? The Role of Institutions and Culture in Patterns of Web Use. Journal of Communication66 (1): 161–182.
81.
ThompsonD (2008) Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science. Annual Review of Political Science11: 497–520.
82.
VenablesWNRipleyBD (2002) Modern Applied Statistics with S. New York: Springer.
83.
WarrenME (2006) Democracy and Deceit: Regulating Appearances of Corruption. American Journal of Political Science50 (1): 160–174.
84.
WeeksBEKsiążekTBHolbertL (2016) Partisan Enclaves or Shared Media Experiences? A Network Approach to Understanding Citizens’ Political News Environments. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media60 (2): 248–268.
85.
WojcieszakM (2010) “Don’t Talk to Me”: Effects of Ideologically Homogeneous Online Groups and Politically Dissimilar Offline Ties on Extremism. New Media & Society12 (4): 637–655.
86.
WojcieszakMMutzD (2009) Online Groups and Political Discourse: Do Online Discussion Spaces Facilitate Exposure to Political Disagreement?Journal of Communication59 (1): 40–56.
87.
WojcieszakMPriceV (2010) Bridging the Divide or Intensifying the Conflict? How Disagreement Affects Strong Predilections about Sexual Minorities. Political Psychology31 (3): 315–339.
88.
WojcieszakMPriceV (2012) Perceived versus Actual Disagreement: Which Influences Deliberative Experiences?Journal of Communication62: 418–436.
89.
YoungI (2002) Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
