Using the unique circumstances of the 2004 Illinois U.S. Senate election, we report findings from survey data from a probability sample of White voters conducted in Illinois during the course of the 2004 election. In an experimental manipulation embedded in the survey, we tested four distinctive framings of Barack Obama by systematically altering the degree and content of his racialization as a Black man, and observing the effect of these treatments on evaluations of Obama. We hypothesize that more strongly racialized framings that highlight Obama’s identity and connection with African Americans would push White voters toward more unfavorable evaluations of the candidate in comparison with deracialized framings. In addition, we argue that party identification has an important moderating influence on the relationship between the racialized treatment and respondents’ evaluations of Obama.
Abramowitz, A.I. ( 1980). A comparison of voting for U.S. senator and representative in 1978. American Political Science Review, 74, 633-640.
2.
Bartels, L. ( 2007). Homer gets a warm hug: A note on ignorance and extenuation . Perspectives on Politics, 5, 785-790.
3.
Berinsky, A.J. ( 2002). Political context and the survey response: The dynamics of racial policy opinion. Journal of Politics, 64, 567-584.
4.
Citrin, J., Green, D.P., & Sears, D.O. ( 1990). White reactions to Black candidates: When does race matter ? Public Opinion Quarterly, 54, 74-96.
5.
Colleau, S.M., Glynn, K., Lybrand, S., Merelman, R.M., Mohan, P., & Wall, J.E. ( 1990). Symbolic racism in candidate evaluation: An experiment . Political Behavior, 12, 385-402.
6.
Funk, C.L. ( 1999). Bringing the candidate into models of candidate evaluation . Journal of Politics, 61, 700-720.
7.
Gilens, M. ( 1996). "Race Coding" and White opposition to welfare. American Political Science Review, 90, 593-604.
8.
Hajnal, Z. ( 2006). Changing White attitudes towards Black political leadership . New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Harris-Lacewell, M., & Junn, J. ( 2007). Old friends and new alliances: How the 2004 Illinois senate race complicates the study of race and religion. Journal of Black Studies, 38, 30-50.
10.
Huber, G.A., & Lapinski, J. ( 2006). The "Race Card" revisited: Assessing racial priming in policy contests. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 375-401.
11.
Huber, G.A., & Lapinski, J. ( 2008). Testing the implicit-explicit model of racialized political communication. Perspectives on Politics, 6, 125-134.
12.
Kinder, D.R. ( 1983). Presidential traits: Pilot study report to the 1984 NES Planning Committee and NES Board. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies.
13.
Lodge, M., McGraw, K.M., & Stroh, P. ( 1989). An impression-driven model of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 83, 399-419.
14.
Lodge, M., Steenbergen, M.R., & Brau, S. ( 1995). The responsive voter: Campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review , 89, 309-326.
15.
Lodge, M., Stroh, P., & Wahlke, J. ( 1990). Black-box models of candidate evaluation. Political Behavior, 12, 5-18.
16.
Lupia, A., Levine, A.S., Menning, J.O., & Sin, G. ( 2007). Were Bush tax cut supporters "simply ignorant"? A second look at Conservatives and Liberals in "Homer Gets a Tax Cut." Perspectives on Politics, 5, 773-784.
17.
McDermott, M.L. ( 1998). Race and gender cues in low-information elections. Political Research Quarterly, 51, 895-918.
18.
Mendelberg, T. ( 1997). Executing Hortons: Racial crime in the 1988 presidential campaign. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 134-157.
19.
Mendelberg, T. ( 2001). The race card: Campaign strategy, implicit messages, and the norm of equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
Mendelberg, T. ( 2008). Racial priming revived. Perspectives on Politics, 6, 109-123.
21.
Miller, A.H. ( 1990). Public judgments of Senate and House candidates. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 15, 525-542.
22.
Peffley, M., Hurwitz, J., & Sniderman, P.M. (1997). Racial stereotypes and Whites’ political views of Blacks in the context of welfare and crime . American Journal of Political Science, 41, 30-60.
23.
Reeves, K. ( 1997). Voting hopes or fears? White voters, Black candidates, and racial politics in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
Sigelman, C.K., Sigelman, L., Walkosz, B.J., & Nitz, M. ( 1995). Black candidates, White voters: Understanding racial bias in political perceptions. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 243-265.
25.
Sigelman, L., & Sigelman, C.K. (1982). Sexism, racism, and ageism in voting behavior: An experimental analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 263-269.
26.
Terkildsen, N. ( 1993). When White voters evaluate Black candidates: The processing implications of candidate skin color, prejudice, and self-monitoring. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 1032-1053.
27.
Valentino, N.A. ( 1999). Crime news and the priming of racial attitudes during evaluations of the president. Public Opinion Quarterly, 63, 293-320.
28.
Valentino, N.A., Hutchings, V.L., & White, I.K. ( 2002). Cues that matter: How political ads prime racial attitudes during campaigns. American Political Science Review, 96, 75-90.
29.
Weisberg, H.F., & Rusk, J.G. ( 1970). Dimensions of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 64, 1167-1185.
30.
White, I. ( 2007). When race matters and when it doesn’t: Racial group differences in response to racial cues. American Political Science Review, 101, 339-351.
