Individuals who discuss politics and current events in their social network also participate in civic activities. However, analytical biases make it difficult to show a causal relationship between these two phenomena. To obtain a more accurate measurement of the effect that civic talk has on civic participation, data were collected through a panel study conducted on students who were randomly assigned to their college dormitory roommates. These data show that engaging in civic talk causes civic participation. The evidence also shows that the civic talk effect is mitigated for individuals who are not already predisposed to participate in civic activities.
Achen, C. ( 1986). The statistical analysis of quasi-experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press.
2.
Barabas, J. ( 2004). How deliberation affects policy opinions. American Political Science Review, 98, 687-701.
3.
Barker, D.C. ( 1998). Rush to action: Political talk radio and health care (un)reform. Political Communication, 15, 83-97.
4.
Beck, P.A. ( 1977). The role of agents in political socialization. In S. A. Renshon (Ed.), The handbook of political socialization (pp. 115-141). New York: Free Press.
5.
Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., Miller, W.E., & Stokes, D.E. ( 1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.
6.
Campbell, D.E., & Wolbrecht, C. ( 2006). See Jane run: Women politicians as role models for adolescents . Journal of Politics, 68, 233-247.
7.
Dawes, R.M., van de Kragt, A.J.C., & Orbell, J.M. ( 1990). Cooperation for the benefit of us-not me, or my conscience . In J. Mansbridge (Ed.), Beyond self-interest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Dawson, R.E., Prewitt, K., & Dawson, K.S. ( 1977). Political socialization. Boston: Little Brown.
9.
Delli Carpini, M.X., Cook, F.L., & Jacobs, L.R. ( 2004). Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 315-344.
10.
Downs, A. ( 1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
11.
Dunning, T. ( 2008). Improving causal inference: Strengths and limitations of natural experiments. Political Research Quarterly, 61, 282-293.
12.
Eckstein, H. ( 1975). Case studies and theory in political science. In F. I. Greenstein & N. W. Polsby (Eds.), Handbook of political science, scope and theory. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
13.
Eliasoph, N. ( 1998). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Fowler, J. ( 2006). Habitual voting and behavioral turnout. Journal of Politics, 68, 335-344.
15.
Gerber, A., & Green, D. ( 2000). The effects of personal canvassing, telephone calls, and direct mail on voter turnout: A field experiment. American Political Science Review, 94, 641-652.
16.
Gerber, A., Green, D., & Shachar, R. ( 2003). Voting may be habit-forming: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 540-550.
17.
Gerring, J. ( 2001). Social science methodology: A criterial framework. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Gu, X., & Rosenbaum, P. ( 1993). Comparison of multivariate matching methods: Structures, distances, and algorithms. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 2, 405-420.
19.
Hansen, B.B. ( 2004). Full matching in an observational study of coaching for the SAT. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 99, 609-618.
20.
Harris-Lacewell, M.V. ( 2004). Barbershops, bibles, and BET: Everyday talk and Black political thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
Hibbing, J.R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (1995). Congress as public enemy: Public attitudes toward American political institutions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Ho, D.E., Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E.A. ( 2007a). Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Analysis, 15, 199-236.
23.
Ho, D.E., Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E.A. ( 2007b). Matchit: Nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. Retrieved February, 11, 2009, from http://gking.harvard.edu/matchit
24.
Honaker, J., King, G., & Blackwell, M. ( 2007). Amelia II: A program for missing data. Retrieved February, 11, 2009, from http://gking.harvard.edu/amelia
25.
Huckfeldt, R., Beck, P.A., Dalton, R.J., & Levine, J. ( 1995). Political environments, cohesive social groups, and the communication of public opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 1025-1054.
26.
Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. ( 1985). Presidential election campaign study, 1984: South Bend, Indiana [Computer file]. ICPSR version. Indiana University, Center for Survey Research [Producer]. Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research [Distributor].
27.
Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. ( 1991). Discussant effects on vote choice: Intimacy, structure, and interdependence. Journal of Politics, 53, 122-158.
28.
Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. ( 1995). Citizens, politics, and social communication: Information and influence in an election campaign. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Imai, K., King, G., & Lau, O. ( 2007). Zelig: Everyone’s statistical software. Retrieved February, 11, 2009, from http://gking.harvard.edu/zelig
30.
Imai, K., King, G., & Lau, O. ( 2008). Toward a common framework for statistical analysis and development. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics , 17, 892-913.
31.
Johnson, P.E., & Huckfeldt, R. ( 2004). Agent-based explanations for the survival of disagreement in social networks. In Zuckerman, A. S. (Ed.), The social logic of politics: Personal networks as contexts for political behavior. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
32.
Kenny, C. ( 1992). Political participation and effects for the social environment . American Journal of Political Science, 36, 259-267.
33.
Kenny, C. ( 1994). The microenvironment of attitude change. Journal of Politics, 56, 715-728.
34.
King, G., Honaker, J., Joseph, A., & Scheve, K. ( 2001). Analyzing incomplete political science data: An alternative algorithm for multiple imputation. American Political Science Review, 95, 49-69.
35.
Klofstad, C.A. ( 2007). Talk leads to recruitment: How discussions about politics and current events increase civic participation. Political Research Quarterly, 60, 180-191.
36.
Lake, R.L., & Huckfeldt, R. ( 1998). Social capital, social networks, and political participation . Political Psychology, 19, 567-583.
37.
Laver, M. ( 2005). Book review of "The Social Logic of Politics." Perspectives on Politics, 3, 933-934.
38.
Lazarsfeld, P.F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. ( 1968). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential election. New York: Columbia University Press.
39.
McClurg, S.D. ( 2003). Social networks and political participation: The role of social interaction in explaining political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 449-464.
40.
McClurg, S.D. ( 2004). Indirect mobilization: The social consequences of party contacts in an election campaign. American Politics Research , 32, 406-443.
41.
McDonald, M., & Popkin, S. ( 2001). The myth of the vanishing voter. American Political Science Review, 95, 963-974.
42.
McIntosh, H., Hart, D., & Youniss, J. ( 2007). The influence of family political discussion on youth civic development: Which parent qualities matter? PS: Political Science & Politics, July, 495-499.
43.
Mendelberg, T. ( 2002). The deliberative citizen: Theory and evidence. In M. X. Delli Carpini, L. Huddy, & R. Shapiro (Eds.), Political decision making, deliberation, and participation. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
44.
Mutz, D.C. ( 2002). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 838-855.
45.
Nickerson, D.W. ( 2008). Is voting contagious? Evidence from two field experiments . American Political Science Review, 102, 49-57.
46.
Olson, M. ( 1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
Page, B., & Shapiro, R. ( 1992). The rational public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48.
Plutzer, E. ( 2002). Becoming a habitual voter: Inertia, resources, and growth in young adult-hood. American Political Science Review, 96, 41-56.
49.
Putnam, R. ( 1994). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50.
Putnam, R. ( 2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community . New York: Simon & Schuster .
51.
Rosenbaum, P. ( 1991). A characterization of optimal designs for observational studies. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 53, 597-610.
52.
Sally, D. ( 1995). Conversation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis of experiments from 1958 to 1992. Rationality and Society , 7, 58-92.
53.
Silbiger, S.L. ( 1977). Peers and political socialization. In S. A. Renshon (Ed.), The handbook of political socialization (pp. 172-189). New York: Free Press.
54.
Stimson, J.A. ( 1990). A macro theory of information flow. In J. Kuklinski & J. Ferejohn (Eds.), Information and democratic processes. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
55.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K.L., & Brady, H.E. ( 1995). Voice and equality. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
56.
Walsh, K.C. ( 2004). Talking about politics: Informal groups and social identity in American life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. ( 1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
58.
Zaller, J. ( 1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
