Regions of limited state presence persist in weak states, but does unevenness persist even in so-called ‘strong’ states? An underlying assumption behind weak states is that they lack capacity to broadcast power evenly over the entirety of their territory. Yet all states have finite resources, thus it is not clear that uneven state presence should be restricted to weak states. I develop a formal model that explores when strong states might strategically retain regions of limited state presence or subcontract state functions to non-state actors. The model demonstrates subnational characteristics that render the broadcasting of power by the state to be suboptimal, creating incentives for even strong states to retain regions of limited state presence.
GibelmanMGelmanSR (2001) Very public scandals: Nongovernmental organizations in trouble. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations12(1): 49–66.
9.
GibsonEL (2005) Boundary control: Subnational authoritarianism in democratic countries. World Politics58(1): 101–132.
10.
HerbstJ (2000) States and Power in Africa: Comparative Lessons in Authority and Control. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
11.
HönkeJThauerCR (2014) Multinational corporations and service provision in sub-Saharan Africa: Legitimacy and institutionalization matter. Governance27(4): 697–716.
12.
LallSTimminsCYuS (2009) Connecting lagging and leading regions: The role of labor mobility. Policy Research Working Paper 4843, World Bank, USA, February.
13.
LeeMM (2015) Mind the gap? The international sources of sovereignty and state weakness. PhD Thesis, Stanford University, USA.
14.
LeeMMWalter-DropGWieselJ (2014) Taking the state (back) out? Statehood and the delivery of collective goods. Governance27(4): 635–654.
15.
LeviM (1989) Of Rule and Revenue. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
16.
MampillyZC (2011) Rebel Rulers: Insurgent Governance and Civilian Life During War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
17.
MannM (1984) The autonomous power of the state: Its origins, mechanisms and results. European Journal of Sociology25(2): 185–213.
18.
NorthDC (1981) Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: Norton.
19.
O’DonnellG (1993) On the state, democratization and some conceptual problems: A Latin American view with glances at some postcommunist countries. World Development21(8): 1355–1369.
20.
RisseT (2011) Governance in areas of limited statehood: Introduction and overview. In: RisseT (ed) Governance Without a State. New York: Columbia University Press.
21.
RobinsonJATorvikR (2005) White elephants. Journal of Public Economics89(2): 197–210.
22.
SoiferHD (2012) Midiendo la capacidad estatal en la América Latina contemporánea. Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago)32(3): 585–598.
23.
SteinbergJ (2016) Strategic sovereignty: A model of non-state goods provision and resistance in regions of natural resource extraction. Journal of Conflict Resolution60(8): 1503–1528.
24.
TarrowSGKatzensteinPJGrazianoL (1978) Territorial Politics in Industrial Nations. New York: Praeger Publishers.
