Do interest groups strategically select lobbying tactics in response to the legislative context of policies they wish to influence? As rational actors, interest groups should be keen to spend their resources wisely by responding strategically to legislative contexts. This research suggests a theoretical and empirical framework and attempts to explain variations in interest group behavior at the policy level. The empirical design associates direct and indirect interest group lobbying activities with specific policies and tests the hypothesis that interest groups use legislative context as a part of their decision calculus when considering how to lobby Congress. I find that measures of legislative context are important components of models of direct and indirect lobbying.
Ainsworth, S. (1993). Regulating lobbyists and interest group influence . Journal of Politics, 55, 41-56.
2.
Bacheller, J.M. (1977). Lobbyists and the legislative process: The impact of environmental constraints. American Political Science Review , 71, 252-263.
3.
Baumgartner, F.R., & Leech, B.L. (1998). Basic interests: The importance of groups in politics and in political science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
Berry, J.M. (1997). The interest group society (3rd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.
5.
Caldeira, G.A., & Wright, J.R. (1998). Lobbying for justice: Organized interests, Supreme Court nominations, and United States Senate. American Journal of Political Science, 82, 1109-1127.
6.
Cox, G., & McCubbins, M.D. (1993). Legislative leviathan: Party government in the house. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
Dillman, D. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys. New York: John Wiley.
8.
Evans, D. (1991). Lobbying the committee: Interest groups and the house public works and transportation committee. In A. J. Cigler & B. A. Loomis (Eds.), Interest group politics (3rd ed., pp. 257-276). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
9.
Evans, D. (1996). Before the roll call: Interest group lobbying and public policy outcomes in house committees. Political Research Quarterly, 49, 287-304.
10.
Gais, T.L., & Walker, J.L., Jr. (1991). Pathways to influence in American politics. In J. L. Walker, Jr. (Ed.), Mobilizing interest groups in America (pp. 103-121). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
11.
Gujarati, D.N. (1995). Basic econometrics. New York : McGraw-Hill.
12.
Hall, R.L., & Wayman, F.W. (1990). Buying time: Moneyed interests and the mobilization of bias in congressional committees. American Political Science Review, 84, 797-820.
13.
Hansen, J.M. (1991). Gaining access: Congress and the farm lobby, 1919-1981 . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
Hojnacki, M., & Kimball, D.C. (1998). Organized interests and the decision of whom to lobby in Congress. American Political Science Review, 92, 775-790.
15.
Hojnacki, M., & Kimball, D.C. (1999). The who and how of organizations' lobbying strategies in committee. Journal of Politics, 61, 999-1024.
16.
Hula, K.W. (1995). Rounding up the usual suspects: Forging interest group coalitions in Washington. In A. J. Cigler & B. A. Loomis (Eds.), Interest group politics (4th ed., pp. 239-258). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
17.
King, G., Tomz, M., & Wittenberg, J. (2000). Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 347-361.
18.
Kingdon, J.W. (1989). Congressmen's voting decisions (3rd ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
19.
Kollman, K. (1998). Outside lobbying: Public opinion and interest group strategies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
Milbrath, L.W. (1963). The Washington lobbyists. Chicago: Rand McNally.
21.
Rohde, D.W. (1991). Parties and leaders in the postreform house. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
Schattschneider, E.E. (1975). The semisovereign people. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
23.
Schlozman, K.L., & Tierney, J.T. (1986). Organized interests and American democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
24.
Sinclair, B. (2000). Unorthodox lawmaking: New legislative processes in the US Congress (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
25.
Tomz, M., Wittenberg, J., & King, G. (2001). CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results (Version 2.0). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. Retrieved June 1, 2006, from http://gking.harvard.edu
26.
Weisberg, H.F., Krosnick, J.A., & Bowen, B.D. (1996). An introduction to survey research, polling, and data analysis (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
Wright, J.R. (1996). Interest groups & Congress: Lobbying, contributions, and influence. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
