Although much research has been done on advertising in American political campaigns, virtually all has focused on the use of television. The dearth of work on radio advertising limits our ability to fully understand American electoral dynamics. More campaigns use radio than television, and there is reason to suspect that the narrowcasting that is possible with highly targeted radio ads may be substantively different from the campaign messages that are broadcast over the television airwaves. In this article, we use data from a survey of registered voters in Arkansas and Missouri during the 2002 election season to explore the dynamics of political advertising on the radio. We focus in particular on factors that influence exposure to radio ads, the public’s perceptions of the importance of these ads, and the impacts of exposure on the public’s perceptions of the quality of the democratic process in the United States.
Ansolabehere, S., Iyengar, S., & Simon, A. (1995). Evolving perspective on the effects of campaign communication. In P. C. Washburn (Ed.), Research in political sociology: Volume 7, mass media and politics (pp. 13-31). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
2.
Ansolabehere, S., Iyengar, S., & Simon, A. (1999). Replicating experiments using aggregate and survey data: The case of negative advertising and turnout. American Political Science Review, 93, 901-909.
3.
Ansolabehere, S., Iyengar, S., Simon, A., & Valentino, N. (1994). Does attack advertising demobilize the electorate?American Political Science Review, 88, 829-838.
4.
Barker, D. (1998). Rush to action: political talk radio and health care (un)reform. Political Communication, 15, 83-97.
5.
Barker, D. (1999). Rushed decisions: Political talk radio and vote choice, 1994-1996. Journal of Politics, 61, 527-539.
6.
Barker, D., & Knight, K. (2000). Political talk radio and public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 149-170.
7.
Barth, J., & Parry, J. (2003). Provincialism, personalism, and politics: Campaign spending and the 2002 U.S. Senate race in Arkansas. In D. B. Magleby & J. Q. Monson (Eds.), The last hurrah? Soft money and issue advocacy in the 2002 congressional elections (pp. 54-69). Provo, UT: Brigham Young University, Center for the Study of Elections and Democracy.
8.
Cappella, J., Turow, J., & Jamieson, K. H. (1996). Call-in political talk radio: Background, content, audiences, portrayal in mainstream media. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Annenberg Public Policy Center.
9.
Dobrez, T. (1996). Radio: The secret weapon. Campaigns and Elections, 17(8), 39-39.
10.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1975). An attribution analysis of the effect of communication characteristics on opinion change: The case of communicator attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 136-144.
11.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
12.
Fletcher, B. (1999). Radio ads. In D. D. Perlmutter (Ed.), The Manship School guide to political communication (pp. 186-195). Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
13.
Freedman, P., & Goldstein, K. (1999). Measuring media exposure and the effects of negative campaign ads. American Journal of Political Science, 43, 1189-1208.
14.
Geer, J. G., & Geer, J. H. (2003). Remembering attack ads: An experimental investigation of radio. Political Behavior, 25, 69-95.
15.
Hart, R. P., & Shaw, D. (Eds.). (2001). Communication in U.S. elections. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
16.
Herrnson, P. S. (2000). Congressional elections: Campaigning at home and in Washington (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
17.
Herweg, G. W., & Herweg, A. P. (1997). Radio’s niche marketing revolution: Futuresell. Woburn, MA: Focal Press.
18.
Hibbing, J. (2002). How to make Congress popular. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 27, 219-244.
19.
Hibbing, J., & Theiss-Morse, E. (1998). The media’s role in public negativity toward Congress: Distinguishing emotional reactions and cognitive evaluations. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 475-498.
20.
Hibbing, J., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth democracy: Americans’ beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Hofstetter, C. R. (1998). Political talk radio, situation involvement, and political mobilization. Social Science Quarterly, 70, 273-286.
22.
Hofstetter, C. R., Donovan, M., Klauber, M., Cole, A., Huie, C., & Yuasa, T. (1994). Political talk radio: A stereotype reconsidered. Political Research Quarterly, 47, 467-479.
23.
Hollander, B. (1996). Talk radio: Predictors of use and effects on attitudes about government. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 73, 102-113.
24.
Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
Jones, D. A. (1998). Political talk radio: The Limbaugh effect on primary voters. Political Communication, 15, 367-381.
26.
Judis, J. B. (2002, November 11). Soft sell. New Republic, p. 47-47.
27.
Kaid, L. L., & Johnston, A. (2000). Videostyle in presidential campaigns: Style and content of televised political advertising. New York: Praeger.
28.
Katz, E. (1959). Mass communications research and popular culture. Studies in Public Communication, 2, 10-19.
29.
Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of mass communication. In J. G. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communication: Perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 19-32). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
30.
Katz, E., Gurevitch, M., & Haas, H. (1973). On the uses of mass media for important things. American Sociological Review, 38, 164-181.
31.
Klinger, E. (1977). Meaning and void: Inner experience and the incentives in people’s lives. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
32.
Klinger, E. (1978). Modes of normal conscious flow. In K. S. Pope & J. L. Singer (Eds.), The stream of consciousness: Scientific investigations into the flow of human experience (pp. 225-258). New York: Plenum.
33.
Kolbert, E. (1992, October 5). Fueled by words alone, radio ads are nastier. The New York Times, p. A15-A15.
34.
Lau, R. R., & Pomper, G. M. (2002). Effectiveness of negative campaigning in U.S. Senate elections. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 47-66.
35.
Lee, G., & Cappella, J. N. (2001). The effects of political talk radio on political attitude formation: Exposure versus knowledge. Political Communication, 18, 369-394.
36.
Livsey, A. J. (2004, January 15). A further graying of network television. Media Life. Retrieved February 12, 2006, from http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2004/jan04/jan12/4_thurs/news3thursday.html
37.
Magleby, D. B., & Monson, J. Q. (Eds.). (2003). The last hurrah? Soft money and issue advocacy in the 2002 congressional elections. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University, Center for the Study of Elections and Democracy.
38.
McCleneghan, J. S. (1987). Impact of radio ads on New Mexico mayoral races. Journalism Quarterly, 64, 590-593.
39.
McGrath, C. (1998, June). Swimming the channels—Viewer loyalty to particular TV channels at record low. American Demographics.
40.
McQuail, D. (1987). Mass communication theory: An introduction (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
41.
Nelson, M. (2002, October 11). GOP mounts radio effort to entice Black voters in LR. Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, p. 1B-1B.
42.
Newton, K. (1999). Mass media effects: Mobilization or media malaise?British Journal of Political Science, 29, 577-599.
43.
Owen, D. (1997). Talk radio and evaluations of President Clinton. Political Communication, 14, 333-353.
44.
Parmley, P. (2004, October 15). Bush spends heavily on cable ads. Philadelphia Enquirer. Retrieved October 15, 2004, from http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/9922057.htm
45.
Peacock, J. (2002). Radio ad effectiveness lab: Research compendium. Retrieved March 16, 2006, from http://www.radioadlab.org/library/RAEL_Compendium_firstedition.pdf
46.
Pfau, M., Cho, J., & Chong, K. (2001). Communication forms in U.S. presidential campaigns: Influences on candidate perceptions and the democratic process. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 6, 88-105.
47.
Reynolds, C. (2004, February 1). Game over—Television broadcasting. American Demographics.
48.
Schulberg, R. (1989). Radio advertising: The authoritative handbook. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Business Books.
49.
Severin, W. J., & Tankard, J. W. (1997). Communication theories: Origins, methods, and uses in the mass media (4th ed.). New York: Longman.
50.
Shah, D. V., Kwak, N., & Holbert, R. L. (2001). Connecting and “disconnecting” with civic life: Patterns of internet use and the production of social capital. Political Communication, 18, 141-162.
51.
Shapiro, M. A., & Reiger, R. H. (1992). Comparing positive and negative advertising on radio. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 135-145.
52.
Sweitzer, D., & Heller, D. (1996). Radio tips: 10 ways to give your campaign ads more punch. Campaigns and Elections, 17(5), 40-40.
53.
Thurber, J., Nelson, C. J., & Dulio, D. A. (Eds.). (2000). Crowded airwaves: Campaign advertising in elections. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
54.
Uslaner, E. M. (2004). Trust, civic engagement, and the Internet. Political Communication, 21, 223-242.
55.
Viles, P. (1992). Campaign spending rises on radio. Broadcasting, 122(43), 26-26.
56.
Wachtler, J., & Counselman, E. (1981). When increasing liking for a communicator decreases opinion change: An attributional analysis of attractiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 386-395.
57.
Wayne, S. J. (1996). The road to the White House 1996: The politics of Presidential elections. New York: St. Martin’s.
58.
West, D. M. (1993). Air wars: Television advertising in election campaigns, 1952-1992. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
