In 1995, House Republicans adopted a conference rule stating that seniority would no longer be the sole criterion for advancement to a full committee chair. In addition, they adopted a standing rule of the House limiting chairs to three consecutive Congresses at the helm of any given standing committee. This article examines the determinants of advancement to full committee chairs in the aftermath. The research focuses primarily on the large-scale displacement of chairs at the outset of the 107th Congress. We find that with the demise of seniority, a candidate's position relative to the party and funding prowess figure prominently in Republican steering committee decision making.
Abram, M.,& Cooper, J. (1968). The rise of seniority in the House of Representatives. Polity, 1, 52-85.
2.
Adler, E. S. (2002). Why congressional reforms fail: Reelection and the House committee system. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
Aldrich, J. H. (1994). A model of a legislature with two parties and a committee system. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 19, 313-339.
4.
Aldrich, J. H.,& Rohde, D. W. (2001). The logic of conditional party government: Revisiting the electoral connection. In L.C. Dodd & B.I. Oppenheimer (Eds.), Congress reconsidered(pp. 269-292). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
5.
Bailey, H. (2001). Buying leadership: House Republicans and the scramble for committee chairmanships. Money in Politics Alert. Retrieved January 30, 2001, from http://www.opensecrets.org/alerts/v6/alert6_01.asp
6.
Barry, J. M. (1989). The ambition and the power: A true story of Washington. New York: Penguin.
7.
Bettelheim, A. (2001, January 6). Party unity: Votes belie partisan intensity. CQWeekly, p. 56-56.
8.
Binder, S. (1997). Minority rights, majority rule: Partisanship and the development of Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Bolton, A. (2000, December 6). House chairmanship candidates cite funds. The Hill. Retrieved December 11, 2000, from http://www.hillnews.com/jump3.html
10.
Bowman, T. (2000, December 6). House faces free-for-all for committee chairmanships. Baltimore Sun, p. 16A-16A.
11.
Collie, M. P., & Roberts, B. E. (1992). Trading places: Choice and committee chairs in the U.S. Senate, 1950-1986. Journal of Politics, 54, 231-245.
12.
Cox, G. W., & McCubbins, M. D. (1993). Legislative leviathan: Party government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
13.
Crook, S. B., & Hibbing, J. R. (1985). Congressional reform and party discipline: The effects of changes in the seniority system on party loyalty in the U.S. House of Representatives. British Journal of Political Science, 15, 207-206.
14.
Deering, C. J., & Smith, S. S. (1997). Committees in Congress. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
15.
Eilperin, J. (2001a, January 3). GOP's new rules bolster House Banking Committee. Washington Post, p. A4-A4.
16.
Eilperin, J. (2001b, January 5). House GOP revamps panels'leadership. Washington Post, p. A1-A1.
17.
Greene, W. H. (1997). Econometric analysis(3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
Gugliotta, G. (1998, March 23). Term limit prompts House chairmen to hunt newperches. Washington Post, p. A17-A17.
19.
Hasbrouck, P. D. (1927). Party government in the House of Representatives. New York: MacMillan.
20.
Hibbing, J. R. (1991). Congressional careers: Contours of life in the U.S. House of Representatives. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
21.
Hinckley, B. (1971). The seniority system in Congress. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
22.
Loomis, B. A. (1984). Congressional careers and party leadership in the contemporary House of Representatives. American Journal of Political Science, 28, 180-202.
23.
Maltzman, F. (1997). Competing principals: Committees, parties, and the organization of Congress. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
24.
March, J. G.,& Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press.
25.
Morgan, D., & Eilperin, J. (2001, January 12). A House GOP reform boomerangs. Washington Post, p. A1-A1.
26.
Parker, G. R. (1979). The selection of committee leaders in the House of Representatives. American Politics Quarterly, 7, 71-93.
27.
Polsby, N. W., Gallaher, M.,& Rundquist, B. S. (1969). The growth of the seniority system in the U.S. House of Representatives. American Political Science Review, 63, 787-807.
28.
Rohde, D. W. (1991). Parties and leaders in the postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
Rohde, D. W. (1994). Parties and committees in the House: Member motivations, issues, and institutional arrangements. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 19, 341-360.
30.
Shepsle, K. J. (1978). The giant jigsaw puzzle: Democratic committee assignments in the House of Representatives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
Sinclair, B. (1983). Majority party leadership in the U.S. House. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
32.
Stewart, C., III,& Woon, J. (2001). Congressional committee assignments, 103rd to 105th Congresses, 1993-1998: House of Representatives. Retrieved February 5, 2001, from http://web.mit.edu/17.251/www/data_page.html
33.
Wright, F. M. (2000). The caucus reelection requirement and the transformation of House committee chairs, 1959-1994. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25, 469-480.
