In intraparty congressional leadership races, the characteristics of candidates and the nature of their campaigns increase the salience of particular legislator goals and, in doing so, influence legislators' support of particular leadership candidates. Using multinomial logit regression analysis, the authors test this “goal salience” theory to determine what factors predict individual legislators' commitments to candidates in the 2006 House Republican majority leader's race. Notably, among other factors, the level of campaign donations made to Republican House members had a positive and statistically significant relationship with the choice of specific candidates.
Bibby, John, and Roger H. Davidson .1967. On Capitol Hill: Studies in the legislative process. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
2.
Boehner, John.2006. For a majority that matters. January 9. http://johnboehner.house.gov/majoritythatmatters.pdf (accessed March 27, 2006).
3.
Bolton, Alexander.2006. Bass, Flake press the 3 candidates. The Hill, January 18.
4.
Brown, Lynne P., and Robert L. Peabody .1992. Patterns of succession in House Democratic leadership: Foley, Gephardt, and Gray, 1989. In New perspectives on the House of Representatives, 4th ed., ed. Robert L. Peabody and Nelson W. Polsby, 319-72. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
5.
Carsey, Thomas M.2000. Campaign dynamics: The race for governor. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
6.
Cheng, Simon, and J. Scott Long.2007. Testing for IIA in the multinomial logit model. Sociological Methods & Research35 (4): 583-600.
7.
Cillizza, Chris.2006. Backing dark horse Boehner may mean big payoff for a few . Washington Post, February 5.
8.
Currinder, Marian. 2003 . Leadership PAC contribution strategies and House member ambitions . Legislative Studies Quarterly28 (4): 551-77.
9.
Dinan, Stephen.2006. Boehner wins the majority. Washington Times, February 3.
10.
Dow, Jay K., and James W. Endersby .2004. Multinomial probit and multinomial logit: A comparison of choice models for voting research. Electoral Studies23:107-22.
11.
Fagan, Amy.2006. Unlikely GOP allies back Shadegg. Washington Times, January 25.
12.
Fenno, Richard F., Jr.1973. Congressmen in committees. Boston: Little, Brown.
13.
Finkel, Steven E.1993. Reexamining the “minimal effects” model in recent presidential campaigns. Journal of Politics55 (1): 1-21.
14.
Franklin, Charles H.1991. Eschewing obfuscation? Campaigns and the perception of U.S. Senate incumbents. American Political Science Review85 (4): 1193-1214.
15.
Green, Matthew N.2006. McCormack versus Udall: Explaining intraparty challenges to the Speaker of the House. American Politics Research34 (1): 3-21.
16.
Hammond, Susan Webb.1998. Congressional caucuses in national policymaking. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
17.
Harris, Douglas B.2006. Legislative parties and leadership choice: Confrontation or accommodation in the 1989 Gingrich-Madigan whip race. American Politics Research34 (2): 189-222.
18.
Hulse, Carl.2006. In election, a fight to lead the G.O.P. in a crucial year . New York Times, January 30.
19.
Iyengar, Shanto, and Donald R. Kinder .1987. News that matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Jacobson, Gary.2004. Politics of congressional elections. 6th ed. New York: Pearson Longman .
21.
Kaplan, Jonathan E.2006. Blunt claims he has the votes. The Hill, January 14.
22.
Kelly, Sean Q.1995. Generational change and the selection of Senate Democratic leader in the 104th Congress. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Tampa, FL.
23.
Killian, Linda.1998. The freshmen. Boulder, CO: Westview.
24.
King, Larry L.1972. The road to power in Congress. In Education of a congressman: The newsletters of Morris K. Udall, ed. Robert L. Peabody.Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
25.
Loomis, Burdett.1988. The new American politician. New York : Basic Books.
26.
Nelson, Garrison.1977. Partisan patterns of House leadership change, 1789-1977 . American Political Science Review71 (3): 918-39.
27.
O'Connor, Patrick.2006a. Blunt takes initial lead. The Hill , January 11.
28.
———. 2006b. Boehner pulls off victory on second ballot. The Hill, February 2.
29.
———. 2006c. Boehner triumph signals shift in House GOP. The Hill, February 2.
30.
———. 2006d. GOP's new leadership team starts by mending fences. The Hill, February 3.
31.
———. 2006e. Leadership election officially set for Feb. 2. The Hill, January 11.
32.
Oppenheimer, Bruce I., and Robert L. Peabody .1977. How the race for House majority leader was won—by one vote. Washington Monthly, November, pp. 47-56.
33.
Peabody, Robert L.1967. Party leadership change in the United States House of Representatives. American Political Science Review61 (3): 675-93.
34.
———. 1976. Leadership in Congress: Stability, succession, and change . Boston: Little, Brown.
35.
Pearson, Kathryn.2005. Party discipline in the contemporary Congress: Rewarding loyalty in theory and in practice. PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley.
36.
Pershing, Ben.2006a. Full elections no done deal; balloting looms Thursday . Roll Call, February 1.
37.
———. 2006b. House GOP seeks new direction. Roll Call, January 9.
38.
———. 2006c. Leader race goes to wire. Roll Call, February 2. ———. 2006d. Winner's allies stand to benefit. Roll Call, February 6.
39.
Petrocik, John R.1996. Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science40 (3): 825-50.
40.
Polsby, Nelson W.1969. Two strategies of influence: Choosing a majority leader . In New perspectives on the House of Representatives, 2nd ed., ed. Robert L. Peabody and Nelson W. Polsby.Chicago: Rand McNally.
41.
Poole, Keith T., and Howard Rosenthal .1997. Congress: A political-economic history of roll call voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
Riker, William H.1986. The art of political manipulation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
43.
———. 1990. Heresthetic and rhetoric in the spatial model. In Advances in the spatial theory of voting, ed. James M. Enelow and Melvin J. Hinich.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Schickler, Eric.2001. Disjointed pluralism. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
45.
Sellers, Patrick J.1998. Strategy and background in congressional campaigns. American Political Science Review92 (1): 159-71.
46.
Sinclair, Barbara.1995. Legislators, leaders, and lawmaking: The U.S. House of Representatives in the postreform era. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
47.
Taylor, Andrew.2006a. Arizona congressman joins race for House majority leader . Associated Press State & Local Wire, January 13.
48.
———. 2006b. Two jockey for House Republicans' support. Associated Press Online, January 10.
49.
VandeHei, Jim, and Shailagh Murray .2006. Post-Abramoff mood shaped vote for DeLay's successor. Washington Post, February 3.
50.
Weisman, Jonathan.2006a. Corruption scandals cast shadow on GOP leadership race . Washington Post, January 30.
51.
———. 2006b. Shadegg enters GOP contest. Washington Post, January 14.
