In this article, we develop and make available measures of public ideology in 2010 for the 50 American states, 435 congressional districts, and state legislative districts. We do this using the geospatial statistical technique of Bayesian universal kriging, which uses the locations of survey respondents, as well as population covariate values, to predict ideology for simulated citizens in districts across the country. In doing this, we improve on past research that uses the kriging technique for forecasting public opinion by incorporating Alaska and Hawaii, making the important distinction between ZIP codes and ZIP Code Tabulation Areas, and introducing more precise data from the 2010 Census. We show that our estimates of ideology at the state, congressional district, and state legislative district levels appropriately predict the ideology of legislators elected from these districts, serving as an external validity check.
AmosBrianMcDonaldMichael P.WatkinsRussell. 2017. “When Boundaries Collide: Constructing a National Database of Demographic and Voting Statistics.” Public Opinion Quarterly81 (Suppl. 1): 385–400.
AnsolabehereStephen D.SnyderJames M.StewartCharles. 2001. “Candidate Positioning in U.S. House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science45:136–59.
4.
BanerjeeSudiptoCarlinBradley P.GelfandAlan E. 2015. Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Spatial Data. 2nd ed.New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
5.
BerryWilliam D.RingquistEvan J.HansonRichard C. Fording Russell L. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-93.” American Journal of Political Science42:327–48.
6.
BeyerKirsten M. M.SchultzAlan F.RushtonGerard. 2008. “Using ZIP Codes as Geocodes in Cancer Research.” In Geocoding Health Data: The Use of Geographic Codes in Cancer Prevention and Control, Research, and Practice, eds. RushtonGerardArmstrongMarc P.GittlerJosephineGreeneBarry R.PavlikClaire E.West Dale L.Michele M.Zimmerman. New York: CRC Press, 37–68.
7.
CressieNoel A. C.1993. Statistics for Spatial Data. Rev. ed. New York: John Wiley.
8.
DeLeonRichard E.NaffKatherine C. 2004. “Identity Politics and Local Political Culture: Some Comparative Results from the Social Capital Benchmark Survey.” Urban Affairs Review39 (6): 689–719.
9.
DigglePeter J.RibeiroPaulo J.Jr.2007. Model-Based Geostatistics. New York: Springer.
10.
DjupePaul A.SokheyAnand E. 2011. “Interpersonal Networks and Democratic Politics.” PS: Political Science & Politics44 (1): 55–59.
11.
ElazarDaniel J.1966. American Federalism: A View from the States. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
12.
EriksonRobert S.WrightGerald C. 1980. “Policy Representation of Constituency Interests.” Political Behavior2:91–106.
13.
EriksonRobert S.WrightGerald C.McIverJohn P. 1993. Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14.
FischerDavid Hackett. 1989. Albion’s Seed: Four British Folkways in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
GarreauJoel. 1981. The Nine Nations of North America. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
16.
GastilRaymond D.1975. Cultural Regions of the United States. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
17.
GelmanAndrewLittleThomas C. 1997. “Poststratification into Many Categories Using Hierarchical Logistic Regression.” Survey Methodology23:127–35.
18.
GimpelJames G.SchuknechtJason E. 2003. Patchwork Nation: Sectionalism and Political Change in American Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
19.
GrammichCliffordHadawayKirkHousealRichardJonesDale E.KrindatchAlexeiStanleyRichieTaylorRichard H. 2012. 2010 U.S. Religion Census: Religious Congregations & Membership Study. Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies. https://www.amazon.com/2010-U-S-Religion-Census-Congregations/dp/0615623441 (accessed June 1, 2020).
20.
GrubesicTony H.2008. “Zip Codes and Spatial Analysis: Problems and Prospects.” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences42 (2): 129–49.
21.
GrubesicTony H.MatisziwTimothy C. 2006. “On the Use of ZIP Codes and ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs) for the Spatial Analysis of Epidemiological Data.” International Journal of Health Geographics5:58.
22.
HanrettyChrisLauderdaleBenjamin E.VivyanNick. 2018. “Comparing Strategies for Estimating Constituency Opinion from National Survey Samples.” Political Science Research and Methods6 (3): 571–91.
23.
HuckfeldtRobertSpragueJohn T. 1995. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Influence in an Election Campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
JacksonJohn E.1989. “An Errors in Variables Approach to Estimating Models with Small Area Data.” Political Analysis1:157–80.
25.
JacksonJohn E.2008. “Endogeneity and Structural Equation Estimation in Political Science.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, eds. Box-SteffensmeierJanet M.BradyHenry E.CollierDavid. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 404–431.
26.
KernellGeorgia. 2009. “Giving Order to Districts: Estimating Voter Distributions with National Election Returns.” Political Analysis17:215–35.
27.
LaxJeffrey R.PhillipsJustin H. 2009. “How Should We Estimate Opinion in the States?” American Journal of Political Science53:107–21.
28.
LieskeJoel. 1993. “Regional Subcultures of the United States.” Journal of Politics55 (4): 888–913.
29.
McCartyNolan M.PooleKeith T.RosenthalHoward. 1997. Income Redistribution and the Realignment of American Politics. American Enterprise Institute Studies on Understanding Economic Inequality. Washington, DC: AEI Press.
30.
Minnesota Population Center. 2011. National Historic Geographic Information System: Version 2.0. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
31.
MonoganJames E.IIIGillJeff. 2016. “Measuring State and District Ideology with Spatial Realignment.” Political Science Research and Methods4 (1): 97–121.
32.
MonoganJames E.IIIKoniskyDavid M.WoodsNeal D. 2017. “Gone with the Wind: Federalism and the Strategic Location of Air Polluters.” American Journal of Political Science61(2):257–70.
33.
ParkDavid K.GelmanAndrewBafumiJoseph. 2004. “Bayesian Multilevel Estimation with Poststratification: State-Level Estimates from National Polls.” Political Analysis12:375–85.
34.
ParkDavid K.GelmanAndrewBafumiJoseph. 2006. “State-Level Opinions from National Surveys: Poststratification Using Multilevel Logistic Regression.” In Public Opinion in State Politics, ed. CohenJeffrey E. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 209–228.
35.
PoolIthiel de SolaAbelsonRobert P.PopkinSamuel L. 1965. Candidates, Issues, and Strategies. Cambridge: MIT Press.
36.
PooleKeith T.RosenthalHoward. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
PutnamRobert D.1966. “Political Attitudes and the Local Community.” American Political Science Review60(3):640–54.
38.
PutnamRobert D.1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
39.
RavishankerNaliniDeyDipak K. 2002. A First Course in Linear Model Theory. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
40.
SelbPeterMunzertSimon. 2011. “Estimating Constituency Preferences from Sparse Survey Data Using Auxiliary Geographic Information.” Political Analysis19 (4): 455–70.
41.
ShorBorisMcCartyNolan. 2011. “The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures.” American Political Science Review105 (3): 530–51.
42.
SinclairBetsy. 2012. The Social Citizen: Peer Networks and Political Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43.
Tam ChoWendy KGimpelJames G. 2007. “Prospecting for (Campaign) Gold.” American Journal of Political Science51(2):255–68.
44.
TausanovitchChrisWarshawChristopher. 2013. “Measuring Constituent Policy Preferences in Congress, State Legislatures, and Cities.” Journal of Politics75 (2): 330–42.
45.
ToblerWaldo R.1970. “A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region.” Economic Geography46 (2): 234–40.
WeberRonald E.HopkinsAnne H.MezeyMichael L.MungerFrank. 1972. “Computer Simulation of State Electorates.” Public Opinion Quarterly36:549–65.
48.
WeberRonald E.ShafferWilliam R. 1972. “Public Opinion and American State Policy-Making.” Midwest Journal of Political Science16:683–99.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
