I argue that the value of a particular set of committee assignments for a legislator is dependent on that legislator’s policy interests. By this, I mean that “good” assignments will match committee policy jurisdictions with member policy priorities. I develop this concept of committee-agenda matching and present a measure of this match for legislators in 12 state lower chambers. After some brief measure validation, I present a substantive application, demonstrating that this match poses serious consequences for individual legislator’s ability to shepherd their bills through the legislative process.
AdlerE. ScottJohnS. Lapinski. 1997. “Demand-Side Theory and Congressional Committee Composition: A Constituency Characteristics Approach.” American Journal of Political Science41 (3): 895–918.
2.
AdlerE. ScottJohnD. Wilkerson. 2008. “Intended Consequences: Jurisdictional Reform and Issue Control in the House of Representative.” Legislative Studies Quarterly33 (1): 85–112.
3.
AdlerE. ScottWilkersonJohn D.2013. Congress and the Politics of Problem Solving. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
AndersonWilliam D.Box-SteffensmeierJanet M.Sinclair-ChapmanValeria. 2003. “The Keys to Legislative Success in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly28 (3): 357–86.
5.
AnziaSarah F.JackmanMolly C.2012. “Legislative Organization and the Second Face of Power: Evidence from U.S. State Legislatures.” The Journal of Politics75 (1): 210–24.
6.
BarnelloMichelle A.BrattonKathleen A.2007. “Bridging the Gender Gap in Bill Sponsorship.” Legislative Studies Quarterly32:449–74.
7.
BattistaJames C.2006. “Committee Theories and Committee Votes: Internal Committee Behavior in the California Legislature.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly6 (2): 151–73.
8.
BattistaJames C.2009. “Why Information? Choosing Committee Informativeness in U.S. State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly34 (3): 375–97.
9.
BaumgartnerFrank R.JonesBryan D.1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
BickelRobert. 2007. Multilevel Analysis for Applied Research: It’s Just Regression!New York: The Guilford Press.
11.
Box-SteffensmeierJanet M.GrantJ. Tobin. 1999. “All in a Day’s Work: The Financial Rewards of Legislative Effectiveness.” Legislative Studies Quarterly24 (4): 511.
12.
BrattonKathleen A.HaynieKerry L.1999. “Agenda Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender and Race.” The Journal of Politics61 (3): 658–79.
13.
BullockCharles S.1972. “Freshman Committee Assignments and Re-election in the United States House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review66 (3): 996–1007.
14.
BullockCharles S.1976. “Motivations for Congressional Committee Preferences: Freshmen of the 92nd Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly1:201–12.
15.
BullockCharles S.1985. “U.S. Senate Committee Assignments: Preferences, Motivations, and Success.” American Journal of Political Science29 (4): 789–808.
16.
BullockCharles S.SpragueJ.1969. “A Research Note on the Committee Reassignments on Southern Democratic Congressmen.” Journal of Politics31: 493–512.
17.
ChoWendy K. TamFowlerJames H.2010. “Legislative Success in a Small World: Social Network Analysis and the Dynamics of Congressional Legislation.” The Journal of Politics72:124–35.
18.
CoxGary W.McCubbinsMatthew D.1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
19.
CoxGary W.McCubbinsMatthew D.2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
CrombezChristopheGrosecloseTimKrehbielKeith. 2006. “Gatekeeping.” The Journal of Politics68 (2): 322–34.
22.
EvansLawrence. 1991. Leadership in Committee: A Comparative Analysis of Behavior in the U.S. Senate. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
23.
FennoRichard F.1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
24.
FowlerJames H.2006. “Connecting the Congress: A Study of Cosponsorship Networks.” Political Analysis14:456–87.
25.
FrancisWayne L.1962. “Influence and Interaction in a State Legislative Body.” The American Political Science Review56 (4): 953–60.
26.
FrancisWayne L.1985. “Leadership, Party Caucuses, and Committees in U.S. State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly10 (2): 243–57.
27.
FrancisWayne L.1989. The Legislative Committee Game. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
28.
FrantzichStephen. 1979. “Who Makes Our Laws? The Legislative Effectiveness of Members of the U. S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly4 (3): 409–28.
29.
FreemanPatriciaHedlundRonald D.1993. “The Functions of Committee Change in State Legislature.” Political Research Quarterly46 (4): 911–29.
30.
GilliganThomas W.KrehbielKeith. 1990. “Organization of Informative Committees by a Rational Legislature.” American Journal of Political Science34: 531–64.
31.
GertzogIrwin N.1976. “The Routinization of Committee Assignments in the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Journal of Political Science20 (4): 639–712.
32.
GrosecloseTimKingDavid. 2001. “Committee Theories, Reconsidered.” In Congress Reconsidered, eds. DoddLawrence C.OppenheimerBruce I.CQ Press. 191–216.
33.
GrosecloseTimStewartCharles. 1998. “The Value of Committee Seats in the House, 1947-91.” American Journal of Political Science42 (2): 453–74.
HammKeith E.1980. “U.S. State Legislative Committee Decisions: Similar Results in Different Settings.” Legislative Studies Quarterly5:31–54.
36.
HammKeith E.1982. “Consistency between Committee and Floor Voting in U.S. State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly7 (4): 473–90.
37.
HammKeith E.1983. “Patterns of Influence among Committees, Agencies, and Interest Groups.” Legislative Studies Quarterly8 (3): 379–426.
38.
HammKeith E.HedlundRonald D.MartoranoNancy. 2006. “Measuring State Legislative Committee Power: Change and Chamber Differences in the 20th Century.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly6 (1): 88–111.
39.
HarbridgeLaurel. 2015. Is Bipartisanship Dead? Policy Agreement and Agenda-setting in the House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
HaseckeEdward B.MycoffJason D.2007. “Party Loyalty and Legislative Success: Are Loyal Majority Party Members More Successful in the U.S. House of Representatives?” Political Research Quarterly60 (4): 607–17.
41.
HedlundRonald D.1989. “Entering the Committee System: State Committee Assignments.” The Western Political Quarterly42 (4): 597–625.
42.
HedlundRonald D.PattersonSamuel C.1992. “The Electoral Antecedents of State Legislative Committee Assignments.” Legislative Studies Quarterly17 (4): 539–59.
43.
JaydelAlanaTaylorAndrew. 2003. “Are Women Legislators Less Effective? Evidence from the U.S. House in the 103rd-105th Congress.” Political Research Quarterly56 (1).
44.
KingDavid C.1997. Turf Wars: How Congressional Committees Claim Jurisdiction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45.
KirklandJustin H.2011. “The Relational Determinants of Legislative Outcomes: Strong and Weak Ties between Legislators.” The Journal of Politics73:887–98.
46.
KlarnerCarlBerryWilliamCarseyThomasJewellMalcolmNiemiRichardPowellLyndaSnyderJames. 2013. “State Legislative Election Returns (1967-2010).” Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], Ann Arbor. https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/studies/34297?q=34297.
47.
KlingdonJ. W.1984. Agendas, Alternative, and Pulbic Policy. Little Brown.
48.
KousserThad. 2005. Term Limits and the Dismantling of State Legislative Professionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49.
KousserThad. 2006. “The Limited Impact of Term Limits: Contingent Effects on the Complexity and Breadth of Laws.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly6 (4): 410–29.
50.
KrehbielKeith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
51.
MakseTodd. 2014. “Majority Party Change and Committee Jurisdictions in State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly39 (3): 387–405.
52.
MaltzmanForrest. 1997. Competing Principals: Committees, Parties, and the Organziation of Congress. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
53.
MastersNicholas A.1961. “Committee Assignments in the House of Representatives.” The American Political Science Review55 (2): 345–57.
54.
MatthewsDonald R.1960. U.S. Senators and Their World. Random House.
55.
MeyerKatherine. 1980. “Legislative Influence: Toward Theory Development through Causal Analysis.” Legislative Studies Quarterly5 (4): 563–85.
56.
MiquelGerardo P.SnyderJames M. 2006. “Legislative Effectiveness and Legislative Careers.” Legislative Studies Quarterly31: 347–81.
57.
MooreMichael K.ThomasSue. 1991. “Explaining Legislative Success in the U.S. Senate: The Role of the Majority and Minority Parties.” The Western Political Quarterly44 (4): 959–70.
58.
MungerMichael C.1988. “Allocation of Desirable Committee Assignments: Extended Queues versus Committee Expansion.” American Journal of Political Science32 (2): 317–44.
59.
OverbyL. MarvinThomasA. Kazee. 2000. “Outlying Committees in the Statehouse: An Examination of the Prevalence of Committee Outliers in State Legislatures.” The Journal of Politics62 (3): 701–28.
60.
OverbyL. MarvinKazeeThomas A.DavidW. Prince. 2004. “Committee Outliers in State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly29 (1): 81–107.
61.
Rabe-HeskethSophiaSkrondalAnders. 2012. Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata. 3rd ed.Stata Press.
62.
RayBruce A.SmithSteven S.1984. “Committee Size in the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly9:679–95.
63.
RoccaMichael S.GordonStacy B.2010. “The Position-Taking Value of Bill Sponsorship in Congress.” Political Research Quarterly63:387–97.
64.
RohdeDavid W.ShepsleKenneth A.1973. “Democratic Committee Assignments in the House of Representatives: Strategic Aspects of a Social Choice Process.” The American Political Science Review67 (3): 889–905.
65.
ShepsleKenneth. 1978. The Giant Jigsaw Puzzle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
66.
ShepsleKennethWeingastBarry R.1987. “The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power.” The American Political Science Review81: 85–104.
ShorBorisMcCartyNolan. 2011. “The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures.” American Political Science Review105:530–51.
69.
SmithSteven S.DeeringChristopher J.1983. “Changing Motives for Committee Preferences of New Members of the U.S. House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly8 (2): 271–81.
70.
SquirePeverill. 1992. “Challenger Quality and Voting Behavior in US Senate Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly17: 531–47.
71.
SquirePeverill. 2007. “Measuring State Legislative Professionalism: The Squire Index Revisited.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly7: 211–27.
72.
SquirePeverill. 2017. “A Squire Index Update.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly17 (4): 361–71.
73.
StewartCharlesGrosecloseTim. 1999. “The Value of Committee Seats in the United States Senate, 1947-91.” American Journal of Political Science43 (3): 963–73.
74.
SulkinTracy. 2011. The Legislative Legacy of Congressional Committees. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75.
VoldenCraigWisemanAlan E.2014. Legislative Effectiveness in the United States Congress: The Lawmakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
76.
WilsonW.1885. Congressional Government: A Study in American Politics. United States: Houghton Mifflin.
77.
WeingastBarry R.MarshallWilliam. 1988. “The Industrial Organization of Congress: Or, Why Legislatures, like Firms, Are not Organized as Markets.” Journal of Political Economy96:132–63.
78.
WeissertCarol S.1991a. “Determinants and Outcomes of State Legislative Effectiveness.” Social Science Quarterly72 (4): 797–806.
79.
WeissertCarol S.1991b. “Issue Salience and State Legislative Effectiveness.” Legislative Studies Quarterly16 (4): 509–520.
80.
WestefieldLouis P.1974. “Majority Party Leadership and the Committee System in the House of Representatives.” The American Political Science Review68 (4): 1593–604.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
