Why do state legislators vote the way they do? Which influence is predominant: ideology, party, or public opinion? The implementation votes surrounding the Affordable Care Act (ACA) provides a unique setting to examine this question, as they make all three considerations highly salient. State roll call votes on ACA implementation were sometimes polarized and sometimes unexpectedly bipartisan. What accounts for the heterogeneity in individual legislator behavior on bills implementing the ACA at the state level? Using new data on legislator ideology and votes from 2011–2015, I show evidence that legislator ideology was by far the most important predictor of voting on implementation votes, far more so than legislator party or public opinion. Moreover, I show the influence of ideology is heterogeneous by issue area and bill.
AldrichJohn H.Coleman BattistaJames S.2002. “Conditional Party Government in the States.” American Journal of Political Science46 (1): 164–72.
2.
BafumiJosephGelman.Andrew2006. “Fitting Multilevel Models When Predictors and Group Effects Correlate.” Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia. August2006
3.
BarberMichaelMcCartyNolan M.2015. “Causes and Consequences of Polarization.” In Solutions to Political Polarization in America, ed. PersilyNathaniel, 15-58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BarrilleauxCharlesRaineyCarlisle. 2014. “The Politics of Need Examining Governors’ Decisions to Oppose the “Obamacare” Medicaid Expansion.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly14 (4): 437–60.
5.
BindmanAndrew B.SchneiderAndreas G.2011. “Catching a Wave - Implementing Health Care Reform in California.” New England Journal of Medicine364 (16): 1487–89.
6.
ClintonJoshuaJackmanSimonRiversDouglas. 2004. “The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data.” American Political Science Review98:355–70.
7.
CoxGaryMcCubbinsMathew. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the US House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
CoxGary W.McCubbinsMathew. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9.
EriksonRobert S.WrightGerald C.McIverJohn P.1993. Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
EriksonRobert S.WrightGerald C.McIverJohn P.2006. “Public Opinion in the States: A Quarter Century of Change and Stability.” In Public Opinion in State Politics, ed. CohenJeffrey E.Stanford: Stanford University Press, 229–53.
11.
GelmanAndrew. 2005. “Two-Stage Regressiona and Multilevel Modeling: A Commentary.” Political Analysis13:459–61.
12.
GelmanAndrewHillJennifer. 2006. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
GrayVirginiaLoweryDavidFellowesMatthewMcAteeAndrea. 2004. “Public Opinion, Public Policy, and Organized Interests in the American States.” Political Research Quarterly57 (3): 411–20. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=1065-9129 (accessed August 7, 2018).
14.
GreenhillBrianWardMichael D.SacksAudrey. 2011. “The Separation Plot: A New Visual Method for Evaluating the Fit of Binary Models.” American Journal of Political Science55:990–1002.
15.
HaederSimon F.WeimerDavid L. 2015. “You Can’t Make Me Do It, but I Could Be Persuaded: A Federalism Perspective on the Affordable Care Act.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law40:281–323.
16.
HerronMichael C.1999. “Postestimation Uncertainty in Limited Dependent Variable Models.” Political Analysis8 (1): 83–98.
17.
JacobsLawrence R.TimothyCallaghan. 2013. “Why states expand Medicaid: Party, resources, and history.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law38 (5): 1023–50.
18.
JonesDavid KBradleyKatharine W. V.JonathanOberlander. 2014. “Pascal’s wager: health insurance exchanges, Obamacare, and the Republican dilemma.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law39 (1): 97–137.
19.
KernellGeorgia. 2009. “Giving Order to Districts: Estimating Voter Distributions with National Election Returns.” Political Analysis17 (3): 215–35.
20.
LaxJeffrey R.PhillipsJustin H.2009a. “Gay Rights in the States: Public Opinion and Policy Responsiveness.” American Political Science Review103 (3): 367–86.
21.
LaxJeffrey R.PhillipsJustin H.2009b. “How Should We Estimate Public Opinion in The States?” American Journal of Political Science53 (1): 107–21.
22.
LeeFrances E.2009. Beyond Ideology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
LevenduskyMatthew S.PopeJeremy C.JackmanSimon D.2008. “Measuring District-Level Partisanship with Implications for the Analysis of U.S. Elections.” The Journal of Politics70 (3): 736–53.
24.
McCartyNolanPooleKeith T.RosenthalHoward. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge: MIT Press.
25.
NoelHans. 2013. Political Ideologies and Political Parties in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
NyhanBrendanMcGheeEricSidesJohnMasketSethGreeneSteven. 2012. “One Vote Out of Step? The Effects of Salient Roll Call Votes in the 2010 Election.” American Politics Research20 (10): 844-879.
27.
ParkDavid KAndrewGelmanJosephBafumi. 2004. “Bayesian Multilevel Estimation with Poststratification: State-Level Estimates from National Polls.” Political Analysis12:375–85.
28.
PooleKeithRosenthalHoward. 1985. “A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science29 (2): 357–84.
29.
PooleKeithRosenthalHoward. 1991. “Patterns of Congressional Voting.” American Journal of Political Science35 (1): 228–78.
30.
PooleKeithRosenthalHoward. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
31.
PooleKeith T.RosenthalHoward. 2007. Ideology and Congress. New York: Transaction Publishers.
32.
RaudenbushStephen W.BrykAnthony S.2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. 2nd ed.Newbury Park: Sage.
33.
RigbyElizabethHaselswerdtJake. 2013. “Hybrid Federalism, Partisan Politics, and Early Implementation of State Health Insurance Exchanges.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism43 (3): 368–91.
34.
ShorBorisBafumiJosephKeeleLukeParkDavid. 2007. “A Bayesian Multilevel Modeling Approach to Time-Series Cross-Sectional Data.” Political Analysis15 (2): 165–81. http://pan.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/15/2/165 (accessed August 7, 2018).
35.
ShorBorisMcCartyNolan. 2011. “The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures.” American Political Science Review105 (3): 530–51.
36.
TausanovitchChrisWarshawChristopher. 2013. “Measuring Constituent Policy Preferences in Congress, State Legislatures, and Cities.” Journal of Politics75 (2): 330–42.
37.
WarshawChristopherRoddenJonathan. 2012. “How Should We Measure District-Level Public Opinion on Individual Issues?” Journal of Politics74 (1): 203–19.
38.
WesternBruce. 1998. “Causal Heterogeneity in Comparative Research: A Bayesian Modelling Approach.” American Journal of Political Science42:1233–59.
39.
WrightGerald C.SchaffnerBrian F.2002. “The Influence of Party: Evidence from the State Legislatures.” The American Political Science Review96 (2): 367–79.
