Do the occupational backgrounds of politicians affect the government’s agenda? Businesses have long thought so. The first occupational data on state legislators were collected by the Insurance Information Institute, an interest group representing major insurance companies. In this paper, we test one potential motive for these kinds of efforts: the idea that the occupational makeup of governments affects the agendas they pursue, an argument that has been largely neglected in research on politicians’ occupational backgrounds. We focus here on the insurance industry. Using original data, we find that state legislatures with more former insurers consider fewer bills regulating insurance (negative agenda control), that former insurers play a disproportionate role in drafting the insurance bills that are introduced (positive agenda control), and that the bills former insurers introduce tend to be more favorable to the industry than those that their colleagues introduce (positive agenda control). The occupational makeup of legislatures may indeed affect their agendas, as industry groups have long suspected.
BachrachPeterBaratzMorton S.1962. “Two Faces of Power.” American Political Science Review56 (4): 947–52.
2.
BattistaJames Coleman. 2012. “State Legislative Committees and Economic Connections: Expertise and Industry Service.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly12 (3): 284–302.
3.
BattistaJames C.2013. “Financial Interests and Economic Diversity in State Legislatures.” Social Science Quarterly94 (1): 175–99.
4.
BaumgartnerFrankBerryJeffrey M.HojnackiMarieKimballDavid C.LeechBeth L.2009. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
BellemareMarc F.CarnesNicholas. 2015. “Why Do Members of Congress Support Agricultural Protection?”Food Policy50 (1): 20–34.
6.
BerkmanMichael B.O’ConnorRobert E.1993. “Do Women Legislators Matter? Female Legislators and State Abortion Policy.” American Politics Quarterly21 (1): 102–24.
7.
BerryWilliam D.RingquistEvan J.FordingRichard C.HansonRussell L.1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-93.” American Journal of Political Science42 (1): 327–48.
8.
BonicaAdam. 2017. “Why Are There So Many Lawyers in Congress?” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April6–9.
9.
BrattonKathleen A.HaynieKerry L.1999. “Agenda Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender and Race.” Journal of Politics61 (3): 658–79.
10.
BroockmanDavid E.2013. “Black Politicians Are More Intrinsically Motivated to Advance Blacks’ Interests: A Field Experiment Manipulating Political Incentives.” American Journal of Political Science57 (3): 521-36.
11.
BuchananWilliam. 1962. “Subject Matter Experts.” In The Legislative System: Explorations in Legislative Behavior, eds. WahlkeJohn C.EulauHeinzBuchananWilliamFergusonLeroy C., 193-215. New York: Wiley & Sons.
12.
BurdenBarry C.2007. The Personal Roots of Representation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
13.
BursteinPaul. 2014. American Public Opinion, Advocacy, and Policy in Congress: What the Public Wants and What It Gets. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14.
CampbellRosieCowleyPhilip. 2014. “Rich Man, Poor Man, Politician Man: Wealth Effects in a Candidate Biography Survey Experiment.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations16 (1): 56-74.
15.
CanonDavid T.1999. Race, Redistricting and Representation: The Unintended Consequences of Black Majority Districts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
CarnesNicholas. 2012. “Does the Numerical Underrepresentation of the Working Class in Congress Matter?” Legislative Studies Quarterly37 (1): 5-34
17.
CarnesNicholas. 2013. White-Collar Government: The Hidden Role of Class in Economic Policy Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
CarnesNicholas. 2016. “Who Votes for Inequality?” In Congress and Policy Making in the 21St Century, eds. JenkinsJeffrey A.PatashnikEric M., 106-34. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19.
CarnesNicholasHansenEric R.2016. “Does Paying Politicians More Promote Economic Diversity in Legislatures?” American Political Science Review110 (4): 699-716.
20.
CarnesNicholasLupuNoam. 2015. “Rethinking the Comparative Perspective on Class and Representation: Evidence from Latin America.” American Journal of Political Science59 (1): 1–18.
21.
CarpenterDaniel. 2014. “Detecting and Measuring Capture.” In Preventing Regulatory Capture: Special Interest Influence and How to Limit It, eds. CarpenterDanielMossDavid A., 57-68. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
DeauxKayReidAnneMizrahiKimEthierKathleen A.1995. “Parameters of Social Identity.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology68 (2): 280-91.
23.
DomhoffG. William. 1967. Who Rules America?. New York: Prentice Hall.
24.
EulauHeinzSpragueJohn D.1964. Lawyers in Politics: A Study in Professional Convergence. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
25.
FennoRichard F.Jr. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. New York: Little, Brown.
26.
GrayVirginiaLoweryDavidFellowesMatthewAndersonJennifer. 2005. “Legislative Agendas and Interest Advocacy: Understanding the Demand Side of Lobbying.” American Politics Research33 (3): 404-34.
27.
GriffinJohn D.Anewalt-RemsburgClaudia. 2013. “Legislator Wealth and the Effort to Repeal the Estate Tax.” American Politics Research41 (4): 599-622.
28.
GriffinJohn D.NewmanBrian. 2008. Minority Report: Evaluating Political Equality in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
GroseChristian R.2011. Congress in Black and White: Race and Representation in Washington and at Home. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30.
HallRichard L.1996. Participation in Congress. New Haven: Yale University Press.
31.
HammKeith E.HedlundRonald D., and Stephanie Shirley Post. 2011. “Committee Specialization in U.S. State Legislatures during the 20th Century: Do Legislatures Tap the Talents of Their Members?” State Politics & Policy Quarterly11 (3): 299–324.
32.
HansenEric R.TreulSarah A.2015. “The Symbolic and Substantive Representation of LGB Americans in the U.S. House.” Journal of Politics77 (4): 955–67.
33.
HinkleSteveBrownRupert J.1990. “Intergroup Comparisons and Social Identity: Some Links and Lacunae.” In Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances, eds. AbramsDominicHoggMichael A., 48-70. New York: Springer-Verlag.
34.
JansaJoshua M.GrayVirginia. 2017. “Captured Development: Industry Influence and State Economic Development Subsidies in the Great Recession Era.” Economic Development Quarterly31 (1): 50–64.
35.
KingdonJohn W. [1984] 2011. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
36.
KogerGregory. 2003. “Position Taking and Cosponsorship in the U.S. House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly28 (2): 225–46.
37.
KollmanKen. 1998. Outside Lobbying: Public Opinion and Interest Group Strategies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
38.
KrausMichael W.CallaghanBennett. 2014. “Noblesse Oblige? Social Status and Economic Inequality Maintenance among Politicians.” PLoS ONE9 (1): e85293.
39.
KrehbielKeith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
40.
KwakJames. 2014. “Cultural Capture and the Financial Crisis.” In Preventing Regulatory Capture: Special Interest Influence and How to Limit It, eds. CarpenterDanielMossDavid A., 71-98. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
LittleThomas H.DunnDanaDeenRebecca E.2001. “A View from the Top: Gender Differences in Legislative Priorities among State Legislative Leaders.” Women and Politics22 (4): 29–50.
42.
LoweryDavidGrayVirginiaCluveriusJohnHardenJeffrey J.2012. “Explaining the Anomalous Growth of Public Sector Lobbying in the American States, 1997–2007.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism43 (4): 580–99.
43.
MaddoxH. W. Jerome. 2004. “Opportunity Costs and Outside Careers in U.S. State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly29 (4): 517–44.
44.
MatthewsDonald R.1964. The Social Backgrounds of Political Decision-makers. New York: Random House.
45.
MayhewDavid R.2000. America’s Congress: Actions in the Public Sphere. New Haven: Yale University Press.
MillerMark C.1995. The High Priests of American Politics: The Role of Lawyers in American Political Institutions. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
48.
MintaMichael D.2011. Oversight: Representing the Interests of Blacks and Latinos in Congress. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
49.
PitkinHannah Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
50.
PutnamRobert D.1976. The Comparative Study of Political Elites. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
51.
RenzulliDianne and Center for Public Integrity. 2002. Capitol Offenders: How Private Interests Govern Our States. Washington, DC: Public Integrity Books.
52.
SchattschneiderE. E.1960. The Semisovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
53.
SchillerWendy J.1995. “Senators as Political Entrepreneurs: Using Bill Sponsorship to Shape Legislative Agendas.” American Journal of Political Science: 39:186–203.
54.
SojournerAaron. 2013. “Do Unions Promote Electoral Office-Holding? Evidence from Correlates of State Legislatures’ Occupational Shares.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review66 (2): 467–86.
55.
SwersMichele. 2002. The Difference Women Make. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56.
TajfelHenriTurnerJohn C.1986. “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior.” In Psychology of Intergroup Relations, eds. WorchelStevenAustinWilliam G., 7-24. Chicago: Nelson Hall.
57.
ThomasSue. 1991. “The Impact of Women on State Legislative Policies.” Journal of Politics53:958–76.
58.
TibshiraniRobert. 1996. “Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological)58 (1): 267–88.
59.
WawroGregory J.2000. Legislative Entrepreneurship in the U.S. House of Representatives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
60.
WeingastBarry R.MarshallWilliam J.1988. “The Industrial Organization of Congress; or, Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets.” Journal of Political Economy96:132–63.
61.
WhitbyKenny J.1997. The Color of Representation: Congressional Behavior and Black Interests. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
62.
WitkoChristopherFriedmanSally. 2008. “Business Backgrounds and Congressional Behavior.” Congress & the Presidency35:71–86.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
