The European Parliament (EP) has one of the highest proportions of women in its ranks, with over a third in 2009. Although previous research has pointed to the use of proportional representation (PR) in European elections as ‘friendlier’ to women, few have looked at differences in the types of PR rules in use in each country. In this article, we argue that the conventional wisdom according to which institutional design—the choice of electoral rules—should shape the composition of the EP does not hold, and suggest that the well-documented empirical connection between electoral rules and descriptive representation might in fact be an endogenous rather than a causal relationship.
Amorim NetoOCoxG (1997) Electoral institutions, cleavage structures, and the number of parties. American Journal of Political Science41(1): 149–174.
2.
AndersenK (1975) Working women and political participation, 1952–1972. American Journal of Political Science19(3): 439–455.
3.
AndersenKCookEA (1985) Women, work, and political attitudes. American Journal of Political Science29(3): 606–625.
4.
BakkerRde VriesCEdwardsE (forthcoming) Measuring party positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File, 1999–2010. Party Politics. Epub ahead of print 29 November 2012. DOI: 10.1177/1354068812462931.
5.
BartoliniS (2005) Restructuring Europe: Centre Formation, System Building, and Political Structuring between the Nation State and the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
BawnKThiesMF (2003) A comparative theory of electoral incentives representing the unorganized under PR, plurality and mixed-member electoral systems. Journal of Theoretical Politics15(1): 5–32.
7.
BeauvalletWMichonS (2008) Les femmes au Parlement européen: Effets du mode de scrutin, des stratégies et des ressources politiques. L'exemple de la délégation française. Swiss Political Science Review14(4): 663–690.
8.
BeckwithK (1992) Comparative research and electoral systems: Lessons from France and Italy. Women and Politics12(1): 1–33.
9.
BoixC (1999) Setting the rules of the game: The choice of electoral systems in advanced democracies. American Political Science Review93(3): 609–624.
10.
BowlerSFarrellDM (1993) Legislator shirking and voter monitoring: Impacts of European Parliament electoral systems upon legislator-voter relationships. Journal of Common Market Studies31(1): 45–70.
11.
CareyJMShugartMS (1995) Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies14(4): 417–439.
12.
CastlesFG (1981) Female legislative representation and the electoral system. Politics1(2): 21–27.
13.
CaulM (1997) Women's Representation in National Legislatures: Explaining Differences across Advanced Industrial Democracies. Paper presented at the western political science association meeting, Tucson/AZ.
14.
CaulM (1999) Women's representation in parliament: The role of political parties. Party Politics5(1): 79–98.
15.
CaulKittilson M (2006) Challenging Parties, Changing Parliaments: Women and Elected Office in Contemporary Western Europe, Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
16.
ChivaC (forthcoming) Gender, European integration and candidate recruitment: The European Parliament elections in the new EU member states. Parliamentary Affairs. Epub ahead of print 30 August 2012. DOI: 10.1093/pa/gss047.
17.
ColomerJM (2005) It's the parties that choose electoral systems (or Duverger's law upside down). Political Studies53(1): 1–21.
18.
DahlerupD (2006) Women, Quotas and Politics, London: Routledge.
19.
DarcyRWelchSClarkJ (1994) Women, Elections and Representation, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
20.
DuvergerM (1955) The Political Role of Women, Paris: The United Nations Economic and Social Council.
21.
FarrellDMScullyR (2005) Electing the European Parliament: How uniform are ‘uniform’ electoral systems?Journal of Common Market Studies43(5): 969–984.
22.
FarrellDMScullyR (2007) Representing Europe's Citizens: Electoral Institutions and the Failure of Parliamentary Representation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
FlickingerRSStudlarDT (2007) One Europe, many electorates? Models of turnout in European Parliament elections after 2004. Comparative Political Studies40(4): 383–404.
24.
FootittH (2002) Women, Europe and the New Language of Politics, London and New York: Continuum.
25.
FortinJ (2008) Patterns of democracy? Counterevidence from nineteen post-communist countries. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft2(1): 198–220.
26.
FreedmanJ (2002) Women in the European Parliament. Parliamentary Affairs55(1): 179–188.
27.
GallagherM (1991) Proportionality, disproportionality and electoral systems. Electoral Studies10(1): 33–51.
28.
GallagherM (1992) Comparing proportional representation electoral systems: Quotas, thresholds, paradoxes and majorities. British Journal of Political Science22(4): 469–496.
29.
GrummJG (1958) Theories of electoral systems. Midwest Journal of Political Science2(4): 357–376.
30.
HéritierA (2007) Explaining Institutional Change in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
HixSHagemannS (2008) Could changing the electoral rules fix European Parliament elections?Politique Européenne2(28): 37–52.
32.
HixSHøylandB (2013) Empowerment of the European Parliament. Annual Review of Political Science16: 171–189.
33.
HixSLordC (1997) Political Parties in the European Union, London: Macmillan.
34.
InglehartRNorrisP (2003) Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change around the World, New York: Cambridge University Press.
35.
IversenTRosenbluthF (2008) Work and power: The connection between female labour force participation and female political participation. Annual Review of Political Science11: 479–495.
36.
IversenTSoskiceD (2006) Electoral institutions and the politics of coalitions: Why some democracies distribute more than others. American Political Science Review100(2): 165–181.
37.
JonesM (2009) Gender quotas, electoral laws, and the election of women. Comparative Political Studies42(1): 56–81.
38.
KantolaJ (2010) Gender and the European Union, Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.
39.
KatzR (1997) Democracy and Elections, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
KenworthyLMalamiM (1999) Gender inequality in political representation: A worldwide comparative analysis. Social Forces78(1): 235–268.
41.
KrookML (2002) Europe for women, women for Europe. In: MicgielJS (eds) Democracy and Integration in the European Union, New York: Institute for the Study of Europe, pp. 67–86.
42.
KrookML (2009) Quotas for Women in Politics. Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43.
KrookML (2010) Women's representation in parliament: A qualitative comparative analysis. Political Studies58(5): 886–908.
44.
KunovichSPaxtonP (2005) Pathways to power: The role of political parties in women's national political representation. American Journal of Sociology111(2): 505–552.
45.
LakemanE (1994) Comparing political opportunities in Great Britain and Ireland. In: RuleWZimmermanJF (eds) Electoral Systems in a Comparative Perspective. Their Impact on Women and Minorities, Westport and London: Greenwood Press, pp. 15–30.
46.
LaneJC (1995) The election of women under proportional representation: The case of Malta. Democratization2(2): 140–157.
47.
LijphartA (1984) Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
48.
LijphartA (1986) Degrees of proportionality of proportional representation formulas. In: GrofmanBLijphartA (eds) Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences, New York: Agathon Press, pp. 170–182.
49.
LijphartA (1999) Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performances in Thirty-Six Countries, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
50.
LipsetSMRokkanS (1967) Cleavage structures, party systems and voter alignments. Introduction. In: LipsetSMRokkanS (eds) Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives, New York: The Free Press, pp. 1–64.
51.
LipsonL (1964) The Democratic Civilization, New York: Oxford University Press.
52.
ManowPDöringH (2008) Electoral and mechanical causes of divided government in the European Union. Comparative Political Studies41(10): 1349–1370.
53.
MarksGSteenbergenM (2002) Understanding political contestation in the European Union. Comparative Political Studies38(8): 879–892.
54.
Mateo DiazM (2005) Representing Women? Female Legislators in West European Parliaments, Colchester: ECPR press.
55.
MatherJ (2001) The European Parliament: A model of representative democracy?West European Politics24(1): 181–201.
56.
MatlandRE (1993) Institutional variables affecting female representation in national legislatures: The case of Norway. Journal of Politics55(3): 737–755.
57.
MatlandRE (1998) Women's representation in national legislatures: Developed and developing countries. Legislative Studies Quarterly23(1): 109–125.
58.
MatlandRE (2005) Enhancing women's political participation: Legislative recruitment and electoral systems. In: KaramABallingtonJ (eds) Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers, Stockholm: International IDEA, pp. 93–131.
59.
MatlandREStudlarDT (1996) The contagion of women candidates in single-member district and proportional representation electoral systems: Canada and Norway. Journal of Politics58(3): 707–733.
60.
McAllisterIStudlarDT (2002) Electoral systems and women's representation: A long term perspective. Representation39(1): 3–14.
61.
McElroyGBenoitK (2007) Party groups and policy positions in the European Parliament. Party Politics31(1): 5–28.
62.
McElroyGMarshM (2010) Candidate gender and voter choice: Analysis from a multimember preferential voting system. Political Research Quarterly63(4): 822–833.
63.
MezeyS (1980) Perception of women's roles on local councils in Connecticut. In: StewartD (eds) Women in Local Politics, Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press, pp. 61–85.
64.
MoserRG (2001) The effects of electoral systems on women's representation in post-communist states. Electoral Studies20(3): 273–292.
65.
MoserRGScheinerE (2012) Electoral Systems and Political Context: How the Effects of Rules Vary Across New and Established Democracies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66.
MurrayR (2010) Parties, Gender Quotas and Candidate Selection in France, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
67.
NivenD (1998) Party elites and women candidates. Women & Politics19(2): 57–80.
68.
NorrisP (1985) Women's legislative participation in Western Europe. Western European Politics8(4): 90–101.
69.
NorrisP (1996) Legislative recruitment. In: LeDucLNiemiRGNorrisP (eds) Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in a Global Perspective, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 184–215.
70.
NorrisP (1997) Conclusions. Comparing passages to power. In: NorrisP (eds) Passages to Power. Legislative Recruitment in Advanced Democracies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 209–231.
71.
NorrisP (2004) Electoral Engineering. Voting Rules and Political Behavior, New York: Cambridge University Press.
72.
NorrisPFranklinM (1997) Social representation. European Journal of Political Research32(2): 185–210.
73.
NorrisPKrookML (2011) Gender equality in elected office: A six-step action plan. Baseline study for the OSCE/ODIHR Handbook on Measures to Promote Women's Participation in Political Parties.
74.
OakesAAlmquistE (1993) Women in national legislatures. Population Research and Policy Review12(1): 71–81.
75.
OdershookPShvetsovaO (1994) Ethnic heterogeneity, district magnitude and the number of parties. American Journal of Political Science38(1): 100–123.
76.
PaxtonP (1997) Women in national legislatures: A cross national analysis. Social Science Research26(4): 442–464.
77.
PaxtonPHughesMM (2007) Women, Politics, and Power: A global Perspective, Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
78.
PaxtonPKunovichS (2003) Women's political representation: The importance of ideology. Social Forces82(1): 87–113.
79.
PerssonTTabelliniG (2003) The Economic Effects of Constitutions, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
80.
PhillipsA (1995) The Politics of Presence, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
81.
PitkinHF (1967) The Concept of Representation, Berkeley: University of California Press.
82.
PollackMAHafner-BurtonE (2000) Mainstreaming gender in the European Union. Journal of European Public Politics7(3): 432–456.
83.
ReifKSchmittH (1980) Nine-second order national elections. European Journal of Political Research8(1): 3–44.
84.
ReynoldsA (1999) Women in the legislatures and executives of the world knocking at the highest glass ceiling. World Politics51(4): 547–572.
85.
ReynoldsAReillyB (1997) The International IDEA Handbook of Electoral System Design, Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
86.
RittbergerB (2005) Building Europe's Parliament. Democratic Representation Beyond the Nation State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
87.
RobertsASeawrightJCyrJ (2013) Do electoral laws affect women's representation?Comparative Political Studies46(12): 1555–1581.
RuleW (1987) Electoral systems, contextual factors, and women's opportunity for election to parliament in twenty-three democracies. Western Political Quarterly40(3): 477–498.
91.
RuleW (1994) Women's underrepresentation and electoral systems. PS: Political Science and Politics27(4): 689–692.
SchmidtG (2008) The election of women in list PR systems: Testing the conventional wisdom. Electoral Studies28(2): 190–203.
94.
Schwindt-BayerLAMishlerW (2005) An integrated model of women's representation. The Journal of Politics67(2): 407–428.
95.
ShugartM (1994) Minorities represented and unrepresented. In: RuleWZimmermanJF (eds) Electoral Systems in Comparative Perspective: The Impact on Women and Minorities, Westport, CT: Westview Press, pp. 31–41.
96.
SiaroffA (2000) Women's representation in legislatures and cabinets in industrial democracies. International Political Science Review21(2): 197–215.
97.
StockemerD (2008) Women's representation in Europe – A comparison between the national parliaments and the European Parliament. Comparative European Politics6(4): 463–485.
98.
StudlarDTMcAllisterI (1991) Political recruitment to the Australian legislature: Toward an explanation of women's electoral disadvantages. Western Political Quarterly44(2): 467–485.
99.
StudlarDTWelchS (1991) Does district magnitude matter? Women candidates in London local elections. Western Political Quarterly44(2): 457–466.
100.
TaageperaR (1994) Beating the law of minority attrition. In: RuleWZimmermanJF (eds) Electoral Systems in Comparative Perspective. Their Impact on Women and Minorities, Westport: Greenwood Press, pp. 235–246.
101.
TaageperaR (1998) Effective magnitude and effective threshold. Electoral Studies17(4): 393–404.
102.
TaageperaR (2007) Predicting Party Sizes: The Logic of Simple Electoral Systems, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
103.
ThamesFCWilliamsMS (2010) Incentives for personal votes and women's representation in legislatures. Comparative Political Studies43(12): 1575–1600.
104.
TrippAMKangA (2008) The global impact of quotas: The fast track to female representation. Comparative Political Studies41(3): 338–361.
105.
ValdiniME (2012) A deterrent to diversity: The conditional effect of electoral rules on the nomination of women candidates. Electoral Studies31(4): 740–749.
106.
VallanceEDavisE (1986) Women of Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
107.
VengroffRCreeveyLKrischH (2000) Electoral system effects on gender representation. Japanese Journal of Political Science1(2): 197–222.
108.
WangnerudL (2009) Women in parliaments: Descriptive and substantive representation. Annual Review of Political Science12: 51–69.
109.
WelchSStudlarDT (1986) British public opinion towards women in politics: A comparative perspective. Western Political Quarterly39(1): 138–154.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
