This study employs state-level panel data between 1978 and 2000 to explore the relationship between transparency, media market penetration, class bias in voter participation, and welfare effort in the United States. I present empirical evidence that the effect of transparency—operationalized as state fiscal transparency—on state welfare effort is conditional on class bias in voter participation. Specifically, I present evidence that in states where transparency and class bias increased over time, state welfare effort significantly declined. These results are robust to the inclusion of controls for other determinants of redistribution that traditionally vary with geography such as governor partisanship, legislator ideology, citizen ideology, gross state product (GSP), and state demographic characteristics, and are robust across several alternate model specifications. My findings suggest that increased transparency does not automatically improve the condition of socioeconomically-disadvantaged citizens and that transparency may have welfare-reducing effects in societies with increasing participatory gulfs between the most and least advantaged citizens.
AlbrittonRobert. 1990. “Social Services: Welfare and Health.” In Politics in the American States, 5th ed., eds. GrayVirginiaJacobHerbertAlbrittonRobert. Glenview: Scott, Foresman/Little, Brown, 411-446.
AltJames E.LassenDavid DreyerRoseShanna. 2006. “The Causes of Fiscal Transparency: Evidence from the U.S. States.” IMF Staff Papers53:30–57.
4.
AltJames E.LowryRobert C.2010. “Transparency and Accountability: Empirical Results for US States.” Journal of Theoretical Politics22 (4): 379–406.
5.
ArellanoManuelBondStephen. 1991. “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations.” The Review of Economic Studies58 (2): 277–97.
6.
BarrilleauxCharlesHolbrookThomasLangerLaura. 2002. “Electoral Competition, Legislative Balance, and American State Welfare Policy.” American Journal of Political Science46:415–27.
7.
BartelsBrandon L.2008. ‘Beyond ‘‘Fixed versus Random Effects’’: A Framework for Improving Substantive and Statistical Analysis of Panel, Time-Series Cross-Sectional, and Multilevel Data’. Paper presented at the Political Methodology Conference. Ann Arbor, MI. 9-12 July. http://home.gwu.edu/, bartels/cluster.pdf.
8.
BeckNathaniel L.2001. “Time-Series-Cross-Section Data: What Have We Learned in the Past Few Years?”Annual Review of Political Science4 (1): 271–93.
9.
BellAndrewJonesKelvyn. 2015. “Explaining Fixed Effects: Random Effects Modeling of Time-Series Cross-Sectional and Panel Data.” Political Science Research and Methods3 (1): 133–53.
10.
BertotJohn CarloJaegerPaul T.LangaLesley A.McClureCharles R.2006a. “Drafted: I Want You to Deliver e-Government.” Library Journal131 (13): 34–37.
11.
BertotJohn CarloJaegerPaul T.LangaLesley A.McClureCharles R.2006b. “Public Access Computing and Internet Access in Public Libraries: The Role of Public Libraries in e-Government and Emergency Situations.” First Monday11 (9). http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_9/bertot/S (Accessed August 1, 2017).
12.
BesleyTimothy. 2006. Principled Agents? The Political Economy of Good Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
BinderSarah A.LeeFrances E.2015. “Making Deals in Congress.” In Political Negotiation: A Handbook, eds. MansbridgeJaneMartinCathie JoWashington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 54-72.
14.
BlakelyTony A.KennedyBruce P.KawachiIchiro. 2001. “Socioeconomic Inequality in Voting Participation and Self-Rated Health.” American Journal of Public Health91 (1): 99–104.
BurnettGaryJaegerPaul T.ThompsonKim M.2008. “Normative Behavior and Information: The Social Aspects of Information Access.” Library Information Science Research30 (1): 56–66.
17.
CalvoErnesto. 2007. “The Responsive Legislature: Public Opinion and Law Making in a Highly Disciplined Legislature.” British Journal of Political Science37 (2): 263–80.
18.
CaseAnne C.RosenHarvey S.HinesJames R.1993. “Budget Spillovers and Fiscal Policy Interdependence: Evidence from the States.” Journal of Public Economics52 (3): 285–307.
19.
DruckmanJames N.2005. “Media Matter: How Newspapers and Television News Cover Campaigns and Influence Voters.” Political Communication22 (4): 463–81.
20.
DugdaleAnniDalyAnnePapandreaFrancoMaria MaleyM. 2005. “Accessing e-Government: Challenges for Citizens and Organizations.” International Review of Administrative Sciences71 (1): 109–18.
21.
DyeThomas R.1984. “Party and Policy in the States.” The Journal of Politics46 (4): 1097–1116.
22.
FerejohnJohn. 1999. “Accountability and Authority: Towards a Model of Political Accountability.” In Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, eds. PrzeworskiAdamManinBernardStokesSusan C.New York: Cambridge University Press, 131-153.
23.
FoxJonathan. 2007. “The Uncertain Relationship between Transparency and Accountability.” Development in Practice17 (5): 663–71.
24.
FrankoWilliam W.KellyNathan J.WitkoChristopher. 2016. “Class Bias in Voter Turnout, Representation, and Income Inequality.” Perspectives on Politics14 (2): 351–68.
25.
GaventaJohnMcGeeRosemary. 2013. “The Impact of Transparency and Accountability Initiatives.” Development Policy Review31:3–28.
26.
GilensMartinPageBenjamin I.2014. “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens.” Perspectives on Politics12 (3): 564–81.
27.
GuillaudElvire. 2013. “Preferences for Redistribution: An Empirical Analysis over 33 Countries.” The Journal of Economic Inequality11(1): 57-78.
28.
GurriaAngel. 2017. “Bribery and Corruption—OECD, Openness and Transparency.” Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, June1.
29.
HackerJacob S.PiersonPaul. 2010. “Winner-Take-All Politics: Public Policy, Political Organization, and the Precipitous Rise of Top Incomes in the United States.” Politics Society38 (2): 152–204.
30.
HainmuellerJensMummoloJonathanXuYiqing. 2018. “How Much Should We Trust Estimates from Multiplicative Interaction Models? Simple Tools to Improve Empirical Practice.” Political Analysis. In press. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2739221
31.
HaleyKevin J.FesslerDaniel M. T.2005. “Nobody’s Watching? Subtle Cues Affect Generosity in an Anonymous Economic Game.” Evolution & Human Behavior26 (3): 245–56.
32.
HoechleDaniel2007. “Robust Standard Errors for Panel Regressions with Cross-Sectional Dependence.” Stata Journal7 (3): 281–312.
33.
HollyerJames R.RosendorffB. PeterVreelandJames R.2011. “Democracy and Transparency.” The Journal of Politics73 (4): 1191–1205.
34.
JacobsLawrence R.SossJoe. 2010. “The Politics of Inequality in America: A Political Economy Framework.” Annual Review of Political Science13:341–64.
35.
JaegerPaul T.BertotJohn C.2010. “Transparency and Technological Change: Ensuring Equal and Sustained Public Access to Government Information.” Government Information Quarterly27 (4): 371–76.
36.
JenningsEdward T.1979. “Competition, Constituencies, and Welfare Policies in American States.” American Political Science Review73 (2): 414–29.
37.
KaufmannDanielMastruzziMassimoZavaletaDiego. 2002. “Sustained Macroeconomic Reforms, Tepid Growth: A Governance Puzzle in Bolivia?” The World Bank, Washington, DC.
38.
KeohaneRobert O.NyeJoseph S.2003. “Redefining Accountability for Global Governance.” In Governance in a Global Economy: Political Authority in Transition, eds. KahlerMilesLakeDavid. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 386–411.
39.
KimPan S.HalliganJohnChoNamshinOhCheol H.EikenberryAngela M.2005. “Toward Participatory and Transparent Governance: Report on the Sixth Global Forum on Reinventing Government.” Public Administration Review65 (6): 646–54.
LindstedtCatharinaNaurinDaniel. 2010. “Transparency Is Not Enough: Making Transparency Effective in Reducing Corruption.” International Political Science Review31 (3): 301–22.
42.
LivingstoneSoniaMarkhamTim. 2008. “The Contribution of Media Consumption to Civic Participation.” The British Journal of Sociology59 (2): 351–71.
43.
LowiTheodore. 1969. The End of Liberalism. New York: W.W. Norton.
44.
MaleskyEdmundSchulerPaulTranAnh. 2012. “The Adverse Effects of Sunshine: A Field Experiment on Legislative Transparency in an Authoritarian Assembly.” American Political Science Review106 (4): 762–86.
45.
MalenaCarmenForsterReinerSinghJanmejay. 2004. “Social Accountability: An Introduction to the Concept and Emerging Practice”. Social Development Paper76, Washington, DC: World Bank.
46.
MansbridgeJane. 2009. “A Selection Model of Political Representation.” Journal of Political Philosophy17 (4): 369–98.
47.
MartinPaul S.2003. “Voting’s Rewards: Voter Turnout, Attentive Publics, and Congressional Allocation of Federal Money.” American Journal of Political Science47 (1): 110–27.
48.
MayhewDavid R.1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
49.
McConnellGrant. 1966. Private Power and American Democracy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
50.
McGeeRosieGaventaJohn. 2011. “Shifting Power? Assessing the Impact of Transparency and Accountability Initiatives.” IDS Working Papers 383. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
51.
MeijerAlbert. 2014. “Transparency.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability, eds. BovenMarkGoodinRobert. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52.
MeltzerAllan H.RichardScott F.1981. “A Rational Theory of the Size of Government.” Journal of Political Economy89 (5): 914–27.
53.
MohtadiHamidRoeTerry L.2003. “Democracy, Rent Seeking, Public Spending and Growth.” Journal of Public Economics87 (3): 445–66.
54.
NamTaewooSayogoDjoko Sigit. 2011. “Who Uses e-Government? Examining the Digital Divide in e-Government Use.” In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV’11), ACM, New York, 27-36.
55.
ObamaBarack.2007. “Press Release - Obama Pledges Most Transparent and Accountable Administration in History.” The American Presidency Project, 15Aug. 2007, www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=93244 (Accessed August 10, 2017).
56.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2016. “Are There Differences in How Advantaged and Disadvantaged Students Use the Internet?” PISA in Focus No. 64. Paris: OECD Publishing.
57.
PeisakhinLeonidPintoPaul. 2010. “Is Transparency an Effective Anti-corruption Strategy? Evidence from a Field Experiment in India.” Regulation & Governance4 (3): 261–80.
58.
PetersYvetteEnsinkSander J.2015. “Differential Responsiveness in Europe: The Effects of Preference Difference and Electoral Participation.” West European Politics38 (3): 577–600.
59.
PikettyThomas. 1995. “Social Mobility and Redistributive Politics.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics110(3): 551-584.
60.
PikettyThomasSaezEmmanuel. 2003. “Income Inequality in the United States, 1913–1998.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics118 (1): 1–41.
61.
PivenFrances F.2006. Challenging Authority: How Ordinary People Change America. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
62.
PlumperThomasTroegerVera E.2007. “Efficient Estimation of Time-Invariant and Rarely Changing Variables in Finite Sample Panel Analyses with Unit Fixed Effects.” Political Analysis15:124–39.
63.
ReinikkaRitvaSvenssonJakob. 2004. “The Power of Information: Evidence from a Newspaper Campaign to Reduce Capture.” Policy Research Working Paper No. 3239. World Bank, Washington, DC.
64.
Rose-AckermanSusan. 2005. “Governance and Corruption.” In Global Crises, Global Solutions, ed. LomborgBjorn. Cambridge University Press, 301-362.
65.
RossMichael. 2006. “Is Democracy Good for the Poor?”American Journal of Political Science50 (4): 860–74.
66.
SchattschneiderElmer E.1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
67.
ShiMinSvenssonJakob. 2003. “Political Budget Cycles: A Review of Recent Developments.” Nordic Journal of Political Economy29 (1): 67–76.
SoltFrederick. 2008. “Economic Inequality and Democratic Political Engagement.” American Journal of Political Science52 (1): 48–60.
70.
SossJoeJacobsLawrence R.2009. “The Place of Inequality: Non-participation in the American Polity.” Political Science Quarterly124 (1): 95–125.
71.
StiglitzJoseph. 2001. “Transparency in Government, in the Right to Tell: The Role of Mass Media in Economic Development.” World Bank, Washington, DC.
72.
StrolovitchDara Z.2006. “Do Interest Groups Represent the Disadvantaged? Advocacy at the Intersections of Race, Class, and Gender.” The Journal of Politics68 (4): 894–910.
73.
TisnéMartin. 2010. “Transparency, Participation and Accountability: Definitions”. Unpublished Background Note for Transparency and Accountability Initiative. Institute of Development Studies.
74.
VerbaSidneySchlozmanKay L.BradyHenry. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
75.
WichowskyAmber. 2012. “Competition, Party Dollars, and Income Bias in Voter Turnout, 1980–2008.” The Journal of Politics74 (2): 446–59.
76.
WooldridgeJeffrey M.2015. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Scarborough, ON: Nelson Education.
77.
ZornChristopher. 2001. “Estimating Between- and Within-Cluster Covariate Effects, with an Application to Models of International Disputes.” International Interactions27:433–45.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
