Studies of state judicial selection systems require accurate classification of electoral systems. While agreement exists for most states, Ohio and Michigan are difficult to classify. In this paper, we discuss the different practices and explain how, in the absence of candidates’ party affiliation on the ballot, elections in these states may justifiably be classified as partisan. Replicating the results of an important study on participation in judicial elections, we show how the treatment of these states may result in differing substantive conclusions. We conclude by urging scholars to provide evidence that their results are robust to alternative classifications.
American Judicature Society. 2003. “Judicial Selection in the States: Initial Selection, Retention, and Term Length.” Paper published by American Judicature Society.
BaumLawrence. 1987a. “Explaining the Vote in Judicial Elections: The 1984 Ohio Supreme Court Elections.” Western Political Quarterly40:361–71.
4.
BaumLawrence. 1987b. “Information and Party Voting in ‘Semipartisan’ Judicial Elections.” Political Behavior9:62–74.
5.
BawnKathleenCohenMartenKarolDavidMasketSethNoelHansZallerJohn. 2012. “A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands and Nominations in American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics10:571–97.
6.
BlumeJohnEisenbergTheodore. 1998. “Judicial Politics, Death Penalty Appeals, and Case Selection: An Empirical Study.” Southern California Law Review72:465–503.
7.
BonneauChris W.2004. “Patterns of Campaign Spending and Electoral Competition in State Supreme Court Elections.” Justice System Journal25:21–38.
8.
BonneauChris W.2005a. “Electoral Verdicts: Incumbent Defeats in State Supreme Courts.” American Politics Research33:818–41.
9.
BonneauChris W.2005b. “What Price Justice(s)? Understanding Campaign Spending in State Supreme Court Elections.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly5:107–25.
10.
BonneauChris W.2007a. “Campaign Fundraising in State Supreme Court Elections.” Social Science Quarterly88:68–85.
11.
BonneauChris W.2007b. “The Effects of Campaign Spending in State Supreme Court Elections.” Political Research Quarterly60:489–99.
12.
BonneauChris W.2007c. “The Dynamics of Campaign Spending in State Supreme Court Elections” In Running for Judge, ed. StrebMatthew J.New York: New York University Press, 59–72.
13.
BonneauChris W.HallMelinda Gann. 2003. “Predicting Challengers in State Supreme Court Elections: Context and the Politics of Institutional Design.” Political Research Quarterly56:337–49.
14.
BonneauChris W.HallMelinda Gann. 2009. In Defense of Judicial Elections. New York: Routledge.
15.
BracePaulHallMelinda Gann. 1993. “Integrated Models of Judicial Dissent.” Journal of Politics55:914–35.
16.
CaldaroneRichard P.Canes-WroneBrandiceClarkTom S.2009. “Partisan Labels and Democratic Accountability: An Analysis of State Supreme Court Abortion Decisions.” Journal of Politics71:560–73.
17.
Canes-WroneBrandiceClarkTom S.2009. “Judicial Independence and Nonpartisan Elections.” Wisconsin Law Review2009:21–65.
18.
CannDamon. 2007. “Beyond Accountability and Independence: Judicial Selection and State Court Performance.” Judicature90:226–32.
19.
CheekKyle D.ChampagneAnthony. 2003. “Partisan Judicial Elections: Lessons from Bellwether State.” Willamette Law Review39:1357–84.
20.
DriscollAmandaNelsonMichael J.2013a. “The Political Origins of Judicial Elections: Evidence from the United States and Bolivia.” Judicature96:151–60.
21.
DriscollAmandaNelsonMichael J.2013b. “Candidate Qualifications and the 2011 Judicial Elections in Bolivia.” Paper presented at the 2013 Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Orlando, Florida.
22.
DuboisPhilip L. 1979. “Voter Turnout in State Judicial Elections: An Analysis of the Tail on the Electoral Kite.” Journal of Politics41:865–87.
23.
FlangoVictor, EugeneDucatCraig R.1979. “What Difference Does Method of Judicial Selection Make? Selection Procedures in State Courts of Last Resort.” Justice System Journal5:25–44.
24.
FrederickBrianStrebMatthew J.2008. “Women Running for Judge: The Impact of Sex on Candidate Success in State Intermediate Appellate Court Elections.” Social Science Quarterly89:937–54.
25.
GordonStanford C.HuberGregory A.2007. “The Effect of Electoral Competitiveness on Incumbent Behavior.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science2:107–38.
26.
HallMelinda Gann. 2001. “State Supreme Courts in American Democracy: Probing the Myths of Judicial Reform.” American Political Science Review95:315–30.
27.
HallMelinda Gann. 2007. “Voting in State Supreme Court Elections: Competition and Context as Democratic Incentives.” Journal of Politics69:1147–59.
28.
HallMelinda GannBonneauChris W.2006. “Does Quality Matter? Challengers in State Supreme Court Elections.” American Journal of Political Science50:20–33.
29.
HallMelinda GannBonneauChris W.2008. “Mobilizing Interest: The Effects of Money on Citizen Participation in State Supreme Court Elections.” American Journal of Political Science52:457–70.
30.
HallMelinda GannBonneauChris W.2013. “Attack Advertising, the White Decision, and Voter Participation in State Supreme Court Elections.” Political Research Quarterly66(1): 115–26.
31.
HallMelinda, GannBracePaul. 1992. “Toward and Integrated Model of Judicial Voting Behavior.” American Politics Research20:147–68.
32.
HallMelinda GannBracePaul. 1999. “State Supreme Courts and the Environments: Avenues to General Theories of Judicial Choice.” In Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches, eds. ClaytonCornell W.GillmanHoward. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 281–300.
33.
HanssenF. Andrew. 2004. “Learning about Judicial Independence: Institutional Change in the State Courts.” Journal of Legal Studies33:431–74.
34.
HurwitzMark S. 2010. “Selection System, Diversity, and the Michigan Supreme Court.” Wayne State Law Review56:691–704.
35.
KleinDavidBaumLawrence. 2001. “Ballot Information and Voting Decisions in Judicial Elections.” Political Research Quarterly54:709–28.
36.
KritzerHerbert M. 2007. “Law is the Mere Continuation of Politics by Different Means: American Judicial Selection in the Twenty-First Century.” DePaul Law Review56:423–68.
37.
KritzerHerbert M. 2011. “Competitiveness in State Supreme Court Elections, 1946–2009.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies8(2): 237–59.
38.
LangerLaura. 2002. Judicial Review in State Supreme Courts: A Comparative Study. Albany: State University of New York Press.
39.
LascherEdward L. 1991. “The Case of the Missing Democrats: Reexamining the ‘Republican Advantage’ in Nonpartisan Elections.” Western Political Quarterly44:656–75.
40.
LupiaArthur. 1994. “Shortcuts versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections.” American Political Science Review88:63–76.
41.
MasketSeth. 2007. “It Takes an Outsider: Extra-legislative Organization and Partisanship in the California Assembly, 1849-2006.” American Journal of Political Science51:482–97.
42.
MasketSeth. 2009. No Middle Ground: How Informal Party Organizations Control Nominations and Polarize Legislatures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
43.
NagelStuart S. 1961. “Political Party Affiliation and Judges’ Decisions.” American Political Science Review55:843–50.
44.
NelsonMichael J. 2011. “Uncontested and Unaccountable? Contestation Rates in Trial Court Elections.” Judicature10:208–17.
45.
PetersC. Scott. 2009. “Canons of Ethics and Accountability in State Supreme Court Elections.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly9:24–55.
46.
PhillipsThomas R. 2009. “The Merits of Merit Selection.” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy32:67–96.
47.
RockEmilyBaumLawrence. 2010. “The Impact of High-Visibility Contests for U.S. State Court Judgeships: Partisan Voting in Nonpartisan Elections.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly10:368–96.
48.
SampleJamesSkaggsAdamBlitzerJonathanCaseyLindaHallCharles. 2010. The New Politics of Judicial Elections, 2000-2009. Washington, DC: Justice At Stake Campaign.
49.
SchotlandRoy A. 2007. “New Challenges to States’ Judicial Selection.” Georgetown Law Journal96:1077–105.
50.
ShepherdJoanna M.2009a. “Are Appointed Judges Strategic Too?” Duke Law Journal58:1589–626.
51.
ShepherdJoanna M.2009b. “The Influence of Retention Politics on Judges’ Voting.” Journal of Legal Studies38:169–206.
52.
ShepherdJoanna M. 2010. “The Politics of Judicial Opposition.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics166:88–107.
53.
ShugermanJed Handlesman. 2012. The People’s Courts: The Rise of Judicial Elections and Judicial Power in America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
54.
StrebMatthew. 2007. “Partisan Involvement in Partisan and Nonpartisan Trial Court Elections.” In Running for Judge, ed. StrebMatthew J.New York: New York University Press, 96–115.
55.
StrebMatthew J.FrederickBrianLaFranceCasey. 2007. “Contestation, Competition, and the Potential for Accountability in Intermediate Appellate Court Elections.” Judicature91:70–78.
56.
TarrG. Alan. 2003. “Reform Proposals: Rethinking the Selection of State Supreme Court Justices.” Willamette Law Review39:1445.
57.
UlmerS. Sidney. 1962. “The Political Party Variable in the Michigan Supreme Court.” Journal of Public Law11:352–62.
58.
WheatElizabethHurwtizMark S.2013. “The Politics of Judicial Selection: The Case of the Michigan Supreme Court.” Judicature96:178–88.
59.
WrightGerald C.2008. “Charles Adrian and the Sudy of Nonpartisan Elections.” Political Research Quarterly61:13–16.
