In the last 30 years, female state legislative representation in the United States has increased steadily and dramatically. While the cross-sectional variation in this representation has been studied at length, longitudinal changes have yet to be explained. We attempt to do this using two theories of large-scale cultural and political attitude change over the last several decades-postmaterialism and post-industrialism. Our empirical analyses are more consistent with post-industrialism theory than postmaterialism theory. We find that both cross-sectional differences and longitudinal changes in the percentage of state legislators who are female are explained primarily by college education and religious adherence, not age cohort or income. The effects of college education and religious adherence remain strong even in the presence of controls for other cultural and institutional variables that have been found to influence the sexual composition of state legislatures. Thus, our study suggests the existence of an education-religion cleavage on social issues among Americans.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbramsonPaul R.InglehartRonald. 1995. Value Change in Global Perspective. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
2.
ArceneauxKevin. 2001. “The ‘Gender Gap’ in State Legislative Representation: New Data to Tackle an Old Question.” Political Research Quarterly54:143–60.
3.
BarnelloMichelle A.1999. “Gender and Roll Call Voting in the New York State Assembly.” Women & Politics20:77–94.
4.
BaroneMichaelLilleyWilliamIIIDe FrancoLaurence J.. 1998. State Legislative Elections: Voting Patterns and Demographics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
5.
BellDaniel. 1973. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. New York: Basic Books.
6.
BelsleyDavid A.KuhEdwinWelschRoy E.. 1980. Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. New York: John Wiley.
7.
BerkmanMichael B.1994. “State Legislators in Congress: Strategic Politicians, Professional Legislatures, and the Party Nexus.” American Journal of Political Science38:1025–55.
8.
BerryWilliam D.RingquistEvan J.FordingRichard C.HansonRussell L.. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960–93.” American Journal of Political Science42:327–48.
9.
BoeckelmanKeith. 1995. “The American States in the Postindustrial Economy.” State and Local Government Review27:182–7.
10.
BradleyMartin B.GreenNorman M.Jr.JonesDale E.LynnMacMcNeilLou. 1992. Churches and Church Membership in the United States 1990: An Enumeration by Region, State, and County Based on Data Reported for 133 Church Groupings. Atlanta, GA: Glenmary Research Center.
11.
BrattonKathleen A.HaynieKerry L.. 1999. “Agenda Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender and Race.” Journal of Politics61:658–79.
12.
BrintSteven. 1984. “‘New Class’ and Cumulative Trend Explanations of the Liberal Political Attitudes of Professionals.” American Journal of Sociology90:30–71.
13.
BrintSteven. 1985. “The Political Attitudes of Professionals.” Annual Review of Sociology11:389–414.
14.
BrintSteven. 1994. In an Age of Experts: The Changing Role of Professionals in Politics and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
BrintStevenCunninghamWilliam L.LiRebecca S. K.. 1997. The Politics of Professionals in Five Advanced Industrial Societies. In Citizen Politics in Post-Industrial Societies, eds. Nichols ClarkTerryRempelMichael. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
16.
BrooksClemManzaJeff. 1997a. Partisan Alignments of the ‘Old’ and ‘New’ Middle Classes in Post-Industrial America. In Citizen Politics in Post-Industrial Societies, eds. Nichols ClarkTerryRempelMichael. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
17.
BrooksClemManzaJeff. 1997b. “The Social and Ideological Bases of Middle-Class Political Realignment in the United States, 1972–1992.” American Sociological Review67:191–208.
18.
BurrellBarbara. 1994. A Woman's Place Is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
19.
ButtsPaul. 1997. The Social Orders of Feminism and Political Activism: Findings from Fourteen Countries. In Citizen Politics in Post-Industrial Societies, eds. Nichols ClarkTerryRempelMichael. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
20.
CareyJohn M.NiemiRichard G.PowellLynda W.. 2000. Term Limits in the State Legislatures. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
21.
CarrollSusan. 1994. Women as Candidates in American Politics. 2nd ed.Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
22.
Center for the American Woman and Politics. Various years.Fact Sheet: Women in State Legislatures. New Brunswick, NJ: Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University.
23.
ClarkJanet. 1998. Women at the National Level: An Update on Roll Call Voting Behavior. In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, eds. ThomasSueWilcoxClydeNew York: Oxford University Press.
24.
Council of State Governments. Various years.The Book of the States. Lexington, KY: The Council of State Governments.
25.
CoxElizabeth M.1996. Women State and Territorial Legislators, 1895–1995. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company.
26.
DarcyR.1995. Electoral Barriers to Women. In The United States Electoral Systems: Their Impact on Women and Minorities, eds. RuleWilmaZimmermanJosephNew York: Greenwood Press.
27.
DarcyR.WelchSusanClarkJanet. 1985. “Women Candidates in Single- and Multi-Member Districts: American State Legislative Races.” Social Science Quarterly66: 945–53.
28.
DarcyR.WelchSusanClarkJanet. 1994. Women, Elections, and Representation. 2nd ed.Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
29.
DavisNancy J.RobinsonRobert V.. 1991. “Men's and Women's Consciousness of Gender Inequality: Austria, West Germany, Great Britain, and the United States.” American Sociological Review56:72–84.
30.
DiamondIrene. 1977. Sex Roles in the State House. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31.
Diez-NicolasJuan. 1993. Postmaterialismo y Desrollo Economico en Espana. Presented at the World Conference on Social Values, Madrid, Spain.
32.
DuchRaymond M.TaylorMichael A.. 1993. “Postmaterialism and the Economic Condition.” American Journal of Political Science37:747–79.
33.
DurbinJ.1970. “Testing for Serial Correlation in Least-Squares Regression When Some of the Regressors Are Lagged Dependent Variables.” Econometrica38:410–21.
34.
DyeThomas R.1966. Politics, Economics, and the Public: Political Outcomes in the American States. Chicago: Rand McNally.
35.
ElazarDaniel J.1966. American Federalism: A View from the States. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company.
FlanaganScott C.1982a. “Changing Values in Advanced Industrial Societies: Inglehart's Silent Revolution from the Perspective of Japanese Findings.” Comparative Political Studies14:403–44.
38.
FlanaganScott C.1982b. “Measuring Value Change in Advanced Industrial Societies: A Rejoinder to Inglehart.” Comparative Political Studies15:99–128.
39.
FlanaganScott C.1987. “Value Change in Industrial Societies.” American Political Science Review81:1289–319.
40.
GierzynskiAnthony. 1994. Elections to State Legislatures. In Encyclopedia of the American Legislative System, ed. SilbeyJoel H.. New York: Scribner's.
41.
HillDavid B.1981. “Political Culture and Female Political Representation.” Journal of Politics43:159–68.
42.
HimmelsteinJerome L.1986. “The Social Basis of Anti-Feminism: Religious Networks and Culture.” The Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion25:1–15.
43.
HoganRobert E.2001. “The Influence of State and District Conditions on the Representation of Women in U.S. State Legislatures.” American Politics Research29:4–24.
44.
HoutMichaelBrooksClemManzaJeff. 1995. “The Democratic Class Struggle in the United States, 1948–1992.” American Sociological Review60:805–28.
45.
HunterJames Davison. 1991. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York: Basic Books.
46.
InglehartRonald. 1977. The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47.
InglehartRonald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
48.
InglehartRonald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49.
JackmanMary R.MuhaMichael. 1984. “Education and Inter-Group Attitudes: Moral Enlightenment, Superficial Democratic Commitment, or Intellectual Refinement?” American Sociological Review49:751–69.
50.
JohnsonDouglasPicardPaul R.QuinnBernard. 1974. Churches and Church Membership in the United States 1971: An Enumeration by Region, State, and County. Washington, DC: Glenmary Research Center.
51.
KingJames D.2002. “Single-Member Districts and the Representation of Women in American State Legislatures: The Effects of Electoral System Change.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly2:161–75.
52.
KleinEthel. 1984. Gender Politics: From Consciousness to Mass Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53.
LaddEverett C.Jr.1976–1977. “Liberalism Turned Upside Down: The Inversion of the New Deal Order.” Political Science Quarterly91:577–600.
54.
LaddEverett C.Jr.1978. “The New Lines Are Drawn: Class and Ideology in America.” Public Opinion3:48–53.
55.
LaddEverett C.Jr.1979. Pursuing the New Class: Social Theory and Social Data. In The New Class?, ed. Bruce-BriggsB.. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
56.
LaymanGeoffrey C.CarminesEdward G.. 1997. “Cultural Conflict in American Politics: Religious Traditionalism, Postmaterialism, and U.S. Political Behavior.” Journal of Politics59:751–77.
57.
MatlandRichard E.BrownDeborah Dwight. 1992. “District Magnitude's Effect on Female Representation in U. S. State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly17:469–92.
58.
MoncriefGary F.ThompsonJoel A.. 1992. “Electoral Structure and State Legislative Representation: A Research Note.” Journal of Politics54:246–56.
59.
NechemiasCarol. 1985. “Geographic Mobility and Women's Access to State Legislatures.” Western Political Quarterly38:119–31.
60.
NechemiasCarol. 1987. “Changes in the Election of Women to U.S. State Legislative Seats.” Legislative Studies Quarterly12:125–42.
61.
NiemiRichard G.HillJeffrey S.GrofmanBernard. 1985. “The Impact of Multimember Districts on Party Representation in U.S. State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly10:441–55.
62.
NorranderBarbaraWilcoxClyde. 1998. The Geography of Gender Power: Women in State Legislatures. In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, eds. ThomasSueWilcoxClydeNew York: Oxford University Press.
63.
QuinnBernardAndersonHermanBradleyMartinGoettingPaulShriverPeggy. 1982. Churches and Church Membership in the United States 1980: An Enumeration by Region, State, and County Based on Data Reported by 111 Religious Bodies. Atlanta, GA: Glenmary Research Center.
64.
ReichRobert. 1991. The Work of Nations: Preparing Ourselves for 21st Century Capitalism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
65.
RempelMichaelClarkTerry Nichols. 1997. Post-Industrial Politics: A Framework for Interpreting Citizen Politics since the 1960s. In Citizen Politics in Post-Industrial Societies, eds. Nichols ClarkTerryRempelMichael. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
66.
RuleWilma. 1990. “Why More Women Are State Legislators: A Research Note.” Western Political Quarterly43:432–48.
67.
RuleWilma. 1995. Multimember Legislative Districts: Minority and Anglo Women's and Men's Recruitment Opportunity. In The United States Electoral Systems: Their Impact on Women and Minorities, eds. RuleWilmaZimmermanJosephNew York: Greenwood Press.
68.
Saint-GermainMichelle. 1989. “Does Their Difference Make a Difference?: The Impact of Women on Public Policy in the Arizona State Legislature.” Social Science Quarterly70:956–68.
69.
SpencerByron G.1975. “The Small Sample Bias of Durbin's Tests for Serial Correlation.” Journal of Econometrics3:249–54.
70.
SquirePeverill. 1992. “Legislative Professionalization and Membership Diversity.” Legislative Studies Quarterly17:69–79.
71.
StonecashJeffrey M.2000. Class and Party in American Politics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
72.
ThomasSue. 1989. “Voting Patterns in the California Assembly: The Role of Gender.” Women & Politics9:43–57.
73.
ThomasSue. 1991. “The Impact of Women on State Legislative Policies.” Journal of Politics53:958–76.
74.
ThomasSue. 1994. How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.
75.
ThomasSue. 1998. Introduction: Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future. In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, eds. ThomasSueWilcoxClydeNew York: Oxford University Press.
76.
ThorntonArlandAlwinDuane F.CamburnDonald. 1983. “Causes and Consequences of Sex-Role Attitudes and Attitude Change.” American Sociological Review48:211–27.
77.
TrumpThomas M.1991. “Value Formation and Postmaterialism: Inglehart's Theory of Value Change Reconsidered.” Comparative Political Studies24:365–90.
78.
United States Bureau of Labor Statistics.1998. Geographic Profile of Employment and Unemployment, 1998. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
79.
United States Bureau of the Census.2000. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
80.
VandenboschSue. 1996. “A Negative Relationship Between Religion and the Percentage of Women State Legislators in the United States.” The Journal of Legislative Studies2:322–38.
81.
VegaArturoFirestoneJuanita. 1995. “The Effects of Gender on Congressional Behavior and the Substantive Representation of Women.” Legislative Studies Quarterly20:213–21.
82.
WeilFrederick. 1985. “The Variable Effects of Education on Liberal Attitudes.” American Sociological Review50:458–74.
83.
WelchSusan. 1985. Are Women More Liberal Than Men in the U.S. Congress?Legisla-
