Government and media rhetoric obscures the entrepreneurial roots of closed
circuit television (CCTV) and its position in the regeneration of politically
and economically ‘viable’ city centres. The paper charts
this concern with ‘viability’ and traces the reassertion
of class based discourses on crime, fear and insecurity as a component in the
regeneration of UK cities and reflected and reinforced by camera networks. The
efficacy of CCTV is questionable and its significance may be understood less for
its ‘crime prevention’ potential and more for its success
in reinforcing a long established scrutiny and criminalisation of the activities
of the least powerful inhabitants of urban areas at the expense of scrutinising
other harmful activities in the city.
BrennerT.TheodoreN. (2002) Cities and geographies of
‘actually existing neoliberalism’,
Antipode, 24(3), pp.
349–379.
3.
BourdieuP.WacquantL. (2001) ‘New LiberalSpeak:
notes on the new planetary vulgate’,
Radical Philosophy,
105(January/February), pp.
2–5.
4.
BrogdenM. (1991) On the Mersey Beat: Policing
Liverpool Between the Wars (New
York: Oxford University
Press).
5.
ColemanR.SimJ. (2000) You'll never walk alone: CCTV
surveillance, order and neo-liberal rule in Liverpool City
Centre, British Journal of Sociology,
51(3), pp.
623–639.
6.
ColemanR. (2004a): Images from a Neoliberal
City: the state, surveillance and social control,
Critical Criminology: An International Journal,
12(1), pp.
1–22.
7.
ColemanR. (2004b) Reclaiming the Streets:
Surveillance, Social Control and the City
(Cullompton: Willan
Publishing).
8.
ColemanR.SimJ.WhyteD. (2002) Power, politics and
partnerships: the state of crime prevention on Merseyside,
in: EdwardsA.HughesG.(Eds)Crime Control and Community: the new politics of public safety,
pp. 86–108. (Cullompton: Willan
Publishing).
9.
Daily Post (2003) Jobless at record low, 18
September.
10.
DittonJ. (1998) Public support for town
centre CCTV schemes: myth or reality?in: NorrisC.MoranJ.ArmstrongG.(Eds)Surveillance, Closed Circuit Television and Social Control, pp.
221–228
(Aldershot:
Ashgate).
11.
FaircloughN. (2000) New Labour, New Language?
(London: Karia
Press).
12.
GrahamS. (2000) The fifth
utility, Index on Censorship,
29(3), issue
194.
13.
The Guardian (2002) Mersey mission builds up to a grand
climax, 19 April.
14.
The Guardian (2002) Whitehall ‘fails to let
local people rule’, 29 October.
15.
The Guardian (2003) Benefits of Liverpool's culture
crown ‘overestimated’, 4 June.
16.
Hansard Written Answers for 2 November
1999, House of Commons: 10.
17.
HarveyD. (1990) The Condition of Postmodernity: An
Inquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change
(Oxford:
Blackwell).
18.
Home Office (1999) £170 million package for
CCTV and estate regeneration, press release, 16 March.
19.
The Independent (2004) Big brother Britain, 2004, 12
January.
KatzC. (2001) ‘Hiding the
target: Social Reproduction in Privatised Urban Environment’inMincaC.(ed.)Postmodern Geography: Theory and Praxis
(Oxford: Blackwell
Publishers) pp.
93–110.
24.
KoskelaH. (2002) Video surveillance, gender
and the safety of public urban space: ‘peeping tom’
goes hi-tech?Urban Geography, 23(3), pp.
257–278.
25.
Liverpool City Council (1993) Liverpool City Centre Plan,
Liverpool City Council, Planning and Development
Services.
26.
Liverpool City Council1997Action Plan — Regeneration Agenda for Liverpool: To Develop a
Safer City, Liverpool:
Liverpool City Council, Officer Partnership
Group.
27.
Liverpool Echo (2003) Boom Town, 6
June.
28.
Liverpool Echo (2003) New Deal is failing, 21
October.
29.
Liverpool Echo (2004) Cash down the drain, 8
March.
30.
Liverpool Echo (2004) Police launch race inquiry, 29
March.
31.
MacLeodG. (2002) From urban entrepreneurialism
to a ‘revanchist city’: on the spatial injustices of
Glasgow's renaissance, Antipode,
34(2), pp.
602–624.
32.
MasseyD. (1999) On space and the
city, in: MasseyD.AllenJ.PileS.(Eds)City Worlds, pp.
157–177
(London:
Routledge).
33.
Mersymart (2003) Safety vow for culture year, 19
June.
34.
MitchellD. (2003) The Right to the City: Social
Justice and the Fight for Public Space (New
York: The Guilford
Press).
35.
NACRO (2002) To CCTV or not to CCTV? Current
Review of Research into the Effectives of CCTV Systems in Reducing
Crime (London:
NACRO), May.
NorrisC.ArmstrongG. (1998) The suspicious eye'inCriminal Justice Matters, No. 33, Autumn:
pp. 10–11.
38.
The Observer (2002) Can you hear the Mersey beat?
Britain's richest man is leading private investment into a resurgent
Liverpool, 7 July.
39.
PeckJ. (2003) Geography and public policy:
mapping the penal state, Progress in Human
Geography, 27(2), pp.
222–232.
40.
PeckJ.TickellA. (2002) Neoliberalizing
space, Antipode,
34(3), pp.
380–404.
41.
PeckJ.WardK. (2002) Placing
Manchester, in: PeckJ.WardK.(Eds)City of Revolution: Restructuring Manchester
(Manchester: Manchester
University Press), pp.
1–17.
42.
ParentiC. (1999) Lockdown America: Police and Prisons
in the Age of Crisis (London:
Verso).
43.
PeckJ.TickellA. (2002) Neoliberalizing
space, Antipode,
34(3), pp.
380–404.
44.
SmithN. (1996) The New Urban Frontier:
Gentrification and the Revanchist City
(London:
Routledge).
WacquantL. (1999) How Penal Common Sense Comes
to Europeans: notes on the transatlantic diffusion of the neoliberal
doxa, European Societies,
1(3), pp.
319–352.
47.
WardK. (2002) Entrepreneurial urbanism,
state restructuring and civilising ‘New’ East
Manchester, Area,
35(2), pp.
116–127.
