The worldwide incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is increasing, and AAA remains a major source of mortality in our population. With a mortality rate of over 80% for AAA rupture, diagnosis and treatment of AAAs, although still asymptomatic, is imperative. Current techniques for eval uation of AAAs include clinical exam and radiologic modalities, which include contrast arteriography, ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic reso nance imaging. Controversy exists as to the most cost-effective technique(s) for timely diagnosis and management of AAAs. This article reviews the role of the various diagnostic techniques available for screening, nonoperative surveillance, and both open and endovascular repair of AAAs.
Vital statistics of the United States 1990. U.S. Department of the Health and Human Services, Public Health Services. Vol. II, Part A: 228
2.
Szilagyi, DEClinical diagnosis of intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms . In: Bergan JJ, Yao JST, eds. Aneurysms: Diagnosis and Treatment. New York: Grune & Stratton; 1982:205-215
3.
Ingoldby Cjh , Wujanto R., Mitchell JEImpact of vascular surgery on community mortality from ruptured aortic aneurysms . Br J Surg1986;73:551-553
4.
Johansen K., Kohler TR, Nicholls SC, et al. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: the Harborview experience . J Vasc Surg1991;13:240-247
5.
Dubost C., Allary M., Oeconomas N.Resection of an aneurysm of the abdominal aorta: reestablishment of the continuity by a preserved human arterial graft, with result after five months. Arch Surg1952;64:405-408
6.
Fowl RJ, Blebea J., Stallion A., et al. Prevalence of unsuspected abdominal aortic aneurysm in male veterans. Ann Vasc Surg1993;7:117-121
7.
Bickerstaff L., Hollier L., Van Peenen H, et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysms: the changing natural history. J Vasc Surg1984;1:6-12
8.
Wolk L., Pasdar H., McKeown J. Jr, et al. Computerized tomography in the diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Surg Gynecol Obstet1981;153:229-232
9.
Collin J., Araujo L., Walton J., Lindsell D.Oxford screening programme for abdominal aortic aneurysm in men aged 65 to 74 years. Lancet1988;2:613-615
10.
Thurmond AS , Semler HJAbdominal aortic aneurysm: incidence in a population at risk. J Cardiovasc Surg1986 ;27:457-460
11.
Carty GA, Nachtigal T., Magyar R., et al. Abdominal duplex ultrasound screening for occult aortic aneurysm during carotid arterial evaluation. J Vasc Surg1993;17:696-702
12.
Twomey A., Twomey EM, Wilkins RA, et al. Unrecognized aneurysmal disease in male hypertensive patients . Br J Surg1984;71:307-308
13.
Webster MW, Ferrell RE, St. Jean PL, et al. Ultrasound screening of first-degree relatives of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg1991;13:9-14
Quill DS, Colgan MP, Sumner DSUltrasonic screening for the detection of abdominal aortic aneurysms . Surg Clin North Am1989;69:713
16.
Berridge DC , Griffith Cpm, Amar SS, et al. Screening for clinically unsuspected abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients with peripheral vascular disease. Eur J Vasc Surg1989;3:421-422
17.
Melton L., Bickerstaff L., Hollier L., et al. Changing incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a population based study. Am J Epidemiol1984;120:374-386
18.
Fowkes Fgr, Macintyre Cca, Ruckley CVIncreasing incidence of aortic aneurysms in England and Wales. Br Med J1989;298:33-35
19.
Mealy K., Salmon A.The true incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Surg1988;2:405-498
20.
Castleden W. , Mercer J.Abdominal aortic aneurysms in Western Australia: descriptive epidemiology and patterns of rupture. Br J Surg1985;72:109-112
21.
Cronenwett JL, Murphy TF, Zeleuock GB, et al. Actuarial analysis of variables associated with rupture of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Surgery1985;98:472-483
22.
Joyce JWPreoperative evaluation of aneurysms. In: Strandness DE Jr, van Breda A, eds. Vascular Disease: Surgical and Interventional Therapy. New York: Churchill Livingstone;1994:579-588
23.
Lederle FA, Walker JM, Reinke DBSelective screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms with physical examination and ultrasound. Arch Intern Med1988;148:1753-1756
24.
Robicsek F., Daugherty HK, Mellen DC, et al. The value of angiography in the diagnosis of unruptured aeurysms of the abdominal aorta. Ann Thorac Surg1971 ;11:538-550
25.
Arnell TD, DeVirgilio C., Donayre C., et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening in elderly males with atherosclerosis: the value of physical exam. Am Surg1996; 62:861-864
26.
LaRoy LL, Gormier PJ, Matalon Tas, et al. Imaging of abdominal aortic aneurysm. AJR1989;152:785-792
27.
Stanson AWImaging of aneurysms. In: Strandness DE Jr, van Breda A, eds. Vascular Diseases: Surgical and Interventional Therapy. New York: Churchill Livingstone;1994: 589-603
28.
Perko MJ, Schroeder TV, Olsen PS, et al. Natural history of abdominal aortic aneurysm: A survey of 63 patients treated nonoperatively. Ann Vasc Surg1993;7:113-116
29.
Taylor LM, Porter JMBasic data related to clinical decision-making in abdominal aortic aneurysms . Ann Vasc Surg1986;1:502-504
30.
Bernstein EF , Chan ELAbdominal aortic aneurysm in high risk patients: outcome of selective management based on size and expansion rate. Ann Surg1984;200:255-263
31.
Delin A., Ohlsen H., Swedenborg J.Growth rate of abdominal aortic aneurysm as measured by computed tomography . Br J Surg1985;72:530-532
32.
LiHooy FN, Steffan G., Griesler HP, et al. Use of sequential B-mode ultrasonography to manage abdominal aortic aneurysms. Arch Surg1989;124:419-421
33.
Nevitt MP, Ballard DJ, Hallet JW Jr.Prognosis of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a population-based study . N Engl J Med1989;321:1009-1014
34.
Sterpetti AV , Shultz RD, Feldhaus RJ, et al. Factors influencing enlargement rate of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Surg Res1987;43:211-219
35.
Krupski WC, Bass A., Thurston DW, et al. Utility of computed tomography for surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Arch Surg1990;125:1345-1350
36.
Pillari G.Chang JB, Zito J., et al. Computed tomography of abdominal aortic aneurysm: an in vivo pathological report with a note on dynamic predictors. Arch Surg1988; 123:727-732
37.
Brown PM, Pattenden R., Vernooy C., et al. Selective management of abdominal aortic aneurysms in a prospective measurement program. J Vasc Surg1996;23:213-222
38.
Johansson G. , Nydahl S., Olofsson P., Swedenborg J.Survival of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms: comparison between operative and non-operative management. Eur J Vasc Surg1990;4:497-502
39.
Szilagyi DE , Smith RF, DeRusso FJ, et al. Contribution of abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy to the prolongation of life. Ann Surg1966 ;164:678-699
40.
Debakey ME, Crawford ES, Cooley DA, et al. Aneurysm of abdominal aorta: analysis of results of graft replacement therapy one to eleven years after operation. Ann Surg1964; 160:622
41.
Brewster DC , Retana A., Waltman AC, Darling RCAngiography in the management of aneurysms of the abdominal aorta: its value and safety. N Engl J Med1975;292:822
42.
Couch NP, O'Mahony J., McIrvine A., et al. The place of abdominal aortography in abdominal aortic aneurysm resection. Arch Surg1983;118:1029
43.
Campbell JJ , Bell DD, Gaspar MRSelective use of arteriography in the assessment of aortic aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg1990 ;4(5):419-423
44.
Westhoff-Bleck M., Bleck JS, Jost S.The adverse effects of angiographic radiocontrast media. Drug Safety1991;6(1):28-36
Brothers TE , Elliot BM, Robison JG, Rajagopalen PRStratification of mortality risk for renal artery surgery. Ann Surg1995;61:45-51
47.
Tarazi RY, Hertzer NR, Beven EG, et al. Simultaneous aortic reconstruction and renal revascularization: risk factors and late results in eighty-nine patients. J Vase Surg1987; 5:707-714
48.
Errington ML , Ferguson JM, Gillespie IN, Connell HM, Ruckley CV, Wright AR. Complete pre-operative imaging assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm with spiral CT angiography. Clin Radiol1997;52:369-377
49.
Snidow JJ, Johnson MS, Harris VJ, et al. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for aortoiliac inflow assessment plus renal artery screening in a single breath hold. Radiology1996;198:725-732
50.
Prokop M., Oh Shin H., Schanz A., Schaefer-Prokop CMUse of maximum intensity projections in CT angiography: a basic review . Radiographics1997;17:433-451
51.
Prokop M., Schaefer-Prokop C., Galanski M.Spiral CT angiography of the abdomen. Abdom Imaging1997;22:143-153
52.
Rubin GD, Jeffrey RB3D spiral CT angiography of the abdomen and thorax. In: Fish-man EK, Jeffrey RB, eds. Spiral CT Principles, Techniques and Clinical Applications. New York, NY: Raven Press;1995:183-195
53.
Freund M., Muller-Hulsbeck S., Palmie ST, Wesner F., Heller M.CT angiography of the abdomen with double spiral computed tomography: initial clinical experience. Eur Radiol1995 ;5(Suppl):1262
54.
Costello P.Spiral CT angiography of the abdominal aorta and its side branches . ECR, Vienna, Scientific Program, Abstract 293, 1993:103
55.
Gaa J., Stehling MK, Costello P.The first clinical experiences with spiral-CT-angiography of the abdomen . Rontgenpraxis1993;46:310-312
Rubin GD, Walker PJ, Dake MD, et al. 3D spiral CT angiography: an alternative imaging modality for the abdominal aorta and its branches. J Vasc Surg1993;18:656-666
60.
Ray CE, Kaufman JAComplications of diagnostic angiography. In: Complications in Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Science; 1996:303-316
61.
Rubin GD, Silverman SGHelical (spiral) CT of the retroperitoneum. Radiol Clin North Am1995;33(5):903-932
62.
Platt JF, Ellis JH, Korobkin M., Reige KA, Konnak JW, Leichtman ABPotential renal donors: Comparison of conventional imaging with helical CT . Radiology1996; 198:419-423
63.
Cochran ST, Krasny RM, Danovitch GM, et al. Helical CT angiography for examination of living renal donors . AJR1997;168:1569-1573
64.
Winter TC, Freeny PC, Nghiem HV, et al. Hepatic arterial anatomy in transplantation candidates: evaluation with three-dimensional CT arteriography. Radiology1995; 195:363-370
65.
Gilfeather M., Holland GA, Siegelman ES, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced ultrafast three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of the abdominal aorta and visceral and iliac vessels. Radiographics1997;17:423-432
66.
Snidow JJ, Harris VJ, Johnson MS, et al. Iliac artery evaluation with two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography: update. JVIR1996;7:213-220
67.
Durham JD, Hackworth, Tober JC, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography in the Preoperative evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysms . Am J Surg1993;166:173-178
68.
Ecklund K., Hartnell GG, Hughes LA, Stokes KR, Finn JPMR angiography as the sole method in evaluating abdominal aortic aneurysms: correlation with conventional techniques and surgery. Radiology1994;192:345-350
69.
Prince MR, Chenevert TL, Foo Tkf, Londy FJ, Ward JS, Maki JHContrast-enhanced abdominal MR angiography: optimization of imaging delay time by automating the detection of contrast material arrival in the aorta . Radiology1997;203:109-114
70.
Yano T., Kodama T., Suzuki Y., Watanabe K.Gadolinium-enhanced 3D time-of-flight MR angiography experimental and clinical evaluation. Acta Radiologica1977;38:47-54
71.
Prince MR, Arnoldus G., Frisoli JKNephrotoxicity of high-dose gadolinium compared with iodinated contrast . J Magn Reson Imaging1996;6(1):162-166
72.
Yucel EKMR Angiography for evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm: has the time come ? Radiology1994;192:321-323
73.
Kaufman JA, Stuart GC, Peterson MJ, Cambria RP, Prince MR, Waltman ACMR imaging (including MR angiography) of abdominal aortic aneurysms: comparison with conventional angiography. AJR1994;163:203-210
74.
Ernst CBAbdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med1993 ;328:1167-1172
75.
Rozenblit A. , Marin ML, Veith FJ, Cynamon J., Wahl SI, Bakal CWEndovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: value of postoperative follow-up with helical CT. AJR1995;165:1473-1479
76.
Dorffner R. , Thurnher S. Youssefzadeh S., et al. Spiral CT angiography in the assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms after stent grafting: value of maximum intensity projections. JCAT1997 ;21(3):472-477
77.
White RA, Donayre C., Kopchok G., Walot I., Wilson E., deVirgilio C.Intravascular ultrasound: the ultimate tool for abdominal aortic aneurysm assessment and endovascular graft delivery. J Endovascular Surg1997;4:45-55
