Osborne ED, Sutherland CG, Scholl AJ Jr, Rowntree LGRoentgenography of urinary tract during excretion of sodium iodide . JAMA80:368-373, 1923.
2.
Swick M.Intravenous urography by means of the sodium salt of 5 iodo-2 pyridon-N-acetic acid. JAMA95:1403-1409, 1930 .
3.
Almèn T.Contrast agent design: Some aspects on the synthesis of water soluble contrast agents of low osmolality. J Theor Biol24:216-226, 1969.
4.
Jacobson PD, Rosenquist CJThe introduction of low-osmolar contrast agents in radiology: Medical, economic, legal and public policy issues. JAMA260:1586-1592, 1988.
5.
Dawson P.Chemotoxicity of contrast media and clinical adverse effects: A review . Invest Radiol20:S84-S91, 1985.
6.
Shehadi WHAdverse reactions to intravascularly administered contrast media: A comprehensive study based on a prospective survey. AJR124:145-152, 1975.
7.
Palmer FJThe R.A.C.R. survey of intravenous contrast media reactions: A preliminary report. Australas Radiol32:8-11, 1988.
8.
Shehadi WH, Toniolo G.Adverse reactions to contrast media. A report from the Committee on Safety of Contrast Media of the International Society of Radiology. Radiology137: 299-302, 1980.
9.
Kinnison ML, Powe NR, Steinberg EPResults of randomized controlled trials of low-versus high-osmolality contrast media. Radiology170:381-389, 1989.
10.
Bettman M.Angiographic contrast agents: Conventional and new media compared . AJR139:787-794, 1982.
11.
Bettman MA, Robbins A., Braun SD, et al. Contrast venography of the leg: Diagnostic efficacy, tolerance, and complication rates with ionic and nonionic contrast media. Radiology165:113-116, 1987.
Rao VM, Rao AK, Steiner RM, et al. The effect of ionic and nonionic contrast media on the sickling phenomenon. Radiology144:291-293, 1982.
14.
Kopka PM, Smith DC, Bull BSThrombin generation in nonclottable mixtures of blood and nonionic contrast agents. Radiology174:459-461, 1990.
15.
Rasuli P., McLeish WA, Hammond DIAnticoagulant effects of contrast materials: In vitro study of iohexal, ioxaglate, and diatrozoate. AJR152:309-311, 1989.
16.
Hwang MH, Piao ZE, Murdock DK, et al. Risk of thromboembolism during diagnostic and interventional cardiac procedures with nonionic contrast media. Radiology174: 453-457, 1990.
17.
Bettman MA, Bourdillon PD, Barry WH, et al. Contrast agents for cardiac angiography: Effects of a nonionic agent vs. a standard ionic agent. Radiology153:583-587, 1984.
18.
Smith DG, Lois JF, Gomes AS, et al. Pulmonary arteriography: Comparison of cough stimulation effects of diatrozoate and ioxaglate. Radiology162:617-618, 1987.
19.
Zack A., Måre K., Violante M.The aggravating effect of dehydration on pulmonary edema induced by ionic and nonionic contrast media. Invest Radiol20:212-216, 1985.
20.
Brezis M., Rosen S., Silva P., Epstein FHRenal ischemia: A new perspective. Kidney Int26: 375-383, 1984.
21.
Lund G., Rysavy J., Salomonowitz E., et al. Nephrotoxicity of contrast media assessed by occlusion arteriography . Radiology152:615-619, 1984.
22.
Holtas S., Almèn T., Hellsten S., Tejler L.Proteinuria following nephroangiography. VI. Comparison between metrizoate and metrizamide in an. Acta Radiol21:491-494, 1980.
23.
Gomes AS, Lois JF, Baker JD, et al. Acute renal dysfunction in high-risk patients after angiography: Comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast media. Radiology170:65-68, 1989.
24.
Schwab SJ, Hlatky MA, Pierper KS, et al. Contrast nephrotoxicity: A randomized controlled trial of a nonionic and an ionic radiographic contrast agent. N Engl J Med320:149-153, 1989.
25.
Stacul F., Carraro M., Magnaldi S., et al. Contrast agent nephrotoxicity: Comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents. AJR149:1287-1289, 1987 .
26.
Parfrey PS, Griffiths SM, Barreh BJ, et al. Contrast material-induced renal failure in patients with diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency, or both. N Engl J Med320:143-149, 1989.
27.
Lasser EC, Berry CC, Talner LB, et al. Pretreatment with corticosteroids to alleviate reactions to intravenous contrast material. N Engl J Med317:845-849, 1987.
28.
Widrich WC, Singer RJ, Robbins AHThe use of intra-arterial Lidocaine to control pain due to aortofemoral arteriography . Radiology124:37-41, 1977.
29.
Evens RGEconomic impact of low-osmolality contrast agents on radiology procedures and departments. Radiology162:267-268, 1987.
30.
Fischer HW, Spataro RF, Rosenberg PMMedical and economic considerations in using a new contrast medium . Arch Intern Med146:1717-1721, 1986 .
31.
McClennan BLLow-osmolality contrast media: Premises and promises. Radiology162: 1-8, 1987.
32.
Wolf GLSafer, more expensive iodinated contrast agents: How do we decide?Radiology159:557-558, 1986.
33.
Bettman MAGuidelines for use of low-osmolality contrast agents. Radiology172:901-903, 1989.
34.
McClennan BLIonic and nonionic iodinated contrast media: Evaluation and strategies for use. AJR155:225-233, 1990.
