Restricted accessOtherFirst published online 2007-12
Has evidence changed practice? Appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy after the clinical trials. Halm EA,Tuhrim S,Wang JJ,Rojas M,Hannan EL,Chassin MR. Neurology. 2007;68:187-194
Winslow CM, Solomon DH, Chassin MR, Kosecoff J., Merrick NJ, Brook RHThe appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy. N Engl J Med . 1988;318:721-727.
2.
Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M., et al. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med.1998;339:1415-1425.
3.
Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study.Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA.1995;273:1421-1428.
4.
Perler BA, Dardik A., Burleyson GP, Gordon TA, Williams GMThe influence of age and hospital volume on the results of carotid endarterectomy: a state-wide analysis of 9,918 cases. J Vasc Surg. 1998;27:25-33.
5.
Matsen SL, Chang DC, Perler BA, Roseborough GS, Williams GMTrends in the in-hospital stroke rate following carotid endarterectomy in California and Maryland. J Vasc Surg. 2006 ;44:488-495.
6.
Dimick JB, Cowan JA, Stanley JC, Henke PK, Pronovost PJ, Upchurch GRSurgeon specialty and provider volumes are related to outcome of intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the United States. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:739-744.
