The May 2015 release of the report of the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing highlighted a fundamental change in the issues dominating discussions about policing in America. That change has moved discussions away from a focus on what is legal or effective in crime control and toward a concern for how the actions of the police influence public trust and confidence in the police. This shift in discourse has been motivated by two factors—first, the recognition by public officials that increases in the professionalism of the police and dramatic declines in the rate of crime have not led to increases in police legitimacy, and second, greater awareness of the limits of the dominant coercive model of policing and of the benefits of an alternative and more consensual model based on public trust and confidence in the police and legal system. Psychological research has played an important role in legitimating this change in the way policymakers think about policing by demonstrating that perceived legitimacy shapes a set of law-related behaviors as well as or better than concerns about the risk of punishment. Those behaviors include compliance with the law and cooperation with legal authorities. These findings demonstrate that legal authorities gain by a focus on legitimacy. Psychological research has further contributed by articulating and demonstrating empirical support for a central role of procedural justice in shaping legitimacy, providing legal authorities with a clear road map of strategies for creating and maintaining public trust. Given evidence of the benefits of legitimacy and a set of guidelines concerning its antecedents, policymakers have increasingly focused on the question of public trust when considering issues in policing. The acceptance of a legitimacy-based consensual model of police authority building on theories and research studies originating within psychology illustrates how psychology can contribute to the development of evidence-based policies in the field of criminal law.
AbuwalaR.FaroleD. J. (2008). The effects of the Harlem housing court on tenant perceptions of justice. New York, NY: Center for Court Innovation.
2.
AyresI.BraithwaiteJ. (1992). Responsive regulation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
3.
BartolC. R. (1996). Police psychology: Then, now, and beyond. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 70–89.
4.
BayleyD. (1994). Policing for the future. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
5.
BayleyD.NixonC. (2010). The changing environment for policing, 1985-2008. Cambridge, MA: Kennedy School of Government.
6.
BierieD. M. (2012). Procedural justice and prison violence. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19, 15–29.
7.
BladerS.TylerT. R. (2009). Testing and expanding the group engagement model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 445–464.
8.
BlumsteinA.CohenJ.NaginD. (Eds.). (1978). Deterrence and incapacitation: Estimating the effects of criminal sanctions on crime rates. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
9.
BondC. E. W.GowD. J. (1996). Policing the beat: The experience in Toowoomba, Queensland. Crime Prevention Studies, 6, 153–173.
10.
BottomsA.Von HirschA. (2010). The crime preventive impact of penal sanctions. In CaneP.KritzerH. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of empirical legal research (pp. 96–124). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
11.
BradfordB. (2011). Voice, neutrality and respect: Use of victim support services, procedural justice, and confidence in the criminal justice system. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 11, 345–366.
12.
BradfordB.JacksonJ.HoughM. (2014). Police legitimacy in action. In ReisigM.KaneR. J. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of police and policing (pp. 551–570). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
13.
BradfordB.MurphyK.JacksonJ. (2014). Officers as mirrors: Policing, procedural justice and the (re)production of social identity. British Journal of Criminology, 54, 527–550.
14.
BradfordB.QuintonP.MyhillA.PorterG. (2013). Why do ‘the law’ comply? Procedural justice, group identification and officer motivations in police organizations. European Journal of Criminology, 11, 110–131.
15.
BragaA.WeisburdD. (Eds.). (2006). Police innovation: Contrasting perspectives. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
16.
BrankE.WoolardJ. L.BrownV. E.FondacaroM.LeuscherJ. L.ChinnR. G.MillerS. A. (2007). Will they tell?: Weapons reporting by middle-school youth. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 5, 125–146.
17.
BreyerS. (2010). Making our democracy work: A judge’s view. New York, NY: Random House.
18.
BrubacherM. R.FondacaroM. R.BrankE. M.BrownV. E.MillerS. A. (2009). Procedural justice in resolving family disputes: Implications for childhood bullying. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 15, 149–167.
19.
BrunsonR. K.GauJ. M. (2014). Race, place, and policing the inner-city. In ReisigM.KaneR. J. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of police and policing (pp. 362–382). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
20.
BurkeK.LebenS. (2008). Procedural fairness: A key ingredient of public satisfaction. Court Review, 44, 4–25.
21.
CasperJ. D.TylerT.FisherB. (1988). Procedural justice in felony cases. Law & Society Review, 22, 483–508.
22.
CochranJ. C. (2012). The ties that bind or the ties that break: Examining the relationship between visitation and prisoner misconduct. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 433–440.
23.
CochranJ. C.MearsD. P.BalesW. D. (2013). Assessing the effectiveness of correctional sanctions. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30, 317–347.
24.
ColquittJ. A.ConlonD. E.WessonM. J.PorterC. O. L. H.NgK. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425–445.
25.
CongerJ. A.KanungoR. N. (1998). Charismatic leadership in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
CookP. J.MacDonaldJ. (2011). The role of private action in controlling crime. In CookP. J.LudwigJ.McCraryJ. (Eds.), Controlling crime: Strategies and tradeoffs (pp. 331–365). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
27.
CorrellJ.ParkB.JuddC. M.WittenbrinkB. (2002). The police officer’s dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1314–1329.
28.
CoxW. T. L.DevineP. G.PlantE. A.SchwartzL. L. (2014). Toward a comprehensive understanding of officers’ shooting decisions: No simple answers to this complex problem. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36, 356–364.
DaiM.FrankJ.SunI. (2011). Procedural justice during police-citizen encounters: The effects of process-based policing on citizen compliance and demeanor. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 159–168.
31.
De AngelisJ.KupchikA. (2007). Citizen oversight, procedural justice, and officer perceptions of the complaint investigation process. Policing, 30, 651–671.
32.
De AngelisJ.KupchikA. (2009). Ethnicity, trust, and acceptance of authority among police officers. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 273–279.
33.
DentonD. (2007). Procedural fairness in the California courts. Court Review, 44, 44–54.
34.
DurlaufS. N.NaginD. (2011). Imprisonment and crime: Can both be reduced?Criminology & Public Policy, 10, 13–54.
ElliottI.ThomasS. D. M.OgloffJ. R. P. (2011). Procedural justice in contacts with the police. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17, 592–610.
37.
ElovainioM.KivimakiM.EcclesM.SinervoT. (2002). Team climate and procedural justice as predictors of occupational strain. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 359–374.
38.
ElovainioM.SteenN.PresseauJ.FrancisJ.HrisosS.HawthorneG.. . . EcclesM. P. (2013). Is organizational justice associated with clinical performance in the care of patients with diabetes in primary care?Family Practice, 30, 31–39.
39.
EmeryR. E.MatthewsS. G.KitzmannK. (1994). Child custody mediation and litigation: Parents’ satisfaction and functioning one year after settlement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 124–129.
40.
EppC. R.Maynard-MoodyS.Haider-MarkelD. (2014). Pulled over: How police stops define race and citizenship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
41.
EvansW. N.OwensE. G. (2007). COPS and crime. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 181–201.
42.
FaganJ.PiqueroA. R. (2007). Rational choice and developmental influences on recidivism among adolescent felony offenders. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4, 715–748.
43.
FarmerS. J.BeehrT. A.LoveK. G. (2003). Becoming an undercover police officer. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 373–387.
44.
FaroleD. J. (2007). Public perceptions of New York’s courts: The New York State Residents Survey. New York, NY: Center for Court Innovation.
45.
FischerC. (Ed.). (2014). Legitimacy and procedural justice: A new element of police leadership. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
46.
FischerR.HarbC.Al-SarrafS.NashabeO. (2008). Support for resistance among Iraqi students. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30, 167–175.
47.
FiskeA. P.KitayamaS.MarkusH. R.NisbettR. E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 915–981). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
48.
FoaU. G. (1971). Interpersonal and economic resources. Science, 171, 345–351.
49.
FoxD. R. (1993). Psychological jurisprudence and radical social change. American Psychologist, 48, 234–241.
50.
FrenchJ. R. P.RavenB. (1959). The bases of social power. In CartwrightD. (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
51.
FujishiroK.HeaneyC. A. (2009). Justice at work, job stress, and employee health. Health Education & Behavior, 36, 487–504.
52.
GaesG. G.CampS. D. (2009). Unintended consequences: Experimental evidence for the criminogenic effect of prison security level placement on post-release recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 5, 139–162.
GellerW.BelskyL. (2009). Building our way out of crime: The transformative power of police-community relationships. Brooklyn, NY: Geller & Associates.
56.
GlaserJ. (2015). Suspect race: Causes and consequences of racial profiling. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
57.
GlaserJ.KnowlesE. D. (2008). Implicit motivation to control prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 164–172.
58.
GoffP. A.EberhardtJ. L.WilliamsM. J.JacksonM. C. (2008). Not yet human: Implicit knowledge, historical dehumanization, and contemporary consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 292–306.
59.
GoffP. A.EpsteinL. M.ReddyK. S. (2013). Crossing the line of legitimacy: The impact of cross-deputization policy on crime reporting. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19, 250–258.
60.
GoldM. (1999). The complex social scientist: A Kurt Lewin reader. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
GonzalezC.TylerT. R. (2008). The psychology of enfranchisement. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 447–466.
63.
GottfredsonD. C.KearleyB. W.NajakaS. S.RochaC. M. (2007). How drug treatment courts work. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 44, 3–35.
64.
GottfredsonM. R. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
65.
GregoryA.WeinsteinR. S. (2008). The discipline gap and African-Americans: Defiance or cooperation in the high school classroom. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 455–475.
66.
HaasN. E.KeijserJ. W.BruinsmaG. J. N. (2014). Public support for vigilantism, confidence in police and police responsiveness. Policing & Society, 24, 224–241.
67.
HaneyC. (1991). The Fourteenth Amendment and symbolic legality: Let them eat due process. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 183–204.
68.
HarcourtB. E. (2001). Illusion of order: The false promise of broken windows policing. Cambridge, England: Harvard University Press.
69.
HarcourtB. E.LudwigJ. (2006). Broken windows: New evidence from New York City and a five-city social experiment. University of Chicago Law Review, 73(1), 271–320.
70.
HarrisC. J.WordenR. E. (2014). The effects of sanctions on police misconduct. Crime and Delinquency, 60, 1258–1288.
71.
HarrisL. T.FiskeS. T. (2011). Dehumanized perception: A psychological means to facilitate atrocities, torture, and genocide?Journal of Psychology, 219, 175–181.
72.
HasisiB.WeisburdD. (2011). Going beyond ascribed identities: The importance of procedural justice in airport security screening in Israel. Law & Society Review, 45, 867–892.
73.
HaslamN. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 252–264.
74.
HaydenR. M.AndersenJ. K. (1979). On the evaluation of procedural systems in laboratory experiments: A critique of Thibaut and Walker. Law and Human Behavior, 3, 21–38.
75.
HeponiemiT.KouvonenA.SinervoT.ElovainioM. (2010). Do psychosocial factors moderate the association of fixed-term employment with work interference with family and sleeping problems in registered nurses. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47, 1096–1104.
76.
HindsL. (2007). Building police-youth relationships: The importance of procedural justice. Youth Justice, 7, 195–209.
77.
HindsL. (2009). Youth, police legitimacy and informal contact. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 24, 10–21.
78.
HindsL.MurphyK. (2007). Public satisfaction with police: Using procedural justice to improve police legitimacy. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 40, 27–42.
79.
HippleN. K.GruenewaldJ.McGarrellE. F. (2011). Restorativeness, procedural justice, and defiance as predictors of reoffending of participants in family group conferences. Crime & Delinquency, 60, 1131–1157.
80.
HoffmanM. (1977). Moral internalization. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 85–133). New York, NY: Academic Press.
81.
HoganT. P. (2012). Next steps in understanding the significance of organizational justice. Medical Care, 50, 829–830.
82.
HohlK.StankoB.NewburnT. (2012). The effect of the 2011 London disorder on public opinion of the police and attitudes towards crime, disorder, and sentencing. Policing, 7, 12–20.
83.
HoughM.JacksonJ.BradfordB. (2013). Legitimacy, trust and compliance. In TankebeJ.LieblingA. (Eds.), Legitimacy and criminal justice (pp. 326–352). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
84.
HurdI. (1999). Legitimacy and authority in international politics. International Organization, 53, 379–408.
85.
JacksonJ.BradfordB.HoughM.MyhillA.QuintonP.TylerT. R. (2012). Why do people comply with the law? Legitimacy and the influence of legal institutions. British Journal of Criminology, 52, 1051–1071.
86.
JacksonJ.BradfordB.KuhaJ.HoughM. (2013). Empirical legitimacy as two connected psychological states. In MeskoG.TankebeJ. (Eds.), Improving legitimacy of criminal justice in emerging democracies (pp. 137–160). London, England: Springer.
87.
JacksonJ.BradfordB.StankoB.HohlK. (2013). Just authority?: Trust in the police in England and Wales. New York, NY: Routledge.
88.
JacksonJ.HuqA. Z.BradfordB.TylerT. R. (2013). Monopolizing force? Police legitimacy and public attitudes toward the acceptability of violence. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19, 479–497.
89.
JacobsJ. (2015). The eternal criminal record. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
90.
JainE. (2015). Arrests as regulation. Stanford Law Review, 67, 809–867.
91.
JohnsonR.RaphaelS. (2012). How much crime reduction does the marginal prisoner buy?Journal of Law and Economics, 55, 275–310.
92.
Jonathan-ZamirT.WeisburdD. (2011). The effects of security threats on antecedents of police legitimacy. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 50, 3–32.
Judicial Council of California. (2011, May). Procedural fairness in California: Initiatives, challenges, and recommendations. New York, NY: Center for Court Innovation.
95.
Justice in focus: The strategic plan for California Judicial Branch, 2006–2012. (2006). San Francisco: Judicial Council of California.
96.
KaiserC. R.MajorB.JurcevicI.DoverT. L.BradyL. M.ShapiroJ. R. (2013). Presumed fair: Ironic effects of organizational diversity structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 504–519.
97.
KaneR. J. (2005). Compromised police legitimacy as a predictor of violent crime in structurally disadvantaged communities. Criminology, 43, 469–498.
98.
KatzD.GutekB. (1976). Bureaucratic encounters. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
99.
KelmanH. C. (1958). Compliance, identification and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 51–60.
100.
KelmanH. C.HamiltonV. L. (1989). Crimes of obedience: Toward a social psychology of authority and responsibility. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
101.
KitaeffJ. (Ed.). (2011). Handbook of police psychology. Abingdon, England: Taylor & Francis.
102.
KitzmannK.EmeryR. (1993). Procedural justice and parents’ satisfaction in a field study of child custody dispute resolution. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 553–567.
103.
KivimakiM.ElovainioM.VahteraJ.VirtanenM.StansfeldS. A. (2003). Association between organizational inequity and incidence of psychiatric disorders in female employees. Psychological Medicine, 33, 319–326.
104.
KivimakiM.FerrieJ. E.BrunnerE.HeadJ.ShipleyM.VahteraJ.MarmotM. G. (2005). Justice at work and reduced risk of coronary heart disease among employees. Archives of Internal Medicine, 165, 2245–2251.
105.
KivimakiM.FerrieJ. E.HeadJ.ShipleyM. J.VahteraJ.MarmotM. G. (2004). Organizational justice and change in justice as predictors of employee health. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 58, 931–937.
106.
KleimanM. A. R. (2009). When brute force fails: How to have less crime and less punishment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
107.
KochelT. R. (2012). Can police legitimacy promote collective efficacy?Justice Quarterly, 29, 384–419.
108.
Kohler-HausmannI. (2013). Misdemeanor justice: Control without conviction. American Journal of Sociology, 119, 351–393.
109.
Kohler-HausmannI. (2014). Managerial justice and mass misdemeanors. Stanford Law Review, 66, 611-693.
110.
KopenovichS.YanosP.PrattC.KoernerJ. (2013). Procedural justice in mental health courts: Judicial practices, participant perceptions, and outcomes related to mental health recovery. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 36, 113–120.
111.
KouvonenA.KivimakiM.ElovainioM.VaananenA.DeVogliR.HeponiemiT.. . . VahteraJ. (2008). Low organizational justice and heavy drinking. Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 65, 44–50.
112.
KouvonenA.VahteraJ.ElovainioM.CoxS. J.CoxT.LinnaA.. . . KivimakiM. (2007). Organisational justice and smoking: The Finnish public sector study. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 61, 427–433.
113.
KubrinC. E.MessnerS. F.DeaneG.McGeeverK.StuckyT. D. (2010). Proactive policing and robbery rates across U.S. cities. Criminology, 48, 57–97.
114.
LaFreeG.MorrisN. A. (2012). Does legitimacy matter? Attitudes toward anti-American violence in Egypt, Morocco, and Indonesia. Crime & Delinquency, 58, 689–719.
115.
LebenS. (2011, September). Considering procedural fairness concepts in the courts of Utah. Paper presented at the Educational Conference of the Utah State Courts, Midway, UT.
LentzS. A.ChairesR. H. (2007). The invention of Peel’s principles: A study of policing “textbook” history. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 69–79.
118.
LeviM.TylerT. R.SacksA. (2012). The reasons for compliance with law. In GoodmanR.JinksD.WoodA. (Eds.), Understanding social action, promoting human rights (pp. 70–99). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
119.
LewinK.LippittR.WhiteR. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created social climates. Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 272–279.
120.
LiljegrenM.EkbergK. (2009). The associations between perceived distributive, procedural, and interactional organizational justice, self-reported health and burnout. Work, 33, 43–51.
121.
LindE. A.KulikC. T.AmbroseM.DeVera ParkM. V. (1993). Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using fair procedures as a decision heuristic. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 224–251.
122.
LindE. A.TylerT. R. (Eds.). (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York, NY: Plenum.
123.
LipseyM. W.CullenF. T. (2007). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: A review of systematic reviews. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 297–320.
124.
LipskyM. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
125.
ListwanS. J.SullivanC. J.AgnewR.CullenF. T.ColvinM. (2013). The pains of imprisonment revisited: The impact of strain on inmate recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 30, 144–168.
126.
LoaderI.WalkerN. (2007). Civilizing security. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
127.
MacCounR. J. (1993). Drugs and the law: A psychological analysis of drug prohibition. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 497–512.
128.
MacCounR. J. (2005). Voice, control, and belonging. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1, 171–201.
129.
MacCounR. J.LindE. A.HenslerD. R.BryantD. L.EbenerP. A. (1988). Alternative adjudication. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
130.
MacCounR. J.MartinK. (in press). Legal issues: Public opinion. In The international encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed.).
131.
MacCounR. J.ReuterP. (2001). Drug war heresies: Learning from other vices, times, and places. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
132.
MajorB.QuintonW. J.McCoyS. K. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of attributions to discrimination: Theoretical and empirical advances. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 251–330). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
133.
MastrofskiS.SnipesJ. B.SupinaA. E. (1996). Compliance on demand: The public’s response to specific police requests. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 33, 269–305.
134.
MazerolleL.BennettS.AntrobusE.TylerT. R. (2012). Shaping citizen perceptions of police legitimacy: A randomized field trial of procedural justice. Criminology, 51, 1–31.
135.
McArdleA.ErzenT. (2001). Zero tolerance. New York, NY: NYU Press.
136.
McCluskeyJ. D. (2003). Police requests for compliance: Coercive and procedurally just tactics. New York, NY: LFB Scholarly Publishing.
137.
McCordJ.WidomC. S.CrowellN. A. (2001). Juvenile justice. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
138.
MearesT. L. (2014). The law and social science of stop and frisk. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 10, 335–352.
MearesT. L.TylerT. R.GardenerJ. (in press). The two different worlds we live in: Lawfulness and perceived police misconduct. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology.
141.
MilgramS. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
142.
MillerD. T.RatnerR. K. (1998). The disparity between the actual and assumed power of self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 53–62.
MurphyK. (2013). Does procedural justice matter to youth? Comparing adults’ and youths’ willingness to collaborate with police.Policing & Society, 25, 53–76.
145.
MurphyK.HindsL.FlemingJ. (2008). Encouraging public cooperation and support for police. Policing & Society, 18, 136–155.
146.
MurphyK.TylerT. R. (2008). Procedural justice and compliance behaviour: The mediating role of emotions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 652–668.
147.
MyhillA.BradfordB. (2012). Can police enhance confidence in improving quality of service?Policing & Society, 22, 397–425.
148.
MyhillA.QuintonP. (2011). It’s a fair cop? Police legitimacy, public cooperation and crime reduction. London, England: National Policing Improvement Agency.
149.
NaginD. (1998). Criminal deterrence research at the outset of the twenty-first century. Crime and Justice, 23, 1–42.
150.
NaginD. S.PepperJ.V. (2012). Deterrence and the death penalty. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
151.
National Research Council. (2014). The growth of incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
PapachristosA. V.MearesT. L.FaganJ. (2007). Attention felons: Evaluating project safe neighborhoods in Chicago. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4, 223–250.
154.
PapachristosA. V.MearesT. L.FaganJ. (2012). Why do criminals obey the law?Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102, 397–440.
155.
PaternosterR. (1987). The deterrent effect of the perceived certainty and severity of punishment: A review of the evidence and issues. Justice Quarterly, 4, 173–217.
156.
PaternosterR. (2006). How much do we really know about criminal deterrence?Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 100, 765–824.
157.
PaternosterR.BrameR.BachmanR.ShermanL. W. (1997). Do fair procedures matter? The effect of procedural justice on spouse assault. Law & Society Review, 31, 163–204.
158.
PaulhusD. L. (2002). The dark triad of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563.
159.
PiqueroA. R.Gomez-SmithZ.LangtonL. (2004). Discerning unfairness when othersmaynot: Low self-control and unfair sanction perceptions. Criminology, 42, 699–733.
160.
PiqueroA. R.PaternosterR.PogarskyG.LoughranT. (2011). Elaborating the individual difference component in deterrence theory. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 7, 335–360.
161.
PrattT. C.CullenF. T.BlevensK. R.DaigleL. E.MadensenT. D. (2008). The empirical status of deterrence theory: A meta-analysis. In CullenF. T.WrightJ. P.BlevinsK. R. (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory (pp. 367–396). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
162.
President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. (2015, March). Interim Report. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
163.
ReisigM. D. (1998). Rates of disorder in higher-custody state prisons: A comparative analysis of managerial practices. Crime & Delinquency, 44, 229–244.
164.
ReisigM. D.LloydC. (2009). Procedural justice, police legitimacy, and helping the police fight crime. Police Quarterly, 12, 42–62.
ReisigM. D.TankebeJ.MeskoG. (2013). Compliance with the law in Slovenia: The role of procedural justice and police legitimacy. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 22, 259–276.
167.
Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. (1968). New York, NY: Bantam Books.
168.
RobbinsJ. M.FordM. T.TetrickL. E. (2012). Perceived unfairness and employee health: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 235–272.
169.
RosenfeldR.FornangoR. (2014). The impact of police stops on precinct robbery and burglary rates in New York City, 2003-2010. Justice Quarterly, 31, 132–158.
170.
RottmanD. B. (2005). Trust and confidence in the California courts. San Francisco: Judicial Council of California.
171.
SampsonR. J.CohenJ. (1988). Deterrent effects of the police on crime: A replication and theoretical extension. Law & Society Review, 22, 163–189.
172.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W.EarlsF. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.
173.
SchmittM.DorfelM. (1999). Procedural injustice at work, justice sensitivity, job satisfaction and psychosomatic well-being. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 443–453.
SchultzM. F. (2006). Fear and norms and rock and roll: What jam bands can teach us about persuading people to obey copyright law. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 21, 651–728.
176.
ShermanL. W.RoganD. P. (1995). The effects of gun seizures on gun violence: “Hot spots” patrol in Kansas City. Justice Quarterly, 12, 673–693.
177.
ShermanL. W.StrangH.BarnesG. C.BraithwaiteJ.InkpenN.TehM. M. (1998). Experiments in restorative policing. Canberra: Australian Federal Police and Australian National University.
178.
SklanskyD. (2008). Democracy and the police. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
179.
SkoganW.FrydlK. (2004). Fairness and effectiveness in policing: The evidence. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council.
180.
SparksR.BottomsA.HayW. (1996). Prisons and the problem of order. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
181.
StaubE. (1992). The roots of evil: The origins of genocide and other group violence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
182.
SteeleC. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261–302). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
183.
StottC.HoggettJ.PearsonG. (2012). Keeping the peace: Social identity, procedural justice and the policing of football crowds. British Journal of Criminology, 52, 381–399.
184.
SuchmanM. (1995). Managing legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.
185.
SunshineJ.TylerT. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 37, 513–548.
186.
SuurdC. D. (2009). A test of the relationship among justice facets, overall justice, strain and turnover intention in a military context. Ottawa, Ontario: Defence Research and Development Canada.
187.
TankebeJ. (2009). Self-help, policing, and procedural justice: Ghanaian vigilantism and the rule of law. Law & Society Review, 43, 245–270.
188.
TatarJ. R.KaasaS. O.CauffmanE. (2012). Perceptions of procedural justice among female offenders: Time does not heal all wounds. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 18, 268–296.
189.
TaxmanF. S.GordonJ. A. (2009). Do fairness and equity matter?: An examination of organizational justice among correctional officers in adult prisons. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 695–711.
190.
TepperB. J. (2001). Health consequences of organizational injustice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 197–215.
191.
ThibautJ.WalkerL. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
192.
TomkinsA. J.BornsteinB.HerianM. N.RosenbaumD. I.NeeleyE. M. (2012). An experiment in the law: Studying a technique to reduce failure to appear in court. Court Review, 48, 96–106.
193.
TorA.Gazal-AyalO.GarciaS. M. (2010). Fairness and the willingness to accept plea bargain offers. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 7, 97–116.
194.
TricknerR.TylerT. R.GoffP. (2015). Justice from within: How a procedurally just organizational climate promotes organizational efficiency, endorsement of democratic policing, and officer well-being. Unpublished manuscript, Yale Law School, New Haven, CT.
195.
TylerT. R. (1984). The role of perceived injustice in defendant’s evaluations of their courtroom experience. Law & Society Review, 18, 51–74.
196.
TylerT. R. (1988). What is procedural justice?: Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures. Law & Society Review, 22, 103–135.
197.
TylerT. R. (2006a). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375–400.
198.
TylerT. R. (2006b). Why people obey the law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
199.
TylerT. R. (2011). Why people cooperate: The role of social motivations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
200.
TylerT. R.BladerS. L. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
201.
TylerT. R.CallahanP. E.FrostJ. (2007). Armed, and dangerous (?): Motivating rule adherence among agents of social control. Law & Society Review, 41(2), 457–492.
202.
TylerT. R.CasperJ. D.FisherB. (1989). Maintaining allegiance toward political authorities: The role of prior attitudes and the use of fair procedures. American Journal of Political Science, 33, 629–652.
203.
TylerT. R.FaganJ. (2008). Why do people cooperate with the police?Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231–275.
204.
TylerT. R.FaganJ.GellerJ. (2014). Street stops and police legitimacy: Teachable moments in young urban men’s legal socialization. Journal of Experimental Legal Studies, 11(4), 751–785.
205.
TylerT. R.HuoY. J. (2002). Trust in the law. New York, NY: Russell-Sage.
206.
TylerT. R.JacksonJ. (2014). Popular legitimacy and the exercise of legal authority: Motivating compliance, cooperation and engagement. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20, 78–95.
207.
TylerT. R.JacksonJ.MentovichA. (2015). The consequences of being an object of suspicion. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 12, 602–636. doi:10.1111/jels.12086.
208.
TylerT. R.LindE. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115–191). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
209.
TylerT. R.SchulhoferS. J.HuqA. Z. (2010). Legitimacy and deterrence effects in counter-terrorism policing. Law & Society Review, 44, 365–402.
210.
TylerT. R.SevierJ. (2014). How do the courts create popular legitimacy?Albany Law Review, 77, 101–143.
211.
TylerT. R.ShermanL. W.StrangH.BarnesG. C.WoodsD. J. (2007). Reintegrative shaming, procedural justice, and recidivism: The engagement of offenders’ psychological mechanisms in the Canberra RISE drinking-and-driving experiment. Law & Society Review, 41, 553–586.
212.
TylerT. R.WakslakC. (2004). Profiling and the legitimacy of the police: Procedural justice, attributions of motive, and the acceptance of social authority. Criminology, 42, 13-42.
213.
U. S. Department of Justice. (2013, June12). Statement of interest of the United States in Floyd v. City of New York. Washington, DC: United States District Court, Southern District of New York. Retrieved from http://www.justice.gov/crt/about/spl/documents/floyd_soi_6-12-13.pdf
214.
U. S. Department of Justice. (2013, August12). Floyd et al. v. The City of New York (Opinion and Order, 08 Civ. 1034 (SAS)). U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Retrieved from http://www.nylj.com/nylawyer/adgifs/decisions/scheindlin_floyd.pdf
215.
Van den BosK.van der VeldenL.LindE. A. (2014). On the role of perceived procedural justice in citizens’ reactions to government decisions and the handling of conflicts. Utrecht Law Review, 10(4), 1–26.
216.
VermuntR.SteensmaH. (2003). Physiological relaxation: Stress reduction through fair treatment. Social Justice Research, 16, 135–149.
217.
VickreyW. C.DentonD. G.JeffersonW. B. (2013). Opinions as the voice of the court: How state supreme courts can communicate effectively and promote procedural fairness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School.
218.
VirtanenM.OksanenT.KawachiI.SubramanianS. V.ElovainioM.SuominenS.. . . VahteraJ. (2012). Organizational justice in primary-care health centers and glycemic control of patients with type 2 diabetes. Medical Care, 50, 831–835.
219.
VollaardB.HamedJ. (2012). Why the police have an effect on violent crime after all. Journal of Law and Economics, 55, 901–924.
220.
WalesH. W.HidayV. A.RayB. (2010). Procedural justice and the mental health court judge’s role in reducing recidivism. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33, 265–271.
221.
WardJ. T. (2011). Caught in their own speed trap: The intersection of speed enforcement policy, police legitimacy, and decision acceptance. Police Quarterly, 14, 251–276.
222.
WatsonA. C.AngellB. (2013). The role of stigma and uncertainty in moderating the effect of procedural justice on cooperation and resistance in police encounters with persons with mental illnesses. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19, 30–39.
223.
WeberM. (1968). Economy and society (RothG.WittichC., Eds.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
224.
WeisbergR. (2005). The death penalty meets social science: Deterrence and jury behavior under new scrutiny. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1, 151–170.
225.
WeisburdD.BragaA. (2006). Hot spots as a model for police innovation. In WeisburdD.BragaA. (Eds.), Police innovation: Contrasting perspectives (pp. 225–244). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
226.
WelshB. C.FarringtonD. P. (2012). Science, politics, and crime prevention: Toward a new crime policy. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 128–133.
227.
WemmersJ. M. (1996). Victims in the criminal justice system: A study into the treatment of victims and its effect on their attitudes and behavior (Doctoral dissertation Leiden University, The Netherlands).
228.
WemmersJ. M. (2013). Victims’ experiences in the criminal justice system and their recovery from crime. International Review of Victimology, 19, 221–233.
229.
WickesR.HippJ. R.SargeantE.HomelR. (2013). Collective efficacy as a task specific process: Examining the relationship between social ties, neighborhood cohesion and the capacity to respond to violence, delinquency and civic problems. American Journal of Community Psychology, 52, 115–127.
230.
WilsonJ. Q.AbrahamseA. (1992). Does crime pay?Justice Quarterly, 9, 359–377.
231.
WilsonJ. Q.BolandB. (1978). The effect of the police on crime: A response to Jacob and Rich. Law & Society Review, 12, 367–390.
232.
WilsonJ. Q.KellingG. L. (1982, March). Broken windows. The Atlantic, 249(3), 29–38.
233.
WolfeS. E.PiqueroA. R. (2011). Organizational justice and police misconduct. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(4), 332–353.
234.
WoodW.NealD. T. (2007). A new look at habits and the habit-goal interface. Psychological Review, 114, 843–863.
235.
WorrallJ. L.KovandzicT. V. (2010). Police levels and crime rates. Social Science Research, 39, 506–516.
236.
WrightB.CaspiA.MoffitT. E.PaternosterR. (2004). Does the perceived risk of punishment deter criminally prone individuals?Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 41, 180–213.
237.
WrightS. C.TaylorD. M.MoghaddamF. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994–1003.
238.
YuklG. (1999). An evaluative essay on current conceptions of effective leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8, 33–48.
239.
ZiliakS. T.McCloskeyD. N. (2008). The cult of statistical significance: How the standard error costs us jobs, justice, and lives. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
240.
ZimbardoP. G. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 17, 237–307.
241.
ZimringF. E. (2007). The great American crime decline. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
