We propose that social categorization can encourage particular forms of intergroup cooperation because it differentiates a group in need from a group that can give aid. Moreover, social categorization is most likely to occur when individuals perceive procedural justice (i.e., fair treatment) from authorities in a superordinate group that includes the individuals’ subgroup. Two field studies investigating relations between local and foreign coworkers tested not only this prediction, but also whether high social categorization and procedural justice would yield a dual identity, in which group members identify simultaneously with their social category and the superordinate group. Both studies supported our predictions: Local employees engaged a dual identity and offered knowledge to aid a foreign coworker’s adjustment more often when local-foreign categorization and procedural justice from organizational authorities were high than when these variables were low. These discoveries point to controllable mechanisms that enable intergroup cooperation, and our findings have important implications for intergroup aid, expatriate adjustment, immigration, and multiculturalism.
BeatonA.M.DovidioJ.F.LégerN. (2008). All in this together? Group representations and policy support. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 808–817.
2.
BladerS.L.BobocelR. (2005). Wanting is believing: Understanding psychological processes in organizational justice by examining perceptions of fairness. In GillilandS.SteinerD.SkarlickiD.van den BosK. (Eds.), Research in social issues in management (pp. 3–30). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
3.
BladerS.L.TylerT.R. (2009). Testing and extending the group engagement model: Linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 445–464.
BrownR.HewstoneM. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In ZannaM.P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 255–344). New York, NY: Academic Press.
6.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS.G.AikenL.S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
ColquittJ.A.ConlonD.E.WessonM.J.PorterC.O.L.H.NgK.Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425–445.
8.
CrispR.J.StoneC.HallN.R. (2006). Recategorization and subgroup identification: Predicting and preventing threats from common ingroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 230–243.
9.
DovidioJ.F.GaertnerS.L. (2010). Intergroup bias. In FiskeS.T.GilbertD.T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 1084–1121). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
10.
DovidioJ.F.GaertnerS.L.SaguyT. (2009). Commonality and the complexity of “we”: Social attitudes and social change. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 3–20.
11.
EssesV.M.WagnerU.WolfC.PreiserM.WilburC.J. (2006). Perceptions of national identity and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration in Canada and Germany. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 653–669.
12.
GonzálezR.BrownR.J. (2003). Generalization of positive attitude as a function of subgroup and superordinate group identifications in intergroup contact. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 195–214.
13.
GreenlandK.BrownR. (1999). Categorization and intergroup anxiety in contact between British and Japanese nationals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 503–521.
14.
HaslamS.A.EgginsR.A.ReynoldsK.J. (2003). The ASPIRe model: Actualizing social and personal identity resources to enhance organizational outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 83–113.
15.
HornseyM.J.HoggM.A. (2000a). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Psychology Review, 4, 143–156.
16.
HornseyM.J.HoggM.A. (2000b). Intergroup similarity and subgroup relations: Some implications for assimilation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 948–958.
17.
HullJ.G.TedlieJ.C.LehnD.A. (1992). Moderator variables in personality research: The problem of controlling for plausible alternatives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 115–117.
18.
HuoY.J.MolinaL.E. (2006). Is pluralism a viable model of diversity? The benefits and limits of subgroup respect. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9, 359–376.
19.
LancasterC. (2007). Foreign aid: Diplomacy, development and domestic politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20.
LeonardelliG.J.PickettC.L.BrewerM.B. (2010). Optimal distinctiveness theory: A framework for social identity, social cognition and intergroup relations. In ZannaM.P.OlsonJ.M. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 43, pp. 65–115). New York, NY: Elsevier.
21.
LeonardelliG.J.TormalaZ.L. (2003). The negative impact of perceiving discrimination on collective well-being: The mediating role of perceived ingroup status. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 507–514.
22.
LeungK.SmithP.B.WangZ.SunH. (1996). Job satisfaction in joint ventures hotels in China: An organizational justice analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 27, 947–962.
23.
Mendoza-DentonR.Page-GouldE. (2008). Can cross-group friendships influence minority students’ well-being at historically White universities?Psychological Science, 19, 933–939.
24.
MoormanR.H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845–855.
25.
MorrisonE.W. (1993). Newcomer information seeking: Exploring types, modes, sources, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 557–589.
26.
PettigrewT.F.TroppL.R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.
27.
PhillipsK.W. (2003). The effects of categorically based expectations on minority influence: The importance of congruence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 3–13.
28.
RichterA.W.WestM.A.van DickR.DawsonJ.F. (2006). Boundary spanners’ identification, intergroup contact and effective intergroup relations. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 1252–1269.
29.
SidaniusJ.FeshbachS.LevinS.PrattoF. (1997). The interface between ethnic and national attachment: Ethnic pluralism or ethnic dominance?Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 102–133.
30.
SmidtsA.PruynA.T.H.van RielC.B.M. (2001). The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1051–1062.
31.
SmithH.J.TylerT.R. (1996). Justice and power: When will justice concerns encourage the advantaged to support policies which redistribute economic resources and the disadvantaged to willingly obey the law?European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 171–200.
32.
StantonJ.M.WeissE.M. (2002). Online panels for social science research: An introduction to the StudyResponse project (Technical Report No. 13001). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, School of Information Studies.
33.
StürmerS.SnyderM. (Eds.). (2010). The psychology of prosocial behavior: Group processes, intergroup relations, and helping. Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
34.
SwannW.B.GómezA.DovidioJ.F.HartS.JettenJ. (2010). Dying and killing for one’s group: Identity fusion moderates responses to intergroup versions of the trolley problem. Psychological Science, 21, 1176–1183.
35.
TajfelH.BilligM.G.BundyR.P.FlamentC. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–178.
36.
TohS.M.DeNisiA.S. (2005). A local perspective to expatriate success. Academy of Management Executive, 19, 132–146.
37.
TylerT.R.BladerS.L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349–361.
38.
TylerT.R.LindE.A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In ZannaM.P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115–191). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
39.
WaldzusS.MummendeyA.WenzelM.BoettcherF. (2004). Of bikers, teachers, and Germans: Groups’ diverging views about their prototypicality. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 385–400.
40.
YzerbytV.DemoulinS. (2010). Intergroup relations. In FiskeS.T.GilbertD.T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 1024–1083). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
