Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The conversion of poly (hexamethylene adipamide) or polyamide 66 precursor fiber to carbon fibers was accomplished through thermal stabilization and carbonization processes. Thermal stabilization was conducted of cupric chloride (CuCl₂)–ethanol-impregnated polyamide 66 (PA66) fibers in the air. To determine the influence of heating rate on the fiber structure and properties of the resultant carbon fibers, carbonization experiments were performed at selected temperatures of 500, 700, 900, and 1100°C using 2.5 and 5 °C/min heating rates with no dwelling. The results conclusively revealed that the volume density and tensile properties of the PA66 fiber were higher at 2.5 °C/min heating rate. After fixing the heating rate as 2.5°C/min, further carbonization experiments were conducted at temperatures from 500 to 1100°C, using increments of 100°C with no dwelling time. Linear density, volume density, fiber diameter, carbon yield, elemental composition, tensile, and electrical properties exhibited a strong dependence on the carbonization temperature. After taking into account the effects of structural defects (i.e., microvoids), tensile strength, and tensile modulus of the carbon fibers increased to 794 MPa and 92.4 GPa, respectively, when carbonized at 1100°C. X-ray diffraction analysis of the carbon fibers further revealed the existence of a greatly disordered (i.e., amorphous) structure, which developed during the carbonization process. FT-IR analysis confirmed the formation of highly aromatic carbon clusters at temperatures of 500°C and higher. The outcomes of electrical conductivity in this study confirm that the PA66 precursor was converted into a semi-conducting state once it was carbonized.

Keywords

Polyamide 66 stabilization carbonization mechanical properties X-Ray diffraction FT-IR

Introduction

Carbon fibers are now broadly applied as a reinforcing constituent in structural composites, including carbon fiber reinforced ceramics, carbon fiber reinforced plastics, carbon fiber reinforced metals, and carbon–carbon composites due to their high specific strength and modulus,^1–3 leading to improved mechanical and thermal properties.^2,3 As woven and knitted structures, carbon fibers are used as part of carbon fiber reinforced plastics in airplanes, high-grade sports materials, automobiles, civil engineering, machine parts, pressure vessels, wind power blades, etc.²

Commercially produced carbon fibers have higher tensile properties, about 2–7 GPa tensile strength, 200–965 GPa tensile modulus, 1.75–2.18 g/cm³ density, around 3 GPa compressive strength, excellent thermal and electrical conductivity, and good thermal and chemical resistance properties.^4,5 A number of precursors, including polyacrylonitrile,⁶ mesophase pitch,⁷ and viscose rayon,⁸ are used to manufacture carbon fibers commercially. Now, polyacrylonitrile (PAN) is used as the foremost precursor in carbon fiber manufacturing, occupying about a 90% share of the total carbon fiber production.^2,9 PAN fibers are usually employed to manufacture high-strength carbon fibers; however, mesophase pitch is used to obtain high modulus carbon fibers. At present, the volume of regenerated cellulose-based carbon fibers constitutes approximately 1–2% of the total carbon fiber produced worldwide.¹⁰

Carbon fibers produced from cellulose are not commonly employed in high-strength applications because of their lower carbon yield percentage and lower mechanical properties. Cellulose-based precursor fibers are used to produce activated carbon fibers (ACF).¹¹ ACF has a noteworthy role in both the medical and industrial sectors, such as in the controlled release of drug supply, in filtering water to make it drinkable, in gas separation for different industrial purposes, and in the wastewater treatment plant.¹² Activated carbon fibers are often used for removing pollutants (i.e., pesticides) from wastewater,^13,14 for noise insulation and absorption,^15,16 for shielding electromagnetic interference,¹⁷ for adsorbing metal ions,¹⁸ for gas storage (i.e., hydrogen¹⁹and methane²⁰), for manufacturing personal protective clothing,²¹ for producing electric double-layer capacitors, ²² etc.

There exists a new trend towards using smaller diameter carbon fibers.⁴ It is clear that smaller diameter fibers exhibit higher tensile strength. Currently, the diameters of commercial carbon fibers are reported to be within 5–10 μm.⁴ Producing continuous precursor fibers using conventional technology with diameters below 10 μm, resulting in carbon fibers with a diameter of 5 μm, is reported to be difficult. However, smaller diameter precursor fibers with diameters in the 10 nm–1 μm range can be produced by an electro-spinning technique.⁴ Carbon fibers with distinctive diameters, between 100 nm and 4 μm, are reported to be produced by carbonization of electro-spun PAN,^2,23,24 cellulose,²⁵ and polyvinyl alcohol²⁶ nanofibers. The resulting PAN-based carbon nanofibers are reported to have the values of tensile strength within the 300–600 MPa range and tensile modulus within 40–60 GPa range.²³ In the case of cellulose-based carbon nanofibers carbonized at 1500 and 2200°C, the tensile moduli values were found to vary between 60 and 100 GPa, respectively.²⁵

The production of carbon fiber (Figure 1) from a polymer precursor involves (a) the creation of oriented fibers by different spinning techniques, (b) thermal stabilization of the precursor fibers at a temperature of 200–350°C in air atmosphere, (c) carbonization in an inert atmosphere (commonly up to 1600°C in a nitrogen environment, and at higher temperatures in an argon environment),²⁷ and (d) graphitization as an optional stage at temperatures >2500°C to improve the mechanical properties (Figure 1). Thermally stabilized precursors are characterized by infusibility, intractability, and non-flammability.²⁸

Figure 1.

Production flow chart of polyamide 66-based carbon fiber.

In the last few decades, there has been a steady growth in the use of metal salts during the processing of carbon fibers. The use of metal salts is stated to change the fiber structure and speed up the stabilization reactions. Impregnation of PAN precursor fibers with various metal salts has been the subject of various research studies.^29–32 The use of metal salts in polyacrylonitrile fiber pretreatment lowers the stabilization time, offers better controlling of heat flux in the stabilization process, and finally helps to enhance the tensile properties of the resultant carbon fibers.³⁰

The amide groups of polyamide chains have an interesting ability to form complexation with metal salts.³³ The interactions between amide groups of polyamide chains and metal ions offer new prospects to modify the processing and performance of polyamides. The alkali metal and the transition metal salts were admitted to produce complexation with polyamide 6 (PA6) chains.^34,35 The thermal stabilization of PA66 against thermal damage was performed with Ni, Co, Cu, and Zn chlorides alone or combined with potassium iodide.³⁶ Copper salts were admitted as one of the most effective stabilizing components. Starkweather and Avalian³⁷ showed that the electrical conductivity of PA66 films could be increased by up to 150 fold after immersion in metal halide and alkali metal salts, including LiCl, NaBr, CuCl₂, and ZnCl₂. La Mantia et al.³⁸ declared the manufacturing of polyamide six fibers with enhanced amorphous orientation by incorporating lithium salts in the polymer melt. These investigations suggested that the introduction of lithium halide salts into polyamide six systems could improve the mechanical properties of PA6 fibers.^38,39 A comprehensive research study on the inclusion of gallium ions with polymer chains was mentioned to improve the tensile properties of polyamide 66 fibers.⁴⁰ The addition of gallium ions with polyamide 66 results in the loss of hydrogen bonding. Complete loss of hydrogen bonds from the polymer chain allows higher draw ratios (about 7–13) with lower strain rates.^41–43

Aromatic polyamide (i.e., para- and meta-aramid) fibers such as Kevlar^®/Twaron^® and Nomex^®/Conex^® can be used in the manufacture of carbon fibers without performing thermal stabilization.^44,45 However, because of low thermal stability, aliphatic polyamide (PA6 and PA66) fibers need to have thermal stabilization^46–50 for processing carbon fibers. The thermal stability of polyamide six was reported to be obtained in the presence of biphenol monoacrylate along with a hindered phenolic antioxidant system.⁵¹ Polyamide six pellets containing 0.1–2 wt% of purified (p-MWCNT) and amino-functionalized (f-MWCNT) multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) showed improved thermal stability under the air atmosphere.⁵² Thermally stable PA6 knitted fabric was obtained after crosslinking in the presence of sodium hypophosphite and butanetetracarboxylic acid without the formation of a yellow color.⁵³ Electron beam irradiated polyamide 66 with different doses led to a rise in the number of crosslinks along with chain scission forming.⁵⁴ Formaldehyde alone and formaldehyde in the presence of thiourea-based chemical crosslinking with polyamide 66 was also mentioned in the published literature.⁵⁵

In this study, a comprehensive analysis was carried out of cupric chloride-ethanol impregnation in the absence of water for carrying out thermal stabilization and carbonization reactions. Integration of cupric chloride with PA66 was noticed to significantly accelerate the thermal stabilization and carbonization process with minimum tensile strength loss. During the experimental work, the effects of processing parameters in terms of carbonization temperature, heating rate, and structural defects on the fiber properties of the resultant carbon fibers were explored. These effects were characterized by means of volume density, linear density, fiber diameter, X-ray diffraction, elemental analysis, FT-IR, carbon yield, tensile testing, and electrical conductivity to observe the structural deviations that occurred in the carbonization experiments.

Experimental

Preparation of stabilized and carbonized samples

A polyamide 66 yarn with a linear density of 16.37 tex per 68 filaments, manufactured for textile applications, was used during the course of this study. The PA66 single filament cross-sectional shape is circular, as confirmed by the yarn manufacturer (POLYTEKS AŞ, Turkey). The original polyamide 66 yarn was pretreated with 10% (v/v) ethanol–water solution at 50°C for 40 min to get rid of the surface impurities of the fibers. Following the removal of surface impurities, the sample was left to dry overnight at room temperature and then dried again in an air oven at 80°C for 5 h until constant weight.^46,56

Chemical pretreatment was accomplished by soaking the PA66 yarn in a solution of 1% (w/v) cupric chloride–ethanol for 24 h at room temperature. The chemical solution displayed a pH value of 2.5 ± 0.1 at 22 ± 2°C. The cupric chloride (purity 99.0%) was purchased from Merck (Germany) and was used without further purification. Following the chemical soaking pretreatment, the samples were taken out and dried at 50°C for 24 h after using a cotton fabric to remove the excess liquid. The impregnated PA66 yarn was loaded with 6.05% (w/w) cupric chloride on a dry basis.^46,56

The thermal stabilization process was performed by using a two-phase heating procedure in the air atmosphere. The first heating phase was accomplished between 175 and 205°C using a 1°C/min heating rate. The next heating phase was performed at 250°C at a 0.3°C/min heating rate. Both heating phases employed a heating time varying between 0 and 2 h (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Two-step procedure used during the thermal stabilization of PA66 precursor fibers.

In normal conditions, the nitrogen gas flow rate was 200 mL/min. Prior to the carbonization step, a purge of 2 h with a 150 mL/min flow rate was accomplished to eliminate the air trapped inside the carbonization oven. A tubular furnace (PROTHERM, ANKARA) was used to perform carbonization, employing a 700 mm long ceramic tube with a 50 mm diameter. Carbonization was performed at temperatures between 500 and 1100°C with 100°C steps without any dwelling period. In the present study, a cooling rate of 2 °C/min was also used before removing the sample from the furnace.^44,45,57

Data Collection

Diameter measurement of the samples was performed by employing a polarizing microscope (Nikon ME600 L, Japan) containing a calibrated eyepiece. Twenty diameter measurements were taken for each sample.^44–46

The linear density was evaluated by taking the weight of the samples in grams per unit length. In this work, the unit “tex” is considered for linear density measurement, which can be expressed by the ratio of the weight of yarn (in g) per 1000 m.^47,56,57 The linear density values were evaluated by taking the mean value of five measurements.

The volume density of the samples was determined by employing a density gradient column, where isopropyl alcohol (ρ = 0.79 g/cm³) and perchloroethylene (ρ = 1.612 g/cm³) were employed at 23 ± 1°C for specifying the density values. The measurement of densities of the original and thermally stabilized samples was performed by using this density column. For measuring the density of the carbon fiber samples, a solution was prepared from perchlorethylene (ρ = 1.61 g/cm³) and ethylene dibromide (ρ = 2.91 g/cm³) between 500 and 1100°C.^45,57

Elemental analysis for carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, and C/H ratio was completed using a LECO^® TruSpec Micro Elemental Analyzer. In this analysis, the combustion of the PA66 samples was performed in an oxygen-rich environment. Acetanilide was employed in this process for the calibration of the components, that is, C, H, N, and C/H.^44,45,57

To get wide-angle X-ray diffraction profiles, a Bruker^® AXS D8 X-ray diffractometer employing nickel filtered CuK radiation (λ= 0.15,406 nm) was employed.^44,45,58 The X-ray diffraction profiles of the original, stabilized, and carbonized PA66 fibers were achieved in the 10–40° 2θ scattering range, respectively. Lorentz and polarization corrections were executed for the obtained X-ray diffraction profiles.⁵⁹

Infrared spectra were collected employing a Perkin Elmer^® Spectrum 400 FT-IR spectrometer utilizing a single reflection diamond-based GladiATR^® model ATR attachment. In the present work, the 4000–400 cm⁻¹ range was used with a characteristic resolution of 2 cm⁻¹.^44,45,57

The tensile properties of the carbon fiber samples were evaluated by employing a PROSER tensile testing machine. The testing standard followed in this study was DIN EN ISO 2062:2010–04.⁶⁰ The values were determined by utilizing 10, 20, and 40 mm gauge lengths and 1 mm/min speed.^44,45 Mechanical properties by means of tensile strength and modulus were acquired in N/tex unit. Then, by multiplying with the density values (g/cm³), the original tensile properties of the yarns were converted into MPa or GPa.^61,62

For the electrical measurements, a DC four-point probe method was employed. The four-point probe characterization approach is a widely used standard method for analyzing the electrical properties of materials, especially in the semiconductor industry.^63–66 This method was utilized by keeping the electrical probes on the yarn surface. Two of them were utilized to provide current, and the other two were utilized to measure voltage.^44,45,57 This method has the advantage of removing measurement errors because of the contact resistance, spreading resistance, and probe resistance between the material and the metal probes.^67,68 The whole process was carried out at room temperature.

An LEO 440 Scanning Electron Microscope was used to assess the surface characteristics of the fiber samples, which had an operating voltage of 10 kV and object to detector distances between 8 and 12 mm. To improve conductivity and avoid electrostatic charge, the surfaces of the samples were coated with gold.⁶²

Experimental data analysis

X-Ray data-curve fitting

The profiles of X-ray diffraction (XRD) attained from the stabilized and carbonized PA66 fibers were curve fitted, as stated by the technique established by Hindeleh et al.⁵⁹ The curves are supposed to be a combination of Lorentzian and Gaussian functions. By using a linear baseline, the curve fitting was carried out for the XRD profiles. The area under the baseline is ascribed to an instrumental background signal that might be due to air and incoherent scattering effects.

Evaluation of stacking height (Lc)

The half-height widths acquired from the curve fitting procedure were adjusted by following a deconvolution method established by Stokes.⁶⁹ For a particular reflection, the apparent crystallite size (i.e., the stacking height) was determined by applying the Scherrer equation (1).

L (h k l) = \frac{K . λ}{β . \cos (θ)}

(1)

where θ indicates the Bragg angle for any specific reflection, K is a Scherrer parameter, λ is the wavelength of the radiation (λ = 0.154 nm), β is the breadth at half maximum intensity or the integral breadth in radians, and L (hkl) is the average length the crystallite stands upright in the hkl planes. For the correction of instrumental broadening, hexamethylene-tetramine, treated with 85°C temperature, was used.^44,45,57

The d-spacing was evaluated by employing Bragg’s equation (2)

n λ = 2 d \sin (θ)

(2)

where λ indicates the wavelength of CuK_α radiation and θ indicates Bragg angle.⁴⁴

Evaluation of porosity

According to the published literature, microvoids (i.e., micropores) can be introduced during the fiber extrusion, stabilization, and carbonization stages of precursor fibers.⁷⁰ By utilizing the density values of the carbon fibers and pure graphite, the amount of porosity was determined^70,71 by employing equation (3).

T h e p o r o s i t y (%) = [1 - \frac{p d_{002}}{p_{g} d_{g}}] Χ 100

(3)

where the density and d-spacing of the carbon fibers are ρ and d₀₀₂, respectively. For graphite, ρ_g indicates density (2.26 g/cm³) and d_g indicates d-spacing of the (002) reflection (0.3354 nm).^44,45

Correction of experimental tensile modulus

Tensile modulus values should be corrected due to the influence of microporosity.⁷¹ The tensile modulus values were corrected by employing equation (4).

E_{c o r r} = \frac{ρ_{g} d_{g}}{ρ d_{002}} E

(4)

where the expansions of ρ_g, d_g, ρ, and d₀₀₂ are mentioned in the details of equation (3). E indicates the tensile modulus (experimental) of the carbon fibers.^44,45,71

Results and discussion

Thermal stabilization of PA66 fibers was accomplished in an air atmosphere with 1% CuCl₂ solution pretreatment using a two-step heating profile. Preparation of the cupric chloride solution was carried out in the presence of ethanol. In this sense, ethanol had a dual role of acting as a solvent for cupric chloride and as a swelling agent for the PA66 fibers. Alcohols including ethanol, methanol, benzyl alcohol, and ethylene glycol are typical swelling agents⁷² for aliphatic polyamides, including PA66. Ethanol as a swelling agent was found to be extremely useful to open up the rigid structure of the PA66 chains by reducing the interchain forces operating between hydrogen bonds to enhance the rate of diffusion of cupric ions (Cu⁺²) into the polymer structure.^73,74 During the course of this work, the use of water as a swelling agent was avoided due to the fact that the moisture destroys the intermolecular hydrogen bonding network caused by thermal energy release in the stabilization phase, resulting in the decrease of tensile properties and Tg.^73,74 The first step of thermal stabilization was performed between room temperature and a temperature interval of 175–205°C. Trials were conducted at 175, 190, and 205°C using a dwelling time of 0 and 2 h at each temperature. The second heating step was fixed at a temperature of 250°C for dwelling times varying between 0 and 2 h (Figure 2).

According to our thermal analysis data,^46,56 a temperature of 250°C is safer to work within the second step because it is lower than the melting point of PA66 fiber (T_m=258°C). The heating rate was chosen as 1°C/min in the initial stage and 0.3°C/min in the following stage, respectively. The idea behind the use of a slower heating rate (0.3°C/min) in the following stage is to take advantage of the crosslinking reactions and to see its effect on the tensile properties. Dwelling times were changed in both steps, as seen in Table 1. The highest tensile strength value was aimed for in order to proceed to the next step of carbonization.

Table 1.

Experimental data obtained from the two-step stabilization procedure of PA66 precursor fibers.

Sample	Two-step heating profile	Density (g/cm³)	Tensile strength (MPa)	Extension at break (%)	Tensile modulus (GPa)
1	1°C/min to 175°C and hold 2 h followed by 0.3°C/min to 250°C and hold 0 h	1.4024 ± 0.0024	118 ± 6	3.21 ± 0.85	9.48 ± 1.04
2	1°C/min to 190°C and hold 2 h followed by 0.3°C/min to 250°C and hold 0 h	1.4070 ± 0.0011	124 ± 5	2.60 ± 0.36	10.39 ± 0.91
3	1°C/min to 205°C and hold 2 h followed by 0.3°C/min to 250°C and hold 0 h	1.4115 ± 0.0029	116 ± 10	2.16 ± 0.75	10.84 ± 0.97
4	1°C/min to 190°C and hold 0 h followed by 0.3°C/min to 250°C and hold 0 h	1.4217 ± 0.0022	127 ± 4	3.05 ± 0.65	10.65 ± 1.02
5	1°C/min to 190°C and hold 0 h followed by 0.3°C/min to 250°C and hold 2 h	1.4658 ± 0.0014	91 ± 14	0.86 ± 0.19	12.65 ± 1.13

In an earlier study, polyamide 6 (PA6) precursor fiber was thermally stabilized at 180°C in an air atmosphere pretreated with cupric chloride. Unfortunately, the thermal stabilization of PA6 precursor fiber on its own was not sufficient to proceed to the carbonization step. In order to develop the thermal stability of the stabilized polyamide 6 fiber, pre-carbonization at 250°C in an inert atmosphere was performed prior to carbonization.⁵⁷ In fact, two-step thermal stabilization was sufficient on its own without the necessity of proceeding to the pre-carbonization step for the PA66 precursor prior to carbonization.

The values of density and tensile properties of the thermally stabilized polyamide 66 fibers are presented in Table 1. The tensile testing outcomes reveal that increasing the first step temperature from 175 to 205°C with a dwelling time of 2 h, while keeping the second step temperature at 250°C with no dwelling, resulted in the highest tensile strength value of 124 ± 5 MPa at 190°C. The tensile strength value of the first step temperature of 205°C was the lowest at 116 ± 10 MPa. This clearly shows that the first step temperature should be adjusted at 190°C. In the second set of experiments, the first step temperature was set at 190°C with no dwelling period. The second step temperature was already set at 250°C, but the dwelling period was not clear. To find the best dwelling period, experiments were conducted by varying the dwelling times between 0 and 2 h at 250°C. The outcomes showed that the first step temperature of 190°C with no dwelling and a second step temperature of 250°C with no dwelling, resulted in the highest tensile strength of 127 ± 4 MPa. In the case of 2 h dwelling time at 250°C, the results showed a tensile strength value of 91 ± 14 MPa. These results clearly confirmed that the second heating step should be performed at 250°C with no dwelling.

To summarize, the tensile testing outcomes presented in Table 1 clearly demonstrate that the heat stabilization process of PA66 fiber before the carbonization phase should be performed using a two-step heating profile employing the first step temperature of 190°C with no dwelling at a 1 °C/min heating rate and the following step temperature of 250°C with no dwelling at a 0.3°C/min heating rate, respectively. Thermally stabilized sample 4 (Table 1) was exposed to a flame test. The flame test proved that this sample was flameproof, with no melting behavior observed. The density of sample 4 was found to be 1.4217 ± 0.0022 g/cm³. Sample 4, which had the highest tensile strength (Table 1), was chosen for the next stage of carbonization experiments. Sample 5 presented a density value of 1.4658 ± 0.0014 g/cm³. The tensile strength of this sample was too low (91 ± 14 MPa) to proceed to the next carbonization experiments. It seems that with the increase of density of the stabilized samples the amount of microvoid formation also increases in carbon fibers.⁷⁵ In fact, the presence of a microvoid, which is regarded as a defect, is expected to result in a reduction in the mechanical properties of the carbon fibers.⁷⁵

To decide on the heating rate value, the carbonization experiments were accomplished using a 2.5 and 5 °C/min heating rate at carbonization temperatures of 500, 700, 900, and 1100°C for comparison purposes. During the carbonization experiments at the above temperatures (500–1100°C), no dwelling time was employed for comparison purposes. Tensile strength and modulus of the carbon fibers at carbonization temperatures of 500, 700, 900, and 1100°C are compared in Table 2 and Figure 3.

Table 2.

Tensile properties and volume density values of carbon fibers produced from thermally stabilized PA66 fibers at different heating rates.

Heating rate (°C/min)	Temperature (°C)	Tensile strength (MPa)	Extension at break (%)	Tensile modulus (GPa)	Volume density g/cm³
2.5	500	73 ± 9	0.44 ± 0.07	19.00 ± 2.83	1.6176 ± 0.0236
2.5	700	88 ± 11	0.22 ± 0.06	47.51 ± 3.54	1.7171 ± 0.0218
2.5	900	155 ± 15	0.33 ± 0.08	63.50 ± 3.74	1.7874 ± 0.0217
2.5	1100	194 ± 17	0.45 ± 0.11	80.55 ± 5.75	1.8643 ± 0.0206
5.0	500	55 ± 7	0.45 ± 0.08	11.03 ± 3.49	1.5377 ± 0.0223
5.0	700	66 ± 8	0.22 ± 0.07	39.04 ± 3.29	1.6530 ± 0.0221
5.0	900	117 ± 13	0.30 ± 0.11	53.40 ± 4.05	1.7358 ± 0.0204
5.0	1100	134 ± 16	0.34 ± 0.09	67.87 ± 3.76	1.8107 ± 0.0219

Figure 3.

Tensile strength (a) and tensile modulus (b) values of carbon fibers processed utilizing heating rates of 2.5 (O) and 5°C/min ().

As observed in Figure 3 and Table 2, the tensile strength and modulus values at a 2.5°C/min heating rate were found to be greater than the results of a 5°C/min. These results suggest that the 2.5°C/min rate should be used in the next set of carbonization experiments. 2°C/min was adjusted as the cooling rate in this experiment. Faster cooling rates (e.g., 27°C/min) were reported to result in inferior tensile strength and modulus values.⁵⁸

The volume density values of carbon fibers treated at 500, 700, 900, and 1100°C are represented in Figure 4. The outcomes shown in Table 2 and Figure 4 reveal that the volume density values of the carbon fibers carbonized at a 2.5°C/min rate are greater than those prepared using a 5°C/min rate. The volume density value of carbon fiber carbonized at 1100°C was 1.8643 ± 0.0206 g/cm³ at 2.5°C/min and 1.8107 ± 0.0219 g/cm³ at 5°C/min (Table 2, Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Volume density values of carbon fibers prepared from thermally stabilized PA66 fibers for different heating rates. (O) 2.5°C/min; () 5°C/min.

Following the experimental work, using two different heating rates (2.5 and 5°C/min) for comparison purposes at four different carbonization temperatures (i.e., 500, 700, 900, and 1100°C), it became apparent that detailed experimental work should be performed using the 2.5 °C/min heating rate for the set of carbon fibers prepared at the temperatures between 500 and 1100°C in increments of 100°C after performing thermal stabilization experiments using the two-step procedure as described.

Volume density, fiber diameter, linear density, and carbon yield

Figure 4 presents the volume densities of the carbon fibers for different carbonization temperatures. When the temperature was elevated from 500 to 1100°C, the values of volume density were raised from 1.6176 ± 0.0236 to 1.8643 ± 0.0206 g/cm³. The significant growth in volume density with growing temperature can be accredited to the extensive development of aromatic structures or large-scale crosslink formations in the carbon fiber structure. The rise in volume densities by increasing temperature is also accredited for the elimination of non-carbon components from the carbon fibers due to the formation of heterocyclic rings, along with the expansion and thickening of aromatic carbon clusters. The development of carbon basal planes in the fiber during the carbonization processes also causes the density values to rise with temperature. As a result, during the carbonization process, the development of carbon basal planes in the stabilized fiber causes increases in the density values of the resultant carbon fibers.⁷⁶

The diameter of the carbon fibers for different carbonization temperatures are presented in Table 3. The diameter values drop continuously by the rise of carbonization temperature (Table 3, Figure 5(a)). The highest diameter reduction was observed at 1100°C with an approximately 47.2% loss (Table 3) in comparison to the pure PA66 fiber. The weight loss caused by the elimination of volatile products in carbonization reactions is supposed to be the prime reason for this huge reduction in fiber diameter.

Table 3.

Properties of carbon fibers obtained from thermally stabilized PA66 fibers for different carbonization temperatures (2.5 °C/min heating rate).

Carbonization temperature (°C)	Fiber diameter (μm)	Fiber diameter loss (%)	Linear density (Tex)	Linear density loss (%)	Carbon fiber yield (%)	Volume density g/cm³
PA66 (untreated)	11.67 ± 0.30		16.37 ± 0.51			1.1585 ± 0.002
500	8.27 ± 0.17	−29.13	9.89 ± 0.34	−39.58	60.4 ± 1	1.6176 ± 0.024
600	7.98 ± 0.17	−31.62	9.88 ± 0.41	−39.65	60.4 ± 1	1.6585 ± 0.022
700	7.71 ± 0.15	−33.93	9.59 ± 0.36	−41.60	58.4 ± 1	1.7171 ± 0.022
800	7.17 ± 0.14	−38.56	8.88 ± 0.43	−45.75	54.3 ± 1	1.7391 ± 0.024
900	6.80 ± 0.16	−41.73	8.60 ± 0.55	−47.46	52.5 ± 1	1.7874 ± 0.022
1000	6.59 ± 0.16	−43.53	7.96 ± 0.51	−51.37	48.6 ± 1	1.8143 ± 0.021
1100	6.16 ± 0.15	−47.22	7.22 ± 0.62	−55.89	44.1 ± 1	1.8643 ± 0.026

Figure 5.

Fiber diameter (a) and linear density (b) values of carbon fibers obtained from thermally stabilized PA66 precursor for different carbonization temperatures (2.5°C/min heating rate).

For different carbonization temperatures, the changes in the linear density are plotted in Figure 5(b) and presented in Table 3. As soon as the temperature was elevated from 500 to 1100°C, the linear density values displayed a severe reduction of 55.9% in comparison with the original PA66 fibers. The foremost reason for this huge loss in linear density is the evolution of volatiles in the carbonization stage.

The carbon fiber yields, considering the weight changes per unit length for different carbonization temperatures, are summarized in Table 3. The published carbon content is evaluated as 63.7% based on the chemical formula of PA66 polymer. The values tabulated in Table 3 show that the carbon yield falls from 60.4 to 44.1% as soon as the temperature was elevated from 500 to 1100°C. The difference between the theoretical carbon yield (63.7%) and the experimentally evaluated carbon yield is ascribed to the weight loss that happened in the carbonization step.

Elemental analysis

In Table 4, the outcomes of the elemental analysis of PA66-based carbon fiber samples are presented. The outcomes presented in Table 4 reveal that the carbon (%) content and C/H ratio rise with the increase of temperature; however, the values of nitrogen and hydrogen content indicate a downward trend. During the carbonization process, a significant amount of weight loss occurs, producing a large amount of volatiles. The carbon content shows a tendency to increase even though the nitrogen and hydrogen content values decrease (Table 4) with rising temperatures.

Table 4.

Elemental analysis of PA66-based carbon fibers for different carbonization temperatures.

Carbonization temperature (°C)	C (%)	H (%)	N (%)	C/H
500	70.81 ± 1.5	2.84 ± 0.2	10.38 ± 1.0	24.93
600	72.08 ± 1.3	1.92 ± 0.4	9.93 ± 0.8	37.54
700	73.67 ± 1.9	1.67 ± 0.3	8.84 ± 0.9	44.11
800	74.81 ± 2.0	1.39 ± 0.1	7.60 ± 0.5	53.82
900	73.29 ± 1.8	1.05 ± 0.5	6.01 ± 0.7	69.80
1000	76.36 ± 2.1	1.11 ± 0.3	4.11 ± 0.6	68.79
1100	79.62 ± 1.7	0.97 ± 0.4	2.65 ± 0.4	82.08

The carbon content value of the carbon fiber samples enhanced steadily from 70.8 to 79.6% by the increase of temperature to 1100°C. However, the nitrogen and hydrogen content progressively fell to 2.65% and 0.97%, respectively (Table 4). The rise in carbon content recommends the formation of highly aromatic-based carbon clusters during the carbonization experiments. The formation of carbon clusters is expected to result in the rearrangement and compaction of the carbon layer planes. The ratio of carbon and hydrogen was increased from 24.9 to 82.1% in the carbonization reactions when the temperature rise was observed between 500 and 1100°C.

At the temperature of 500°C and above, it is generally expected that the extensive expansion of graphene layers will take place. In the carbonization reactions, at temperatures between 500 and 1100°C, large-scale intermolecular crosslinking reactions occur between the PA66 polymer chains, which contain highly organized aromatic ring structures. In the carbonization process, extensive crosslinking reactions result in the dimensional changes of graphene planes. The development of a carbonized structure leads to the creation of a higher number of graphene planes that ultimately results in the enhancement of mechanical properties of the carbon fibers. To increase the carbon content to 90% or more, higher carbonization temperatures should be employed.

X-Ray diffraction

By using equatorial X-ray diffraction analysis, structural characterization of the PA66-derived carbon fibers was accomplished. The profiles of the X-ray diffraction are depicted in Figure 6. These diffraction profiles scanned in the scattering angles between 10° and 40° 2θ are characterized by specifying the formation of highly disordered graphene layers.

Figure 6.

Equatorial X-ray diffraction profiles of carbon fibers produced at (a) 500°C, (b) 600°C, (c) 700°C, (d) 800°C, (e) 900°C, (f) 1000°C, and (g) 1100°C.

For the analysis of the X-ray diffraction profiles, the curve fitting technique established by Hindeleh et al.⁵⁹ was employed to achieve detailed peak parameters by means of peak intensity, peak position, and half-height width (Figure 6). In Figure 7, an example of the curve fitting technique is illustrated of the carbon fibers produced at 1100°C.

Figure 7.

Curve fitting of equatorial X-ray diffraction profile of PA66-based carbon fiber produced at 1100°C (Scattering angles between 10 and 40° 2θ).

It is clear from the data presented in Table 5 that the 2θ position of the (002) reflections increase slightly to greater scattering angles and the half-height widths are observed to become marginally narrower by rising temperature, suggesting that the d-spacing of the (002) reflection becomes smaller and the conforming graphene-like carbon layers (i.e., stacking height) become thicker.

Table 5.

Investigation of equatorial X-ray diffraction profiles of PA66-based carbon fibers for different carbonization temperatures (Scattering angles between 10 and 40° 2θ).

Carbonization temperature (°C)	Peak position (2θ)₀₀₂	(002) d-spacing (nm)	Peak height	Half-height width (°)	Stacking height L_C (002) (nm)	Number of graphene layers (N)
500	24.10	0.3690	11.97	10.94	0.826	2.21
600	24.34	0.3654	12.29	9.94	0.909	2.49
700	24.40	0.3645	12.50	9.59	0.942	2.58
800	24.65	0.3609	12.74	8.95	1.010	2.80
900	24.71	0.3600	13.98	8.02	1.127	3.13
1000	24.93	0.3569	14.42	7.52	1.202	3.37
1100	25.10	0.3545	14.45	7.21	1.255	3.54

In Table 5, the structural parameters of the X-ray diffraction profiles are tabulated and were attained by using a curve fitting technique. From the half-height width of the 002 reflection, the value of L_c (stacking height of the carbon layer planes or crystallite thickness) was determined by employing the Scherrer equation (1). The Bragg equation (2) was employed to determine the d-spacing from the position of the (002) peak. In this way, the average number of graphene layer planes could be determined from L_c/d₀₀₂. From the analysis of the curve fitting technique, the acquired results demonstrate that the peak position of the (002) diffraction transfers to a greater diffraction angle from 24.1 to 25.1°, by increasing temperature from 500 to 1100°C, indicating that the d-spacing drops slightly from 0.3690 to 0.3545 nm. The outcomes listed in Table 5 show that the stacking height grows from 0.826 to 1.255 nm by the rise of temperature from 500 to 1100°C. Raising the stacking height (L_c) resembles the growth in graphene layers from 2.2 to 3.5 by the increase of temperature from 500 to 1100°C.

Infrared spectroscopy

In the present work, the structural transformations that occurred in the carbonization reactions were monitored using the infrared spectroscopy technique. Our earlier investigation on the thermal stabilization of PA66 fiber with cupric chloride impregnation⁵⁶ clearly demonstrated a steady weakening and ultimate vanishing of the intensities of OH (hydroxyl) and CH₂ (methylene) bands from 4000 to 2800 cm⁻¹ because of the loss of intermolecular hydrogen bonds. While the cupric ions create an attachment with the carbonyl oxygen during cupric chloride impregnation, the hydrogen bonds from the polymer chains were completely lost after the thermal stabilization experiments.⁵⁶

The IR vibrations of the cupric chloride impregnated PA66 fiber revealed the presence of a “free NH” spectrum in the region of 3600–3350 cm⁻¹.⁵⁶ The broadening and complete disappearance of free NH bands indicate the complete disappearance of hydrogen bonds from the PA66 polymer. Concerning the IR region located between 4000 and 2400 cm⁻¹, the major bands related to the pure PA66 structure, including hydrogen-bonded N–H stretching, amide II, and methylene (CH₂) asymmetrical and symmetrical CH bands at 3309, 2931, and 2861 cm⁻¹ completely disappeared at carbonization temperatures of 500°C and higher confirming the completion of the dehydrogenation reactions (Figure 8).

Figure 8.

FT-IR spectra of carbon fibers in the area of 4000–2400 cm⁻¹ for different carbonization temperatures (a) 500°C, (b) 600°C, (c) 700°C, (d) 800°C, (e) 900°C, (f) 1000°C, and (g) 1100°C.

The initial weakening and the final stage loss of the methylene band intensity is a strong sign of the dehydrogenation reaction occurrence in the thermal stabilization and carbonization reactions. The presence of free NH bands is a direct confirmation of cupric chloride complexation between the carbonyl oxygen and cupric (Cu⁺²) ions. Due to the dehydrogenation reactions in the thermal stabilization process, the release of hydrogen atoms from the PA66 causes the development of C=C bonds, as evidenced by the formation of an IR spectrum at 1600 cm⁻¹. With the progress of the carbonization step, due to the extensive dehydrogenation reactions, crosslinking and aromatization reactions appear to occur, resulting in the formation of aromatic structures and crosslinking between the polymer chains containing an extensive amount of C=C bonds.⁵⁶

The IR spectrum of the untreated PA66 precursor covering the 1900-500 cm⁻¹ region contains several bands, including carbonyl (C=O, 1714 cm⁻¹), amide I (1634 cm⁻¹), amide II (1530 cm⁻¹), amide III (1270 cm⁻¹), and amide IV (728 cm⁻¹) together with several crystalline and amorphous bands.⁵⁶ In the advanced phases of thermal stabilization and carbonization reactions, typical PA66 IR spectra in 1900–500 cm⁻¹ completely disappeared, as depicted in Figure 9, specifying the overall elimination of oxygen (C=O) and hydrogen (CH, CH₂, and N–H) containing groups. Interestingly, the IR vibrations of the carbon fibers produced at 500 and 600°C showed the remnants of the skeletal C–C stretching bands spanning from 1200 to 1000 cm⁻¹ (Figure 9).⁵⁶

Figure 9.

FT-IR spectra of carbon fibers in the area of 1900-500 cm⁻¹ for different carbonization temperatures (a) 500°C, (b) 600°C, (c) 700°C, (d) 800°C, (e) 900°C, (f) 1000°C, and (g) 1100°C.

With the rise of temperature from 700 to 1100°C, the disappearance of skeletal C–C stretching bands is seen in Figure 9. At the same time, it appears that the synthesis of aromatic structures containing heterocyclic rings seems to be initiated, as depicted by the broadening of the C=C band at 1540 cm⁻¹ (Figure 9 c–g).⁷⁷ The remnants of the C=C stretching are only visible in the IR vibrations of the carbon fibers treated at 700°C and higher. The IR spectra are seen in Figure 9 clearly indicate that the polyaromatic structures were entirely converted into the carbon fibers at temperatures of 700°C and above.

Tensile properties

The tensile properties of the obtained carbon fibers in this work are found to be heavily dependent on the processing parameters, including carbonization temperature, heating rate, formation of microvoids, and gauge length. The tensile properties obtained for different carbonization temperatures using the 2.5 °C/min rate are illustrated in Figure 10 and Figure 11.

Figure 10.

Stress–strain diagrams of carbon fibers produced at (a) 500°C, (b) 600°C, (c) 700°C, (d) 800°C, (e) 900°C, (f) 1000°C, and (g) 1100°C.

Figure 11.

Tensile strength (a) and tensile modulus (b) of carbon fibers prepared from thermally stabilized PA66 precursors for different carbonization temperatures (2.5 °C/min heating rate).

The outcomes reveal that the tensile strength and modulus values are enhanced with the increase of carbonization temperature. The tensile strength value of carbon fiber was increased from 73 ± 11 to 194 ± 24 MPa by the intensification of temperature from 500 to 1100°C. Likewise, the tensile modulus value was increased from 19.00 ± 2.83 to 80.55 ± 6.75 GPa. This shows that the effect of carbonization prompted the growth in tensile properties, owing to the positive impact of improvements in the densification of the aromatic carbon clusters.

A comparison of tensile strength and tensile modulus as a function of fiber diameter is illustrated in Figure 12. The tensile properties of carbon fibers increase with decreasing fiber diameter because of increased structural improvements. Increasing the carbonization temperature resulted in a lower number of structural imperfections, including microvoids, resulting in increased tensile strength and modulus values.⁷⁸

Figure 12.

Comparison of the tensile strength (a) and tensile modulus (b) of PA66-based carbon fibers for different fiber diameters (2.5 °C/min heating rate).

The formations of structural defects such as micro or nano-sized voids, surface irregularities, cavities, and flaws are known to occur in the decrease of the experimental mechanical properties ^78,79 (Figure 13). The tensile properties of the carbon fiber samples presented in Figure 11 and Figure 14 confirm the strong dependence of carbonization temperature and gauge length. Figure 14 confirms the strong dependence of gauge length of the carbon fibers produced at 500–1100°C. It shows that with the increase of gauge length, the tensile strength values are noticed to be decreased. The observed decrease with increasing gauge length in tensile strength values is attributed due to the existence of more structural defects located across the length of the carbon fibers.^78–80 By the extrapolation to 1 mm gauge length, the tensile strength values showed an improvement from 144 to 794 MPa (Figure 14) when the temperature was increased from 500 to 1100°C. The observed growth in tensile strength values is accredited to the decrease of the structural defects along the length of the carbon fibers.^78,79

Figure 13.

Schematic representation of structural defects incorporated in carbon fibers.⁷⁹

Figure 14.

The gauge length dependence of tensile strength of the carbon fibers attained at a carbonization temperature of (a) 500°C, (b) 600°C, (c) 700°C, (d) 800°C, (e) 900°C, (f) 1000°C, and (g) 1100°C. Correction of the experimental tensile modulus.

According to the published literature, during fiber spinning, heat stabilization, and carbonization experiments, the formation of microvoids (i.e., micropores) seem to be inevitable. The porosity values of the carbon fibers produced at 500 and 1100°C employing a 2.5 °C/min heating rate were evaluated by employing equation (3). The porosity values presented in Table 6 show a decrease with increasing carbonization temperature. The porosity value decreases with the increase of carbonization temperature from 21.25 to 12.81% (Table 6). It seems that the diameter and linear density decreases play an active role in the reduction of the micropore volume because of the weight loss reactions that occur in the carbonization experiments.

Table 6.

Porosity (%), experimental, and corrected tensile modulus of the carbon fibers for different carbonization temperatures (2.5 °C/min heating rate).

Carbonization temperature (°C)	Porosity (%)	Experimental tensile modulus (GPa)	Corrected tensile modulus (GPa)	(%) Change
500	21.25	19.00 ± 4.83	24.13	26.99
600	20.05	33.94 ± 5.12	42.45	25.08
700	17.43	47.51 ± 9.94	57.54	21.11
800	17.20	58.91 ± 9.87	71.15	20.77
900	15.11	63.50 ± 9.94	74.80	17.80
1000	14.58	70.25 ± 8.82	82.24	17.06
1100	12.81	80.55 ± 10.75	92.39	14.69

In published works, it was proven that the presence of microvoids has a negative influence on the mechanical properties of carbon fibers. The values of tensile modulus of the carbon fibers, produced at 500–1100°C, are corrected⁷¹ to counter the negative effects of microvoid formation using equation (4). The values of tensile modulus, after correction to counter the negative effects of microvoid formation, are summarized in Table 6. This outcome demonstrates that at temperatures between 500 and 1100°C, the values of tensile modulus increase between 27 and 14.7%, respectively.

The corrected tensile modulus values show variation between 24 and 92 GPa (Table 6, Figure 15). Table 6 and Figure 16 demonstrate that the tensile modulus values decrease with the increasing porosity ratio. It appears that porosity fractions decrease with increasing carbonization temperature (Table 6, Figure 16). The results confirm that microvoid formation during the carbonization phase has a negative influence on the tensile modulus values of the carbon fibers.

Figure 15.

Comparison of the experimental (O) and the corrected () tensile modulus for different carbonization temperatures.

Figure 16.

Comparison of experimental tensile modulus values against porosity (%).

The theoretical tensile strength and modulus values of perfect graphite are stated to be around 180 and 1000 GPa, respectively.^5,81 It appears that the tensile modulus value of commercial carbon fiber (Cytec Thornel pitch-based carbon fiber K-1100) is reported to be around 965 GPa.⁵ Owing to the formation of structural defects, for instance, surface cracks/flaws, surface nicks, entanglements, and internal and external micropores (i.e., micro/nano voids), the values of tensile strength of the carbon fibers are reported to be an extent lesser than the theoretical tensile strength value of perfect graphite. The tensile strength value of the commercially available carbon fiber T1000 produced by Toray (Japan) is around 7 GPa.⁸¹ According to the published literature, the values of experimental tensile strength of carbon fibers are affirmed to be around 10–20% of the theoretically estimated values.⁵ Therefore, there exists a significant potential capacity for further improvement in the tensile strength of carbon fibers in the near future.⁸¹

Electrical conductivity

Aromatic carbon clusters containing hexagonal carbon planes (i.e., graphenes) are reported to be generated in the carbonization process. Although the structure of the aromatic carbon clusters is highly disordered, it is similar to graphite. These are usually denoted as being turbostratic graphite in nature and are accredited by poor order and orientation. Electrical conductivity is reported to be generated by the movement of π-electrons along the fiber axis direction.⁸² The electrical conductivity of the pure PA66 precursor fiber used in this study is reported to be around 10⁻¹² S cm⁻¹.⁸³ The results summarized in Table 7 confirm that with the increase of temperature, the resistivity of the carbon fibers goes down. It is clear that the electrical properties of carbon fibers are highly reliant on carbonization temperature, as summarized in Table 7.

Table 7.

Electrical properties of carbon fibers obtained from thermally stabilized PA66 fibers for different carbonization temperatures (2.5 °C/min heating rate).

Carbonization temperature (°C)	Resistivity (ρ) (Ω cm)	Conductivity (σ) (S cm⁻¹)	Log (σ, conductivity) (S cm⁻¹)
500	3.35 ± 1.04 × 10⁷	2.99 ± 0.98 × 10⁻⁸	−7.53 ± 0.56
600	2.40 ± 0.65 × 10⁷	4.17 ± 1.39 × 10⁻⁸	−7.38 ± 0.43
700	1.88 ± 1.06 × 10⁶	5.32 ± 0.78 × 10⁻⁷	−6.84 ± 0.62
800	3.22 ± 1.12 × 10⁴	1.18 ± 0.01 × 10⁻³	−3.79 ± 0.57
900	4.06 ± 1.05 × 10²	2.46 ± 0.03 × 10⁻³	−2.61 ± 0.63
1000	2.38 ± 1.33 × 10²	4.20 ± 0.01 × 10⁻³	−2.38 ± 0.55
1100	1.77 ± 1.24 × 10²	5.65 ± 0.04 × 10⁻³	−2.25 ± 0.58

The correlation of electrical conductivity at room temperature and the carbonization temperature is illustrated in Figure 17. Owing to the removal of non-carbon components, for example, nitrogen, oxygen, and hydrogen in the carbonization process at 500–1100°C, the carbon content in carbon fibers displays an increasing trend (see Table 4), and highly conducting non-graphitizing carbon clusters appear to be generated, causing an increase in electrical conductivity. The value of electrical conductivity was found as 2.99x10⁻⁸ S cm⁻¹ at 500°C and it increases sharply to 5.65 × 10⁻³ S cm⁻¹ at 1100°C, that is, by about five orders of magnitude, owing to the development of polyaromatic species and the rise of hexagonal-shaped carbon layers.

Figure 17.

Comparison of electrical conductivity of PA66-based carbon fibers for different carbonization temperatures.

In the investigation of the equatorial X-ray diffraction results, the stacking height (L_c) of carbon layers was noticed to upsurge, and the d-spacing was seen to drop gradually by intensifying temperature. The outcomes recommend that the development of aromatic carbon clusters is most likely to be accountable for the practical enhancement in electrical conductivity. By intensifying the carbonization temperature from 500 to 1100°C, the electrical conductivity appears to be highly dependent on the development and upsurge of conducting aromatic carbon clusters comprising graphene planes. The size and concentration of the conducting aromatic planes indicate an increase with rising temperature, explaining the overall enhancement in electrical conductivity.⁸⁴

The outcomes mentioned in Table 7 recommend that the PA66 precursor fiber, being a typical insulator, becomes a semi-conducting material after thermal stabilization and carbonization reactions. The electrical conductivity of the carbon fibers was much greater than the untreated PA66 precursor fibers and much lesser than pure graphite (2.5 × 10⁴ S cm⁻¹). The electrical conductivity of PA66-based carbon fiber carbonized at 1100°C was measured as 5.65 × 10⁻³ S cm⁻¹, which is comparable to carbon fibers derived from rice husk [89]. The electrical conductivity of the rice husk carbonized at 900°C was mentioned to be 3.28 × 10⁻⁴ S cm⁻¹.⁸⁵ Indeed, this value should be much higher if the carbonization is performed at 1100°C.

Scanning electron microscopy

Scanning electron microscopy was utilized to examine the surface characteristics of original and carbonized PA66 fibers in the current study. The representation of the surface morphologies of the original PA66 fibers is presented in Figure 18.

Figure 18.

Representative surface morphologies of original PA66 fibers.

Figure 19 shows the morphological images of carbonized samples for different carbonization temperatures. The SEM study revealed that surface properties do not show apparent changes up to 700°C carbonization temperature. However, the SEM images of the carbon fibers produced at temperatures of 900 and 1100°C indicate a number of tiny groove-like holes on the fiber surface, and the copper salts were excreted through the holes. Layden⁸⁶ explored the development of core segments in stabilized PAN fibers and reported that the temperature in the inner portion was greater than the temperature on the surface. Hence, it is assumed that the heat applied in the stabilization process will enhance cyclization and contribute to the development of a misoriented ladder-like polymer in the core area of the fibers. Therefore, the diffusion of oxygen from the surface area is likely to be reduced by the misoriented core region.⁸⁷

Figure 19.

Representative surface morphologies of the carbon fibers attained at a carbonization temperature of (a) 500°C, (b) 700°C, (c) 900°C, (d) 1100°C.

Conclusions

The main purpose of the present investigation was to understand and monitor the effects of the processing parameters and structural defects on the properties of carbon fibers derived from thermally stabilized PA66 fibers impregnated in the presence of cupric chloride-ethanol solution. A two-step stabilization procedure in an air atmosphere was employed for the heat stabilization of PA66 precursor fibers. The physical and mechanical properties of the carbon fibers were evaluated at the chosen temperatures of 500, 700, 900, and 1100°C employing the 2.5°C/min and 5°C/min heating rates for comparison purposes, and finally 2.5°C/min heating rate was decided to employ as it offers better properties in the resultant carbon fiber. The outcomes demonstrated that the linear density and fiber diameter values declined with increasing temperature due to the evolution of volatiles. The PA66 fibers had a carbon yield of 44% when carbonized at 1100°C, which is comparable to 63.7% as the theoretical value. Structural defects are supposed to occur during the fiber extrusion as well as during the thermal stabilization and carbonization steps. The mechanical properties of the carbon fibers were subjected to corrections after taking into account the effects of structural imperfections. By considering the influence of structural defects, the values of tensile strength and modulus of the carbon fibers, after carbonization at 1100°C, increased to 794 MPa and 92.4 GPa, respectively. The existence of the greatly disordered aromatic carbon structure, which developed in the carbonization process, was revealed by the X-ray diffraction analysis of the carbon fibers. FT-IR analysis confirmed the formation of highly aromatic carbon clusters at temperatures of 500°C and higher. The electrical conductivity of carbon fiber at the temperature of 1100°C was noticed to increase to 5.65±0.04x10⁻³ S cm⁻¹. It appears that the PA66 precursor fibers acquire a semi-conducting state following the thermal stabilization and carbonization procedures.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iDs

Md. Mahbubor Rahman

Ismail Karacan

References

Naito

Tanaka

Yang

J-M

, et al. Tensile properties of ultrahigh strength PAN-based, ultrahigh modulus pitch-based and high ductility pitch-based carbon fibers. Carbon 2008; 46: 189–195.

Liu

Kumar

. Recent progress in fabrication, structure, and properties of carbon fibers. Polym Rev 2012; 52: 234–258.

Park

O-K

Lee

Joh

H-I

, et al. Effect of functional groups of carbon nanotubes on the cyclization mechanism of polyacrylonitrile (PAN). Polymer 2012; 53: 2168–2174.

Chae

Choi

Minus

, et al. Carbon nanotube reinforced small diameter polyacrylonitrile based carbon fiber. Composites Sci Tech 2009; 69: 406–413.

MInus

Kumar

. The processing, properties, and structure of carbon fibers. Jom 2005; 57: 52–58.

Damodaran

Desai

Abhiraman

. Chemical and physical aspects of the formation of carbon fibres from PAN-based precursors. J Textile Inst 1990; 81: 384–420.

Matsumoto

. Mesophase pitch and its carbon fibers. Pure Appl Chem 1985; 57: 1553–1562.

Peng

JCM

Donnet

J-B

Wang

, et al. Surface treatment of carbon fibers. Carbon Fibers 1998: 161–229.

Yusof

Ismail

. Post spinning and pyrolysis processes of polyacrylonitrile (PAN)-based carbon fiber and activated carbon fiber: a review. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 2012; 93: 1–13.

10.

Zhang

Guo

Shao

, et al. Nano-carbon black filled Lyocell fiber as a precursor for carbon fiber. J Appl Polym Sci 2006; 99: 65–74.

11.

Choi

Kim

, et al. Novel synthesis and characterization of activated carbon fiber and dye adsorption modeling. Carbon 2002; 40: 2661–2672.

12.

Sun

Wang

. Comparison about the structure and properties of PAN-based activated carbon hollow fibers pretreated with different compounds containing phosphorus. J Appl Polym Sci 2005; 96: 294–300.

13.

Ayranci

Hoda

. Adsorption of bentazon and propanil from aqueous solutions at the high area activated carbon-cloth. Chemosphere 2004; 57: 755–762.

14.

Ayranci

Hoda

. Adsorption kinetics and isotherms of pesticides onto activated carbon-cloth. Chemosphere 2005; 60: 1600–1607.

15.

Chen

Jiang

. Carbonized and activated non-wovens as high-performance acoustic materials: Part I noise absorption. Textile Res J 2007; 77: 785–791.

16.

Chen

Jiang

. Carbonized and activated non-woven as high performance acoustic materials: part II noise insulation. Textile Res J 2009; 79: 213–218.

17.

Chung

DDL

. Increasing the electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of carbon fiber polymer-matrix composite by using activated carbon fibers. Carbon 2002; 40: 445–447.

18.

Kadirvelu

Faur-Brasquet

Cloirec

. Removal of Cu(II), Pb(II), and Ni(II) by Adsorption onto Activated Carbon Cloths. Langmuir 2000; 16: 8404–8409.

19.

De la Casa-Lillo

Lamari-Darkrim

Cazorla-Amorós

, et al. Hydrogen storage in activated carbons and activated carbon fibers. The J Phys Chem B 2002; 106: 10930–10934.

20.

Alcañiz-Monge

De La Casa-Lillo

Cazorla-Amorós

, et al. Methane storage in activated carbon fibres. Carbon 1997; 35: 291–297.

21.

Zeng

Pan

. The structural transitions of rayon under the promotion of a phosphate in the preparation of ACF. Cellulose 2008; 15: 91–99.

22.

Chen

, et al. Activated carbon fiber cloths as electrodes for high performance electric double layer capacitors. Electrochimica Acta 2007; 52: 4595–4598.

23.

Zhou

Lai

Zhang

, et al. Development of carbon nanofibers from aligned electrospun polyacrylonitrile nanofiber bundles and characterization of their microstructural, electrical, and mechanical properties. Polymer 2009; 50: 2999–3006.

24.

Sutasinpromprae

Jitjaicham

Nithitanakul

, et al. Preparation and characterization of ultrafine electrospun polyacrylonitrile fibers and their subsequent pyrolysis to carbon fibers. Polym Int 2006; 55: 825–833.

25.

Deng

Young

Kinloch

, et al. Carbon nanofibres produced from electrospun cellulose nanofibres. Carbon 2013; 58: 66–75.

26.

Ummul Khair Fatema

Ahmed Jalal Uddin

Uemura

, et al. Fabrication of carbon fibers from electrospun poly(vinyl alcohol) nanofibers. Textile Res J 2011; 81: 659–672.

27.

Balasubramanian

Jain

Bhattacharya

, et al. Conversion of acrylonitrile-based precursors to carbon fibres. J Mater Sci 1987; 22: 3864–3872.

28.

Chung

DDL

. Carbon Fiber Composites. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 1994, p. 5.

29.

Mathur

Bahl

Mittal

. Advances in the development of high-performance carbon fibres from PAN precursor. Composites Sci Tech 1994; 51: 223–230.

30.

Mittal

Mathur

Bahl

. Post spinning modification of PAN fibres - a review. Carbon 1997; 35: 1713–1721.

31.

Mathur

Mittal

Bahl

, et al. Characteristics of KMnO4-modified PAN fibres-its influence on the resulting carbon fibres' properties. Carbon 1994; 32: 71–77.

32.

Bahl

Mathur

Dhami

. Modification of polyacrylonitrile fibres to make them suitable for conversion into high performance carbon fibres. Mater Sci Eng 1985; 73: 105–112.

33.

Wang

, et al. FT-IR spectroscopic investigation on the interaction between nylon 66 and lithium salts. J Appl Polym Sci 2004; 91: 2869–2875.

34.

Bianchi

Ciferri

Tealdi

, et al. Bulk properties of synthetic polymer-inorganic salt systems. II. crystallization kinetics of salted Poly(caproamide). Macromolecules 1974; 7: 495–500.

35.

Kim

Harget

. Glass transition temperature of nylon 6-Inorganic salt mixtures. J Appl Phys 1979; 50: 6072–6076.

36.

Cerruti

Rychlý

Matisova-Rychla

, et al. Chemiluminescence from oxidation of polyamide 6,6II. The effect of metal salts. Polym Degrad Stab 2004; 84: 199–206.

37.

Starkweather

Jr Avakian

. Effect of adsorbed salts on the conductivity of nylon 66. Macromolecules 1993; 26: 6217–6219.

38.

Mantia

FPL

Polizzotti

Titomanlio

, et al. Effect of drawing on the structure and the dynamic-mechanical behavior of salted polycaproamide. J Macromolecular Sci B 1982; 21: 131–143.

39.

Richardson

Ward

. Production and properties of fibers spun from nylon 6/lithium chloride mixtures. J Polym Sci Polym Phys Edition 1981; 19: 1549–1565.

40.

Gupta

Saquing

Afshari

, et al. Porous nylon-6 fibers via a novel salt-induced electrospinning method. Macromolecules 2009; 42: 709–715.

41.

Afshari

Gupta

Jung

, et al. Properties of films and fibers obtained from Lewis acid-base complexed nylon 6,6. Polymer 2008; 49: 1297–1304.

42.

Jung

Kotek

Tonelli

, et al. High Modulus Polyamide Fibers. 7666499B2US Patents, 2010.

43.

Kotek

Jung

Tonelli

, et al. Novel methods for obtaining high modulus aliphatic polyamide fibers. J Macromolecular Sci C: Polym Rev 2005; 45: 201–230.

44.

Karacan

Erzurumluoğlu

. Formation of non-graphitizing carbon fibers prepared from poly(p-phenylene terephthalamide) precursor fibers. Fibers Polym 2015; 16: 961–974.

45.

Karacan

Erzurumluoğlu

. The effect of carbonization temperature on the structure and properties of carbon fibers prepared from poly(m-phenylene isophthalamide) precursor. Fibers Polym 2015; 16: 1629–1645.

46.

Karacan

Tunçel

KŞ

. Thermal stabilization of poly(hexamethylene adipamide) fibers in the presence of ferric chloride prior to carbonization. Polym Degrad Stab 2013; 98: 1869–1881.

47.

Karacan

Baysal

. Investigation of the effect of cupric chloride on thermal stabilization of polyamide 6 as carbon fiber precursor. Fibers Polym 2012; 13: 864–873.

48.

Tovmash

Budyka

Mamagulashvili

, et al. Adsorption of hydrogen and methane by carbon foam based on carbonized polyamide fibres. Fibre Chem 2007; 39: 450–453.

49.

Andrichenko

Druzhinina

. Fabrication of metal-containing carbon fibre based on modified polycarproamide fibre. Fibre Chem 1999; 31: 1–7.

50.

Santangelo

. Graphitization of fibrous polyamide resinous materials. US Patents 1970; 3(584): 547.

51.

Yang

Shu

. Thermal stabilization effect of biphenol monoacrylate on polyamide 6. J Appl Polym Sci 2008; 110: 856–863.

52.

Tong

Fang

, et al. Thermal degradation behavior of multi-walled carbon nanotubes/polyamide 6 composites. Polym Degrad Stab 2006; 91: 2046–2052.

53.

Montazer

Shamei

Alimohammadi

. Stabilized nanosilver loaded nylon knitted fabric using BTCA without yellowing. Prog Org Coat 2012; 74: 270–276.

54.

Sengupta

Tikku

Somani

, et al. Electron beam irradiated polyamide-6, 6 films—I: characterization by wide angle X-ray scattering and infrared spectroscopy. Radiat Phys Chem 2005; 72: 625–633.

55.

Sun

Dong

, et al. Durable flame-retardant finishing for polyamide 66 fabrics by surface hydroxymethylation and crosslinking. Polym Adv Tech 2013; 24: 10–14.

56.

Karacan

Tunçel

KŞ

. An assessment of the impact of cupric ion complexation on thermal stabilization of polyamide 66 as carbon fiber precursor. Recent Res Devel Appl Polym Sci 2013; 5: 1–33.

57.

Karacan

Meşeli

. Characterization of amorphous carbon fibers produced from thermally stabilized polyamide 6 fibers. J Ind Textiles 2018; 47: 1185–1211.

58.

Jones

Duncan

. The effect of cooling rate on the mechanical properties of PAN-based carbon fibres. J Mater Sci 1974; 9: 162–164.

59.

Hindeleh

Johnson

Montague

. Computational Methods for Profile Resolution and Crystallite Size Evaluation in Fibrous Polymers. Washington, DC: ACS Publications, 1980, p. 149–182.

60.

DIN EN ISO 2062 - 2010-04 - Beuth.de. Beuth Publishing DIN, https://www.beuth.de/en/standard/din-en-iso-2062/120388973 (accessed 19 August 2021).

61.

Miao

McDonnell

Vuckovic

, et al. Poisson's ratio and porosity of carbon nanotube dry-spun yarns. Carbon 2010; 48: 2802–2811.

62.

Rahman

Demirel

Tunçel

KŞ

, et al. The effect of the ammonium persulfate and a multi-step annealing approach during thermal stabilization of polyacrylonitrile multifilament prior to carbonization. J Mater Sci 2021: 1–22.

63.

Bowler

. Four-point potential drop measurements for materials characterization. Meas Sci Technol 2010; 22: 12001.

64.

Wang

. Characterization of semiconductor surface conductivity by using microscopic four-point probe technique. Phys Proced 2012; 32: 347–355.

65.

Liu

. Study on the graphite and carbon fiber modified asphalt concrete. Construction Building Mater 2011; 25: 1807–1811.

66.

Choi

T-Y

Poulikakos

Tharian

, et al. Measurement of the thermal conductivity of individual carbon nanotubes by the four-point three-ω method. Nano Lett 2006; 6: 1589–1593.

67.

Erat

Metin

Arı

. Influence of the annealing in nitrogen atmosphere on the XRD, EDX, SEM and electrical properties of chemical bath deposited CdSe thin films. Mater Chem Phys 2008; 111: 114–120.

68.

Smits

. Measurement of Sheet Resistivities with the Four-Point Probe. Bell Syst Tech J 1958; 37: 711–718.

69.

Stokes

. A numerical Fourier-analysis method for the correction of widths and shapes of lines on X-ray powder photographs. Proc Phys Soc 1948; 61: 382–391.

70.

70 Sauder

Lamon

. Prediction of elastic properties of carbon fibers and CVI matrices. Carbon 2005; 43: 2044–2053.

71.

Zhang

Xiao

, et al. Effect of hot stretching graphitization on the structure and mechanical properties of rayon-based carbon fibers. J Mater Sci 2014; 49: 673–684.

72.

Silva

Matamá

Guebitz

, et al. Influence of organic solvents on cutinase stability and accessibility to polyamide fibers. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 2005; 43: 2749–2753.

73.

73 Pai

C-C

Jeng

R-J

Grossman

, et al. Effects of moisture on thermal and mechanical properties of nylon-6,6. Adv Polym Tech 1989; 9: 157–163.

74.

Stuart

. A Fourier transform Raman study of water sorption by Nylon 6. Polym Bull 1994; 33: 681–686.

75.

Takaku

Hashimoto

Miyoshi

. Tensile properties of carbon fibers from acrylic fibers stabilized under isothermal conditions. J Appl Polym Sci 1985; 30: 1565–1571.

76.

T-H

Day

T-C

. The effect of pre-carbonization on the properties of PAN-based carbon fibers. Polym Composites 1994; 15: 401–407.

77.

Jazaeri

Zhang

Wang

, et al. Fabrication of carbon nanofiber by pyrolysis of freeze-dried cellulose nanofiber. Cellulose 2011; 18: 1481–1485.

78.

Plaisantin

Pailler

Guette

, et al. Ex-cellulose carbon fibres with improved mechanical properties. J Mater Sci 2006; 41: 1959–1964.

79.

Liu

Yue

Fong

. Continuous nanoscale carbon fibers with superior mechanical strength. Small 2009; 5: 536–542.

80.

Naito

Yang

J-M

Tanaka

, et al. The effect of gauge length on tensile strength and Weibull modulus of polyacrylonitrile (PAN)- and pitch-based carbon fibers. J Mater Sci 2012; 47: 632–642.

81.

Xue

Liu

Lian

, et al. Effect of the oxygen-induced modification of polyacrylonitrile fibers during thermal-oxidative stabilization on the radial microcrystalline structure of the resulting carbon fibers. Polym Degrad Stab 2013; 98: 2259–2267.

82.

T-H

Chen

C-Y

. Improvement in the properties of PAN-based carbon films by modification with cobaltous chloride. J Appl Polym Sci 1999; 74: 1745–1751.

83.

Bajaj

Gupta

OJHA

. Antistatic and hydrophilic synthetic fibers: a Critique. Jms—rev MACROMOL CHEM PHYS 2007; 40(2&3): 105–138.

84.

Rhim

Y-R

Zhang

Fairbrother

, et al. Changes in electrical and microstructural properties of microcrystalline cellulose as function of carbonization temperature. Carbon 2010; 48: 1012–1024.

85.

Kennedy

Vijaya

Sekaran

. Electrical conductivity study of porous carbon composite derived from rice husk. Mater Chem Phys 2005; 91: 471–476.

86.

Layden

. Retrograde core formation during oxidation of polyacrylonitrile filaments. Carbon 1972; 10: 59–63.

87.

T-H

Chiranairadul

Lin

C-H

. The influence of continuous stabilization on the properties of stabilized fibers and the final activated carbon fibers. Part I. Polym Eng Sci 1991; 31: 1618–1626.

Fabrication of carbon fibers from the cupric ion impregnated and thermally stabilized poly(hexamethylene adipamide) precursor

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Experimental

Preparation of stabilized and carbonized samples

Data Collection

Experimental data analysis

X-Ray data-curve fitting

Evaluation of stacking height (Lc)

Evaluation of porosity

Correction of experimental tensile modulus

Results and discussion

Volume density, fiber diameter, linear density, and carbon yield

Elemental analysis

X-Ray diffraction

Infrared spectroscopy

Tensile properties

Electrical conductivity

Scanning electron microscopy

Conclusions

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iDs

References