Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A wet wipe is a commercial product made of a fibrous substrate impregnated with a lotion that often comes folded and individually wrapped for convenience. The present work relates to wet wipes’ composition to clean the baby’s body. Wet wipes were produced from two spunlace nonwoven fabrics consisting of polyester/viscose and a wetting solution. Objective performance evaluation was carried out to determine the efficiency of the wipes for manufacturing and end uses. The lotion formula comprising surfactants, a solubilizer, preservative compounds, perfumes, and mainly purified water is selected to deliver the intended benefits of a baby wet wipe. Besides, physical, mechanical characteristics, and moisture management parameters of the wet wipe fabrics were measured. Optimal lotion (oil–water emulsion) stirring conditions were illustrated using optical microscopy. Lotion foamability appears as an undesirable phenomenon upon the manufacturing of the wet wipe. A mixture design, an extreme vertices design, was used to study the influence of the compounds on the foam volume. The relative contribution of each compound in the lotion to generate bath foam was discussed. Because wet media are more effective than dry media for surface cleaning, the optimum wet pick-up ensuring the best wiping efficiency about of 83.2% was found to be about 3 g of lotion for 1 g of fabric. Assuming that a wipe sample could be performed in less than 3 min, it was also confirmed that the developed wipe remains effective with a moisture content of 242% and can be comparable with other commercial wipes.

Keywords

Spunlace baby wet wipes wet pick-up drying rate foamability lotion formula

Introduction

Rising consumer expenditure on baby care products and growing per capita income of female workforce are the key factors fueling the baby wet wipe market growth around the globe. Parents are concerned about the baby’s sensitive skin, especially the diaper area. The global baby wipes market size was valued at US$4.6 billion in 2019 and is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 5.2% from 2020 to 2027.¹ While diaper sales growth is relatively concentrated in the Asia-Pacific region and Africa, sales of wipes are expected to grow substantially across all global regions.^2,3 Apart from baby care, many wipes application areas exist such as personal care, healthcare, commercial, transportation industry, optical industry, electronic, and computer industry. Baby wet wipes account for almost 70% of total wet wipe sales and, based on volume, these wipes represent over 80% of all wet wipes used in Europe.⁴

A disposable wet wipe consists of three main components: the textile substrate, the lotion helping cleaning, and the package. The substrate is a nonwoven fabric of 40–60 gm⁻².⁵ Generally, they are blends of cellulosic fibers (viscose, lyocell, and cotton) with synthetics; mainly polyester and polypropylene.^5,6 Bamboo is used for Pampers^® baby wipes. Munoz et al. demonstrated the presence of polyester (polyethylene terephthalate (PET)), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), and polyethylene/vinyl acetate (PEVA/EVA) in some flushable wipes and PET in all non-flushable wipes.⁷ Viscose fibers are in wet wipes as they provide sufficient wettability for most cleaning lotions because of the relatively high surface energy of viscose (50 dyn/cm).⁵ Viscose is also designed to reduce friction when wiped across the skin surface.⁸ The polyester fibers provide the necessary strength to the product for durability⁹ but take a considerable time to degrade.¹⁰

Spunlace (49% of the market), air-laid, dry-laid, wet-laid, needle punched, and composite nonwoven fabrics are used for wet wipes.¹¹ Hydro-entanglement technology, commonly known as spun lacing is a common method for producing soft, flexible webs having an optimum cross-direction modulus. It is a mechanical type of bonding using high-speed jets of water to strike the web so that the fibers knot about one another. Since the product does not require any chemical binder, this technology is desired for baby and personal care wet wipes. Soukupova et al.¹⁰ demonstrated that both fiber strength and entanglement play a role in the nonwoven mechanical properties. Nevertheless, the influence of the entanglement intensity of the fibers predominated over the impact of the mechanical properties of the constituent fibers. Wet and dry strength, friction coefficient, softness degree, liquid retention, absorption capacity, and dynamic wiping efficiency are the main criteria to select the nonwoven destined to wet wipes applications.¹² At least a portion of the fibers must have a surface energy that is high enough to allow them to be wetted by the lotion.¹³ Indeed, the wipe should be tolerant to lotions and keep the applied liquid in the product until use.¹⁴

Formulating a hypoallergenic, safe, and effective baby wipe can be challenging as the wipe must meet regulatory, safety, and performance measures while remaining aesthetically pleasing. It is preferred that baby wipes are formulated with a very large percentage of purified water. However, water alone is not enough to effectively remove water‐insoluble residues from baby skin and to prevent the growth of microorganisms or maintain a healthy skin pH.^15,16 In babies, water is rapidly absorbed into the skin, even within 10 s. This has the potential to disrupt the barrier function by increasing the space between skin cells. Furthermore, tap water is more alkaline than the pH of the skin in the weeks following birth. Skin integrity can be compromised if the acidity of the skin is altered.^17,18 Thus, a baby wipe must also contain an extremely mild surfactant to lower surface tension for better cleaning, a preservation system to ensure product freshness before and during use, a pH adjusting system to maintain a solution pH similar to infant skin (pH: 4.5–6), optionally, skin‐benefiting ingredients that reduce frictional damage and replenish the skin lipids, perfumes and vitamins, etc.¹⁹ In 2016, a recommendation was made by the European roundtable meeting on best practice healthy infant skincare stating that a wet wipe for baby skin should contain pH buffers to maintain the slightly acidic pH of the skin, should be free of potential irritants, and should contain well‐tolerated preservatives.²⁰

Baby wet wipes are available in bulk packaging (tubs, flexible films, canisters, flatpacks, etc.) to protect them from any form of contamination and damage. The packing seal shall be secure and allows resealing as many times as possible ensuring the non-used wet wipes are not dry.²¹

Few authors have dealt with the manufacturing complexities of wet wipes in the production line. The effect of the lotion formula, the nonwoven composition and construction properties, the substrate wet pick-up, and the lotion distribution within wipes on cleaning efficiency are not well understood.

Numerous methods are available to determine surface cleanability, ranging from subjective visual techniques to molecular scale techniques.²² In practical situations, the method selected is based on the cleanliness level required, the type of surface material, and the type of soiling. Cleanability is commonly determined as the color change of the soiled or cleaned surface material. Contact angle measurements are employed in precision cleaning (e.g., in semiconductor industries) to detect soiling on surfaces. The measurements were based on different hydrophobic-hydrophilic characteristics of soiling and solid surfaces.²³

Lee et al.²⁴ developed a method to determine the contaminant removal performance of wiping cloths based on image analysis. The correlation coefficient between the image analysis and the gravimetric method was very high, at a correlation coefficient equals 0.97, and with a significance level of 95%. The same study revealed that the wiping efficiency measured using image analysis has a close relationship with the wiping speed, the viscosity of the contaminant, and the wiping pressure at the significance level of 95%. Nandy et al.²⁵ determined the efficiency of microbial removal/killing of pathogenic bacteria using a variety of commercial disinfecting wipes to clean and disinfect common reusable medical devices, after contamination with surrogates. The ASTMD 1792–20²⁶ specifies that in wipe media the minimum absolute collection efficiency for lead dust from a smooth surface shall be 75% or better, as measured against a known mass of lead dust that was placed on the test surface. Swab and wipe test kits with colorimetric indicators are also available for contaminants, including lead, chromate, cadmium, amines, aliphatic and aromatic isocyanates, etc.²⁷

Microbial contamination of wet wipes can occur during their manufacture. The majority of the contaminants are present in the source of water and in the raw materials, including the nonwoven as well as in equipment and plumbing lines.²⁸ Antibacterial evaluations of the used water and the final baby wet wipe are crucial. Before releasing baby wipes for sale to consumers, an evaluation of the final product should be completed for the presence and level of microbes within the product over the short and the long term. Currently, safety testing is accomplished via animal test models, non-animal in vitro test models, and clinical human subject testing.²⁹ Common methods used to assess the tolerability of wipes are repeated insult patch test (RIPT) to control allergy and irritation, cumulative irritation test (CIT) to control irritation, phototoxicity/photoallergy (PT/PA) to control photoallergy (UV-induced) and irritation, ocular installation to control eye irritation, and safety-in-use to control suitability.¹⁹

Manufacturing complexities of baby wet wipes are frequent and include the water quality, the converting processes, the folding configurations, the stack orientation, the packaging formats, and especially the lotion formulation.

Foamability of the lotion appears as an undesired phenomenon, which undoubtedly complicates the lotion application on the wipe through the production line. In fact, a pure liquid does not produce foam, but the decrease in surface tension by the addition of surfactants allows foam production. A bubbly liquid is obtained when a non-equilibrium dispersion of gas bubbles in a relatively small volume of liquid containing surfactants exists.³⁰ These surface-active macromolecules adsorb at the gas/liquid interfaces and are responsible for both the tendency of a liquid to foam (foamability) and the stability of the resulting dispersion.³¹ It has been shown that the amount of foam formed depends on the machinery responsible for its production as well as on the properties of the liquid composition (surface tension and critical micelle concentration (CMC)); whereas the stability of the foam produced is primarily a function of the liquid composition.³¹ Surfactants are classified as cationic, non-ionic, anionic, and amphoteric by the presence of formally charged groups in their head. When dissolved in water, surfactants concentrate at water/air or water/oil interfaces.³² Due to the influence of the type of surfactant and the solution agitation speed, the foamability of surfactant solutions can be hard to control.³³ A theory of the amount of foam produced by compression/decompression cycles of a soft porous media (dishwasher sponge) was developed by Johnson et al.³⁴ The amount of foam produced was found to be dependent on both the amount of surfactant within the media and the decompression of the media as this is the mechanism of where the air penetrates into the soft porous fabric.

Therefore, from the R&D laboratory, the lotion formulator must anticipate the stage of industrial transposition so that the lotion formula developed is feasible on a larger scale. This work is intended to provide manufacturers of wipe sampling media solutions to solve some industrial complexities. In fact, this study was undertaken to further evaluate optimum stirring conditions of lotion compounds and to adjust the lotion formula in order to minimize undesirable foamability. The second goal was to describe the results of the effect of the wipe wet pick-up on the wiping efficiency of two developed wet wipes using the gravimetric method. The dry rate of wet wipes was also recorded and compared to commercial ones. Certain additional comparisons of the physical and mechanical properties of the wipes are included. Antibacterial tests and tolerability results of the developed baby wet wipes were also presented.

Materials and methods

Nonwoven testing

Two types of nonwoven fabrics samples, labeled S1 and S2, were produced by the hydroentanglement bonding technique. Both fabrics are made from 50% viscose (CV), and 50% polyester (PES) blends. Dry wipes are compared in terms of mass according to EDANA NWSP 130.1. R0 (15),³⁵ thickness according to EDANA NWSP 120.1. R0 (15),³⁶ absorption capacity of liquid using EDANA NWSP 010.1. R0 (15),³⁷ and air permeability according to NWSP 070.1. R0 (15)³⁸ under 100 Pa pressure.

Tensile strength was measured in both the dry and wet states, according to IS 15891-3³⁹ to simulate practical conditions of manufacturing. A tensile testing machine, equipped with an autographic recorder to register applied force was used (LLOYD LR 5 K). Wet samples (50 cm × 200 cm) were soaked for at least 1 h in a solution containing 1 g of a non-ionic wetting agent per liter of distilled water. A constant rate of extension of 100 mm/min was applied. The nonwoven specific strength and the fabric density were determined according to equations (1) and (2)¹⁰

Specific strength (N . m . {kg}^{- 1}) = \frac{Breaking tensile strength}{Area density \times thickness}

(1)

Fabric density (Kg . m^{- 3}) = \frac{Area density}{Thickness}

(2)

All fabric samples were conditioned under standard atmospheric conditions of 21 ± 1°C and 65 ± 2% relative humidity for 24 h before testing.

The physical properties of the nonwoven fabrics are given in Table 1.

Table 1.

Details of reference fabrics.

Properties	Spunlace S1	Spunlace S2
Composition	50% viscose; 50% polyester
Area density $g / m^{2}$	54.440 ± 0.002^a	46.500 ± 0.005
Thickness $mm$	0.616 ± 0.011	0.520 ± 0.016
Fabric density $Kg / m^{3}$	88.376 ± 0.180	89.423 ± 0.310
Absorption capacity $%$	958.81 ± 0.04	1114.85 ± 0.05
Air permeability $l / m^{2} / s$	1556 ± 0.87	1760 ± 0.57

^aA mean value ± standard deviation.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the dry wipes were obtained on a scanning electron microscope VHX-6000, operating at (5 kV) and magnification of 500x.

Wet wipes production

Wetting solutions were applied on dry spunlaces S1 and S2 by a drip system through the production line and liquid amounts were arranged through squeezing rollers. In fact, large diameter rolls of dry wipes are unwound, vertically cut, folded, moved over rollers above which a drip system wets the wipe at a low rate, squeezed to ensure a precise wet pick-up, transversally cut, and then stacked. The package is finally bagged in a packing machine and a lid is placed for better sealing (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Wet wipes production line.

Lotion formulation

Lotion composition initially includes 81.5% of purified water. Water purification is a step-by-step process requiring a combination of technologies, each of which varies according to the ability to remove specific contaminants: chlorination treatment, multilayer filters, microfilters, osmosis unit, and a UV-C treatment. The used water has a pH in the range 5–6, a hardness of 0–1 ppm, a TDS: 22–40 ppm, a conductivity ranged from 0 to 9 μs, and a chlorine level of 0ppm (20°C). Besides, the purified water was microbiologically tested against Mesophilic aerobic bacteria, Salmonella, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus Aureus.

The lotion consists of an oil-in-water emulsion and contains also multiple functional ingredients: surfactants, humectant, solubilizer, perfumes, and preservatives detailed in Table 2, added to achieve the desired wetting and rheological properties, for example, low surface tension of 0.038 N/m and a viscosity of 0.05 Pa.s.

Table 2.

Lotion composition.

Compound (percentage)	Ingredient	Function in the lotion	Typical use concentration in baby wipes (w/w)
Compound 1 81.50%	Purified water	Aqueous phase	a
Compound 2 17.38%	Cetrimonium chloride	A cationic surfactant that disperses water and oil and thus promotes soft and pleasant consistencies. It provides antimicrobial and antistatic activities	< 0.25%⁴⁰
	Polysorbate 20	A non-ionic surfactant used as an emulsifier in the preparation of stable oil-in-water emulsions	< 2.50%⁴¹
	Aleo barbadensis leaf extract	Soothing and nourishing extract	< 1.00%⁴²
	Olea europaea (olive) fruit extract	Antimicrobial agent
	Prunus amygdalus duicis (sweet almond) fruit extract	Antioxidant agent, a rich source of E and B-vitamins
	Glycerin	Natural humectant	< 0.50%⁴³
	Allantoin	A nitrogenous compound used for its anti-irritant, anti-inflammatory, and moisturizing properties	< 0.10%⁴⁴
	Polyquaternium-7	Prevents or inhibits the buildup of static electricity and dries to form a thin coating that is absorbed on the skin. It acts as an antibacterial active agent	< 0.50%⁴⁵
	Tetrasodium salt	Biodegradable chelating agent that deactivates metal ions by the formation of a water-soluble complex and prevents the deterioration of personal care products	< 0.03%⁴⁶
	Tocopheryl acetate	Synthetic form of vitamin E, used for its antioxidant properties	< 0.10%⁴⁷
Compound 3 0.12%	Glyceryl Cocoate	Solubilizer used to improve surfactant performance	—
Compound 4 0.80%	Ethylhexylglycerin	The addition of ethylhexylglycerin to phenoxyethanol enhances the efficacy of phenoxyethanol and enhances the anti-microbial efficacity	< 0.05%²⁹
	Phenoxyethanol	Natural preservative	< 0.40%⁴⁸
	Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid	A preservative to preserve or stabilize the lotion	< 0.03%⁴⁹
Compound 5 0.20%	Natural perfumes	Aroma compounds to give a pleasant-smelling scent from a wipe	—

^aNot specified.

Lotion homogenization

The obtained lotion (oil/water emulsion) is stirred mechanically using a laboratory paddle agitator allowing variable rotation speeds at room temperature. Oil-in-water emulsion was carried out with a stirring speed ranged from 60 rpm to 255 rpm, and a stirring time ranged from 10 to 30 min. In fact, energy is required to break up the particles of the dispersed phase into smaller droplets. Indeed, gentle agitation ensures circulation emulsion without causing droplet rupture.⁵⁰ If the agitation continues, the collision between the droplets becomes more frequent and a certain coalescence may appear. It is therefore recommended not to mix emulsions too long, especially if the stirring speed is high.⁵⁰ Initially, compounds 2 and 4 were added to the aqueous phase and then solubilizer (compound 3), and perfumes (compound 5).

Optical microscopy is the most widely used type of microscopy for characterizing emulsion microstructures because it is relatively inexpensive and easy to operate. The droplet size and morphology of multiple emulsions were investigated using a Laica DM 50 microscope. After one droplet of the emulsion is deposited on the slide using a pipet of 1 mL, a smear is made and no glass cover slide is needed above the emulsion. To maintain consistency in the experimental conditions, observations were carried out in duplicate and recorded 3 min after stirring.

Foam test

Lotion foamability must be controlled in the wet wipes production line and on the final wipes as it causes unpleasant aspects. The pour test used is previously described by Ross-Miles^51,52 and adopted as ASTM D1173-53.⁵³ The foam test consisted of pouring 200 mL of a solution (for 60 s) into a graduated beaker from a height of 90 cm already filled with 50 mL of the same solution. When pouring, the container is tilted only once to allow the lotion and foam to freely flow into the beaker. After 150 s, the bottom of the meniscus of both the foam and liquid levels in the cylinder were recorded.⁵⁴ Foamability measurements were carried out in triplicate.

Wipe wet pick-up

The wipe lotion wet pick-up percentage $(W_{p u p})$ measured after one passage through the squeezing rollers was determined using equation (3)

W_{pup} = \frac{ω_{w} - ω_{d}}{ω_{d}} \times 100

(3)

where

ω_{w}

is the surface weight of the squeezed wet wipe (g/m²) and

ω_{d}

is the surface weight of the dry wipe (g/m²).

Wiping efficiency measurement

Objective evaluation of the wet wipe’s performance is needed for the manufacturer to fully understand the performance of the proposed wipes.

The assessment of wiping efficiency $(W_{eff})$ is based on the evaluation of melted chocolate recovery (common dirt of babies and kids) from the hand conducted by the first deposition into the palms. All experiments were performed on only the author’s hands for sampling consistency. Once the melted chocolate was deposited onto the palm, a wet wipe sample was used to clean the palm by only one passage. A standardized method was used in which the test area was wiped from top to bottom (vertical direction). Each experiment was repeated five times.

Wiping efficiency is calculated gravimetrically using equation (4)

W_{eff} = \frac{w_{a} - w_{b}}{w_{c}} \times 100

(4)

where

w_{a}

is the mass (g) of the wet wipe after the wiping test was carried out,

w_{b}

is the mass (g) of the wet wipe before the wiping test was carried out, and

w_{c}

is the mass (g) of the melted chocolate initially deposited on the palm.

The gravimetric method was successfully used by Hossain et al.⁵⁵ and Dey et al.⁵⁶ to evaluate lotion transfer to baby skin for clinical tests.

Antibacterial tests

At birth, baby skin does not have all the necessary defenses to protect against pathogens; thus, it is of utmost importance to keep contaminates off of the skin. Since microbial growth is enhanced in moist environments, baby wipes are at risk for microbial growth. Antibacterial properties of the wet wipes were investigated against total bacterial to simulate real end use conditions of wet wipes.

Other tests were carried out against pathogenic germs: Pseudomonas aeruginosa according to ISO 22717,⁵⁷ Staphylococcus aureus according to ISO 22718,⁵⁸ Escherichia Coli according to ISO 21148,⁵⁹ and Candida albicans according to ISO 18416.⁶⁰ All tests were performed in triplicate. To assure a baby wipe product is effectively preserved and able to overcome this type of contamination, a confirmatory lab test must be utilized to ensure microbial growth will not occur during normal product use. Specifically, the test should involve adding a defined number of some organisms to a defined quantity of product and then monitoring the survival and/or growth of the added organisms over time. This test is commonly utilized on product that has been freshly made and on product aged under ambient or accelerated (high temperature, high relative humidity) conditions. The test method is clearly described by Crémieux et al.⁶¹

Results and discussion

Characterization of spunlace nonwoven fabrics

Two spunlaces produced from the same supplier, S1 and S2, sharing a similar fiber blend and characteristics for which are shown in Table 1 will be used in this study. Substrate S1 is denser and thicker. In fact, the increase in the feed rate of carding (during the web formation step) machine increases the number of fibers in a given mass per unit area. More number of fibers in cross-lapper web will lead to a greater number of fibers per unit area in the final spunlace fabric. The same reason can be applied to the thickness. However, it is observed that spunlace S1 has a lower liquid absorption capacity compared to S2. Recently, Maiti et al.⁶² explained that the increase in jet pressure hydroentanglement process results in a decrease of liquid absorption capacity of spunlace nonwoven samples by the compaction of fabric web. So, the porous nature of hydroentangled webs reduces at high jet pressure leading to a decrease in liquid absorption capacity. Air permeability is not a property directly affecting the performance of a wet wipe but can give an idea about its pore structure and tortuosity enabling ascent of the liquid within the structure.⁵ Air permeability values of S1 and S2 are different from each other. It can be concluded that air permeability changes according to fabric area density. This is an expected result that the number of fibers which the air passes through is less for sample S2 (Figure 2). But when other cellulosic fibers are considered, air permeability values change because the rougher fiber surfaces make more friction with air passing through.⁵

Figure 2.

Scanning electron microscopy images of dry wipes (a) Spunlace S1 (b) Spunlace S2.

In both substrates, the fibers have a serrated cross-section as a result of the coagulation conditions of viscose fibers⁶³ and round polyester cross-sections with effective diameters of 17.2 μm and 14.2 μm, respectively (Figure 2). According to Hoof et al.,⁶⁴ the special mix of round and shaped fibers provide more airy fluffiness of Pampers^® wipes, round fibers allow absorbency, thick trilobed fibers allow air fluffiness, and micro-fine trilobed fibers allow opacity. On the other hand, the presence of a large number of pores in spunlace (S2) samples provides more capillary channels to transport liquid and explains their high absorption capacity. Fiber orientations of the nonwoven fabrics were determined by angle measurements on SEMimages of the fibers with the horizontal axis. Spunlace 1 shows randomly distributed fibers while S2 shows layered fibers with predetermined orientation (54°–88°). This means that they are oriented more on the machine direction.

Figure 3 shows the tensile strength of wet and dry wipes as a function of elongation. Results show that the ultimate strength values of the tested nonwovens are slightly different: S1 shows a slightly lower tensile strength compared to S2 although it is heavier. The calculated specific strength in machine direction of S1 and S2 was 2.27 $N . m . {kg}^{- 1}$ and 3.48 $N . m . {kg}^{- 1}$ , respectively. This may be attributed to the influence of the entanglement intensity of the fibers, interaction and harmony between mixture components, the position of the fibers in the web, and the way fibers are entangled and, namely, individual mechanical properties of fibers making up the mixture.⁶⁵ In fact, the resulting development of the fabric structure predominated over the impact of the mass of the constituent fibers. The breaking extension values of both nonwovens are higher than 20%. The tensile strength in the wet state was lower in comparison with that in the dry state for both samples. The tensile strength of the wet samples S2 and S1 was about 15–23% lower for samples in the dry state, respectively. In fact, the wet strength of viscose fibers is always lower than the dry strength (24 cN/tex in the dry state and 13.5 cN/tex in the wet state).⁶⁶

Figure 3.

Tensile strength of wipes as a function of elongation (machine direction).

Figure 4 shows that the tensile strength in the cross-machine direction is lower than that in the machine direction for all dry samples. In general, the tensile strength in the wet state was higher in comparison with that in the dry state. The extension of fabrics in the wet state was slightly lower in cross-machine direction. The samples cut on the machine direction were significantly stronger and less extendible due to predominance of fiber orientation in the machine direction resulting from the web formation technique.¹⁰ The calculated specific strength in cross-machine direction of S1 and S2 was 0.655 $N . m . {kg}^{- 1}$ and 0.507 $N . m . {kg}^{- 1}$ , respectively.

Figure 4.

Tensile strength of wipes as a function of elongation (cross-machine direction).

Microscopic study of the emulsion system

The formation of emulsions by breaking down one liquid in the presence of another may be achieved by mechanical means. In some instances, simple stirring may be sufficient. Where the interfacial tension is very low, the energy needed to form an emulsion is correspondingly small and may be provided by the thermal motion of the molecules.⁶⁷

Various mixing conditions were applied on the prepared lotion and oil droplets were observed by Laica DM 50 microscope using a ×50 magnification as shown in Figure 5. The required amount of each compound (wt.%) was added to the solution (Table 2).

Figure 5.

Some optical views of emulsions under different mixing conditions (a) 60 rpm, 10 min; (b) 60 rpm, 20 min; (c) 110 rpm, 10 min; (d) 110 rpm, 20 min; (e) 250 rpm, 10 min; and (f) 250 rpm, 20 min.

The obtained emulsions have a homogeneous appearance to the naked eye and therefore do not show any sign of phase separation. They are also stable because they persist without phase separation for 5 days or more.⁶⁸

Figure 5 shows some optical microscopy images of the same emulsion formula stirred under different mixing conditions.

Droplets of different shapes and sizes (diameter values: 42.70 μm–81.95 μm) are observed in the emulsion stirred at 60 rpm for 10min referring to several different components in the lotion (Figure 5(a)). Small well-defined spherical droplets (average diameter values: 35.32 μm) were observed in the emulsion stirred at 60 rpm for 20 min (Figure 5(b)) due to the surfactant molecules with a little intense boundary line (interfacial layer). The above illustrations represent the effect of stirring shear rate on the size of the droplets of an emulsion.

Under mixing conditions of 110 rpm and for 20 min (Figure 5(d)), we can view the formation of two phases (aqueous and dispersed), as well as the presence of very small droplets (average diameter values: 10.71 μm) in the emulsion phase. It is noteworthy that these emulsions presented an average droplet diameter value lower than 10 μm, indicating that they are stable.⁶⁹

For a mixing speed higher than 110 rpm, the foamability of the lotion appears as an undesired phenomenon, which complicates the lotion application on the wipe in the production line, particularly at the liquid feeding and squeezing steps.

On the other hand, the droplets’ size decrease with the increase of stirring rotation and time and becomes invisible at 250 rpm for 20 min stirring time using Laica DM 50 microscope (50x magnification). Such a transparent system, with a high amount of water (extremely low viscosity), may consist of microemulsion (droplets’ size from 1 μm–10 μm).⁶⁶

Lotion formula adjustment

Foamability appears as an undesirable phenomenon in the wet wipe production line and in the final product. Two solutions were proposed: the first one is the adjustment of the lotion formula which should be carried out without affecting wet wipe performance, the second one (not discussed in this work), is the introduction of an antifoaming agent to the lotion formula. In the experimental part of this section, statistical analysis was conducted by taking the percentage of compounds 1–3 as input variables and the foam volume as the output variable. Minitab^® 17.1.0 statistical software was used to design a mixture design.

In fact, mixture design, a special type of RSM (response surface method), is a very effective method for determining the proportions of variables of a blend. The output varies depending on the proportions, but the total remains constant as 1 (or 100%), they are therefore not independent. Mixture designs have been successfully applied to scientific research and development and have been implemented successfully in real-world problems.^70,71,72,73

An n-component mixture is shown in the equation (5)⁷⁰

0 \leq x_{i} \leq 1; \sum_{1}^{n} x_{i} = 1; i = 1, 2, \dots, n

(5)

where

x_{i}

represents the proportion of the

i^{t h}

component in the mixture. The n-components form a regular (n-1) dimensional simplex.

One of the widely used mixture design types is the extreme vertices design, which presents a design that covers only a smaller space within the simplex. The presence of both lower and upper bound constraints on the components often creates this condition.

These restrictions take the form of lower $L_{i}$ and upper $U_{i}$ constraints on the component proportions. The general form of the constrained mixture problem is shown in equation (6)⁷¹

\sum_{i} x_{i} = 1; L_{i} \leq x_{i} \leq U_{i}

(6)

A mixture design, augmented by a center point and three axial points, was used.⁷² Table 3 shows the outputs of the extreme vertices design and corresponding low and high proportions. However, compounds 4 (based on preservatives) and 5 (based on perfumes) were held at 0.008% and 0.002%, respectively. Obtained solutions were stirred for 20 min with 110 rpm to ensure homogeneity. After each experiment was conducted, one response, foam volume was obtained.

Table 3.

Output variables of extreme vertices design.

Output	Symbol	Low percentage	High percentage
Compound 1	$x_{1}$	81.50	90.00
Compound 2	$x_{2}$	8.92	17.38
Compound 3	$x_{3}$	0.08	0.12

A response trace plot (Figure 6) shows the effect of each component on the response. Several response traces, which are a series of predictions from the fitted quadratic model (R² = 98.75%), p-value < 0.05) presented in equation (7), are plotted along a component direction

Foam volume (c l) = 0.036 x_{1} + 6.250 x_{2} - 4163.921 x_{3} - 0.078 x_{1} x_{2} + 421.333 x_{1} x_{3} + 422.071 x_{2} x_{3}

(7)

Figure 6.

Response trace plot (volume foam).

The trace curves (Figure 6) show the effect of changing the corresponding component when we start at the location that corresponds to the reference blend. As the proportion of purified water in the mixture increases, the foam volume decreases. As the proportion of compound 2 in the mixture increases, the foam volume increases. In fact, compound 2 is composed of at least two surfactants (cetrimonium chloride and polysorbate 20) which may be responsible for solution foamability. The use of a single surfactant does not always ensure optimum stability of an emulsion. Therefore, the use of two types of surfactants is often more effective. One will ensure the stability of the interface, by decreasing the interfacial tension, while the other will prevent flocculation, by the electrostatic or steric effect.³² High concentration solutions were characterized by fine and fairly uniform distributed bubble size, whereas lower concentrations clearly reveal a different foam texture with larger bubble sizes and broad distribution which quickly disappears (few seconds).

The proportion of compound 3, composed of one surface agent (Glyceryl Cocoate, < 0.12%), has no significant effect on the foam volume (see the green curve). Based on these findings, increasing purified water and decreasing surfactant concentration in the lotion (compound 2’s proportion) can avoid foamability. On the other hand, strict limits are prescribed in Table 2 and support the reduction of surfactants in baby lotion. Indeed, it is important to note that most baby wipes contain less than 0.3% of a mild surfactant; in contrast, bottled baby products contain 5%–20% surfactant.⁷⁴ Besides, commercial baby wipes contain high amounts of water: aqua wipes 99.6%, babynu 98%, babyhug 97%, JOHNSON’S Baby Skincare 97%, etc.

Minitab^® 17.1.0 statistical software calculates an optimum solution using the desirability function to minimize foam volume, considering a target and an upper limit of 0–1 cl. Indeed, AATCC 167–2008.⁵⁴ classifies foam volume in six classes and considered foam volume ranged from 0 to 3 cl as very low foam.

The optimum lotion formula obtained using desirability function with a total desirability of 0.676 is as follows:

1.·Purified water: 89.96%.

2.·Compound 2: 8.92%.

3.·Compound 3: 0.12%.

4.·Compound 4: 0.80%.

5.·Compound 5: 0.20%.

Because an appropriate balance between effective wipe body cleaning and manufacturing conditions must be attained, the next sections are presented.

Baby wipe wet pick-up

Because it is known that wet media are more effective than dry media for surface cleaning, wet pick-up might seem to be an important characteristic of premoistened wiping media. To evaluate the wipe wet pick-up, both the dry and humid wipe weights (after wipe squeezing) are measured. Hence, they are compared to determine the wet pick-up (by weight). The results of the hand wipe evaluation of melted chocolate recovery as a function of lotion wet pick-up are displayed in Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Effect of nonwoven wet pick-up on wiping efficiency.

As expected, wiping efficiency increases with the increase of the wet pick-up but has not exceeded 83.61%, precision was good with a relative standard deviation of 3.03%. From a wet pick-up of 245%, that is, (3.5 g of lotion per gram of fabric) the wiping efficiency remains constant and this may be because a part of the lotion is left behind on the sampled surface. A p-value > 0.05 is not statistically significant and indicates that the spunlace type has a non-significant effect on the wiping efficiency.

Having only 83.61% of wiping efficiency should be expected given the topography of the hand palm, which is crisscrossed with whorls and furrows and may be callused. Indeed, these results agree well with previous reports on lead dust recovery using hand wipes. Vostal et al.²⁷ conducted hand wiping using Wash’n Dri wipes to recover lead-containing dust from six children’s hands and reported a satisfactory recovery of 68.7% ± 1.49 from the first wipe. On the other hand, it is best to use a necessary and sufficient amount of lotion on the wipe so that all of the solution will be picked up by the wipe and not left behind on the sampled surface.²⁷ Added in large amounts to the wipe, lotion sinks to the bottom of the package, and the wipe becomes a breeding ground for mold and bacteria, and lotion drips from the wipe in uses. As an indication, the lotion transfer to the skin from the first to the third wipe was 1.52%, 2.63%, and 3.93%, respectively.

The results of wiping efficiency were then compared with two commercial wipes. The wiping efficiency percentage was ranged from 82.61% to 85.34%.

Precision should be improved with multiple wipes by averaging out the random operator variability in each wipe, such as the evaporation, the lotion transfer to the operator’s hand, the amount of pressure applied, the quickness of wiping, etc.

Drying rate of developed baby wet wipes

The drying rate might be worthy of consideration because it might relate to wipe performance. The drying rate of the wet wipes is presented in Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Mean moisture loss as a percentage of initial moisture content.

To evaluate moisture content, the wet weights and the dry weights of the wipes (at 105°C) were measured so that the moisture content (by weight) could be determined. Moisture content was measured by opening a wipe from its package, unfolding it completely and immediately placing it on an electronic balance with a precision of 10⁻⁴ g. Weight was recorded over several predetermined times. Temperature and relative humidity were 19°C and 62%, respectively. Assuming that a wipe sample could be performed in less than 3 min based on experimental experience,⁷⁵ it can be confirmed that the developed wipe remains effective with a moisture content of 242% and can be comparable with other commercial wipes. Glycerin present in wet wipes prevents premature drying of the lotion.⁴²

Antibacterial activity test results and tolerability of developed wipes

Antibacterial tests have been made and show that pathogenic germs: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia Coli, and Candida albicans were absent. For total bacterial, results were also satisfactory and lower than 100 CFU/g for developed wipes, limits are defined according to ISO 17516.⁷⁶

Human subject testing, using repeated insult patch test, occurs after the formulation assessment is complete, and it is determined safety risks are unlikely. Tests were achieved under the control of Good Clinical Practices (GCPs), demonstrated tolerance and confirmed developed baby wet wipes purported use.

Conclusion

In this study, an attempt has been made to develop baby wet wipes which adhere to strict criteria set and must pass a series of quality checkpoints during manufacturing. Objective evaluations of the wiping performance methods are always needed in order to fully understand the efficiency and limitations of each wipe quality.

Two nonwoven spunlaces were characterized consisting of polyester and cellulose (viscose) and an initial commercial wetting solution was proposed. Microscopic observations of several wetting solutions revealed that 110 rpm mixing speed for 20min was sufficient to obtain a homogeneous emulsion with small well-defined spherical droplets. Efficient foam control throughout the production line is mandatory in order to avoid operational disturbance and failure or wipe surface defects. Thus, investigations were conducted employing a three-component constrained mixture design to formulate a new lotion that generates a minimum foamability. An appropriate balance between effective wipe body cleansing and manufacturing conditions must be attained. Therefore, a necessary and sufficient wet pick-up was determined ensuring an optimum wiping efficiency of 83.2% was found using the gravimetric method. Besides, developed baby wet wipes remains effective during the first 3 min and even more with a moisture content of 242%. Experimental errors can’t be avoided using the gravimetric method, which is the general testing method used for determining the wiping efficiency and moisture content.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iDs

Rim Cheriaa

Jaouachi Boubaker

References

Grand View Research . Baby Wipes Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report by Product (Dry Wipes, Wet Wipes), Report by Distribution Channel (Hypermarkets & Supermarkets, E-Commerce), by Region, and Segment Forecasts, 2020—2027. Report no: GVR-4-68038-838-1, 2020, August.

Sternberg

. The Global Market for Baby Care: Where is it Currently and where is it Going, 2019, https://www.nonwovens-industry.com (accessed 1 March 2020).

Global Baby Wipes Market – Industry Trends and Forecast to 2027. 2020. https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/reports/global-baby-wipes-market (accessed 09 February 2020).

Cabrera

Garcia

. The environmental & economic costs of single-use menstrual products, baby nappies & wet wipes, Investigating the impact of these single-use items across Europe, By zero waste Europe. Report, 2019, November.

Kaplan

Pulan

Ulusoy

. Objective and subjective performance evaluations of wet wipes including herbal components. J Ind Textiles 2018; 47: 1959–1978.

Pulan

Kaplan

Ulusoy

. An investigation about liquid transfer characteristics of nonwoven wet wipes. Tekstil ve Mühendis 2015; 22: 13–24.

Pantoja Munoz

Gonzalez Baez

McKinney

, et al. Characterisation of “flushable” and “non-flushable” commercial wet wipes using micro Raman, FTIR spectroscopy and fluorescence microscopy: to flush or not to flush. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2018; 25: 20268–20279.

Siegert

. Preservative trends in wet wipes. Int J Appl Sc 2011; 5: 44–51.

Sentthilkumar

Dhinakaran

Sathishkumar

, et al. Development of wet wipes from natural herbal extracts. Asian J Microbiol Bio Env Sci Pap 2017; 19: 12–15.

10.

Soukupova

Boguslavsky

AnandJiwala

. Studies on the properties of biodegradable wipes made by the hydroentanglement bonding technique. Textile Res J 2007; 77: 301–311.

11.

Markets and Markets

. Global Non-woven Fabrics Market – Industry Analysis and Forecast (2019-2026) by Technology, by Material, by Application & Region. Report no 17274, 2020.

12.

Das

Kothari

Mane

. Frictional characteristics of woven and nonwoven wipes. Fibers Polym 2005; 6: 318–321.

13.

Sheehan

Brennan

Sawin

, et al. Low Basis Weight Wet Wipes with a Pleasing Hand. USA: Patent 8557722B2, 2013.

14.

Wied

Neuhofer

Burrow

. The world of nonwoven cellulosic fibers. Skinology: The Effect of Tencel Fibers on Skin. Linz: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013, pp. 48–49.

15.

Pericoi

. Études clinuques et tolérance des lingettes chez les bébés atopiques. Arch de Pédiatrie 2006; 13: 10–13.

16.

Vongsa

Rodriguez

Koenig

, et al. Benefits of using an appropriately formulated wipe to clean diapered skin of preterm infants. Glob Pediatr Health 2019; 6: 2333794X1982918. DOI: 10.1177/2333794X19829186.

17.

Lavender

Furber

Campbell

, et al. Effect on skin hydration of using baby wipes to clean the napkin area of newborn babies: assessor-blinded randomised controlled equivalence trial. BMC Pediatr 2012; 12: 59.

18.

Priestley

McVittie

Aldridge

. Changes in skin pH after the use of baby wipes. Pediatr Dermatol 1996; 13: 14–17.

19.

Rodriguez

Cunningham

Foxenberg

, et al. The science behind wet wipes for infant skin: ingredient review, safety, and efficacy. Pediatr Dermatol 2020; 37: 447–454. DOI: 10.1111/pde.14112.

20.

Blume-Peytavi

Lavender

Jenerowicz

, et al. Recommendations from a European roundtable meeting on best practice healthy infant skin care. Pediatr Dermatol 2016; 33: 311–321.

21.

DKS 2720-2016 : Non-woven Disposable Wet Wipes- Specifications.

22.

Kohli

Mittal

. Methods for assessing surface cleanliness. In: Kohli

Mittal

(eds). Developments in Surface Contamination and Cleaning. ■■■: Elsevier; 2019, pp. 23–105.

23.

Leinonen

. Determination of Cleanability of Plastic Surfaces. Academic dissertation, University of Helsinki, Finland, 2005.

24.

Lee

Kim

. Image analysis: a novel technique to determine the efficiency of wiping cloths. Fibers Polym 2006; 7: 73–78.

25.

Nandy

Lucas

Gonzalez

, et al. Efficacy of commercially available wipes for disinfection of pulse oximeter sensors. Am J Infect Control 2016; 44: 304–310.

26.

ASTM E1792 . Standard Specification for Wipe Sampling Materials for Lead in Surface Dust, 2020.

27.

Vostal

Taves

Sayre

, et al. Lead analysis of house dust: a method for the detection of another source of lead exposure in inner city children. Environ Health Perspect 1974; 7: 91–97.

28.

Siegert

. Sustainable Use of Preservatives in Wet Cleaning. Household & personal care wipes/Fall, 2012, pp. 26–29.

29.

Burnett

Boyer

Bergfeld

, et al. Amended safety assessment of methylisothiazolinone as used in cosmetics. Int J Toxicol 2019; 38: 70S–84S.

30.

Belhaij

Al-Mahdy

. Foamability and foam stability of several surfactants solutions: The role of screening and flooding. J Pet Environ Biotechnol 2015; 6: 1–6.

31.

Amaral

das Neves

Oliveira

ÂZ

, et al. Foamability of detergent solutions prepared with different types of surfactants and waters. J Surfactants Detergents 2008; 11: 275–278.

32.

Arun

Ketan

Chattopadhyay

. Foaming and cleaning performance comparison of liquid detergent formulations using mixtures of anionic and nonionic surfactants. Tenside Sur Det 2018; 55: 162–168.

33.

Wang

Zhong

, et al. Foam properties and application in dyeing cotton fabrics with reactive dyes. Coloration Tech 2014; 130: 266–272.

34.

Johnson

Vaccaro

Starov

, et al. Foam formation by compression/decompression cycle of soft porous media. Colloids Inter 2020; 4: 31. DOI: 10.3390/colloids4030031.

35.

NWSP 130.1.R0: 2015 . Mass Per Unit Area of Nonwoven Fabrics (EDANA Method)

36.

NWSP 120.1.R0: 2015 . Thickness of Nonwoven Fabrics (EDANA Method)

37.

NWSP 010.1.R0: 2015 . Three Standard Test Methods for Nonwoven Absorption (EDANA Method)

38.

NWSP 070.1.R0: 2015 . Air Permeability of Nonwoven Materials

39.

IS 15891 (Part 3): 2011 . Test Methods for Nonwovens, Part 3 Determination of Tensile Strength and Elongation

40.

Becker

Bergfeld

Belsito

, et al. Safety assessment of trimoniums as used in cosmetics. Int J Toxicol 2012; 31: 296S–341S.

41.

Walters

Fevola

Joseph

, et al. LiBrizzi and Katharine Martin, Designing Cleansers for the Unique Needs of Baby Skin. USA: Report Johnson & Johnson Consumer and Personal Products Worldwide, 2013.

42.

Keitel

. Guidance on essential oils in cosmetic products. Report, European Directorate for the quality of medicines & healthcare, 2016.

43.

Becker

Berfeld

Belsito

, et al. Safety assessment of glycerin as used in cosmetics. Int J Toxicol 2019; 38: 6S‐22S.

44.

Becker

Bergfeld

Belsito

, et al. Final report of the safety assessment of allantoin and Its related complexes. Int J Toxicol 2010; 29: 84S–97S.

45.

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. Requirements for Specific Cosmetic Products. Available at. http://www.ecfr.gov (2015, (accessed 14 January 2021).

46.

Cosmetic Ingredient Review . Safety Assessment of EDTA & Salts as Used in Cosmetics, 2019, Available at. https://www.cir-safety.org (accessed 14 January 2021).

47.

Fiume

Bergfeld

Belsito

, et al.. Safety assessment of tocopherols and tocotrienols as used in cosmetics. Int J Toxicol 2018; 37: 61S–94S.

48.

Lilienblum

. Opinion of the scientific committee on consumer safety (SCCS) - final version of the opinion on phenoxyethanol in cosmetic products. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2016; 82: 156. DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.11.007.

49.

Katata

Nagaraju

Crouch

. Determination of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, ethylenediaminedisuccinic acid and iminodisuccinic acid in cosmetic products by capillary electrophoresis and high performance liquid chromatography. Analytica Chim Acta 2006; 579: 177–184.

50.

Mdhlovu

. Optimisation of Water-in-Oil Microemulsion Formulation Stabilised by Nonylphenol Ethoxylated Phosphate Ester. PhD Thesis. University of pretoria etd, 2005.

51.

Antzoulatos

. Formulation. (accessed January 2021), http://eduscol.education.fr/physique-chimie (2016.

52.

Powale

Andheria

Maghrabi

, et al. A novel method for evaluating foam properties. J Dispersion Sci Tech 2005; 26: 597–603.

53.

ASTM D1173-53 : 2001. Standard Test Method for Foaming Properties of Surface-Active Agents

54.

AATCC Test Method 167 : 2008. Foaming Propensity of Disperse Dyes.

55.

Hossain

Jones

Dey

, et al. Quantitation of baby wipes lotion transfer to premature and neonatal skin. Food Chem Toxicol 2015; 84: 106–114.

56.

Dey

Carr

, et al. Probabilistic Monte Carlo estimation for quantitative exposure assessment of lotion transfer via baby wipes usage. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2016; 79: 54–63.

57.

ISO 22717 : 2015. Cosmetics- Microbiology- Detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

58.

ISO 22718 : 2015. Cosmetics- Microbiology- Detection of Staphylococcus aureus

59.

ISO 21148 : 2017. Cosmetics- Microbiology- General instructions for microbiological examination.

60.

ISO 18416 : 2015. Cosmetics- Microbiology- Detection of Candida Albicans

61.

Cre´mieux

Cupferman

Lens

. Method for evaluation of the efficacy of antimicrobial preservatives in cosmetic wet wipes. Int J Cosmet Sci 2005; 27: 223–236.

62.

Maiti

Bele

Basu

. Effect of material properties and process parameters on properties of hydroentangled nonwoven fabrics. J Textile Inst 2020; 112: 914–920. DOI: 10.1080/00405000.2020.1791398.

63.

Röder

Moosbauer

Wöss

, et al. Man-made cellulose fibers–a comparison based on morphology and mechanical properties. Lenzinger Berichte 2013; 91: 07–12.

64.

Van Hoof

Weisbrod

Kruse

. Assessment of progressive product innovation on key Environmental Indicators: Pampers Baby Wipes from 2007-2013. Sustainability 2014; 6: 5129–5142.

65.

Rawal

Moyo

Soukupova

, et al. Studies on the optimization of parameters in hydroentanglement process. J Indust Text 2006; 35: 207–220.

66.

Zhang

Chen

Duan

. Regenerated cellulose by the lyocell process, a brief review of the process and properties. Bioresources 2018; 3: 1–16.

67.

Lefrançois

. Le développement d’un produit dermo-cosmétique destiné au jeune enfant : enjeux industriels et officinaux. France: PhD Thesis, Université de Rouen, 2015. ffdumas-01171784.

68.

da Silva

Sad

CMS

Pereira

, et al. Study of the stability and homogeneity of water in oil emulsions of heavy oil. Fuel 2018; 226: 278–285.

69.

Mikula

. Emulsion characterization. In: Shramm

(ed). Emulsions fundamentals and applications in the petroleum industry. 4th ed.. Washington; 1992, pp. 79–129, Adv Chem.

70.

Buruk Sahin

Aktar Demirtaş

Burnak

. Mixture design: a review of recent applications in the food industry. Pamukkale Univ J Eng Sci 2016; 22: 297–304.

71.

Aktar Demirtas

Ayva

Buruk

. A case study in mixture design: multi response optimization of glaze formulation. Qual Eng 2015; 27: 186–195.

72.

Cornell

. Experiment with Mixtures. 3rd ed.. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1981, p. 312.

73.

Kpodo

Afoakwa

Amoa

, et al. Application of multiple component constraint mixture design for studying the effect of ingredient variations on the chemical composition and physico-chemical properties of soy-peanut-cow milk. Int Food Res J 2013; 20: 811–818.

74.

Gao

Simpson

. Market trends in baby skin care products and implications for clinical practice. Pediatr Dermatol 2014; 31: 734–738.

75.

Boeniger

. A Comparison of surface wipe media for sampling lead on hands. J Occup Environ Hyg 2006; 3: 428–434.

76.

ISO 17516: 2014 . Cosmetics- Microbiology- Microbiological limits.

Quality assessment of baby wet wipes

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Materials and methods

Nonwoven testing

Wet wipes production

Lotion formulation

Lotion homogenization

Foam test

Wipe wet pick-up

Wiping efficiency measurement

Antibacterial tests

Results and discussion

Characterization of spunlace nonwoven fabrics

Microscopic study of the emulsion system

Lotion formula adjustment

Baby wipe wet pick-up

Drying rate of developed baby wet wipes

Antibacterial activity test results and tolerability of developed wipes

Conclusion

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iDs

References