Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Development of conductive fabrics causes usually deterioration of the some of the comfort attributes of the final textile product. In this work, we propose a simple non-deteriorative method for preparation of electrical conductive fabrics based on wool and polyester as well as the blended fabric thereof. The unmodified fabrics or saponified polyester or oxidized wool were treated in aqueous solution containing heavy metal ion salts, namely, silver nitrate, copper II sulfate using exhaustion technique at 70°C for 1 h followed by reduction step. Nano zinc oxide was also used directly for treatment on the said fabrics. The electrical conductivity of the metal ions-treated fabrics and the influence of sewing on their conductivity was measured. The effect of pretreatment of the fabrics, saponification of polyester or oxidation of wool on their ability to absorb metal ions was monitored. Scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy were used to prove the incorporation of metal particles onto the treated fabrics. The change in chemical composition of the treated fabrics was studied using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Atomic absorption was adopted to measure the amount of metal incorporated onto the treated fabrics. The formation of nanometal crystals was proved using X-ray diffraction pattern. Different parameters of comfort, namely, air/water permeability of the treated as well as untreated fabrics were assessed. The treated fabrics exhibit enhanced electrical conductivity as well as some improved comfort properties without any effect on their inherent mechanical properties.

Keywords

metal particles polyester wool electrical conductive comfortability

Introduction

In the last few decades, conductive textiles have been spread out very widely. Such fabrics can be used for medical and military applications, protective clothing, and are called smart- or e-textiles [1].

Conductivity in fibers and yarns are being utilized, not only for conducting electricity and sensing but also for delivering antimicrobial [2,3] anti-static [4,5] and electromagnetic shielding [6,7] properties. Currently, researchers and industry have produced conductive yarns out of whole metals known as metallic yarns, hybrid yarns out of a combination of metallic yarns and conventional textile yarns [8], yarns laminated with conductive films, yarn coated with conductive solutions, and yarns made from nanomaterials [9]. The selection of conductive yarns for a smart textile application should be based on the level of conductivity needed, durability of the conductive component, yarn material content, method to be used in fabrication, suitability to wear, and comfort. Some conductive yarns tend to behave less than their corresponding normal textile yarns and their brittle characteristics can damage weaving or knitting machinery during production [10]. Moreover, they may also be uncomfortable to wear due to abrasion [11] and prone that inducing allergic contact dermatitis [12,13]. Recently, clay, metal and metal oxide nanoparticles, and graphene, graphite, and carbon nanotubes (and allotropes) are being studied for conductive textile applications [14].

Recently, nanocoating is an interesting technique in the textile field and became under research due to the materials processed at nanoscale have greater surface areas comparing to conventional coatings [15,16]. Nanoscale materials can be dispersed or converted to conductive polymer composite solutions and coated on yarns to impart conductivity [17,18]. Conductive finishing on yarns is more controllable, durable, and significantly enhances the functionality by incorporating various nanoparticles, i.e. silver nanoparticles, gold [18,19], or creating nanostructured surfaces.

Literatures contain many researches that deal with electric conductive yarns for smart textiles applications. In situ synthesis of silver nanoparticles on nylon fabric has been introduced through a chemical reduction method in order to create a thin layer of silver nanoparticles on nylon fabric producing an electro conductive fabric with considerable antibacterial properties [20]. In 2018, a unique design of a conductive coating on cotton fabric to improve the electrical stability is proposed. The coating has a hierarchical structure composed of an interlayer of silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs), a top layer of conductive hydrogel and a bottom layer of L-cysteine binder [21].

Polyester (PET) as a synthetic fabric and wool as a natural one are prevalently used textile materials for outer garment. Silver and copper nanoparticles were used to achieve antibacterial, coloration, and conductive function for these fabrics [22,23].

This work is devoted to chemical modification of wool, polyester, and wool/polyester fabrics with heavy metal ions or nanometal oxide using exhaustion technique followed by reduction to impart permanent electrical conductivity without any deterioration in their comfort attributes and mechanical properties.

Experimental

Materials and reagents

Heavy weight 100% wool and wool/polyester (70/30) % w/w fabrics of twill structure (228–294 g/m²) with thickness (0.065 mm) were used in this study. In addition, 100% polyester of plain structure of light weight fabric (101–121 g/m²) with thickness (0.027 mm) was also investigated. All the above fabrics were supplied by Misr Co. for Spinning and Weaving, El-Mehalla El-Kubra, Egypt. The yarn count in both warp and weft is shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Yarn count in wool, polyester, and wool/polyester blended fabrics.

Fabric	Yarn count/cm
Fabric	Warp	Weft
Wool	28	21
Polyester	25	22
Wool/polyester	30	21

Sodium hydroxide and sodium carbonate were purchased from El-Nasr Pharmaceutical Chemicals Company, Egypt. Silver nitrate was supplied by Sisc Research Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India. Hydrated copper II sulfate was purchased from Loba Chemie Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India. Zinc oxide nanopowder (>100 nm) particle size and ascorbic acid (AA) were supplied by Sigma Aldrich. Egyptol® PLM, a non-ionic detergent based on nonylphenol ethoxylate, was kindly supplied by Starch and Detergent Company, Alexandria, Egypt.

Method

Scouring

Wool, polyester, and wool/polyester fabrics were scoured using 2 g/L sodium carbonate and 1 g/L non-ionic detergent at 60°C for 15 min with liquor ratio 1:50, followed by thorough rinsing with cold water, then squeezed and air-dried at ambient temperature.

Fabric pretreatment

Oxidation of wool

Oxidation of wool was made for the rupture of the disulfide bonds of cystine present in wool into cysteic acid that acts as a redox-active site and assisted the reduction of metal ions into metal nanoparticles.

Scoured wool sample was treated in a bath containing diluted solution of H₂O₂ (3% w/v) at pH 9 (adjusted by sodium silicate solution) at 65°C for 60 min, the material to liquor ratio was 1:25. The sample was then washed thoroughly with distilled water and air-dried.

Saponification of PET

Saponification of PET was carried out to create reactive hydroxyl and carboxylic groups (new functional groups).

Scoured polyester fabric was pretreated with 1 M NaOH solution at 80°C for 60 min, the material-to-liquor ratio was 1:100. The recorded loss in weight of polyester fabric after treatment was about 5%–6%.

Fabric treatment

Untreated wool (UW), untreated polyester (UPET), untreated wool/polyester blend (W/PET), oxidized wool (OW), and saponified polyester (SPET) fabrics were treated with two metal salt solutions, namely, 0.005 M CuSO₄·5H₂O and 0.005 M AgNO₃.

In another experiment, the aforementioned fabrics were treated with 0.01 M nano-ZnO at 70°C for 60 min with liquor ratio 1:30.

Reduction step

The reduction of metal ions treated fabrics was carried out by two ways:

1. The metal ions were reduced within the wool fabric vicinity by virtue of its reducing nature producing metal nanoparticles.

2. Fabrics treated with CuSO₄·5H₂O were reduced using aqueous solutions of 0.11 M AA at 80°C for 60 min with liquor ratio 1:30 to form the copper nanoparticles (Cu NPs). AgNO₃-treated fabrics were also reduced using sodium borohydride (SBH) 0.004 M at room temperature for 15 min with liquor ratio 1:30 to form silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs).

Testing and measurements

Scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy

Bruker Nano GmbH Scanning Electron Microscope D-12489 Berlin, Germany, was applied to investigate the morphological structure of the treated as well as untreated samples. The samples were mounted on aluminium stubs, and sputter coated with chromium in an S150A with 20 KV scanning voltage. The energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) measurements were reported at 20 KV accelerating voltage and 15 mm working distance. The distribution of particles’ diameter was measured using Image J software program saved on scanning electron microscope (SEM).

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of untreated as well as of treated samples were recorded by using an FTIR spectrophotometer (Nexus 670 Fourier transform infrared spectrometer; Nicolet, USA) in the region of 4000–400 cm⁻¹ with spectra resolution of 4.0 cm⁻¹.

Atomic absorption spectrometry

The metal content per gram of fabric was determined using flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer. Metal ions on the treated fabric was extracted by immersing 0.2 g of the fabric in 20 mL of 15 wt% aqueous nitric acid at 80°C for 2 h. The concentration of silver, copper, and zinc in the extract was measured by Contraa 700 flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS, Analytik, Jena, Germany) equipped with a silver lamp at 328.1 nm wavelength, copper lamp at 222.6 nm, and a zinc lamp at 213.9 nm

The Ag, Cu, and Zn content in the fabrics was calculated according to equation (1) [23]

X = C \times V / [W \times (1 - MC / 100)]

(1)

where X is the metal ion content in the treated fabric (mg/g), C is the metal ion concentration (mg/L) in extracted solution, V is the volume of extracted solution (0.02 L), W is the weight of dried treated fabric (g), and MC is the moisture content in dried treated fabric (%).

X-ray diffraction pattern

The X-ray diffraction analysis was performed at room temperature for copper- and silver-treated fabrics on a Bruker D8 Avance using CuK_α as the target with secondary mono-chromator to operate at 40 KV and 40 mA. The scans were performed within the range of 4° < 2θ < 60° with scanning step 0.02° in reflection geometry.

Comfort characteristics

AC electrical conductivity

The electrical conductivity of untreated and treated fabrics before and after sewing was measured using LRC-bridge (Hioki model 3531zHi Tester, Japan).

The relative dielectric permittivity was calculated using the following equation

ε' = Cd / ε_{o} A

(2)

where C is the capacitance of the measured sample in Farad, d is the thickness of the thin film sample in meters, A is the cross-section area of the electrode, and εo is the permittivity of free space (8.854 × 10⁻¹² Fm⁻¹).

ε^{″} = ε^{'} * tan δ

(3)

where ε″ is the dielectric loss and tanδ is the loss tangent.

The AC resistivity (ς′) of the prepared samples has been estimated from the dielectric parameters. As long as the pure charge transport mechanism is the major contributor to the loss mechanism, ς′ can be calculated using the following relation

(ρ) = 1 / (ω ε_{o} ε' \tan δ) Ω cm

(4)

where ω = 2 π f, ω is the angular frequency and f is the frequency of the applied electric field in Hertz.

σ = 2 π fdC tan δ / A

(5)

where σ is the AC conductivity, f is the operating frequency, d is the thickness of the dielectrics, tan δ is the dielectric loss, C is the capacitance, and A is the area of the electrode.

Air permeability

Air permeability of the examined fabrics was measured on FX 3300 air permeability tester (TEXTEST AG, Switzerland) at a pressure of 100 Pa according to ASTM D737 standard method.

Water permeability

The water permeability of the treated as well as the untreated fabrics was assessed according to ASTM–D 1913 (American Test Method for Water Repellency; Water Spray Test new edition 2010).

Physico-mechanical properties

Tensile strength

The tensile properties of untreated and treated fabrics were evaluated using an Instron Tensile Tester (USA) according to ASTM D 76 Standard Specification for Textile Testing Machines. The average dimensions for each sample is (5 × 20 cm).

Roughness

Surface roughness of treated and untreated fabrics was measured according to ASTM D7127-17 standard test method using surface roughness tester Model SE 1700∞ (Kosaka Laboratory Ltd., Japan).

Bending stiffness

The bending stiffness of untreated as well as treated PET fabrics was determined according to the standard test method ASTM D1388-2018. The bending stiffness was taken as a measure of the fabric drapability.

Results and discussion

Intelligent and smart textiles are now being produced with various electric conductive properties. Electrically conductive fabrics have attracted interest due to their assembly facility with wearable devices. Herein, we propose a simple method for fabricating conductive fabrics with comfort properties.

Comfort characteristics

Electrical conductivity

Electrical conductivity is the movement of electrically charged particles through a transmission medium. Figure 1 shows the conductivity of different fabrics treated with nanometals as well as untreated ones. It is clearly observed that the conductivity of the untreated wool and wool/polyester fabrics is higher than that of untreated polyester fabric. This is due to the higher moisture absorption of wool in which more dissociative water molecules can be ionized [24]; moreover, this hygroscopicity nature of wool facilitate the motion of ions or impurities resulting in the higher electrical conductivity than that of polyester. Generally, all metal-treated fabrics exhibit remarkable higher electrical conductivity than the untreated ones. This could be explained by the fact that the conductive metals are adequately adsorbed on the fabric surface until it reaches the percolation threshold, which is known as the critical point at which electrical conductivity increased sharply [25]. The conductivity percentage of the metal-treated fabrics increased to different extents relative to the respective untreated fabrics, i.e. 52.2% for Cu NPs–treated wool, 46.6% for ZnO NPs–treated oxidized wool, 35.7% for Zn NPs polyester, and 49% for Ag NPs wool polyester. This difference in conductivity for the metal-treated fabrics may be related to the homogenous distribution of metals nanoparticles in fabrics. It was found that, the pores between adjacent metal nanoparticles must be minimized, and accordingly the conductivity of current through these particles is continuous [22]. It can be noticed from Figure 1 that the electrical conductivity of oxidized wool is higher than that of the native wool. Oxidation of wool with H₂O₂ decreases the electrostatic charges on the material, presumably due to formation cysteic acid residues along keratin macromolecules which results in an increase in the hydrophilicity of the cuticle which permits conduction of the charges to the cortex [26].

Figure 1.

Electrical conductivity of different fabrics treated with different nanometals.

In comparison between the conductivity of metal-treated wool, oxidized wool and wool polyester using external reducing agent (SBH and AA) and/or self-reduction, the results of this investigation are shown in Figures 2 and 3. These figures emphasize also that reduction of metal ions either with wool macromolecule side chain (self-reduction) or by reducing agents resulted in similar improvement in its electrical conductivity. So from economic and ecological point of view, it can be concluded that reduction of metal ions by wool is more preferable than using external hazard reducing agent.

Figure 2.

Electrical conductivity of fabrics treated with Ag NPs.

Figure 3.

Electrical conductivity of fabrics treated with Cu NPs.

Electric conductivity after sewing

The effect of sewing of the metal-treated fabrics on their electrical conductivity was studied and the results were presented in Table 2.

Table 2.

The effect of in sewing (sewing stitch type SSa–1) on the electrical conductivity metalized fabrics (self reduction in case of wool or using reducing agent in case of polyester).

Metal	Fabric	Decrease in the conductivity (%)^a
Ag NPs	Wool	2.1
	Oxidized wool	2
	Wool/polyester	9
	Polyester	9.5
Cu NPs	Wool	3
	Oxidized wool	3.8
	Wool/polyester	10.5
	Polyester	10.4
ZnO NPs	Wool	1.5
	Oxidized wool	2.1
	Wool/polyester	5.3
	Polyester	5.6

NPs: nanoparticles.

^aAverage of three measurements.

The data of Table 2 shows that there is a limited decrease (1.5%–10.5%) in the electrical conductivity of the said fabrics after being sewn. The limited decrease in the electrical conductivity of the metalized fabrics may be attributed to the increase if the air gaps due to sewing process as well as the bad electrical conductivity of the polyester threads used in the sewing process.

Physico-mechanical properties

Table 3 summarizes the physical and mechanical properties that would have an impact on the comfort characteristics of metal treated as well as untreated fabrics.

Table 3.

Physico-mechanical properties of the nanometal-treated fabrics (average of three measurements each).

Property	Treatment	Polyester	W/PET	Wool	Oxidized Wool
Air permeability (cm³/cm²·S)	Untreated	121	21.2	45.2	46.5
	Cu NPs	134	24.3	45.2	44
	Ag NPs	132	25.4	41.6	46.7
	ZnO NPs	134	23.5	40.1	41.4
Water permeability (cm³/cm²·L)	Untreated	1.31	1.42	1.39	1.42
	Cu NPs	1.25	1.42	1.3	1.42
	Ag NPs	1.25	1.2	1.39	1.3
	ZnO NPs	1.23	1.38	1.39	0.74
Bending stiffness (cm)	Untreated	1.92	3.34	3.40	3.20
	Cu NPs	1.26	3.24	3.24	3.30
	Ag NPs	1.22	3.04	3.04	2.84
	ZnO NPs	1.90	3.40	3.42	3.11
Tensile strength (N/m²)	Untreated	39.994	89.874	51.355	46.924
	Cu NPs	41.235	83.573	50.634	47.938
	Ag NPs	38.077	89.717	48.982	47.841
	ZnO NPs	41.744	87.292	49.678	49.766
Roughness (µm)	Untreated	17.20	18.45	25.24	24.21
	Cu NPs	21.82	21.53	25.97	23.93
	Ag NPs	21.22	19.68	25.39	23.95
	ZnO NPs	19.81	19.9167	25.97	24.62

W/PET: untreated wool/polyester blend; NPs: nanoparticles.Boldface values refer to the best results obtained for each substrate and reagent.

Permeability is a part of apparel comfort and defined as the rate of air/water flow passing perpendicular through a known area. It is a measure of how well a fabric allows the passage of air/water through it [27]. Data of Table 3 imply that most of the treated fabrics have higher, or nearly equal, air permeability than the corresponding untreated fabrics. For each substrate, the rate of air that flows through the fabric depends on the nature of nanometal loaded onto the fabric, which affects the fabric porosity. The boldfaced results in Table 3 refer to the samples that exhibited the best results regarding air permeability for each fabric material. The situation is different in case of water permeability. The decrease in water permeability in case of PET, W/PET, W, and OW relative to the corresponding untreated fabrics reaches 6.1%, 15.5%, 6.5%, and 47.9%, respectively. This might be due to engagement of most of the hydrophilic groups along keratin macromolecules of wool fabrics as well as the limited number of such groups along PET chains with metal ions via covalent of coordinate bonds. This will decrease the water combining capacity of the fabrics and hence enhances their water permeability.

Results in this table indicate also that the drapability of the fabrics loaded with silver nanoparticles is higher than the analogous untreated copper ions or zinc oxide–treated ones.

The surface roughness of polyester and wool/polyester fabrics increases by metallization. However, the increase in surface roughness of wool and oxidized wool was not so high after being treated with copper and silver, respectively. Additionally, there is no observable change in the tensile strength of all fabrics after different metal treatments.

Atomic absorption spectrometry

The amount of metal particles taken by the different treated fabrics was measured using atomic absorption spectrometry and the results are tabulated in Table 4.

Table 4.

Metal contents of the different treated fabrics.

Sample	Metal salt treatment	Metal content (mg/g)
Wool	Treated by AgNO₃ followed by SBH reduction	18.76
Oxidized wool		20.3
Wool/polyester		18.32
Polyester		0.39
Wool	Treated by AgNO₃ and reduced by wool itself	19.78
Oxidized wool		20.32
Wool/polyester		16.71
Wool	Treated by Cu⁺² ions followed by reduction with AC	6.9
Oxidized wool		7.3
Wool/polyester		6.2
Polyester		0.34
Wool	Treated by CuSO₄ and reduced by wool itself	8.2
Oxidized wool		8.39
Wool/polyester		6.4
Wool	Treated by ZnO NPs	9.5
Oxidized wool		9.17
Wool/polyester		8.5
Polyester		6.8

SBH: sodium borohydride; NPs: nanoparticles.

The data of Table 4 indicated the following:

The adsorption power of textile materials for different metal ions used in this investigation is in the order: oxidized wool > wool > wool/polyester blend. This adsorption power of textiles substrate for metal ions is a function of the number of electron pair donor groups along the respective macromolecules which is responsible for capture of the metal ions.

In the presence or absence of reducing agent, the amount of adsorbed silver ions on wool, oxidized wool, as well as wool/polyester blended fabrics is higher than copper ions. This is may be due to the higher ability of Ag⁺ ions to make electrostatic interaction force with the negative charge of carboxylate groups or lone pair of nitrogen and sulfur of the amino acids (–COOH, –NH₂, and –SH) along the keratin macromolecules of wool than Cu⁺² ions [23].

Oxidation of wool fabric resulted in the formation of oxidized cystine moieties (cysteic acid, for instance) which would enhance the efficiency of wool to bind with metal ions.

The adsorption of ZnO NPs by polyester fabrics is much higher than CuSO₄ or AgNO₃. This may be attributed to the fact that ZnO is used in its nano form which facilitates its adsorption by the fabric surface more than Cu⁺² or Ag⁺.

It is worth to mention that, the high metal uptake by any textile substrate does not assure the best electrical conductivity. Other factors affect the conductivity of textile substrate, such as the morphology of the metal particles and their homogenous distribution onto fabrics, fabric structures, and fabric gaps [28].

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

FTIR analysis was used to monitor any alteration in the chemical composition of the used fabrics after being modified using metal ions.

Figure 4(a) to (c) shows the FTIR spectra of the untreated wool, oxidized wool, wool/polyester blend fabrics, as well as the corresponding fabrics treated with Ag NPs, Cu NPs, and ZnO NPs. The characteristic peaks of wool appear at 3273 cm⁻¹ (N–H), 2930 cm⁻¹ (C–H), the protein amide I at 1630 cm⁻¹ corresponds to with (C = O) stretching vibration, the protein amide II which absorbed at 1519 cm⁻¹ was related to (N–H) bending and (C–N) stretching vibrations [29,30], and protein amide III at 1237 cm⁻¹. Compared to untreated fabrics, the peaks of treated fabrics found to be red shifted with stronger intensity.

Figure 4.

FTIR spectra of different fabrics treated with different metals (a) UW and W fabric treated with Ag⁺ and Cu⁺² ions and ZnO nanoparticle, (b) OW fabric treated with Ag, Cu and Zn nanoparticle, (c) W/PET fabric and W/PET treated with Ag⁺ and Cu⁺² ions and ZnO nanoparticle, (d) UPET fabric and PET fabrics treated with Ag⁺ and Cu⁺² ions and ZnO nanoparticle, and (e) saponified polyester fabric treated with Ag⁺ and Cu⁺² ions and ZnO nanoparticle.UW: untreated wool; UPET: untreated polyester; SPET: saponified polyester.

Figure 4(d) and (e) shows FTIR spectra of the untreated polyester, saponified polyester fabrics, and Ag NPs–, Cu NPs–, and ZnO NPs–treated fabrics. The characteristic peaks of untreated polyester appear at 2963 cm⁻¹ (–CH₃), 1710 cm⁻¹(C = O), 1243 cm⁻¹ (–CH₂), and 1093 cm⁻¹ for C–O bond. The peaks show enhancement in their intensity after treatment with the nanometal.

The results obtained from the FTIR confirm the in situ synthesis of Ag NPs and Cu NPs on the fabrics successfully. Additionally, the spectra of the metalized fabrics have no new peaks different from those of their respective untreated samples, which mean that no alteration in the chemical composition of the fabrics take place after being treated with metal NPs. This would assure the hypothesis which said that loading of metal NPs on the fabric surface takes place via physical deposition process which leads to shifting in the bands and its intensity only [31].

X-ray diffraction pattern

The X-ray diffraction pattern was used to ensure the reduction of Ag⁺ and Cu⁺² ions by reducing agents or by wool (Figures 5 to 7).

Figures 5 and 6 show prominent 2θ peaks in the diffractogram at 20.8° and 9.7° which corresponds to wool [32,33]. Figure 7 shows characteristic 2θ peaks in the diffractogram at 17.5° and 25.6° which corresponds to polyester fabrics [34].

Figure 5.

XRD pattern spectra of oxidized wool treated with Cu NPs.

Figure 6.

XRD pattern spectra of oxidized wool treated with Ag NPs.

Figure 7.

XRD pattern spectra of polyester treated with Ag NPs and Cu NPs.

In Figures 5(a) and (b) and 7(b), we observe 2θ low intense peaks at 30°, 41°, 50°, and 61° which might correspond to Cu and Cu₂O nanoparticles. These peaks emphasize the formation of a mixture of Cu and Cu₂O nanoparticles on the fabric [35]. Figures 6(a) and (b) and 7(a) have 2θ low intense peaks at 39°,43°, 45°, and 46°, which correspond to Ag nanoparticles. It has been reported that the XRD pattern of Ag NPs are found to be at 2θ peaks at 38°, 45°, and 65° [36].

Scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy

SEM and EDX of untreated and metal-treated fabrics were used to assign the change in the morphological structure of the fabrics (Figures 8 to 10).

In general, SEM images for the untreated fabrics (wool, polyester, and wool/polyester) show clear and smooth surface (Figures 8(a), 9(a), and 10(a), respectively).

Figure 8.

SEM and EDX analysis for: (a) untreated wool fabric, (b) wool treated by CuSO₄.5H₂O, and (c) oxidized wool treated by ZnO NPs.

Figure 9.

SEM and EDX analysis for: (a) untreated polyester fabric and (b) polyester treated by ZnO NPs.

Figure 10.

SEM and EDX analysis for: (a) untreated wool/polyester fabric and (b) wool/polyester treated by AgNO₃.

On the other hand, the micrographs for the different treated fabrics show uneven distribution of metal that covered the fabrics surface.

The incorporation of the metal particles onto the treated fabrics was also confirmed by the EDX. There are elemental peaks at 1.00, 8.00, and 9.00 keV for copper-treated wool fabric [37] (see Figure 8(b)). Moreover, there are different peaks of zinc and oxygen signals of zinc oxide nanoparticle appear at around 1, 8.601, and 9.5 keV for Zn beside peak at around 0.5 keV for O [38] (see Figures 8(c) and 9(b)). The signals at 3 keV for elemental silver in the EDX spectra of wool/polyester-treated fabric proved the immobilization of Ag NPs into fabric [39], see Figure 10(b).

EDX was used to map Cu, Ag, and Zn NPs on wool, polyester, and wool/polyester fabrics. As shown in Figure 11, Cu, Ag, and Zn NPs are homogenously distributed all over the tested samples.

Figure 11.

EDX mapping of (a) Cu NPs on wool fabric, (b) Ag NPs on wool/polyester fabric, and (c) ZnO NPs on polyester fabric.

Conclusion

Conductive wool, polyester, and wool/polyester blended fabrics were prepared by simple and easily applicable method using Cu⁺² and Ag⁺ ions as well as ZnO nanoparticles. Unlike saponification of polyester, pre-oxidation of wool was found to be effective in enhancing the subsequent metallization step. Metallized oxidized wool was found to be superior regarding its electrical conductivity, compared with untreated wool. Sewing of the treated fabrics has limited effect on its electrical conductivity. The incorporation of metal nanoparticles on the treated fabrics was proved by SEM and EDX. Moreover, XRD and FTIR charts emphasized the formation of nanometals in case of Cu⁺² and Ag⁺ treatment. Comfort results and physic-mechanical properties of the metal-treated fabrics show that the proposed method of treatment has no negative effect on the comfort attributes of the treated fabrics.

The treated fabrics would be a probable candidate for the production of conductive goods used for medical applications, such as suits for physical therapy.

Footnotes

Acknowledgement

The authors are indebted to Eng. Basma A. Ashmawi for her technical assistance during preparation of this work.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was financed by the National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt (grant number AR 110302).

ORCID iD

Hosam El-Sayed

References

Ghosh

Dhawan

Electronic textiles and their potential. Indian J Fibre Text Res 2006; 31: 170–176.

Xue

Chen

Yin

, et al. Superhydrophobic conductive textiles with antibacterial property by coating fibers with silver nanoparticles. J Appl Surf Sci 2012; 258: 2468–2472.

Topp

Haase

Degen

, et al. Coatings with metallic effect pigments for antimicrobial and conductive coating of textiles with electromagnetic shielding properties. J Coat Technol Res 2014; 11: 943–957.

Bashir

Skrifvars

Persson

Surface modification of conductive PEDOT coated textile yarns with silicone resin. Mater Sci Technol 2013; 6: 135–139.

Mao

Guo

Development of blended conductive yarn and antistatic filter cloth. Adv Mater Res 2013; 821–822: 278–282.

Yao

Zhao

, et al. Effect of weaving direction of conductive yarns on electromagnetic performance of 3D integrated microstrip antenna. Appl Compos Mater 2013; 20: 827–838.

Alagirusamy

Eichhoff

Gries

, et al. Coating of conductive yarns for electro-textile applications. J Text Inst 2013; 4: 270–277.

El-Newashy

Saad

Turky

Integration of conductive yarns into fabric by stitching. J Am Sci 2012; 8: 213–217.

Raji

Miao

Boakye

Electrical conductivity in textile fibers and yarns—review. AATCC J Res 2017; 4: 8–21.

10.

Dhawan

Ghosh

Seyam

, et al. Development of woven fabric-based electrical circuits. In Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

11.

Friedman

Phan

Schairer

, et al. Antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activity of chitosan-alginate nanoparticles: a targeted therapy for cutaneous pathogens. J Invest Dermatol 2013; 133: 1231–1239.

12.

Tuchman

Silverberg

Jacob

, et al. Nickel contact dermatitis in children. Clin Dermatol 2015; 33: 320–326.

13.

Nygaard

Kralund

Sommerlund

Allergic contact dermatitis induced by textile necklace. Case Rep Dermatol 2013; 5: 336–339.

14.

Wang

Luo

, et al. High-strength carbon nanotube fibre-like ribbon with high ductility and high electrical conductivity. Nat Commun 2014; 5: 3848.

15.

Rehan

Barhoum

Khattab

, et al. Colored, photocatalytic, antimicrobial and UV-protected viscose fibers decorated with Ag/Ag₂ CO₃ and Ag/Ag₃ PO₄ nanoparticles. Cellulose 2019; 26: 5437–5453.

16.

Rehan

Barhoum

Khattab

, et al. Development of Ag/AgX (X= Cl, I) nanoparticles toward antimicrobial, UV-protected and self-cleanable viscose fibers. Carbohydr Polym 2018; 197: 227–236.

17.

Zhang

Deng

Valenca

, et al. Carbon nanotube polymer coatings for textile yarns with good strain sensing capability. Sens Actuators A Phys 2012; 179: 83–91.

18.

Zhang

Miao

Metallic conductivity transition of carbon nanotube yarns coated with silver particles. Nanotechnology 2014; 25: 275702.

19.

Wang

, et al. Construction of an electrochemical cytosensor based on polyaniline nanofiber/gold nanoparticle interface and application to detection of cancer cells. Chin J Anal Chem 2012; 40: 184–190.

20.

Montazer

Nia

Conductive nylon fabric through in-situ synthesis of nano-silver: preparation and characterization. Mater Sci Eng C 2015; 56: 341–347.

21.

Cai

Zhou

Duan

, et al. A hierarchical structure of L-cysteine/Ag NPs/hydrogel for conductive cotton fabrics with high stability against mechanical deformation. Cellulose 2018; 25: 7355–7367.

22.

Hong

Kim

Park

Facile fabrication of multifunctional fabrics: use of copper and silver nanoparticles for antibacterial, superhydrophobic, conductive fabrics. RSC Adv 2018; 8: 41782–41794.

23.

Mowafi

Kafafy

Arafa

, et al. Facile and environmental benign in-situ synthesis of silver nanoparticles for multifunctionalization of wool fibers. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2018; 25: 29054–29069.

24.

Wang

, et al. Study on the electrical resistance of textiles under wet conditions. Text Res J 2009; 79: 753–760.

25.

Stauffer

Aharony

Introduction to percolation theory. Revised 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2014.

26.

Moharram

AbouSekkina

Rabie

Electrical conductivity of γ-irradiated and chemically oxidized wool. J Appl Polym Sci 1981; 26: 2791–2796.

27.

Tokura

Yamashita

Tomioka

The effects of moisture and water absorbency of fibres on the sweating rates of sedentary man in hot ambient environments. In: Kawabata

Postle

Niwaeds

(eds) Objective specification of fabric quality, mechanical properties and performance. Osaka: Textile Machinery Society of Japan, 1982, pp. 407–417.

28.

Tokarska

Gniotek

Anisotropy of the electrical properties of flat textiles. J Text Inst 2015; 106: 9–18.

29.

Jackson

Mantsch

HH.

Biomedical infrared spectroscopy. New York: Wiley-Liss, 2006, p. 311.

30.

Jackson

Mantsch

Ex vivo tissue analysis by infrared spectroscopy. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2000, p. 131.

31.

Zahrana

Ahmed

El-Rafie

Surface modification of cotton fabrics for antibacterial application by coating with AgNPs–alginate composite. Carbohydr Polym 2014; 108: 145–152.

32.

Lovejoy

Lou

Davis

, et al. Single pot extraction analysis of dyed wool fibers with ionic liquids. Anal Chem 2012; 84: 9169–9175.

33.

Wang

Preparation of regenerated wool keratin films from wool keratin–ionic liquid solutions. J Appl Polym Sci 2013; 127: 2648–2653.

34.

Huang

Zhang

, et al. Effects of dimethylol propionic acid modification on the characteristics of polyethylene terephthalate fibers. Mol Med Rep 2012; 6: 709–715.

35.

Khan

Rashid

Younas

, et al. A chemical reduction approach to the synthesis of copper nanoparticles. Int Nano Lett 2016; 6: 21–26.

36.

Hosseinpour-Mashkani

Ramezani

Silver and silver oxide nanoparticles: synthesis and characterization by thermal decomposition. J Mater Lett 2014; 130: 259–262.

37.

Gondwal

Pant

Synthesis and catalytic and biological activities of silver and copper nanoparticles using cassia occidentalis. Int J Biomater 2018; 2018: 1–10.

38.

Yedurkar

Maurya

Mahanwar

Biosynthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using Ixora coccinea leaf extract—a green approach. Open J Synth Theory Appl 2016; 5: 1–14.

39.

Rehan

Mowaﬁ

Aly

, et al. Microwave-heating for in-situ Ag NPs preparation into viscose ﬁbers. Eur Polym J 2017; 86: 68–84.

Facile development of electrically conductive comfortable fabrics using metal ions

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Experimental

Materials and reagents

Method

Scouring

Fabric pretreatment

Oxidation of wool

Saponification of PET

Fabric treatment

Reduction step

Testing and measurements

Scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

Atomic absorption spectrometry

X-ray diffraction pattern

Comfort characteristics

AC electrical conductivity

Air permeability

Water permeability

Physico-mechanical properties

Tensile strength

Roughness

Bending stiffness

Results and discussion

Comfort characteristics

Electrical conductivity

Electric conductivity after sewing

Physico-mechanical properties

Atomic absorption spectrometry

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

X-ray diffraction pattern

Scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy

Conclusion

Footnotes

Acknowledgement

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iD

References