This article performs a historical corrective, documenting representations of disability in popular U.S. television sitcoms of the 1990s. While these shows did not center disability, they often featured strikingly similar episodic narratives involving disability, using the framework of romantic dates with a main character. This article analyzes these episodes as a microgenre, referred to as “disability dates.” This microgenre represents a fleeting subgenre of the sitcom that used similar strategies to represent disability and to reproduce popular discourses that opposed or undermined the Americans with Disabilities Act (1990).
AlperMeryl. 2021. “Critical Media Access Studies: Deconstructing Power, Visibility, and Marginality in Mediated Space.”Journal of International Communication15 (0): 22.
2.
BellChris. 2010. “The Disability Studies Reader.” In Is Disability Studies Actually White Disability Studies?, 3rd edn. edited by DavisLennard J., 374–82. Abingdon and New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
BodroghkozyAniko. 1992. “‘Is This What You Mean by Color TV?’: Race, Gender, and Contested Meanings in NBC’s Julia.” In Private Screenings: Television and the Female Consumer, edited by SpigelLynnMannDenise. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
4.
ButlerJanine. 2020. “The Visual Experience of Accessing Captioned Television and Digital Videos.”Television & New Media21 (7): 679–96.
5.
ButlerJeremy G.2019. The Sitcom. 1st ed. Abingdon and New York, NY: Routledge.
6.
CohnJonathanPorstJennifer. 2021. Very Special Episodes: Televising Industrial and Social Change. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
7.
ColkerRuth. 2005. The Disability Pendulum: The First Decade of the Americans with Disabilities Act. New York, NY: New York University Press.
8.
ConsalvoMia. 1999. The Best of Both Worlds? Examining Bodies, Technologies, Gender and the Borg of Star Trek. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa.
9.
D’AcciJulie. 1994. Defining Women: Television and the Case of Cagney and Lacey. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.
10.
D’AcciJulie. 2004. “Cultural Studies, Television Studies, and the Crisis in the Humanities.” In Television After TV: Essays on a Medium in Transition, edited by SpigelLynnOlssonJan, 418–45. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
11.
DolmageJay Timothy. 2014. Disability Rhetoric. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
12.
DonnellyColleen Elaine. 2016. “Re-Visioning Negative Archetypes of Disability and Deformity in Fantasy: Wicked, Maleficent, and Game of Thrones.”Disability Studies Quarterly36 (4). doi:10.18061/dsq.v36i4.5313.
13.
DorfmanDoron. 2019. “Fear of the Disability Con: Perceptions of Fraud and Special Rights Discourse.”Law & Society Review53 (4): 1051–91.
14.
DouglasSusan J.1994. Where the Girls Are: Growing Up Female With the Mass Media. New York, NY: Times Books.
15.
DowBonnie J. 1996. Prime-Time Feminism: Television, Media Culture, and the Women’s Movement Since 1970. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
16.
EllisKatie. 2020. Disability and Digital Television Cultures: Representation, Access, and Reception. New York, NY: Routledge.
17.
EllisKatieGogginGerardHallerBethRosemaryCurtis. 2019. The Routledge Companion to Disability and Media. New York, NY: Routledge.
18.
EllisKatieMikeKent, eds. 2016. Disability and Social Media: Global Perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
ElmanJulie Passanante. 2010. “After School Special Education: Rehabilitative Television, Teen Citizenship, and Compulsory Able-Bodiedness.”Television & New Media11 (4): 260–92.
21.
ElmanJulie Passanante. 2014. Chronic Youth: Disability, Sexuality, and U.S. Media Cultures of Rehabilitation. New York, NY: New York University Press.
22.
Garland-ThomsonRosemarie. 1997. Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Physical Disability in American Culture and Literature. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Garland-ThomsonRosemarie. 2013. “Disability Studies: A Field Emerged.”American Quarterly65 (4): 915–26.
25.
GogginGerardNewellChristopher. 2003. Digital Disability: The Social Construction of Disability in New Media. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
26.
GrayHerman. 2004. Watching Race: Television and the Struggle for Blackness. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
27.
GrayJonathan. 2010. Show Sold Separately: Promos, Spoilers, and Other Media Paratexts. New York, NY: NYU Press.
28.
GrayJonathanLotzAmanda D.2011. Television Studies. Polity.
29.
GriffinHollis. 2011. “Never, Sometimes, Always: The Multiple Temporalities of ‘Post-Race’ Discourse in Convergence Television Narrative.”Popular Communication9 (4): 235–50.
30.
HallerBeth. 1998. “Crawling Toward Civil Rights: News Media Coverage of Disability Activism.” In Cultural Diversity and the U.S. Media, edited by KamalipourYahya R.CarilliTheresa, 89–98. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
31.
HallerBeth. 2010. Representing Disability in an Ableist World: Essays on Mass Media. Louisville, KY: Avocado Press.
32.
HaralovichMary BethRabinovitzLauren, eds. 1999. Television, History, and American Culture: Feminist Critical Essays. Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books.
33.
KanarHanley E.2000. “No Ramps in Space: The Inability to Envision Accessibility in Star Trek: Deep Space Nine.” In Fantasy Girls: Gender in the New Universe of Science Fiction and Fantasy Television, edited by HelfordElyce Rae, 245–64. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
KirkpatrickBill. 2012. “‘A Blessed Boon’: Radio, Disability, Governmentality, and the Discourse of the ‘Shut-In,’ 1920–1930.”Critical Studies in Media Communication29 (3): 165–84.
36.
KleinAmanda Ann. 2011. American Film Cycles: Reframing Genres, Screening Social Problems, and Defining Subcultures. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
37.
KriegerLinda Hamilton, ed. 2003. Backlash Against the ADA: Reinterpreting Disability Rights. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
38.
LaCheenCary. 2000. “Achy Breaky Pelvis, Lumber Lung and Juggler’s Despair: The Portrayal of the Americans with Disabilities Act on Television and Radio.”Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law21 (1): 223–45.
39.
LongmorePaul K. 2003. Why I Burned My Book and Other Essays on Disability. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
LotzAmanda D.2014. Cable Guys: Television and Masculinities in the 21st Century. New York, NY: NYU Press.
42.
MannBenjamin W.2018. “Rhetoric of Online Disability Activism: #cripthevote and Civic Participation.”Communication Culture & Critique11 (4): 604–21.
43.
MartinDouglas. 1997. “Disability Culture: Eager to Bite the Hands That Would Feed Them.”New York Times, June1.
44.
MarxNickSienkiewiczMatt, eds. 2018. The Comedy Studies Reader. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
45.
McCabeJanetAkassKim. 2006. “Feminist Television Criticism: Notes and Queries.”Critical Studies in Television1 (1): 108–20. https://doi.org/10.7227/CST.1.1.15.
46.
McRuerRobert. 2011. “Disabling Sex: Notes for a Crip Theory of Sexuality.”GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies17 (1): 107–17.
47.
MeeufRussell. 2014. “The Nonnormative Celebrity Body and the Meritocracy of the Star System: Constructing Peter Dinklage in Entertainment Journalism.”Journal of Communication Inquiry38: 204–22.
48.
MitchellDavidSnyderSharon. 2006. “Narrative Prosthesis and the Materiality of Metaphor.” In The Disability Studies Reader, edited by DavisLennard J., 2nd Edition, 205–16. New York, NY: Routledge.
49.
MittellJason. 2001. “A Cultural Approach to Television Genre Theory.”Cinema Journal40 (3): 3–24.
50.
MogkMarja, ed. 2013. Different Bodies: Essays on Disability in Film and Television. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co.
51.
NewmanMichael Z.LevineElana. 2012. Legitimating Television: Media Convergence and Cultural Status. New York, NY: Routledge.
52.
NordenMartin F.1994. The Cinema of Isolation: A History of Physical Disability in the Movies. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
53.
PressAndrea. 1991. Women Watching Television: Gender, Class, and Generation in the American Television Experience. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
54.
RabinovitzLauren. 1999. “Ms.-Representation: The Politics of Feminist Sitcoms.” In Television, History, and American Culture: Feminist Critical Essays, edited by MaryBeth HaralovichRabinovitzLauren, 144–67. Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books.
55.
RabinovitzLauren. 1989. “Sitcoms and Single Moms: Representations of Feminism on American TV.”Cinema Journal29 (1): 3–19.
56.
RehakBob. 2007. “The Migration of Forms: Bullet Time as Microgenre.”Film Criticism32 (1): 26–48.
