The argument of this essay is that migrants, especially refugees, in the contemporary globalized world are inevitably second-class citizens because their stories do not fit the narrative requirements of modern nation-states. As a result, there is no easy way for them to fit either their memories or their aspirations into acceptable forms that fit the criteria for full citizenship in most states. This essay argues for renewed attention to the relationship between migrants and mediation, especially based on the idea that archives are not only records of the past but are also maps for the future.
AndersonBenedict. 1992. Long-distance Nationalism: World Capitalism and the Rise of Identity Politics. Amsterdam: Center for Asian Studies.
2.
AppaduraiArjun. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
3.
AppaduraiArjun. 2003. “Archive and Aspiration.” In Information Is Alive, edited by BrouwerJokeMulderArjen, 14–25. Rotterdam: V_2 Publications.
4.
AppaduraiArjun. 2004. “The Capacity to Aspire: Culture and the Terms of Recognition.” Culture and Public Action59:62–63.
5.
TaylorCharles. 1994. “The Politics of Recognition.” In Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition, edited by GutmannAmi, 25-73. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
