Binge watching serialized video content is a phenomenon that has triggered interest from diverse research fields. Despite the progress researchers have made across different areas, a grounded conceptualization and definition of binge watching is still lacking. In this article, we conduct a transdisciplinary literature review to identify continuity and viewer autonomy as the two fundamental attributes underlying binge watching. Then, using these attributes as conceptual anchors, we offer a convergent definition and categorize the existing binge-watching definitions in the literature. The results of this categorization reveal that the vast majority of the definitions used in the literature fail to distinguish binge watching from other viewing practices such as casual viewing, single-episode appointments, and marathon appointments. We discuss the implications and, to move the binge-watching research forward, conclude with recommendations and an agenda for future research.
AbbottAndrew. 2014. “The Problem of Excess.” Sociological Theory32 (1): 1–26.
2.
AhmedAzza. 2017. “New Era of TV-watching Behavior: Binge Watching and its Psychological Effects.” Media Watch8 (2): 192–207.
3.
Ball-RokeachSandra J.DeFleurMelvin L.1976. “A Dependency Model of Mass-media Effects.” Communication Research3 (1): 3–21.
4.
CarilloKevinScornavaccaEusebioZaStefano. 2017. “The Role of Media Dependency in Predicting Continuance Intention to Use Ubiquitous Media Systems.” Information & Management54 (3): 317–35.
5.
ConlinLindsey T.2015. “There Goes the Weekend: Understanding Television Binge-watching.” PhD diss., The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.
DevasagayamRaj. 2014. “Media Bingeing: A Qualitative Study of Psychological Influences.” Paper presented at the Marketing Management Association, Chicago, IL, March 26.
8.
DickinsonKaren. 2014. “Confessions of the Millennial Binge-viewer: An Examination of the TV show Binge-viewing Phenomenon.” Master’s thesis, California State University, Long Beach.
FlayelleMaévaMauragePierreBillieuxJoël. 2017. “Toward a Qualitative Understanding of Binge-watching Behaviors: A Focus Group Approach.” Journal of Behavioral Addictions6 (4): 457–71.
FriedmanBatyaNissenbaumHelen. 1997. “Software Agents and User Autonomy.” In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Autonomous Agents, edited by JohnsonW. L., 466–69. Marina del Rey, CA: Association for Computing Machinery Press.
GigliettoFabioSelvaDonatella. 2014. “Second Screen and Participation: A Content Analysis on a Full Season Dataset of Tweets.” Journal of Communication64 (2): 260–77.
16.
Glebatis PerksLisa. 2014. Media Marathoning: Immersions in Morality. New York: Lexington Books.
17.
Godinho de MatosMiguelFerreiraPedro. 2017. “Binge Yourself Out: The Effect of Binge Watching on the Subscription of Video on Demand.” In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems. https://pedro-ferreira.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Binge-Watching.pdf (accessed November 2, 2018).
18.
HargravesHunter. 2015. “(TV) Junkies in Need of an Intervention: On Addictive Spectatorship and Recovery Television.” Camera Obscura30 (88): 71–98.
19.
HoreckTanyaJennerMareikeKendallTina. 2018. “On Binge-watching: Nine Critical Propositions.” Critical Studies in Television13 (4): 499–504.
KatzElihu. 1959. “Mass Communications Research and the Study of Popular Culture: An Editorial Note on a Possible Future for This Journal.” Studies in Public Communication2:1–6.
25.
KatzElihuBlumlerJay G.GurevitchMichael. 1974. “Utilization of Mass Communication by the Individual.” In The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research, edited by BlumlerJay G.KatzElihu, 19–32. Beverly Hills: Sage.
26.
KompareDerek. 2006. “Publishing Flow: DVD Box Sets and the Reconception of Television.” Television & New Media7 (4): 335–60.
27.
KrippendorffKlaus. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks: Sage.
28.
KruglanskiArie W.WebsterDonna M.1996. “Motivated Closing of the Mind: ‘Seizing’ and ‘Freezing’.” Psychological Review103 (2): 263–83.
29.
MatrixSidneyeve. 2014. “The Netflix Effect: Teens, Binge Watching, and On-demand Digital Media Trends.” Jeunesse: Young People, Texts, Cultures6 (1): 119–38.
30.
MyrickJessica Gall. 2015. “Emotion Regulation, Procrastination, and Watching Cat Videos Online: Who Watches Internet Cats, Why, and to What Effect?” Computers in Human Behavior52:168–76.
PingreeSuzanneHawkinsRobert P.Bush HitchonJacqueline C.GilliganEileenRadlerBarryKahlorLeeAnnGorhamBradleyKolbeinsGudbjörg HildurSchmidtTonyKannaovakunPrathana. 2001. “If College Students Are Appointment Television Viewers.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media45 (3): 446–63.
35.
PittmanMatthewSheehanKim. 2015. “Sprinting a Media Marathon: Uses and Gratifications of Binge-watching Television through Netflix.” First Monday20 (10). https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/6138 (accessed February 26, 2014).
36.
PittmanMatthewTefertillerAlec C.2015. “With or Without You: Connected Viewing and Co-viewing Twitter Activity for Traditional Appointment and Asynchronous Broadcast Television Models.” First Monday20 (7). https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/5935 (accessed February 26, 2014).
37.
RiddleKarynPeeblesAlannaDavishCatashaXuFangxinSchroederElizabeth. 2018. “The Addictive Potential of Television Binge Watching: Comparing Intentional and Unintentional Binges.” Psychology of Popular Media Culture7 (4): 589–604.
38.
RosenfieldPatricia L.1996. “The Potential of Transdisciplinary Research for Sustaining and Extending Linkages between the Health and Social Sciences.” Social Science & Medicine35 (11): 1343–57.
39.
RubenkingBridgetBracketCheryl CampanellaSandovalJenniferRisterAlex. 2018. “Defining New Viewing Behaviours: What Makes and Motivates TV Binge-Watching?” International Journal of Digital Television9 (1): 69–85.
40.
RyanRichard M.DeciEdward L.2006. “Self-regulation and the Problem of Human Autonomy: Does Psychology Need Choice, Self-determination, and Will?” Journal of Personality74 (6): 1557–85.
41.
SchweidelDavid A.MoeWendy W.2016. “Binge Watching and Advertising.” Journal of Marketing80:1–19.
42.
ShimHongjinKimKi Joon. 2018. “An Exploration of the Motivations for Binge-watching and the Role of Individual Differences.” Computers in Human Behavior82 (5): 94–100.
43.
SilvermanRachel E.RyallsEmily D.2016. “‘Everything is Different the Second Time Around’: The Stigma of Temporality on Orange Is the New Black.” Television & New Media17 (6): 520–33.
44.
SteinerEmilXu.Kun2018. “Binge-watching Motivates Change: Uses and Gratifications of Streaming Video Viewers Challenge Traditional TV Research.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. Published electronically January9. doi:10.1177/1354856517750365.
TrouleauWilliamAshkanAzinDingWeicongErikssonBrian. 2016. “Just One More: Modeling Binge Watching Behavior.” Paper presented at the ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, August 13–17.
47.
TukachinskyRivaEyalKaren. 2018. “The Psychology of Marathon Television Viewing: Antecedents and Viewer Involvement.” Mass Communication and Society21 (3): 275–95.
WagnerCharles N.2016. “‘Glued to Sofa’: Exploring Guilt and Television Binge-watching Behaviors.” Master’s thesis, Trinity University, San Antonio, TX.
51.
Walton-PattisonEmilyDombrowskiStephan U.PresseauJustin. 2018. “‘Just One More Episode’: Frequency and Theoretical Correlates of Television Binge Watching.” Journal of Health Psychology23 (1): 17–24.
52.
WarrenStephen Marshall.2016. “Binge-watching Rate as a Predictor of Viewer Transportation Mechanisms.” Master’s thesis, Syracuse University, NY.
53.
WheelerKatherine S.2015. “The Relationships between Television Viewing Behaviors, Attachment, Loneliness, Depression, and Psychological Well-being.” University Honors Program thesis, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro.
54.
ZillmannDolf. 1988. “Mood Management through Communication Choices.” American Behavioral Scientist31 (3): 327–40.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
