In its current, popular manifestation, Virtual Reality (VR) represents the culmination of more than two centuries of screen practice aimed at creating greater immersion. VR’s optical illusions produce an expanded multisensory immersive experience that enhances the viewer’s interior position within new space. This article questions where embodiment and disembodiment lie in VR’s multisensory optical illusion and whether there is a difference produced by the digital environment versus the photographic, live-action environment? It takes into account our present moment in the history of VR during which the fantasy of total bodily engagement and transference into the “machine” has not yet occurred. In doing so, this article considers the way VR uses synesthetic modes rather than direct sensory stimuli to engage more of the senses.
AclandCharles R.1998. “Imax Technology and the Tourist Gaze.” Cultural Studies12 (3): 429–45.
2.
AllenRichard. 1995. Projecting Illusion: Film Spectatorship and the Impression of Reality. Cambridge Studies in Film. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BalászBéla. 1999. “The Close-up (1945).” In Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings, edited by BraudyLeoCohenMarshall, 5th ed., 304–11. New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
BarkerJennifer. 2009. The Tactile Eye: Touch and the Cinematic Experience. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
BatchenGeoffrey. 1998. “Spectres of Cyberspace.” In The Visual Culture Reader, edited by MirzoeffNicholas, 237–42. London: Routledge.
6.
BatesJoseph. 1992. “Virtual Reality, Art, and Entertainment.” Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments1 (1): 133–38. doi:10.1162/pres.1992.1.1.133.
7.
BazinAndré. 2009. What Is Cinema?1st ed. Translated by BarnardTim. Montreal: Caboose.
8.
BeltonJohn. 1992. Widescreen Cinema. London: Harvard University Press.
BioccaFrank. 2002. “The Evolution of Interactive Media: Toward ‘Being There’ in Nonlinear Narrative Worlds.” In Narrative Impact: Social and Cognitive Foundations, edited by GreenMelanieStrangeJefferyBrockTimothy, 97–130. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
DanielAdam. 2017. “Affective Intensities in Horror: From Found Footage to New Media Forms.” PhD diss., Western Sydney University, Sydney.
21.
DarleyAndrew. 2000. Visual Digital Culture: Surface Play and Spectacle in New Media Genres. London; New York: Routledge.
22.
DoaneMary Ann. 2003. “The Close-up: Scale and Detail in the Cinema.” Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies14 (3): 89–111.
23.
ElsaesserThomas. 2006. “Discipline through Diegesis: The Rube Film between ‘Attractions’ and ‘Narrative Integration.’” In The Cinema of Attractions Reloaded, edited by StrauvenWanda, 205–23. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
24.
EpsteinJean. 1977. “Magnification and Other Writings.” October3 (Spring): 9–25.
GrauOliver. 2003. Virtual Art: From Illusion to Immersion. Cambridge: MIT Press.
27.
GreenMelanie C.BrockTimothy C.2000. “The Role of Transportation in the Persuasiveness of Public Narratives.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology79 (5): 701–21.
28.
GriffithsAlison. 2008. Shivers down Your Spine: Cinema, Museums and the Immersive View. New York: Columbia University Press.
29.
GrodalTorben. 2003. “Stories for Eye, Ear, and Muscles: Video Games, Media and Embodied Experiences.” In The Video Game Theory Reader, edited by WolfMark J. P.PerronBernard, 129–56. New York: Routledge.
30.
GunningTom. 1995a. “An Aesthetic of Astonishment: Early Films and the (In)Credulous Spectator.” In Viewing Positions, edited by WilliamsLinda, 818–32. New Brunswick: Rutgers.
31.
GunningTom. 1995b. “Phantom Images and Modern Manifestations: Spirit Photography, Magic Theater, Trick Films, and Photography’s Uncanny.” In Fugitive Images: From Photography to Video, edited by PetroP., 42–71. Bloomington: John Wiley.
32.
GunningTom. 2006. “The Cinema of Attraction: Early Film, Its Spectator and the Avant-garde.” In The Cinema of Attractions Reloaded, edited by StrauvenWanda, vol. 8, 381–88. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
33.
GunningTom. 2010. “Moving Away from the Index: Cinema and the Impression of Reality.” In The Film Theory Reader: Debates & Arguments, edited by FurstenauMarc, 255–69. New York: Routledge.
34.
GuttentagDaniel A.2010. “Virtual Reality: Applications and Implications for Tourism.” Tourism Management31 (5): 637–51. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2009.07.003.
35.
HeimMichael. 1998. Virtual Realism. New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
HersonBen. 2016. “Empathy Engines: How Virtual Reality Films May (or May Not) Revolutionize Education.” Comparative Education Review60 (4): 853–62. doi:10.1086/688582.
37.
HillisKen. 1999. Digital Sensations: Space, Identity, and Embodiment in Virtual Reality. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
38.
HuhtamoErkki. 2013. “Illusion and Its Reverse: About Artistic Explorations of Stereoscopic 3D.” In Expanded Narration. Das Neue Erzählen. B3 Biennale Des Bewegten Bildes. [The new story. B3 Biennial of the Moving Image], edited by KrackeBerndRiesMarc, 123–33. Frankfurt: Biennale des Bewegten Bildes.
JohnstonKeith M.2012. “A Technician’s Dream? The Critical Reception of 3-D Films in Britain.” Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television32 (2): 245–65. doi:10.1080/01439685.2012.669887.
42.
KingGeoff. 2000. “Ride-films and Films as Rides in Contemporary Hollywood Cinema of Attractions.” CineAction, 51 (February): 2–9.
43.
KirkpatrickGraeme. 2009. “Controller, Hand, Screen: Aesthetic Form in the Computer Game.” Games and Culture4 (2): 127–43. doi:10.1177/1555412008325484.
44.
KoolHollis. 2016. “The Ethics of Immersive Journalism: A Rhetorical Analysis of News Storytelling with Virtual Reality Technology.” Intersect: The Stanford Journal of Science, Technology, and Society9 (3): 1–11.
45.
KruegerMyron W.1991. “Artificial Reality: Past and Future.” In Virtual Reality: Theory, Practice, and Promise, edited by HelselSandra K.RothJudith Paris, 19–26. Westport: Meckler.
46.
KubotaTyson. 2016. “New Encounters with the Sublime: Why Movie Lovers Should Care about Emerging Virtual and Augmented Realities.” Film Comment52 (5): 24–25.
47.
LindnerKatharina. 2012. “Questions of Embodied Difference: Film and Queer Phenomenology.” NECSUS2.
48.
LoomisJack M.2016. “Presence in Virtual Reality and Everyday Life: Immersion within a World of Representation.” Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments25 (2): 169–74. doi:10.1162/PRES_a_00255.
49.
MacGowanKenneth. 1957. “The Wide Screen of Yesterday and Tomorrow.” The Quarterly of Film Radio and Television11 (3): 217–41. doi:10.2307/1209743.
50.
MarksLaura U.2000. The Skin of the Film. Durham: Duke University Press.
51.
MarksLaura U.2002. Touch: Sensuous Theory and Multisensory Media. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
McMahanAlison. 2006. “Chez Le Photographe c’est Chez Moi: Relationship of Actor and Filmed Subject to Camera in Early Film and Virtual Reality Spaces.” In The Cinema of Attractions Reloaded, edited by StrauvenWanda, 291–308. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
MoodyPaul. 2017. “An ‘Amuse-bouche at Best’: 360° VR Storytelling in Full Perspective.” International Journal of E-Politics8 (3): 42–50. doi:10.4018/IJEP.2017070104.
58.
MoriMasahiro. 1970. “The Uncanny Valley.” Energy7 (4): 33–35.
59.
NashKate. 2018. “Virtual Reality Witness: Exploring the Ethics of Mediated Presence.” Studies in Documentary Film12:119–31. doi:10.1080/17503280.2017.1340796.
60.
NdalianisAngela. 2004. Neo-baroque Aesthetics and Contemporary Entertainment. Cambridge: MIT Press.
61.
PaulWilliam. 2004. “Breaking the Fourth Wall: ‘Belascoism’, Modernism and a 3-D Kiss Me Kate.” Film History16 (3): 229–42.
62.
PopatSita. 2016. “Missing in Action: Embodied Experience and Virtual Reality.” Theatre Journal68 (3): 357–78. doi:10.1353/tj.2016.0071.
RheingoldHoward. 1991. Virtual Reality. New York: Summit Books.
65.
RossMiriam. 2013. “Stereoscopic Visuality Where Is the Screen, Where Is the Film?”Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies19 (4): 406–14. doi:10.1177/1354856513494178.
66.
RossMiriam. 2015. 3D Cinema: Optical Illusions and Tactile Experiences. Houndmills, Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
67.
SandiferPhilip. 2011. “Out of the Screen and into the Theater: 3-D Film as Demo.”Cinema Journal50 (3): 62–78.
68.
SobchackVivian. 2004. Carnal Thoughts: Embodiment and Moving Image Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
StrauvenWanda. 2006. “Introduction to an Attractive Concept.” In The Cinema of Attractions Reloaded, edited by StrauvenWanda, 11–30. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
WalserRandal. 1991. “Elements of a Cyberspace Playhouse.” In Virtual Reality: Theory, Practice, and Promise, edited by HelselSandra K.RothJudith Paris, 51–64. Westport: Meckler.
WilliamsLinda. 1991. “Film Bodies: Gender, Genre, and Excess.” Film Quarterly44 (4): 2–13. doi:10.2307/1212758.
77.
WilliamsVicki. 2018. “Frameless Fictions: Exploring the Compatibility of Virtual Reality and the Horror Genre.” Refractory: A Journal of Entertainment Media30 (July). https://refractory-journal.com/30-williams/.
