This article examines the role that the microblogging service Twitter plays in engaging audiences with televised political debate. Analysis focuses on Q&A, a political discussion show hosted by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, and the #QandA hashtag used to discuss the broadcast. Analysis suggests that rather than enabling user-to-user communication, the #QandA stream is characterized by the struggle to signify and complex nonlinear temporalities. These contributions to ongoing language wars imply an emergent type of audience engagement, which may not be compatible with a normative framing of deliberative discourse.
BarberBenjamin R. 2002. “The Ambiguous Effects of Digital Technology on Democracy in a Globalizing World.” In Innovations for an E-Society: Challenges for Technology Assessment, edited by G. BanseA. GrunwaldRadarM.43–56. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
6.
BarberBenjamin R. 2006. “How Democratic Are the New Telecommunication Technologies?” Second Conference on the Internet, Law and Politics: Analysis and Prospective Study, Open University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.
BohmanJ. 1998. “Survey Article: The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy.”Journal of Political Philosophy6 (4): 400–25.
9.
boyddanahGolderScottLotanGilad. 2010. “Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter.”System Sciences (HICSS), 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference, Honolulu, HI, January 5–8.
10.
BrunsAxelBurgessJean. 2011. “The Use of Twitter Hashtags in the Formation of Ad Hoc Publics.”European Consortium for Political Research Conference, Reykjavik, Iceland, August 25–27.
BrunsAxelMoeHallvard. 2014. “Structural Layers of Communication on Twitter.” In Twitter and Society, edited by WellerK.BrunsA.BurgessJ.MahrtM.PuschmannC., 15–28. New York: Peter Lang.
13.
BuchsteinHubertus. 2002. “Bytes that Bite: The Internet and Deliberative Democracy.”Constellations4 (2): 248–63.
14.
CastellsManuel. 2010. The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture, Volume 1. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
15.
ChenJilinPirolliPeter. 2012. “Why You Are More Engaged: Factors Influencing Twitter Engagement in Occupy Wall Street.”Sixth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Dublin, June 4–7.
16.
DeanJodi. 2001. “Cybersalons and Civil Society: Rethinking the Public Sphere in Transnational Technoculture.”Public Culture13 (2): 243–65.
17.
GehlRobert W.2011. “The Archive and the Processor: The Internal Logic of Web 2.0.”New Media & Society13 (8): 1228–44. doi:10.1177/1461444811401735.
18.
GenoskoGary. 1996. “Introduction.” In The Guattari Reader, edited by GenoskoG., 1–36. Oxford: Blackwell.
HabermasJürgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
21.
HabermasJürgen. 1994. “Three Normative Models of Democracy.”Constellations1 (1): 1–10.
22.
HabermasJürgen. 2006. “Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research.”Communication Theory16:411–26.
23.
HartleyJohn. 1996. Popular Reality: Journalism, Modernity, Popular Culture. London: Arnold.
24.
HassanRobert. 2009. Empires of Speed: Time and the Acceleration of Politics and Society. Leiden: Brill.
25.
HassanRobert. 2012. “Not Ready for Democracy: Social Networking and the Power of the People. The Revolts of 2011 in a Temporalized Context.”Arab Media & Society (15). http://www.arabmediasociety.com/?article=788 (accessed October 10, 2014).
26.
HeldDavid. 2006. Models of Democracy. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.
27.
HindemanMatthew. 2010. The Myth of Digital Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
28.
HutchbyIan. 2001. “Technology, Texts and Affordances.”Sociology35:441–56.
29.
JacobsonThomas L.PanLingling. 2008. “Indicating Citizen Voice: Communicative Action Measures for Media Development.”Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Global Communication and Social Change Division, Montreal, QC, May 22–26.
30.
JacobsonThomas L.StoreyJ. Douglas. 2004. “Development Communication and Participation: Applying Habermas to a Case Study of Population Programs in Nepal.”Communication Theory14 (2): 99–121.
31.
LewisJeff. 2005. Language Wars: The Role of Media and Culture in Global Terror and Political Violence. London: Pluto Press.
32.
NiedererSabineDijckJosé van. 2012. “Wisdom of the Crowd or Technicity of Content? Wikipedia as a Sociotechnical System.”New Media & Society12 (8): 1368–87.
33.
PoellThomas. 2009. “Conceptualizing Forums and Blogs as Public Spheres.” In Digital Material: Tracing New Media in Everyday Life and Technology, edited by van den BoomenM.LammesS.LehmannA.-S.RaessensJ.SchäferM. T.239-251. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
34.
PoellThomas. 2013. “Social Media and the Transformation of Activist Communication: Exploring the Social Media Ecology of the 2010 Toronto G20 Protests.”Information, Communication & Society17 (6): 716–31.
RuthsDerekPfefferJürgen. 2014. “Social Media for Large Studies of Behavior.”Science346 (6213): 1063–64.
39.
ThelwallMike. 2014. “Sentiment Analysis and Time Series with Twitter.” In Twitter and Society, edited by WellerK.BrunsA.BurgessJ.MahrtM., 83–95. New York: Peter Lang.
40.
TufekciZeynepFreelonDeen. 2013. “Introduction to the Special Issue on New Media and Social Unrest.”American Behavioral Scientist57 (7): 843–47.
41.
VirilioPaul. 1977. Speed and Politics. Translated by PolizzottiMarc. Los Angeles: Semiotexte.
42.
WeltevredeEstherHelmondAnneGerlitzCarolin. 2014. “The Politics of Real-Time: A Device Perspective on Social Media Platforms and Search Engines.”Theory, Culture & Society31 (6): 125–50. doi:10.1177/0263276414537318.
43.
WohnD. YvetteNaEun-Kyung. 2011. “Tweeting About TV: Sharing Television Viewing Experiences via Social Media Message Streams.”First Monday16 (3). doi:10.5210/fm.v16i3.3368. http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3368/2779 (accessed March 7, 2011).
