Living Through It: Anger,Laughter,and Internet Memes in Dark Times

Abstract

In this article, the author examines online political discourse as it is made manifest in internet memes in order to illuminate the lived, felt dimensions of progressive politics at a historical moment when those politics seem especially imperiled. The author argues for an understanding of online engagements with politics as being borne of oscillation as users move between platforms as well as affective states. The goal: to underscore how anger and laughter provide progressives with different opportunities to weather, make fun of, and combat the ascendancy of right-wing populism. Rooted in literature on affect and scholarship on internet memes, especially feminist internet memes, the article examines several different memes that circulated between 2016 and 2020, including #pussygrabsback, #neverthelessshepersisted, Prankster Joe Biden memes, and Creepy Joe Biden memes.

Keywords

affect anger feminism internet memes laughter social media temporality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

(2016) Obama–Biden memes are the internet’s comic relief after election. CBS News, 15 November. Available at: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/barack-obama-joe-biden-memes-are-the-internets-comic-relief-after-election/ (accessed 19 October 2020).

Banet-Weiser

(2019) Empowered: Popular Feminism and Popular Misogyny. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Baym

(1995) The performance of humor in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 1. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1995.tb00327.x

Berlant

(1997) The Queen of America Goes to Washington City: Essays on Sex and Citizenship. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Berlant

(2017) The predator and the jokester. In: Supervalent Thought. Available at: https://supervalentthought.com/2017/12/12/the-predator-and-the-jokester/ (accessed 25 February 2019).

Berry

Sobieraj

(2014) The Outrage Industry: Political Opinion Media and the New Incivility. New York: Oxford University Press.

Butler

(1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.

Day

(2018) Welcome to the clickhole: The economics of internet parody and critique. In: Marx

Sienkiewicz

(eds) The Comedy Studies Reader. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, pp. 120–133.

Jarrett

(2015) “Let’s express our friendship by sending each other funny links instead of actually talking”: Gifts, commodities, and social reproduction in Facebook. In: Hillis

Paasonen

Pettit

(eds) Networked Affect. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 203–220.

10.

Know Your Meme (2015) Creepy Joe Biden. https://knowyourmeme.com/

11.

Know Your Meme (2016) Prankster Joe Biden memes. https://knowyourmeme.com

12.

Kuipers

(2009) Humor styles and symbolic boundaries. Journal of Literary Theory 3(2): 219–239.

13.

Lewis

(2017) Women line up to get “nevertheless, she persisted” tattoo. CNN, 23 February. Available at: https://www.cnn.com/2017/02/23/politics/tattoo-parlor-women-slogan-trnd/index.html

14.

Marwick

Caplan

(2018) Drinking male tears: Language, the manosphere, and networked harassment. Feminist Media Studies 18(4): 543–559.

15.

Massanari

Chess

(2018) Attack of the 50-foot social justice warrior: The discursive construction of SJW memes as the monstrous feminine. Feminist Media Studies 18(4): 525–542.

16.

Mendes

Ringrose

Keller

(2019) Digital Feminist Activism: Girls and Women Fight Back Against Rape Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.

17.

Milner

(2016) The World Made Meme: Public Conversations and Participatory Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

18.

Mina

(2019) Memes to Movements: How the World’s Most Viral Media is Changing Social Protest and Power. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

19.

Paasonen

(2011) Carnal Resonance: Affect and Online Pornography. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

20.

Paasonen

(2015) A midsummer’s bonfire: Affective intensities of online debate. In: Hillis

Paasonen

Pettit

(eds) Networked Affect. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 27–42.

21.

Page

Arcy

(2019) #Metoo and the politics of collective healing: Emotional connection as contestation. Communication, Culture and Critique. doi:10.1093/ccc/tcz032.

22.

Papacharissi

(2014) Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.

23.

Phillips

(2015) This is Why We Can’t Have Nice Things: Mapping the Relationship between Online Trolling and Mainstream Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

24.

Puglise

(2016) “Pussy grabs back” becomes rallying cry for female rage against Trump. The Guardian. 10 October.

25.

Relman

Sheth

(2019) Here are all the times Joe Biden has been accused of acting inappropriately toward women and girls. Business Insider, 19 June. Available at: https://www.businessinsider.com/joe-biden-allegations-women-2020-campaign-2019-6 (accessed 19 October 2020).

26.

Rentschler

Thrift

(2015) Doing feminism in the network: Networked laughter and the ‘binders full of women’ meme. Feminist Theory 16(3): 329–359.

27.

Ringrose

Lawrence

(2018) Remixing misandry, manspreading, and dick pics: Networked feminist humour on Tumblr. Feminist Media Studies 18(4): 686–704.

28.

Senft

(2008) Camgirls: Celebrity and Community in the Age of Social Networks. New York: Peter Lang.

29.

Shifman

(2013a) Memes in a digital world: Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 18(3): 362–377.

30.

Shifman

(2013b) Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

31.

Sonmez

(2019) Biden responds to allegation of unwanted touching, kissing. Denver Post, 31 March. Available at: https://www.denverpost.com/2019/03/31/joe-biden-sexual-misconduct-allegations/ (accessed 19 October 2020).

32.

Stolberg

Ember

(2019) Biden’s tactile politics threaten his return in the #metoo era. The New York Times, 2 April. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/02/us/politics/joe-biden-women-me-too.html

33.

Sundén

Paasonen

(2018) Shameless hags and tolerance whores: Feminist resistance and the affective circuits of online hate. Feminist Media Studies 18(4): 643–656.

34.

Sundén

Paasonen

(2019) Inappropriate laughter: Affective homophily and the unlikely comedy of #metoo. Social Media + Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119883425

35.

Sunstein

(2017) #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

36.

Tomkins

(1995) Shame and Its Sisters: A Silvan Tomkins Reader. Sedgwick

Frank

eds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

37.

Victor

(2017) “Nevertheless, she persisted”: How Senate’s silencing of Warren became a meme. The New York Times, 8 February. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/08/us/politics/elizabeth-warren-republicans-facebook-twitter.html (accessed 19 October 2020).

38.

Wagstaff

(2016) Joe Biden plotting against Trump is the meme America needs. Mashable, 13 November. Available at: https://mashable.com/2016/11/13/obama-biden-meme-against-trump/ (accessed 19 October 2020).

39.

Wahl-Jorgensen

(2018) Public displays of disaffection: The emotional politics of Donald Trump. In: Boczkowski

Papacharissi

(eds) Trump and the Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp.79–86.

40.

Warner

(2002) Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone Books.

41.

White

(2005) The Body and the Screen: Theories of Internet Spectatorship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

42.

White

(2019) Producing Masculinity: The Internet, Gender, and Sexuality. New York: Routledge.