Despite the easily identifiable concept of a “nerd,” only a few significant articles on nerds and popular culture, and specifically television, exist. This article contributes to television studies by addressing this overlooked, yet popularly significant, representation and lived reality in terms of race, gender, and sexuality. The article introduces the hip/square dialectic and explores the sociocultural construction of nerds vis-à-vis the hip/square dialectic as commodity. The article historicizes the hip/square construct of the nerd or geek on television, assesses claims about the emergence of geek chic, and introduces three reality television case studies: Tranji and reality TV nerd dancing; William Hung, American Idol loser; and the Beauty and the Geek program. At issue is the political-economic factors in the production and circulation of the nerd commodity and the racial and gendered or sexualized politics of the televisual nerd discourses and performances.
MeehanE.1991. “Holy commodity fetish, Batman!”: The economics of a commercial intertext. In The many lives of the Batman: Critical approaches to a superhero and his media, ed. UricchioW.PearsonR. E., 47–65. London: British Film Institute and Routledge.
36.
MeehanE.2005. Why TV is not our fault: Television programming, viewers, and who’s really in control. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
37.
MittellJ.2004. A cultural approach to television genre theory. In The television studies reader, ed. AllenR. C.HillA., 171–81. New York: Routledge.
38.
MurrayS.OuelletteL. eds. 2004. Reality TV: Remaking television culture. New York: New York University Press.
NavarroM.2007. Trying to crack the hot 100. New York Times, March4, 9.
41.
NewcombH.2007. Television: The critical view. 7th ed.New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
QuailC.RazzanoK.SkalliL. (2005). Vulture culture: The politics and pedagogy of daytime television talk shows. New York: Peter Lang.
43.
RaphaelC.2004. The political economic origins of reali-TV. In Reality TV: Remaking television culture, ed. MurrayS.OuelletteL., 119–36. New York: New York University Press.
44.
RoscoeJ.2004. Big brother Australia: Performing the “real” twenty-four-seven. In The television studies reader, ed. AllenR. C.HillA., 311–21. New York: Routledge.
45.
SteinJ.2007. Looking for Mr. Adorkable. Time169 (17): 85.
TysonK.DarityW.2005. “It’s not a ‘black thing’”: Understanding the burden of acting white and other dilemmas of high achievement. American Sociological Review70:582–605.
48.
WaskoJ.1994. Hollywood in the information age. Austin: University of Texas Press.
49.
WhiteMichael. 2006. Lousy is the best they can ever be. New York Times, August 6, 26.
50.
YoungV. A.2007. Your average nigga: Performing race, literacy, and masculinity. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
