This article examines the interdependent relationship among the text, its producers, and “extra-hyperdiegetic space” constructed around the romantic relationship between Michael and Sara, the central protagonists of the Prison Break television series. The Prison Break creators have created extensive digital and analogue platforms to create an extended textual experience that constructs a close text–audience relationship. The digital and analogue platforms construct a space that is inhabitable by fans, one in which to express their own desires. This article explores the online material generated by fans (the most prevalent artifact of this extended space is the Prison Break fan fiction) as well as material released outside the story by producers on their blogs and official promo sites related the show and examines the interconnected (however mediated) relationship among these different spaces in relation to the increasingly romanticized and melodramatic relationship between Michael and Sara.
Bacon-SmithCamille. 1986. Spock among the women. New York Times Sunday Book Review, November16.
4.
CicioniMirna. 1998. Male pair bonds and female desire in fan slash writing. In Theorizing fandom: Fans, subculture and identity, ed. CherylHarrisAlexanderAlison, 153–77. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
5.
DeAngelisMichael. 2001. Gay fandom and crossover stardom: James Dean, Mel Gibson, and Keanu Reeves. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
HallStuart. 1993. Encoding and decoding in television discourse. In Studying culture, ed. GrayAnnMcGuiganJim, 28–34. London: Edward Arnold.
11.
HelleksonKarenKristinaBusse eds. 2006. Fan fiction and fan communities in the age of the internet: New essays. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
12.
HillsMatt. 2002. Fan cultures. London: Routledge.
13.
HillsMatt. 2004. Defining cult TV: Texts, inter-texts and fan audiences. In The television studies reader, ed. AllenRobertHillAnnette, 509–23. London: Routledge.
JancovichMarkLyonsJames, eds. 2003. Quality popular television: Cult TV, the industry and fans. London: British Film Institute.
16.
JenkinsHenry. 1992. Textual poachers: Television fans and participatory culture. New York: Routledge.
17.
JenkinsHenry. 2002. Interactive audiences? In The new media book, ed. HarriesDan, 157–70. London: British Film Institute.
18.
JohnsonDerek. 2007a. Fan-tagonism: Factions, institutions, and constitutive hegemonies of fandom. In Fandom: Identities and communities in a mediated world, ed. GrayJonathanSandvossCornelHarringtonC. Lee, 285–300. New York: New York University Press.
19.
JohnsonDerek. 2007b. Inviting audiences in: The spatial reorganization of production and consumption in “TVIII.”New Review of Film and Television5 (1): 61–80.
20.
JonesSara Gwenllian. 2002. The sex lives of cult television characters. Screen43 (1): 79–90.
21.
JonesSara Gwenllian. 2003. Web wars: Resistance, online fandom and studio censorship. In Quality popular television, ed. JancovichMarkLyonsJames, 163–80. London: British Film Institute.
22.
KustritzAnne. 2003. Slashing the romance narrative. Journal of American Culture26 (3): 371–84.
23.
LambPatricia FrazerDianeVeith. 1986. Romantic myth, transcendence, and Star Trek zines. In Erotic universe: Sexuality and fantastic literature, ed. PalumboDonald, 235–55. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
SconceJeffrey. 2004. What if? Charting television’s new textual boundaries. In Television after TV: Essays on a medium in transition, eds. SpigelLynnOlssonJan, 93–112. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
