This article addresses academic debates around the relationship between nationality and humor through an empirical case study of national and transnational TV comedy audiences. Based on data from twenty-five focus groups held in Norway and Britain, it examines audience talk around interlinguistic subtitling and articulated responses to two case study programs: The Office (BBC2, 2001—3) and Nissene på Låven (TVNorge, 2001). Discussing constraints associated with transnational TV comedy, the analysis underlines national differences in engagement with subtitles but argues that participants tended to underestimate the ability of transnational viewers to comprehend and enjoy the case study texts. Drawing on theories of humor and nationality, the article suggests that the recurring emphasis on cultural difference served to maintain nation-based us—them distinctions.
Antonini, R.2005. The perception of subtitled humor in Italy. Humor18 (2): 209-25.
3.
BBC News.2008. The Office to be remade in Russia. http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/entertainment/7525248.stm (accessed July 25, 2008).
4.
Beeden, A., and J. de Bruin .2010. The Office: Articulations of national identity in television format adaptation. Television & New Media11:3-19.
5.
Biltereyst, D.1991. Resisting American hegemony: A comparative analysis of the reception of domestic and US fiction. European Journal of Communication6:469-98.
6.
Bore, I.-L.K.2009. Negotiating generic hybridity: Audience engagement with The Office. Continuum23:33-42.
7.
Brabazon, T.2005. "What have you ever done on the telly?" The Office, (post) reality television and (post) work. International Journal of Cultural Studies8 (1): 101-17.
8.
Chiaro, D.2004. The effect of translation on humor response: The case of dubbed comedy. In Doubts and directions in translation studies , ed. Y. Gambier, M. Schlesinger and R. Stolze, 137-52. Lisbon : John Benjamins.
9.
Chiaro, D.2005. Foreword. Verbally expressed humor and translation: An overview of a neglected field. Humor18 (2): 135-45.
10.
Critchley, S.2002. On humour. London: Routledge.
11.
David Graham and Associates.1999. Building a global audience: British television in overseas markets [online]. Department for Culture, Media and Sport. http://www.culture.gov.uk/images/publications/globalaudience.pdf (accessed May 5, 2008).
12.
Davis, W.2008. Playing the television field: Kath and Kim and the changing face of TV comedy. Continuum22:353-61.
13.
Dhoest, A.2007. The national everyday in contemporary European television fiction: The Flemish case. Critical Studies in Television2 (2): 60-76.
14.
Dobson, H.2006. Mister Sparkle meets the yakuza: Depictions of Japan in The Simpsons. Journal of Popular Culture39 (1): 44-68.
15.
Freud, S.1905/1991. Jokes and their relation to the unconscious . London: Penguin.
16.
Gentikow, B.2006. Eksport og import av humor: "Hvem gidder å se på et komiprogram fra Estland, lissom?" In Humor i mediene, ed. Y. Kjus and B. H. Kaare, 57-80. Oslo: Cappelen.
17.
Gray, J.2007. Imagining America: The Simpsons go global. Popular Communication5 (2): 129-48.
18.
Griffin, J.2008. The Americanization of The Office: A comparison of the offbeat NBC sitcom and itsBritish predecessor. Journal of Popular Film and Television35 (4): 154-63.
19.
Gullestad, M.2002. Invisible fences: Egalitarianism, nationalism and racism . Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute8 (1): 45-63.
20.
Horan, D.2007. Quality US TV: A buyer’s perspective. In Quality TV: Contemporary American television and beyond, ed. J. McCabe and K. Akass, 111-17. London: I.B. Tauris .
21.
Klages, M.1992. What to do with Helen Keller jokes: A feminist act. In New perspectives on women and comedy, ed. R. Barreca, 13-22. Philadelphia: Gordon and Breach.
22.
Koolstra, C.M., A.L. Peeters, and H. Spinhof.2002. The pros and cons of dubbing and subtitling . European Journal of Communication17:325-54.
23.
Kostogriz, A.2004. Rethinking spatiality of literacy practices in multicultural conditions [online]. Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Melbourne. http://www.aare.edu.au/04pap/kos04610.pdf (accessed July 17, 2005).
24.
McCallum, J.1998. Cringe and strut: Comedy and national identity in post-war Australia. In Because I tell a joke or two: Comedy, politics and social difference, ed. S. Wagg, 202-20. London : Routledge.
25.
Medhurst, A.2007. A national joke: Popular comedy and English cultural identities . London: Routledge.
Nelson, R.2007. TV fiction exchange: Local/regional/national/global. Critical Studies in Television2 (2): 4-17.
29.
Office for National Statistics.2001. Country of birth [online]. Neighbourhood Statistics. http://neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/LeadTableView.do?a=7&b=276879&c=cardiff&d=13&e=15&g=421924&i=1001x1003x1004&m=0&r=1&s=1257522812500&enc=1&dsFamilyId=11 (accessed September 15, 2008).
30.
Paul, W.1994. Laughing screaming: Modern Hollywood horror and comedy . New York: Columbia University Press.
31.
Roscoe, J., and C. Hight.2001. Faking it: Mock-documentary and the subversion of factuality. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
32.
Sørenssen, B.1994. "I have a plan!" The Olsen Gang captures Denmark and Norway: Negotiating the popular culture gap. Velvet Light Trap34:71-83.
33.
Stokker, K.2000. Keeping Christmas: Yuletide traditions in Norway and the new land. St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society Press.
34.
Syvertsen, T.1992. Public television in transition [online]. http://home.chello.no/~trine.syvertsen/PHD/PHD1.html (accessed June 5, 2005).
35.
Verdery, K.1996. Whither "nation" and "nationalism"? In Mapping the nation, ed. G. Balakrishnan, 226-34. London : Verso.
