Competence-based education is an emerging trend in nursing education. Finland has initiated a pilot program for a national exam designed to evaluate the knowledge of graduating nursing students. However, research concerning students’ perspectives on exam quality and implementation remains scarce. The aim of this study was to explore graduating nursing students’ experiences and identify key areas for improvement in the organizational implementation of competence-based national nursing examination in Finland. This study employed Elo and Kyngäs’ qualitative content analysis, which examined a set of 109 mentions to open-ended questions from 106 graduating nursing students. The results revealed that students wanted better content validation, exam clarity, preparation resources, and flexibility in exams. The students also required explicit instructions and a structured framework for drug calculations. A competence-based national examination ensures compliance with standards, and it is essential to validate test questions and equip educators. Students need early preparation, and practice tests and materials should be improved for readiness.
AlizadehM.BehshidM.CheraghiR.DehghaniG. (2024). Nursing students’ experiences of professional competence evaluation by objective structured clinical examination method: A qualitative content analysis study. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1302. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06292-3
2.
AlkhelaiwiW. A.TraynorM.RogersK.WilsonI. (2024). Assessing the competence of nursing students in clinical practice: The clinical Preceptors’ perspective. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 12(10), 1031. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12101031
3.
AlmasloukhK. B.MinerM.PhillipsK.EvansM. (2023). Educational strategies and nursing theory to prepare leaners for NCLEX-RN. Nursing Open, 10(11), 7144–7153. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1998
4.
CantR. P.CooperS. J. (2017). Use of simulation-based learning in undergraduate nurse education: An umbrella systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 49, 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.015
5.
CharetteM.McKennaL. G.DeschênesM.HaL.MerisierS.LavoieP. (2020). New graduate nurses’ clinical competence: A mixed methods systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76(11), 2810–2829. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14487
6.
ColeH. S. (2023). Competency-based evaluations in undergraduate nursing simulation: A state of the literature. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 76, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2022.12.004
7.
DavisJ. H.MorrowM. R. (2021). Professional preparation: Faculty practices for NCLEX-RN(®) success. Nursing Science Quarterly, 34(4), 360–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/08943184211031581
8.
DreherH. M.Smith GlasgowM. E.SchreiberJ. (2019). The use of “high-stakes testing” in nursing education: Rhetoric or rigor?Nursing Forum, 54(4), 477–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12363
9.
El IdrissiW.ChemsiG.KababiK.RadidM. (2021). Assessment practices of student’s clinical competences in nurse education. Open Nursing Journal, 15, 47–54. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874434602115010047
10.
EloS.KääriäinenM.KansteO.PölkkiT.UtriainenK.KyngäsH. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. SAGE open, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522
11.
EloS.KajulaO.TohmolaA.KääriäinenM. (2022). Laadullisen sisällönanalyysin vaiheet ja eteneminen. Steps and phases of qualitative content analysis process. Hoitotiede, 34(4), 215–225. https://journal.fi/hoitotiede/article/view/128987/78028
Finnish National Agency for Education and the Ministry for Education and Culture. (2018). Report on the referencing of the Finnish National Qualifications Framework to the European Qualifications Framework and the Framework for Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area. https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/190482_report_on_the_referencing_of_the_finnish_national_qualifications_framework.pdf
16.
GaudetJ.ThibeaultC.BettsL.MastrilliP.SaeedD.IlyinN. (2022). Supporting Canadian nursing students to write the NCLEX-RN exam: A three-phased mixed methods descriptive design. Revue Canadienne de Recherche En Sciences Infirmieres [The Canadian Journal of Nursing Research], 54(3), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/08445621221103933
17.
GillM.AndersenE.HilsmannN. (2019). Best practices for teaching pharmacology to undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review of the literature. Nurse Education Today, 74, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.11.017
18.
GlasgowM. E. S.DreherH. M.SchreiberJ. (2019). Standardized testing in nursing education: Preparing students for NCLEX-RN® and practice. Journal of Professional Nursing: Official Journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 35(6), 440–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2019.04.012
19.
GravinaE. W. (2017). Competency-based education and its effect on nursing education: A literature review. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 12(2), 117–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2016.11.004
20.
GunawanJ.AungsurochY.FisherM. L.MarzilliC.LiuY. (2020). Factors related to the clinical competence of registered nurses: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 52(6), 623–633. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12594
21.
HolmesA. G. D.TuinM. P.TurnerS. L. (2021). Competence and competency in higher education, simple terms yet with complex meanings: Theoretical and practical issues for university teachers and assessors implementing competency-based education (CBE). Educational Process: International Journal, 10(3), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2021.103.3
22.
HosslerC.JamesA. (2021). Competency-based nursing: Reducing cost while maintaining or improving quality. The Journal of Competency-Based Education, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/cbe2.1247
23.
HouJ.ChenS.SabharwalS.FanV.YanM.WangW. (2019). Comparison of RN licensure examination: China and the United States. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 6(1), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2018.11.002
24.
HuwendiekS.JungD.SchirloC.HuberP.BalestraG.GuttormsenS.BerendonkC. (2020). The introduction of a standardised national licensing exam as a driver of change in medical education: A qualitative study from Switzerland. Medical Teacher, 42(10), 1163–1170. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1798911
ImmonenK.OikarainenA.TomiettoM.KääriäinenM.TuomikoskiA. M.KaučičB. M.FilejB.RiklikieneO.Flores Vizcaya-MorenoM.Perez-CañaverasR. M.De RaeveP.MikkonenK. (2019). Assessment of nursing students’ competence in clinical practice: A systematic review of reviews. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 100, 103414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103414
27.
JohnsonA. M.SmithS. M. (2016). Respiratory clinical guidelines inform ward-based nurses' clinical skills and knowledge required for evidence-based care. Breathe, 12(3), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1183/20734735.010816
28.
Kajander-UnkuriS. (2015). Nurse competence of graduating nursing students. Annales Universitatis Turkuensis D 1158.
29.
KeY.KuoC.HungC. (2017). The effects of nursing preceptorship on new nurses’ competence, professional socialization, job satisfaction and retention: A systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 73(10), 2296–2305. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13317
30.
LahtiM.HätönenH.VälimäkiM. (2014). Impact of e-learning on nurses’ and student nurses’ knowledge, skills, and satisfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51(1), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.12.017
31.
LaiH.-L.FuS.-Y.PengT.-C. (2023). Predictors of success in the registered nurse licensure exam for nursing graduates whose education was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 18(3), e72–e78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2023.04.002
LavoieP.MichaudC.BélisleM.BoyerL.GosselinÉGrondinM.LarueC.LavoieS.PepinJ. (2018). Learning theories and tools for the assessment of core nursing competencies in simulation: A theoretical review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74(2), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13416
LewisL. S.RebeschiL. M.HuntE. (2022). Nursing education practice update 2022: Competency-based education in nursing. SAGE Open Nursing, 8, https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608221140774
36.
LičenS.PlazarN. (2015). Identification of nursing competency assessment tools as possibility of their use in nursing education in Slovenia - A systematic literature review. Nurse Education Today, 35(4), 602–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.12.023
37.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic in-quiry. Sage.
38.
LiuY.AungsurochY. (2018). Current literature review of registered nurses’ competency in the global community. Journal of Nursing Scholarship: An Official Publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 50(2), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12361
39.
LuoY.GengC.PeiX.ChenX.ZouZ. (2021). The evaluation of the distance learning combining webinars and virtual simulations for senior nursing students during the COVID-19 period. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 57, 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.04.022
MoranV.WadeH.MooreL.IsraelH.BultasM. (2022). Preparedness to write items for nursing education examinations: A national survey of nurse educators. Nurse Educator, 47(2), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1097/nne.0000000000001102
45.
Nabizadeh-GharghozarZ.AlaviN. M.AjorpazN. M. (2021). Clinical competence in nursing: A hybrid concept analysis. Nurse Education Today, 97, 104728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104728
NestelD.GroomJ.Eikeland-HusebøS.O'DonnellJ. M. (2018). Simulation for learning and teaching procedural skills: The state of the science. Simulation in Healthcare, 13(2), 98–102. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e318227ce96
48.
PikeA. D.LukewichJ.WellsJ.KirklandM. C.ManuelM.WatkinsK. (2019). Identifying indicators of National Council Licensure Examination for registered nurses (NCLEX-RN) success in nursing graduates in Newfoundland & Labrador. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2018-0060
49.
PiresS.MonteiroS.PereiraA.ChalóD.MeloE.RodriguesA. (2017). Non-technical skills assessment for prelicensure nursing students: An integrative review. Nurse Education Today, 58, 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.07.015
50.
PolitD. F.BeckC. T. (2015). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
51.
QuinnB. L.SmolinskiM.PetersA. B. (2018). Strategies to improve NCLEX-RN success: A review. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 13(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2017.09.002
52.
RetnaningsihD. (2022). Nursing competency for nursing students: An integrative review. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S5), 6051–6058. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS5.11316
SaudH.ChenR. (2018). The effect of competency-based education on medical and nursing students’ academic performance, technical skill development, and overall satisfaction and preparedness for future practice: An integrative literature review. International Journal of Health Sciences Education, 5(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.59942/2325-9981.1068
SongY.McCrearyL. L. (2020). New graduate nurses’ self-assessed competencies: An integrative review. Nurse Education in Practice, 45, N.PAG-N.PAG. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102801
57.
StolicS. (2014). Educational strategies aimed at improving student nurse’s medication calculation skills: A review of the research literature. Nurse Education in Practice, 14(5), 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2014.05.010
58.
Ten CateO. (2017). Competency-based postgraduate medical education: Past, present and future. GMS Journal for Medical Education, 34(5), Doc69. https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001146
59.
TheisenJ. L.SandauK. E. (2013). Competency of new graduate nurses: A review of their weaknesses and strategies for success. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 44(9), 406–414. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20130617-38
60.
TongA.SainsburyP.CraigJ. (2007). Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19, 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
61.
VaismoradiM.TurunenH.BondasT. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study: Qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
62.
Wennberg-CapelladesL.Fuster-LinaresP.Rodríguez-HiguerasE.Fernández-PueblaA. G.Llaurado-SerraM. (2022). Where do nursing students make mistakes when calculating drug doses? A retrospective study. BMC Nursing, 21(1), 309. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01085-9
63.
WHO. (2016). The global strategic directions for strengthening nursing and midwifery. World Health Organization.
64.
WitR. F.de VeerA. J.BatenburgR. S.FranckeA. L. (2023). International comparison of professional competency frameworks for nurses: A document analysis. BMC Nursing, 22, 343. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01514-3
WuX.EnskärK.LeeC.WangW. (2015). A systematic review of clinical assessment for undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 35(2), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.11.016
67.
WuZ.GanW.XueZ.NiZ.ZhengX.ZhangY. (2024). Performance of ChatGPT on nursing licensure examinations in the United States and China: Cross-sectional study. JMIR Medical Education, 10, e52746–e52746. https://doi.org/10.2196/52746
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
