A Policy Analysis of State Plans for Independent Living in the U.S.

Abstract

People aging with disability and people of retirement age depend upon their respective states to follow the philosophical tenets of independent living (IL) to remain self-sufficient in their communities with a high quality of life. Independent living services are specified, programmatic sets of services funded by the Administration for Community Living (ACL) in line with expressly stated goals for implementation by state agencies for their state indepdent living centers (SILCSs) to implement through a State Plan for Independent Living (SPIL). Designated state agencies are required to submit their SPIL every three years to maintain funding through the ACL. This policy analysis of funded state plans for inclusion of people with disability aimed to determine which SPILs promote the IL philosophies of consumer choice and control. To this end, qualitative and quantitative content analyses were done to evaluate SPIL's inclusion of IL philosophies. Specifically, the consumer choice and control philosophy, involvement of people with disability, as well as the coherency of IL services from state to state were reviewed. The results of this paper indicate disparities in consumer choice and control initiatives across states, with approximately half of all states clearly promoting consumer control initiatives in their plans. Only three states made it clear that people with disability were involved in the SPIL development. The results give direction for nursing organizations who wish to work with and support SILCs as they advocate for person-centered approaches for people with disability.

Keywords

independent living people with disability policy analysis consumer support and control person centered

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ACL. (2017). Aging and disability resource centers. Retrieved July 12, 2022, from https://acl.gov/programs/aging-and-disability-networks/aging-and-disability-resource-centers

ACL. (2021a). Centers for independent living. Background. Retrieved July 12, 2022, from https://acl.gov/programs/aging-and-disability-networks/centers-independent-living

ACL. (2021b). Indepdent living services (ILS) programs. Retrieved July 12, 2022, from https://acl.gov/ils-programs

ACL. (2021c). History. Organizational history. Retrieved July 12, 2022, from https://acl.gov/about-acl/history

ACL. (2021d). Older Americans act. Retrieved July 12, 2022, from https://acl.gov/about-acl/authorizing-statutes/older-americans-act

ACL. (2021e). Consumer choice and control. Retrieved July 12, 2022, from https://acl.gov/programs/consumer-control

ACL. (2021f). Person centered planning. Retrieved July 12, 2022, from https://acl.gov/programs/consumer-control/person-centered-planning

Administration of Aging (AoA). (2017). Administration on aging . https://acl.gov/about-acl/administration-aging

Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 [ADA]. (2009). Title 42: the public health and welfare. Chapter 126: equal opportunity for individuals with disabilities. https://www.ada.gov/pubs/adastatute08.htm

10.

Askearn (2021). Employer assistance and resource network on disability inclusion. Retrieved July 22, 2021 from https://askearn.org/topics/laws-regulations/rehabilitation-act/

11.

Bascom

G. W.

Keith M. Christensen

K. M

. (2017). The impacts of limited transportation access on persons with disabilities’ social participation. Journal of Transport & Health, 7(Part B), 227–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.10.002

12.

Beach

S. R.

Schulz

Friedman

E. M.

Rodakowski

Martsolf

R. G.

James

A. E

. (2020). Adverse consequences of unmet needs for care in high-need/high-cost older adults. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 75(2), 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby021

13.

Carlson

B. L.

Foster

Dale

S. B.

Brown

. (2007). Effects of Cash and Counseling on personal care and well-being. Health services research, 42(1 Pt 2), 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00673.x

14.

CMS Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2021). Home and community-based services. Retrieved February 8, 2022, from https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/American-Indian-Alaska-Native/AIAN/LTSS-TA-Center/info/hcbs

15.

Cranley

L. A.

Cummings

G. C.

Profetto-McGrath

Toth

Estabrooks

C. A

. (2017). Facilitation roles and characteristics associated with research use by healthcare professionals: a scoping review. BMJ Open, 7(8), e014384. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014384

16.

Das

Edwards

W.K.

Kennedy-Mayo

Swire

. (2021). Privacy for the people? Exploring collective action as a mechanism to shift power to consumers in end-user privacy. Sociotechnical Security and Privacy, 19, 66–70. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSEC.2021.3093135

17.

DeJong

. (1979). Indepdent living: From social movement to analytic paradigm. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 60(10), 435–446.

18.

Fawcett

S. B.

Francisco

V. T.

Schultz

J. A.

Berkowitz

Wolff

T. J.

Nagy

. (2000). The community tool box: a web-based resource for building healthier communities. Public Health Reports, 115(2-3), 274–278. https://doi.org/10.1093/phr/115.2.274

19.

Fleischer

D. Z.

Zames

. (2011). The disability rights movement : from charity to confrontation (Updated ed.). Temple University Press.

20.

Friedman

Rizzolo

M. C.

Spassiani

N. A

. (2020). The impact of organizational supports on the person-centered health of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Policy & Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 17(1), 70–78. https://doi-org.libproxy.txstate.edu/10.1111/jppi.12320 https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12320

21.

Fullana

Pallisera

Vilà

Valls

M. J.

Díaz-Garolera

. (2020). Intellectual disability and independent living: professionals’ views via a Delphi study. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 24(4), 433–447. https://doiorg.proxy.mul.missouri.edu/10.1177/1744629518824895

22.

Hanson

S. P

. (2000). Applying independent living principles to state health-care programs for people with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 11(3), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/104420730001100305

23.

Harrison

T. C

. (2002). Has the Americans with disabilities act made a difference? A policy analysis of quality of life in the post-Americans with disabilities act. Era. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 3(4), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/152715402237446

24.

Harrison

T. C

. (2006). A qualitative analysis of the meaning of aging for women with disabilities with policy implications. Advances in Nursing Science, 29(2), E1–E13. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-200604000-00012

25.

Heumann

J. E.

Joiner

(2020). Being Heumann: an unrepentant memoir of a disability rights activist. Beacon Press.

26.

Heumann vs. Board of Education of City of New York, 320 F.Supp. 623 (1970). Retrieved July 15, 2022, from https://www.leagle.com/decision/1970943320fsupp6231818

27.

Holt

Jones

D. L.

Petty

R. D.

Crisp

Roth

Galantowicz

(2007). Facilitating consumer partnerships in state policy and partners program design. Independent Living Research Utilization. Retrieved July 12, 2022 from https://www.ilru.org/sites/default/files/Consumer_Partnerships.pdf

28.

Jameson

Riesen

Polychronis

Trader

Mizner

Martinis

Hoyle

. (2015). Guardianship and the potential of supported decision making with individuals with disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 40(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796915586189

29.

Jordan-Sheth

McDonald

K. E.

Fogg

Conroy

N. E.

Elms

E. H. J.

Kraus

L. E.

Frieden

Hammel

. (2019). Satisfaction, safety, and supports: Comparing people with disabilities’ insider experiences about participation in institutional and community living. Disability and Health Journal, 12(2019). 712–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.06.011

30.

Kaye

H. S

. (2014). Toward a model long-term services and supports system: State policy elements. The Gerontologist, 54(5), 754–761. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu013

31.

King

M. L.

(2010). Strength to love: gift edition. Fortress Press.

32.

Leplege

Gzil

Cammelli

Lefeve

Pachoud

Ville

. (2007). Person-centredness: conceptual and historical perspectives. Disability and rehabilitation, 29(20-21), 1555–1565. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280701618661

33.

McDonald

Oxford

(2005). History of Indepdent Living. ILRU. https://www.ilru.org/history-independent-living

34.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

(1994). An Expanded Sourcebook Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Ltd.

35.

Mitchell

. (2015). Facilitators and barriers to informed choice in self-directed support for young people with disability in transition. Health & Social Care in the Community, 23(2), 190–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12137

36.

Murray

. (2017). A systems analysis of access-A-ride, New York City’s paratransit service. Journal of Transport & Health, 6, 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.06.007

37.

National Aging and Disability Transportation Center (NADTC) (n.d.). About NADTC and our mission: Promoting the availability and accessibility of transportation options for older adults, people with disabilities, caregivers, and communities. Retrieved July 12, 2022, from https://www.nadtc.org/about/about-nadtc-and-our-mission/

38.

National Disability Authority (NDA). (n.d.). What is person centered planning? Retrieved July 22, 2021, from http://nda.ie/Good-practice/Guidelines/Guidelines-on-Person-Centered-Planning/Guidelines-on-Person-Centred-Planning-format-versions/2-What-is-Person-Centred-Planning-/

39.

NCIL. (2022). About NCIL. Retrieved July 15, 2022, from https://ncil.org/about/

40.

No Wrong Door (NWD) (n.d.). Our story: Why no wrong door? Retrieved July 12, 2022, from https://nwd.acl.gov/our-story.html

41.

Pfeiffer

(1995). The disability movement and its history . Independent Living Institute. https://www.independentliving.org/docs3/pfeiffer95.html

42.

Ravesloot

C. H.

Seekins

Cahill

Lindgren

Nary

D. E.

White

. (2006). Health promotion for people with disabilities: Development and evaluation of the living well with a disability program. Health Education Research, 22(4), 522–531. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyl114

43.

Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Pub. L. No. 93-112, 87 Stat. 394 (Sept. 26, 1973). codified at 29 U.S.C. § 701. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/93/hr8070/text

44.

Sabatier

P. A.

Jenkins-Smith

(1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Westview Press.

45.

Sabatier

P. A.

Weible

C. M.

(2007). The advocacy coalition framework innovations and clarifications. In Sabatier

P. A.

(Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 189–220). Westview Press.

46.

Shapiro

J. P.

(1993). No Pity. Three Rivers Press.

47.

Sheppard

M. K

. (2016). Fallacy or functionality: law and policy of patient treatment choice in the NHS. Health Care Analysis(HCA): Journal of Health Philosophy and Policy, 24(4), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-014-0275-6

48.

Silvers

. (1998). A fatal attraction to normalizing: treating disabilities as deviation from “species-typical” functioning. In Erik

(Ed.), Enhancing human traits: Ethical and social implications. Georgetown University Press.

49.

Silverman

. (1998). Through the lens of giftedness. Roeper Review, 20(3). 204–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199809553892

50.

Taylor

D. A.

(May 25, 2021). She’s considered the mother of disability rights — and she’s a ‘badass’. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/magazine/judy-heuman-crip-camp-film-rights-pioneer/2021/05/21/d3ab3fa6-b278-11eb-a980-a60af976ed44_story.html

51.

van Puymbrouck

(2017). Supported decision making in the United States: A white paper by CQL | The Council on Quality and Leadership. CQL | The Council on Quality and Leadership.

52.

Wehmeyer

M. L

. (2020). The importance of self-determination to the quality of life of people with intellectual disability: A perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(19), 7121. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197121

53.

Werner

Chabany

. (2016). Guardianship law versus supported decision-making policies: Perceptions of persons with intellectual or psychiatric disabilities and parents. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 86(5), 486–499. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000125

54.

Whitney

D. J.

Warren

C. R.

Smith

Arenales

Meyers

Devaney

Christian

. (2020). Work expectations of adults with developmental disabilities. Alter - European Journal of Disability Research, Revue Européenne de Recherche Sur Le Handicap. 15(4), 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alter.2020.06.010

55.

Williams

Porter

. (2017). The meaning of ‘choice and control’ for people with intellectual disabilities who are planning their social care and support. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities (JARID), 30(1), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12222

56.

World Health Organization [WHO] (n.d.). The 1st international conference on health promotion, Ottawa, 1986. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/teams/health-promotion/enhanced-wellbeing/first-global-conference

57.

Yadow

(2000). Conducting interpretive Policy Analysis. Qualitative Research Methods, series 47. Sage Publications. ISBN: 9780761908272

58.

Zola

I. K

. (1982). Missing pieces: A chronicle of living with a disability. Temple University Press.