Evolution of Postanesthesia Care Units: A Legacy of Politics,Funding,and Patient Safety Concerns

Abstract

Postanesthesia care units or PACUs (earlier called recovery rooms) flourished after World War II as social, political, and economic influences advanced enormous changes in health care expectations and delivery in the United States. Innovations in science and technology, facilitated by increased federal funding of scientific research in the years preceding and during the war, heralded a postwar need for greater complexity of hospital care safely delivered by trained personnel. PACUs began to open in new and modernized postwar hospitals as a means to safely provide more complex postoperative care during a time of persistent nursing shortages. PACUs proved to be an effective and cost-efficient means of decreasing the significantly high incidence of contemporary postoperative morbidity and mortality. Continuous and skilled observation by the recovery room nurses was credited with the improved patient outcomes. Once firmly established, PACUs have remained vital to the delivering of safe and cost-effective postoperative and postprocedural care.

Keywords

postanesthesia care unit nursing shortages health care funding anesthesia complications patient safety health care quality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

Badgwell

(1996) The post anesthesia care unit: Unique contribution, unique risk. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing 11: 248–258.

Aldrete, A. & Wright, A. (1992). Revised Aldrete score for discharge. Anesthesiology News, 18, 17.

American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses (ASPAN). (2012). Perianesthesia nursing standards, practice recommendations and interpretive statements. Retrieved from https://www.aspan.org/ClinicalPractice/ASPANStandards/tabid/3258/Default.aspx.

Anderson

Miller

(1949) Postanesthesia unit in the private hospital. Anesthesiology 10: 351–353.

Beardsley

Brown

Capalbo

(1956) Centralized treatment for seriously ill surgical patients. Journal of the American Medical Association 162: 544–547.

Beecher

Todd

(1954) A study of deaths associated with anesthesia and surgery. Annals of Surgery 140: 2–34.

Brocksmith

(1953) Recovery room gives best care with fewer nurses. Hospital Management 76: 55–56, 141, 143.

Brown

(1948) Nursing for the future: A report prepared for the National Nursing Council, New York, NY: Russell Sage.

Bureau of the Census (1949). Current population reports: Population estimates. Bureau of the Census, Series P-25, No. 18.

10.

Bush

(1945a) Science: The endless frontier, report on a program for postwar scientific research, Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.

11.

Bush

(1945b, July) As we may think. Atlantic101–108.

12.

Bush

(1945c, July 23) As we may think. Time XLVI(4): 93–94.

13.

Bush

(1945d, September 10) As we may think. Life112–114.

14.

Carnahan

(1949) Recovery room for postoperative patients. American Journal of Nursing 49: 581–582.

15.

Charbon

Livingstone

(1949) Planning a recovery room for adequate postoperative care. Hospitals 23(8): 35–38.

16.

Commission on Hospital Care (1947) Hospital care in the United States, New York, NY: Commonwealth Fund.

17.

Conboy

(1947) A recovery room. American Journal of Nursing 47: 686–687.

18.

Congressional Quarterly Service (1965) Congress and the nation: 1945–1964: A review of government and politics in the postwar years, Washington, DC: Author.

19.

Davies

Hunter

(1952) A recovery room: It’s planning in use. Lancet 1: 865–868.

20.

DeBakey

(1947) Military surgery in World War II: A backward glance and a forward look. Journal of Medicine 236: 341–350.

21.

Deignan

Miller

(1952) The support of research in medical and allied fields for the period 1946–1951. Science 115: 321–343.

22.

Dripps

Waters

(1941) Nursing care of surgical patients. American Journal of Nursing 41: 530–534.

23.

Dunn

Sharp

(1943) The recovery room, a wartime economy. American Journal of Nursing 43: 279–281.

24.

Endicott

Allen

(1953) The growth of medical research 1941–1953 and the role of public health service research grants. Science 118: 337–343.

25.

Fairman

(1992) Watchful vigilance: Nursing care, technology, and the development of intensive care units. Nursing Research 41(1): 56–60.

26.

Fairman

Lynaugh

(1998) Critical care nursing: A history, Philadelphia, PA: University of Philadelphia Press.

27.

Haver

Havere

(1957) Subrecovery room solved a familiar problem for this hospital. Hospitals 31(2): 46–48.

28.

Henneberger

(1926) The relation of nursing care to postoperative pneumonia. American Journal of Nursing 26(12): 932–932.

29.

Hilberman

(1975) The evolution of intensive care units. Critical Care Medicine 3(4): 159–165.

30.

Howland

Schweizer

Bellville

(1960) The recovery room: A clinical laboratory. Anesthesiology 21: 252–255.

31.

H. R. Rep. No. 442 (1943, May 12). Program for recruiting and training nurses, U.S. House of Representatives, 78th Congress, 1st session.

32.

H. R. Rep. No. 1151 (1944, February 16). Amending the act approved providing for the training of nurses, U.S. House of Representatives, 78th Congress, 2nd session.

33.

H. R. Rep. No. 727 (1945, June 11). Permanent program of scientific research in interest of national security, U.S. House of Representatives, 79th Congress, 1st session.

34.

H. R. Rep. No. 619 (1946, May 28). Budget for Office of Scientific Research and Development, U.S. House of Representatives, 79th Congress, 2nd session.

35.

H. R. Rep. No. 2519 (1946, July 13). Hospital Survey and Construction Act, U.S. House of Representatives, 79th Congress, 2nd session.

36.

H. R. Rep. No. 2697 (1946, July 29). Hospital Survey and Construction Act, U.S. House of Representatives, 79th Congress, 2nd session.

37.

H. R. Rep. No. 864 (1947, July 10). National Science Foundation Act of 1947, U.S. House of Representatives, 80th Congress, 1st session.

38.

H. R. Rep. No. 727 (1947, July 21). National Science Foundation Act of 1947, U.S. House of Representatives.

39.

H. R. Rep. No. 1020 (1947, July 21). National Science Foundation Act of 1947, U.S. House of Representatives, 80th Congress, 1st session.

40.

H. R. Rep. No. 1406 (1949, October 11). Emergency Professional Health Training Act of 1949, U.S. House of Representatives.

41.

Jean, M. (1956, August 26–27). Is a recovery room worthwhile? Nursing World.

42.

Keeling

(2004) Blurring the boundaries between medicine and nursing: Coronary care nursing, circa the 1960s. Nursing History Review 12: 139–164.

43.

Lowenthal

Russell

(1950) Recovery room: Life-saving and economical. Anesthesiology 12: 470–476.

44.

Lundberg, D. (1945, December). Can science save us? Harper, 525–531.

45.

Lundy

Gage

(1944) PAR spells better care for post-anesthesia patients. Modern Hospital 65(5): 63–64.

46.

McQuillen

(1948) Postanesthesia observation room. Journal of the American Medical Association 16: 24–24, 57.

47.

Mitchell

(2011) Adult surgical nursing and the political agenda. British Journal of Nursing 20(13): 828–829.

48.

Newark

N. J.

(1929) Group nursing at Presbyterian Hospital. American Journal of Nursing 29: 1414–1414.

49.

Nightingale

(1863) Notes on hospitals, Essex, England: Longman, Roberts and Green.

50.

Nunn

Payne

(1962) Hypoxemia after general anesthesia. Lancet 2(631): 61–63.

51.

Ochsner

(1950) Recovery rooms contribute to better patient care. Hospitals 24(7): 50–50.

52.

President’s Commission on Heart Disease, Cancer and Stroke (1964–1965) Report to the President: A national program to conquer heart disease, cancer and stroke vols. I, II, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

53.

President’s Commission on the Health Needs of the Nation (1952) Building America’s health vols. I–IV, Washington, DC: U.S. Printing Office.

54.

Reynolds

F. W.

Price

D. E.

(1949) Federal support of medical research through the Public Health Service. American Scientist 37: 578–586.

55.

Richards

(1946, May 10) The impact of war on medicine. Science575–578.

56.

Ruth

Haugen

Grove

(1947) Anesthesia Study Commission: Findings of eleven years’ activities. The Journal of the American Medical Association 135(14): 881–884. doi:10.1001/jama.1947.02890140001001.

57.

Sadove, M., & Cross, J. (eds). (1956). The recovery room Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders.

58.

Saklad

(1959) The special care unit: It’s place in postoperative care. Anesthesiology 20: 822–824.

59.

Science for every child. (1946, October). Parents Magazine, 137–140.

60.

Shannon

(1967) The advancement of medical research: A twenty year view of the National Institutes of Health. Journal of Medical Education 42(2): 97–108.

61.

Shapley

(1945, October) Status quo or pioneer? Fate of American science. Harper312–317.

62.

Shryock

(1947a) American medical research: Past and present, London, England: Oxford University Press.

63.

Shryock

(1947b) The development of modern medicine: An interpretation of the social and scientific factors involved, London, England: Oxford University Press.

64.

S. Rep. No. 1691 (1938, May 4). Senate investigation of national health problems, U.S. Senate, 75th Congress, 3rd session.

65.

S. Rep. No. 674 (1945, October 30). Hospital survey and construction bill, U.S. Senate, 79th Congress, 1st session.

66.

S. Rep. No. 78 (1947, March 24). National Science Foundation, U.S. Senate, 80th Congress, 1st session.

67.

S. Rep. No. 247 (1950, May 10). National Science Foundation Act of 1950 (signed by the President 1950, May 10). U. S. Senate, 81st Congress. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/1952/b_1952_8.pdf.

68.

S. Rep. No. 1025 (1951, October 1). Emergency Professional Health Training Act of 1951, U.S. Senate, 82nd Congress, 1st session.

69.

S. Rep. No. 2070 (1956, May 29). Health Amendments Act of 1956, U.S. Senate.

70.

Starr

(1982) The social transformation of American medicine, New York, NY: Basic Books.

71.

Tricarico

(1998) Postanesthesia care unit: Just watching. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing 13: 243–245.

72.

Weissmiller