Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper analyzes the inequalities and convergence across countries using data on the top 100 players in chess and tennis. We explore the impact of time trends and exogenous global shocks on countries’ representation in the top 100 players’ lists in a manner akin to a natural experiment, comparing chess and tennis while distinguishing among different country income groups. The results indicate the presence of conditional convergence across countries in their representations in the top 100 chess players, but not in the top 100 tennis players. The availability of internet contributed to the reduction of inequalities in chess, a mind-dominated sport, but not in tennis, a wealth-dominated sport. Negative economic shocks, such as the Great Recession and the Covid pandemic, exacerbated the inequalities in tennis, but not in chess.

Keywords

economic convergence income inequality global shocks FIDE chess ATP tennis sports

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andreff

(2001). The correlation between economic underdevelopment and sport. European Sport Management Quarterly, 1(4), 251–279.

Barget

(2006). 44 The economics of tennis. In Handbook on the economics of sport (p. 418).

Barro

R. J.

Lee

J. W.

(2013). A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010. Journal of Development Economics, 104, 184–198.

Barro

R. J.

Sala-i-Martin

(1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100(2), 223–251.

Barro

R. J.

Ursúa

J. F.

(2012). Rare macroeconomic disasters. Annual Review of Economics, 4(1), 83–109.

Bernard

A. B.

Busse

M. R.

(2004). Who wins the Olympic games: Economic resources and medal totals. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 413–417.

Breznik

Batagelj

(2011). Fide chess network. Austrian Journal of Statistics, 40(4), 225–239.

Bykova

Coates

(2022). Professional team sporting success: Do economic and personal freedom provide competitive advantages? Economics of Governance, 23(3), 323–358.

Coppedge

Gerring

Knutsen

C. H.

Lindberg

S. I.

Teorell

Marquardt

K. L.

Medzihorsky

Pemstein

Fox

Gastaldi

Pernes

Rydé,n

Römer

Tzelgov

Wang

Y.-t.

Wilson

S. L.

(2024). V-Dem Dataset v14. varieties of democracy (V-Dem) Project. https://doi.org/10.23696/mcwt-fr58.

10.

Coupe

Gergaud

Noury

(2018). Biases and strategic behaviour in performance evaluation: The case of the FIFA’s best soccer player award. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 80(2), 358–379.

11.

De Bosscher

De Knop

Heyndels

(2003). Comparing tennis success among countries. International Sports Studies, 25(1), 49–68.

12.

De Bosscher

De Knop

Van Bottenburg

Shibli

(2006). A conceptual framework for analysing sports policy factors leading to international sporting success. European Sport Management Quarterly, 6(2), 185–215.

13.

Forrest

Tena

J. D.

Varela-Quintana

(2023). The influence of schooling on performance in chess and at the olympics. Empirical Economics, 64(2), 959–982.

14.

Gandelman

(2009). Selection biases in sports markets. Journal of Sports Economics, 10(5), 502–521.

15.

Grix

Carmichael

(2012). Why do governments invest in elite sport? A polemic. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 4(1), 73–90.

16.

Güllich

Emrich

(2013). Investment patterns in the careers of elite athletes in east and west Germany. European Journal for Sport and Society, 10(3), 191–214.

17.

Güner

Hamidi Sahneh

Ä.

(2023). Dancing with the stars: Does playing in elite tournaments affect performance?. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 85(1), 1–34.

18.

Gwartney

Lawson

Hall

(2023). Economic Freedom of the World: 2023 Annual Report. Fraser Institute. Retrieved from https://www.fraserinstitute.org/economic-freedom.

19.

Haut

Grix

Brannagan

P. M.

Hilvoorde

I. V.

(2017). International prestige through ‘sporting success’: An evaluation of the evidence. European Journal for Sport and Society, 14(4), 311–326.

20.

Houlihan

Zheng

(2013). The olympics and elite sport policy: Where will it all end? The International Journal of the History of Sport, 30(4), 338–355.

21.

Kovacs

Mundie

Eng

Bramblett

Kovacs

M. J.

Hosek

(2015). How did the top 100 professional tennis players (ATP) succeed: An analysis of ranking milestones. The Journal of Medicine and Science (JMST), 20(2), 50–57.

22.

Kufenko

Geloso

(2021). Who are the champions? Inequality, economic freedom and the olympics. Journal of Institutional Economics, 17(3), 411–427.

23.

Lee

J. W.

(2024). Educational quality and disparities in income and growth across countries. Journal of Economic Growth, 29, 361–389.

24.

Martin

(2015). Is socioeconomic status a contributing factor to tennis players’ success. Journal of Medicine and Science in Tennis, 20(3), 116–121.

25.

Minondo

(2017). Fundamental versus granular comparative advantage: An analysis using chess data. Kyklos, 70(3), 425–455.

26.

Mixon Jr

F. G.

Cebula

R. J.

(2022). Property rights freedom and innovation: Eponymous skills in women’s gymnastics. Journal of Sports Economics, 23(4), 407–430.

27.

Moul

C. C.

Nye

J. V.

(2009). Did the soviets collude? A statistical analysis of championship chess 1940–1978. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 70(1-2), 10–21.

28.

Pawlowski

Steckenleiter

Wallrafen

Lechner

(2021). Individual labor market effects of local public expenditures on sports. Labour Economics, 70, 101996.

29.

Pemstein

Marquardt

K. L.

Tzelgov

Wang

Y. T.

Medzihorsky

Krusell

Miri

von Römer

(2024). The V-Dem measurement model: Latent variable analysis for cross-national and cross-temporal expert-coded data. V-Dem Working Paper No. 21. 9th edition. University of Gothenburg: Varieties of Democracy Institute.

30.

Richard

Piumatti

Pullen

Lorthe

Guessous

Cantoreggi

Stringhini

(2023). Socioeconomic inequalities in sport participation: Pattern per sport and time trends–a repeated cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 23(1), 785.

31.

Riordan

(1988). The role of sport in soviet foreign policy. International Journal, 43(4), 569–595.

32.

Riot

O’Brien

Minahan

(2020). High performance sport programs and emplaced performance capital in elite athletes from developing nations. Sport Management Review, 23(5), 913–924.

33.

Shughart

W. F.

Tollison

R. D.

(1993). Going for the gold: Property rights and athletic effort in transitional economies. Kyklos, 46(2), 263–272.

34.

Siegfried

Zimbalist

(2000). The economics of sports facilities and their communities. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 95–114.

35.

Thibault

(2009). Globalization of sport: An inconvenient truth. Journal of sport management, 23(1), 1–20.

36.

Turner

M. S.

Pluim

B. M.

(2007). Anyone for tennis? British Journal of Sports Medicine, 41(11), 701–702.

37.

UNU-WIDER . (2025). World Income Inequality Database (WIID). Version 29 April 2025. https://doi.org/10.35188/UNU-WIDER/WIID-290425.

38.

Yamamura

(2009). Technology transfer and convergence of performance: An economic study of FIFA football ranking. Applied Economics Letters, 16(3), 261–266.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.51 MB

Economic Inequality and Convergence Through the Lens of Two Sports

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material