This research aims to examine whether income inequality affects economic performance at the regional level, which is mediated by entrepreneurship. By considering hierarchical preferences in consumption, it assumes that income inequality has a negative influence on regional economic growth because it lowers the incentive to innovate. Using a structural equation model, the effect of income inequality on regional economic performance, as well as the mediating effect of entrepreneurship, is tested. The results show that income inequality negatively affects both entrepreneurship and economic growth. This result suggests that insufficient demand for new products/services hampers entrepreneurial activities as well as regional economic performance. The findings contribute to the field, highlighting that entrepreneurship mediates between income inequality and economic performance based on demands.
AcemogluD.LinnJ. (2004). Market size in innovation: Theory and evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 1049–1090.
2.
AcsZ. J. (2006). How is entrepreneurship good for economic growth?Innovations, 1, 97–107.
3.
AcsZ. J.ArmingtonC. (2004). Employment growth and entrepreneurial activity in cities. Regional Studies, 38, 911–927.
4.
AcsZ. J.ArmingtonC. (2006). Entrepreneurship, geography, and American growth. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
5.
AcsZ. J.BraunerhjelmP.AudretschD. B.CarlssonB. (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 32, 15–30.
6.
AcsZ. J.VargaA. (2005). Entrepreneurship, agglomeration and technological change. Small Business Economics, 24, 323–334.
7.
AghionP.AkcigitU.BergeaudA.BlundellR.HémousD. (2015). Innovation and top income inequality (No. w21247). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
8.
AghionP.BlundellR.GriffithR.HowittP.PrantlS. (2009). The effects of entry on incumbent innovation and productivity. Review of Economics and Statistics, 91, 20–32.
9.
AghionP.HowittP. (2006). Joseph Schumpeter lecture appropriate growth policy: A unifying framework. Journal of the European Economic Association, 4, 269–314.
10.
AnderssonD. E. (2005). The spatial nature of entrepreneurship. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 8(2), 21–34.
11.
ArrowK. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 29, 155–173.
12.
AtemsB.JonesJ. (2015). Income inequality and economic growth: A panel VAR approach. Empirical Economics, 48, 1541–1561.
13.
AudretschD. B. (1998). Agglomeration and the location of innovative activity. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14(2), 18–29.
14.
AudretschD. B.BönteW.KeilbachM. (2008). Entrepreneurship capital and its impact on knowledge diffusion and economic performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 687–698.
15.
AudretschD. B.FritschM. (1994). The geography of firm births in Germany. Regional Studies, 28, 359–365.
16.
AudretschD. B.KeilbachM. (2004). Entrepreneurship capital and economic performance. Regional Studies, 38, 949–959.
17.
AudretschD. B.KeilbachM. (2008). Resolving the knowledge paradox: Knowledge-spillover entrepreneurship and economic growth. Research Policy, 37, 1697–1705.
18.
AudretschD. B.LehmannE. E. (2005). Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions?Research Policy, 34, 1191–1202.
19.
BagozziR. P.YiY. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74–94.
20.
BertolaG. (2000). Macroeconomics of distribution and growth. Handbook of Income Distribution, 1, 477–540.
21.
BertolaG.FoellmiR.ZweimüllerJ. (2006). Income distribution in macroeconomic models. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
BitlerM.HoynesH. (2015). Heterogeneity in the impact of economic cycles and the Great Recession: Effects within and across the income distribution. American Economic Review, 105(5), 154–160.
23.
BottazziL.PeriG. (2003). Innovation and spillovers in regions: Evidence from European patent data. European Economic Review, 47, 687–710.
24.
CarminesE. G.McIverJ. P. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structures. In BohrstedtG.BorgattaE. (Eds.), Social measurement: Current issues, (pp. 65–115). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25.
CassonM.WadesonN. (2007). The discovery of opportunities: Extending the economic theory of the entrepreneur. Small Business Economics, 28, 285–300.
26.
Castells-QuintanaD.RamosR.RoyuelaV. (2015). Income inequality in European Regions: Recent trends and determinants. Review of Regional Research, 35, 123–146.
27.
CohenW. M.KlepperS. (1992). The tradeoff between firm size and diversity in the pursuit of technological progress. Small Business Economics, 4, 1–14.
28.
DavidssonP.HonigB. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 301–331.
29.
DesrochersP. (1998). A geographical perspective on Austrian economics. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 1(2), 63–83.
30.
DesrochersP.LeppäläS. (2011). Opening up the “Jacobs Spillover” black box: Local diversity, creativity and the processes underlying new combinations. Journal of Economic Geography, 11, 843–863.
31.
DickersonM. D.GentryJ. W. (1983). Characteristics of adopters and non-adopters of home computers. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 225–235.
32.
DisneyR.HaskelJ.HedenY. (2003). Restructuring and productivity growth in UK manufacturing. Economic Journal, 113, 666–694.
33.
EasterlyW. (2001). The middle class consensus and economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 6, 317–335.
34.
FaggianA.McCannP. (2006). Human capital flows and regional knowledge assets: A simultaneous equation approach. Oxford Economic Papers, 58, 475–500.
35.
FajgelbaumP.GrossmanG. M.HelpmanE. (2011). Income distribution, product quality, and international trade. Journal of Political Economy, 119, 721–765.
FoellmiR.ZweimüllerJ. (2006). Income distribution and demand-induced innovations. Review of Economic Studies, 73, 941–960.
38.
FoellmiR.ZweimüllerJ. (2008). Structural change, Engel’s consumption cycles and Kaldor’s facts of economic growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 55, 1317–1328.
39.
FosterC.HeeksR. (2013). Conceptualising inclusive innovation: Modifying systems of innovation frameworks to understand diffusion of new technology to low-income consumers. European Journal of Development Research, 25, 333–355.
40.
FrankM. W. (2009). Inequality and growth in the United States: Evidence from a new state level panel of income inequality measures. Economic Inquiry, 47, 55–68.
41.
FridC. J.WymanD. M.CoffeyB. (2016). Effects of wealth inequality on entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 47, 895–920.
42.
GordonR. J. (2012). Is US economic growth over? Faltering innovation confronts the six headwinds (No. w18315). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
43.
GottschalkP.SmeedingT. M. (2000). Empirical evidence on income inequality in industrialized countries. Handbook of Income Distribution, 1, 261–307.
44.
GuthM. (2005). Innovation, social inclusion and coherent regional development: A new diamond for a socially inclusive innovation policy in regions. European Planning Studies, 13, 333–349.
45.
Gutiérrez-RomeroR.Méndez-ErricoL. M. (2015). The long-term impact of inequality on entrepreneurship and job creation. Retrieved from http://www.ecap.uab.es/RePEc/doc/wpdea1501.pdf (No. wpdea1501)
46.
HeckerD. E. (2005). High-technology employment: A NAICS-based update. Monthly Labor Review, 128, 57–72.
47.
HoxJ.BechgerT. (1998). An introduction to structural equation modelling. Family Science Review, 11, 354–373.
48.
JonesC. I.KimJ. (2014). A Schumpeterian model of top income inequality (No. w20637). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
49.
JöreskogK. G. (1973). Analysis of covariance structure. In KrishnaiahP. R. (Eds.), Multivariate analysis, (pp. 263–285). New York, NY: Academic Press.
50.
KaleD. (2011, September). Co-evolution of policies and firm level technological capabilities in the Indian automobile industry. Paper presented at the 2011 Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy, Atlanta, GA.
51.
KaplinskyR. (2011). Schumacher meets Schumpeter: Appropriate technology below the radar. Research Policy, 40, 193–203.
52.
KimhiA. (2010). Entrepreneurship and income inequality in southern Ethiopia. Small Business Economics, 34, 81–91.
53.
KumhofM.RancièreR.WinantP. (2015). Inequality, leverage, and crises. American Economic Review, 105, 1217–1245.
54.
LermanR. I.YitzhakiS. (1985). Income inequality effects by income source: A new approach and applications to the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67, 151–156.
55.
MeyerB. D.SullivanJ. X. (2013). Consumption and income inequality and the great recession. American Economic Review, 103, 178–183.
56.
MocanH. N. (1999). Structural unemployment, cyclical unemployment, and income inequality. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81, 122–134.
57.
MoshagenM. (2012). The model size effect in SEM: Inflated goodness-of-fit statistics are due to the size of the covariance matrix. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 19, 86–98.
58.
MuellerV.RosenbuschN.BauschA. (2013). Success patterns of exploratory and exploitative innovation a meta-analysis of the influence of institutional factors. Journal of Management, 39, 1606–1636.
59.
MurphyK. M.ShleiferA.VishnyR. (1989). Income distribution, market size, and industrialization. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104, 537–564.
OstryJ. D.BergA. (2011). Inequality and unsustainable growth: Two sides of the same coin? (No. 11/08). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
62.
PanizzaU. (2002). Income inequality and economic growth: Evidence from American data. Journal of Economic Growth, 7, 25–41.
63.
PolanyiM. (1967). The tacit dimension. New York, NY: Doubleday Anchor.
64.
PorterM. (2003). The economic performance of regions. Regional Studies, 37, 545–546.
65.
QianH.AcsZ. J. (2013). An absorptive capacity theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 40, 185–197.
66.
RenskiH. (2011). External economies of localization, urbanization and industrial diversity and new firm survival. Papers in Regional Science, 90, 473–502.
67.
Rodríguez-PoseA.TseliosV. (2010). Inequalities in income and education and regional economic growth in Western Europe. Annals of Regional Science, 44, 349–375.
68.
SchefoldB. (1997). On changes in the composition of output. In SchefoldB. (Eds.), Normal prices, technical change and accumulation (pp. 317–356). London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
69.
SternbergR. (2009). Regional dimensions of entrepreneurship. Hanover, MA: Now.
70.
StockhammerE. (2012). Financialization, income distribution and the crisis. Investigación Económica, 71(279), 39–70.
71.
StremerschS.TellisG. J. (2004). Understanding and managing international growth of new products. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21, 421–438.
72.
StroombergenA.RoseD.NanaG. (2002). Review of the statistical measurement of human capital. Wellington, New Zealand: Statistics New Zealand.
73.
TseliosV. (2011). Is inequality good for innovation?International Regional Science Review, 34, 75–101.
Van PraagC. M.VerslootP. H. (2007). What is the value of entrepreneurship? A review of recent research. Small Business Economics, 29, 351–382.
76.
XueJ.ZhongW. (2003). Unemployment, poverty and income disparity in urban China. Asian Economic Journal, 17, 383–405.
77.
ZweimüllerJ. (2000). Schumpeterian entrepreneurs meet Engel’s law: The impact of inequality on innovation-drive growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 5, 185–206.
